ML13316A197
| ML13316A197 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 01/28/1997 |
| From: | Gibson G SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9702040067 | |
| Download: ML13316A197 (4) | |
Text
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON An EDISON INTERNATIONAL Company January 28, 1997 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:
Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Gentleman:
Subject:
Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 Semiannual 10 CFR 26 Fitness for Duty Program Data San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, & 3 Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.71(d), this submittal provides the required semiannual Fitness For Duty program performance data for the period of July 1, 1996 to December 31, 1996 (Attachment 1). is a summary of information and management actions for the reporting period.
If you require any additional information, please so advise.
Sincerel,y, G.
T.
Gibson Manager, Compliance Attachments:
10 CFR 26 Performance Data cc:
L. J. Callan, Regional Administrator, Region IV K. E. Perkins, Jr., Director Walnut Creek Field Office, NRC Region IV M. B. Fields, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 2 & 3 J. A. Sloan, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, Units 1, 2, & 3 M. K. Webb, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Unit 1 9702040067 970128 PDR ADOCK' 05000206 R
PDR P. 0. Box 128 San Clemente, CA 92674-0128
Fitness for Duty Program ATTACHMENT 1 Performance Data Page 1 of 2 Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 Southern California Edison July 1, -
December 31, 1996 Company 6 Months Ending San Onofre.Nuclear Generating Station Location S.L. Blue; Administrator, Fitness For Duty (714) 368-2482 Contact Name Phone Number Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml)
Marijuana 50/10 Barbiturates 300/200 Cocaine 300/150 Benzodiazepine 300/300 Opiates 300/300 Methadone 300/200 Amphetamines 1000/500 Propoxyphene 300/200 Methamphetamine 1000/500 Phencyclindine 25/25 Amphetamine
/200 Alcohol (%BAC)
.04 Testing Results SCE Employees Contractor Personnel Total (Short term only)
Average Number with Unescorted Access 1874 834 2708 Categories
- Tests
- Failures
- Tests
- Failures Pre-Access 369 4
2005 41 For Cause:
Observed Behavior 2
0 0
0 Post Accident 0
0 0
0 Random 566 1
159 4
Follow-Up 15 0
64 0
Other 8
0 4
0 Total 960 5
2232 45 Number of Employees Referred To Mandatory Treatment 0
Number of Personnel With Access Restored Employees 0
Contract 9
Total Number of Random Tests 725 Random Testing Rate 26.77%
Annual number of Random Tests 1356 Annual Random Testing Rate 53.21%
ATTACHMENT 1 Page,2 of 2 Table 1, RANDOM TESTING PROGRAM RESULTS Individuals Tested 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
- Failed 14 4
4 10 15 2
1 4
6 0
5
- Tested 2604 1986 1890 1947 2148 996 701 952 759 632 725
% Failed
-5%
.2%
.2%
.5%
.7%
2
-Y2Y QL-2%A 24%
18%
-0%
1 7%I, Table 2, BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS FOR SPECIFIC SUBSTANCES Includes multiple submittal/substances detected M
__n _
COC BARB OPI AMP METHA-BENZ PROP 100/15a 50/10b DONE Licensee Employees 2
4 0
2 10 3
0 1
3 Contract Workers 14 22 5
2 10 18 1
7 7
TOTAL Totals 16 26 5
4 20 21 1
8 10
- Onsite Presumptive n/a 26 5
a - NRC Levels b - SCE Levels
- Certified Lab n/a 26 5
c - If marijuana had been tested at 50/15, results for this reporting period would have been; on-site presumptive 26, total confirmed 26 for a confirmation ratio ofl100%.0 Confirmation Ratio n/a 100%c 100%
Table 3, BREAKDOWN OF ALL CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS CAUSING FAILURES THC COC METH OPI ETOH Licensee Employees 2
0 2
0 1
Contract Workers 21 4
16 la 3
Total Total 23 4
18 1
4[
50 a - A contract worker departed site prior to meeting with the MIRO. Considered a non-contact positive.
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of I (July 1, 1996 - December 31, 1996)
- 1.
There were no temporary suspensions or other administrative actions taken against individuals based upon on-site presumptive positives for marijuana or cocaine.
- 2.
A total of five (5) individuals (one (1) temporary employee and four (4) contract workers) had unescorted protected area access withdrawn for a minimum of 80 work hours following a random substance test failure. Forty-five (45) individuals (four (4) temporary employees and forty-one (41) contract workers) were denied unescorted protected area access following a pre-badging substance test failure.
The five (5) temporary employees (one (1) random and four (4) pre-badging) were denied site and unescorted protected area access following their substance test failure and employment was terminated.
Program violations:
One (1) temporary employee refused a For Cause test, based on Observed Behavior, and employment was terminated, site and unescorted access was permanently denied.
Two (2) contract workers attempted to submit surrogate samples and site and unescorted access was permanently denied.
- 3.
There were no disciplinary suspensions from employment during the reporting period.
- 4.
There were no transfers of licensee employees to non-nuclear positions (away from the San Onofre site) as a result of failed substance tests.
- 5.
No individuals were required to enroll in a treatment program during this period.
- 6.
Nine (9) contract worker were granted (reinstated) unescorted access with a single test failure on record.
- 7.
The MRO reviewed a total of forty-two (42) appeal results for four (4) temporary employees and thirty eight (38) contract workers. The original test results were confirmed. These individuals were provided detailed instructions regarding their rights to appeal management actions which resulted in access denial.
One (1) temporary employee and seven (7) contract workers left site prior to meeting with the MRO, resulting in non-contact positive tests.
Three (3) contract workers appealed denial of access for a test failure, management actions were upheld.
- 8.
There were no identified deficiencies in the Fitness For Duty program.
- 9.
As depicted in Table 2, there were ninety five (95) samples confirmed by the lab as positive. As shown in Table 3, fifty (50) individuals were associated with MRO failed test declarations. Positive tests for prescription medications were declared responsible use by the MRO.
- 10.
During this period there were no reportable events to the Commission.