ML13316A358
| ML13316A358 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 08/27/1999 |
| From: | Scherer A SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9909010011 | |
| Download: ML13316A358 (4) | |
Text
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA A. Edward Scherer Manager of EDISON Nuclear Regulatory Affairs An EDISON INTERNATIONAL" Company August 27, 1999 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361, and 50-362 Semiannual 10 CFR 26 Fitness for Duty Program Data San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 Gentlemen:
Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.71(d), this submittal provides the required semiannual Fitness For Duty program performance data for the period of January 1, 1999 to June 30, 1999 (Attachment 1). is a summary of information and management actions for the reporting period.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact myself or Mr. Clay E. Williams at (949) 368-6707.
Sincerely, Attachments: 10 CFR 26 Performance Data cc:
E. W. Merschoff, Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV L. Raghavan, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 2 and 3 W. C. Huffman, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Unit 1 D. B. Spitzberg, Chief, Fuel Cycle/Decommissioning Branch J. A. Sloan, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, San Onofre Units 2 and 3 9909010011 990827 PDR ADOCK 05000206 R
PDR P. O. Box 128 San Clemente, CA 92674-0128 949-368-7501 Fax 949-368-7575
Fitness for Duty Program ATTACHMENT 1 Performance Data Page 1 of 2 Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 Southern California Edison January 1 -
June 30,1999 Company 6 Months Ending San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Location S.L. Blue; Supervisor, Fitness For Duty (949) 368-2482 Contact Name Phone Number Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml)
Marijuana 50/10 Barbiturates 300/200 Cocaine 300/150 Benzodiazepine 300/300 Opiates 300/300 Methadone 300/200 Amphetamines 1000/500 Propoxyphene 300/200 Methamphetamine 1000/500 Phencyclidine 25/25 Amphetamine
/200 Alcohol (%BAC)
.04 Testing Results SCE Employees Contractor Personnel Total (Short term only)
Average Number with Unescorted Access 1920 1306 3226 Categories
- Tests # Failures
- Tests
- Failures Pre-Access 74 1
984 14 Observed Behavior 1
0 1
0 Post Accident 0
0 0
0 Random 616 0
207 0
Follow-Up 20 0
66 0
Other 43 0
31 0
Total 754 1
1289 14 Number of Employees Referred To Mandatory Treatment 0,
Number of Personnel With Access Restored Employees 1
Contract 2 Total Number of Random Tests 823 Random Testing Rate 25.51%
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 2 of 2 Table 1, RANDOM TESTING PROGRAM RESULTS Individuals Tested 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
- Failed 4
6 0
5 3
2 2
2 0
- Tested 952 759 632 735 838 601 669 656 823
% Failed
.4%
.8%
.0%
.7%
.4%
.3%
.3%
.3%
.0%
Table 2, BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS FOR SPECIFIC SUBSTANCES Includes multiple submittals/substances detected Marijuana COC AMP BARB BENZO OPI PROP 100/15a 50/10b Licensee Employees 0
1 0
0 3
4 6
2 Contract Workers 9
11 3
1 4
2 1
1 Totals 9
12 3
1 7
6 7
3 39
- Onsite Presumptive N/A 14c 3
a - NRC levels b - SCE levels c - One sample prescreened onsite at or near the cutoff level and was
- Certified Lab N/A 12 3
reported negative by the HHS lab. One sample was determined to have been adulterated during onsite collection, the HHS lab confirmed Confirmation Ratio N/A 86%
100%
adulteration and did not report the sample positive for THC.
Table 3, BREAKDOWN OF ALL CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS CAUSING FAILURES Marijuana Cocaine Methamphetamine Barbiturate Licensee Employees 1
0 0
0 Contract Workers 11 2
1 2
Total Total 12 2
1 2
17
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of I (January 1 - June 30, 1999)
- 1.
There were no temporary suspensions or other administrative actions taken against individuals based upon on-site presumptive positives for marijuana or cocaine.
- 2.
One (1) employee and fourteen (14) contract workers were denied unescorted protected area access following a pre-badging substance test failure.
- 3.
There was one (1) disciplinary suspension from employment during the reporting period.
- 4.
There were no transfers of licensee employees to non-nuclear positions (away from the San Onofre site) as a result of failed substance tests.
- 5.
No employees were required to enroll in a treatment program during this period.
- 6.
One (1) employee and two (2) contract worker were granted (reinstated) unescorted access with a single test failure on record.
- 7.
The MRO reviewed a total of eleven (11) appeal results [one (1) employee, ten (10) contract workers].
The original test results were confirmed. These individuals were provided with detailed instructions regarding their rights to appeal management actions which resulted in access denial. Three (3) contract workers left site prior to meeting with the MRO, resulting in non-contact positive tests.
- 8.
There were no identified deficiencies in the Fitness For Duty program.
- 9.
As depicted in Table 2, there were thirty-nine (39) samples confirmed by the lab as positive. As shown in Table 3, seventeen (17) positive tests resulted in fifteen (15) MRO failed test declarations. Due to SCE recollection procedure, several individuals submitted multiple positive samples resulting in a single declared individual failure. Two individuals submitted samples positive for more than one substance.
Positive tests for prescription medications were declared responsible use by the MRO.
- 10.
During this period there were no reportable events to the Commission.