ML13316A179
| ML13316A179 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 08/14/1996 |
| From: | Gibson G SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9608200199 | |
| Download: ML13316A179 (4) | |
Text
r SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA iEISO N An EDISON INTERNATIONAL Company August 14, 1996 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen:
Subject:
Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361, and 50-362 Semiannual 10 CFR 26 Fitness For Duty Program Data San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 & 3 Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.71(d), this submittal provides the required semiannual Fitness For Duty program performance data for the period January 1, 1996 to June 30, 1996 (Attachment 1). is a summary of information and management actions for the reporting period.
If you require any additional information, please so advise.
Sincerely, Gregory T. Gibson Manager, Compliance Attachments:
10 CFR 26 Performance Data cc:
L. J. Callan, Regional Administrator, USNRC Region IV K. E. Perkins, Jr., Director, Walnut Creek Field Office, NRC Region IV M. B. Fields, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 2 and 3 J. A. Sloan, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, Units 1, 2 and 3 9609I200199 960814 PDR ADOCK 05000206 R
PDR P. O. Box 128 San Clemente, CA 92674-0128
Fitness for Duty Program ATTACHMENT 1 Performance Data Page 1 of 2 Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 Southern California Edison January 1, - June 30, 1996 Company 6 Months Ending San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Location S.L. Blue; Administrator, Fitness For Duty (714) 368-2482 Contact Name Phone Number Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml)
Marijuana 50/10 Barbiturates 300/200 Cocaine 300/150 Benzodiazepine 300/300 Opiates 300/300 Methadone 300/200 Amphetamines 1000/500 Propoxyphene 300/200 Methamphetamine 1000/500 Phencyclindine 25/25 Amphetamine
/200 Alcohol (%BAC)
.04 Testing Results SCE Employees Contractor Personnel Total (Short term only)
Average Number with Unescorted Access 1868 490 2358 Categories
- Tests
- Failures
- Tests
- Failures Pre-Access 131 0
231 4
For Cause:
Observed Behavior 0
0 1
0 Post Accident 0
0 0
0 Random 521 0
111 0
Follow-Up 26 0
8 0
Other 12 0
1 0
Total 690 0
352 4
Number of Employees Referred To Mandatory Treatment 0
Number of Personnel With Access Restored Employees 2
Contract 1
Total Number of Random Tests 632 Random Testing Rate 26.8%
ATTACHMENT1I Page 2 of 2 Table 1, RANDOM TESTING PROGRAM RESULTS Individuals Tested 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
- Failed 14 4
4 10 15 2
1 4
6 0
- Tested 2604 1986 1890 1947 2148 996 701 952 759 632
% Failed
,5%
2%
.2%
.5%7%
2
.2%
,8%
0%
Table 2, BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS FOR SPECIFIC SUBSTANCES Includes multiple submittals/substances detected.
Marijuana COC OPI AMP BENZ PROP 100/15a 50/10b Licensee Employees 0
0 0
9 1
4 5
Contract Workers 3
3 0
1 1
2 2
TOTAL Totals 3
3 0
10 2
6 7
28J
- Onsite Presumptive n/a 3
0 a - NRC Levels b - SCE Levels c - If marijuana had been tested at 50/15, results for this
- Certified Lab n/a 3
0 reporting period would have been; on-site presumptive 3, total confirmed 3for a confirmation ratio of 100%.
Confirmation Ratio n/a 100%c n/a Table 3, BREAKDOWN OF ALL CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS CAUSING FAILURES MARIJUANA METHAMPHETAMIN Licensee Employees 0
0 Contract Workers 3
1 Total Total 3
1 4
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of I (January 1, 1996 - June 30, 1996)
- 1.
There were no temporary suspensions or other administrative actions taken against individuals based upon on-site presumptive positives for marijuana or cocaine.
- 2.
A total of four (4) contract workers had unescorted protected area access withdrawn for a minimum of 80 work hours following a substance test failure.
Four (4) contract workers were denied unescorted protected area access following a pre-badging substance test failure.
- 3.
There were no disciplinary suspensions from employment during the reporting period.
- 4.
There were no transfers of licensee employees to non-nuclear positions (away from the San Onofre site) as a result of failed substance tests.
- 5.
No individuals were required to enroll in a treatment program during this period.
- 6.
Two (2) employees and one (1) contract worker were granted (reinstated) unescorted access with a single test failure on record.
- 7.
The MRO reviewed a total of two (2) appeal results for contract workers. The original test results were confirmed. These individuals were provided with detailed instructions regarding their rights to appeal management actions which resulted in access denial. Two (2) contract workers left site prior to meeting with the MRO, resulting in non-contact positive tests.
One (1) worker appealed denial of access for a test failure, management actions were upheld.
- 8.
There were no identified deficiencies in the Fitness For Duty program.
- 9.
As depicted in Table 2, there were twenty eight (28) samples confirmed by the lab as positive. As shown in Table 3, only four (4) individuals were associated with MRO failed test declarations. Positive tests for prescription medications were declared responsible use by the MRO.
- 10.
During this period there were no reportable events to the Commission.