ML13316A325
| ML13316A325 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 02/24/1999 |
| From: | Scherer A SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9903040012 | |
| Download: ML13316A325 (4) | |
Text
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA A. Edward Scherer Manager of EDISONNuclear Regulatory Affairs An EDISON INTERNATIONAL" Company February 24, 1999 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361, and 50-362 Semiannual 10 CFR 26 Fitness for Duty Program Data San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 Gentlemen:
Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.71(d), this submittal provides the required semiannual Fitness For Duty program performance data for the period of July 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998 (Attachment 1). Attachment 2 is a summary of information and management actions for the reporting period.
If you require any additional information, please so advise.
Sincerely, Attachments: 10 CFR 26 Performance Data cc:
E. W. Merschoff, Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV J. W. Clifford, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 2 and 3 R. A. Burrows, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Unit 1 D. B. Spitzberg, Chief, Fuel Cycle/Decommissioning Branch J. A. Sloan, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, Units 2 and 3 9903040012 990224 PDR ADOCK 05000206-7
_R FPDR_12 P. 0. Box 128 San Clemente, CA 92674-0128 949-368-7501 Fax 949-368-7575
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 of2 Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to IOCFR26 Southern California Edison July 1 -
December 31, 1998 Company 6 Months Ending San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Location S.L. Blue; Supervisor, Fitness For Duty (949) 368-2482 Contact Name Phone Number Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml)
Marijuana 50/10 Barbiturates 300/200 Cocaine 300/150 Benzodiazepine 300/300 Opiates 300/300 Methadone 300/200 Amphetamines 1000/500 Propoxyphene 300/200 Methamphetamine 1000/500 Phencyclidine 25/25 Amphetamine
/200 Alcohol (%BAC)
.04 Testing Results SCE Employees Contractor Personnel Total (Short term only)
Average Number with Unescorted Access 1860 723 2583 Categories
- Tests # Failures
- Tests # Failures Pre-Access 250 4
1395 11 For Cause:
Observed Behavior 4
0 1
0 Post Accident 0
0 0
0 Random 545 2
111 0
Follow-Up 24 0
31 0
Other 12 0
56 0
Total 835 6
1594 11 Number of Employees Referred To Mandatory Treatment 2
Number of Personnel With Access Restored Employees 1
Contract 2 Total Number of Random Tests 656 Random Testing Rate 25.4%
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 2 of 2 Table 1, RANDOM TESTING PROGRAM RESULTS Individuals Tested 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
- Failed
.2 1
4 6
0 5
3 2
2 2
- Tested 996 701 952 759 632 735 838 601 669 656
% Failed
.2%
.2%
.4%
.8%
.0%
.7%
.4%
.3%
.3%
.3%
Table 2, BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS FOR SPECIFIC SUBSTANCES Includes multiple submittals/substances detected.
Marijuana COC AMP BARB BENZO OPI PROP ETOH 100/15a 50/10b Licensee Employees 1
4 2
0 5
3 1
1 2
Contract Workers 3
11 0
4 1
2 8
6 0
Total Totals 4
15 2c 4
6 5
9 7
2 50
- Onsite Presumptive n/a 15 2
a - NRC Levels b - SCE Levels c-Two samples confirmed positive and resulted in a single test failure
- Certified Lab n/a 15 2
declaration by the MRO, 1/99 Confirmation Ratio n/a 100%
100%
Table 3, BREAKDOWN OF ALL CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS CAUSING FAILURES Marijuana Cocaine Methamphetamine Alcohol Licensee Employees 4
0 0
2 Contract Workers A9 0
2 0
Total Total 13 0
2 2
17
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of I (July 1 - December 31, 1998)
- 1.
There were no temporary suspensions or other administrative actions taken against individuals based upon on-site presumptive positives for marijuana or cocaine.
- 2.
Four (4) employees and eleven (11) contract workers were denied unescorted protected area access following a pre-badging substance test failure.
Two (2) employees failed a random test and had unescorted protected area access withdrawn for a minimum of 80 work hours.
- 3.
There were two (2) disciplinary suspensions from employment during the reporting period.
- 4.
There were no transfers of licensee employees to non-nuclear positions (away from the San Onofre site) as a result of failed substance tests.
- 5.
Two (2) employees were required to enroll in a treatment program during this period.
- 6.
One (1) employee and two (2) contract worker were granted (reinstated) unescorted access with a single test failure on record.
- 7.
The MRO reviewed a total of thirteen (13) appeal results [five (5) employees, eight (8) contract workers]. The original test results were confirmed. These individuals were provided with detailed instructions regarding their rights to appeal management actions which resulted in access denial. One (1) employee and three (3) contract workers left site prior to meeting with the MRO, resulting in non-contact positive tests.
- 8.
There were no identified deficiencies in the Fitness For Duty program.
LER 1-98-003 reported a fitness for duty violation which resulted in a contract worker being granted access to the protected area prior to passing a pre access test. This event was caused by a computer data entry error; NRC Inspection Reports 50-361/98-12 and 50-362/98-12 characterized this occurrence as non-repetitive and was treated as a non-cited violation. The corrective actions included the briefing and training of appropriate fitness-for-duty personnel and modifying the access authorization process.
- 9.
As depicted in Table 2, there were (50) samples confirmed by the lab as positive. As shown in Table 3, only seventeen (17) individuals were associated with MRO failed test declarations. Due to SCE recollection procedure, several individuals submitted multiple positive samples resulting in a single declared individual failure. Positive tests for prescription medications were declared responsible use by the MRO.
- 10.
During this period there were no reportable events to the Commission.