ML13312A789
| ML13312A789 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 08/03/1994 |
| From: | Marsh W SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9408110107 | |
| Download: ML13312A789 (8) | |
Text
Southern Caifornia Edison Company 23 PARKER STREET IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92718 WALTER C. MARSH August 3, 1994 TELEPHONE MANAGER OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY AFFAIRS (714) 454-4403 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.
20555 Gentlemen:
Subject:
Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361 and 50-362 Semiannual 10 CFR 26 Fitness for Duty Program Data San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.71(d), this submittal provides the required semiannual Fitness for Duty program performance data for the period January 1, 1994 to June 30, 1994 (Attachment 1). is a summary of information and management actions for the reporting period. Attachment 3 graphically illustrates key elements included in Attachment 1.
If you require any additional information, please so advise.
Sincerely, Attachments:
10CFR26 Performance Data cc:
L. J. Callan, Administrator, NRC Region IV K. E. Perkins, Jr., Director, Walnut Creek Field Office, NRC Region IV M. K. Webb, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Unit 1 M. B. Fields, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 2 and 3 J. A. Sloan, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, San Onofre Units 2&3 9408110107 940803 PDR ADOCK 05000206 R
Fitness for Duty Program ATTACHMENT 1 Performance Data Page 1 of 2 Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 Southern California Edison January 1, -
June 30, 1994 Company 6 Months Ending San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Location S.L. Blue; Administrator, Fitness For Duty (714) 368-2482 Contact Name Phone Number Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml)
Marijuana 50/10 Barbiturates 300/200 Cocaine 300/150 Benzodiazepine 300/300 Opiates 300/300 Methadone 300/200 Amphetamines 1000/500 Propoxyphene 300/200 Methamphetamine 1000/500 Phencyclindine 25/25 Amphetamine
/200 Alcohol (%BAC)
.04 Testing Results SCE Employees Contractor Personnel Total Average Number with Unescorted Access 2272 711 2983 Test Types
- Tests
- Failures
- Tests
- Failures Pre-Badging 71 0
179 1
For Cause 0
0 1
1 Post Accident 0
0 0
0 Random 749 1
247 1
Follow-Up 48 1
11 0
Other 51 0
20 0
Total 919 2
458 3
Number of Employees Referred To Mandatory Treatment 1
Number of Personnel With Access Restored Employees 1
Contract 0
Total Number of Random Tests 996 Random Testing Rate 33.4%
ATTACHMENT 1 Page 2 of 2 Table 1, RANDOM TESTING PROGRAM RESULTS See Attachment 3,
Figure 1
Individuals Tested 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
- Failed 1
18 12 11 14 4
4 10 15 2
- Tested 302*
2422 1842 1771 2604 1986 1890 1947 2148 996
% Failed
.3%
.7%
.6%
.6%
.5%
.2%
.2%
.5%
.7%
.2%
- Represents only two months of testing.
Table 2, BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS FOR SPECIFIC SUBSTANCES Includes multiple submittals/substances detected.
Mariiuana COC OPI AMP ETOH BARB BENZO PROP 100/15a 50/10b Licensee Employees 1
1 0
6 0
1 4
3 1
Contract Workers 1
3 0
7 1
1 4
0 2
TOTAL Totals 2
4 0
13 1
32 8
3
-3
- OnSite Presumptive N/A 2
0 a - NRC Levels b -
SCE Levels c - 4 samples were reported positive by the HHS lab,
- certified Lab N/A 4c 0
of those, 2 prescreened negative and were reported Confirmation Ratio I
N/A I 50%d positive at or near cutoff levels.
ConfirmationRatio N/A_
50%d_
N/A d
If marijuana had been tested at 50/15, results for this reporting period would have been; on-site presumptive 2, total confirmed 3 for a confirmation ratio of 67%.
Table 3, BREAKDOWN OF ALL CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS CAUSING FAILURES See Attachment 3, Figure 2 for Breakdown of Failures by Test Type
_MARIJUANA METHAMPHETAMINE ALCOHOL Licensee Employees 1
0 1
Contract Workers 1
1 1
Total Total 2
1 2
5
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of 1 (January 1, 1994 - June 30, 1994)
- 1.
There were no temporary suspensions or other administrative actions taken against individuals based upon on-site presumptive positives for marijuana or cocaine.
- 2.
A total of five (5) individuals (2 employees and 3 contract workers) had unescorted protected area access withdrawn for a minimum of 80 workhours following a substance test failure. One (1) employee and one (1) contract worker failed random tests. One (1) employee failed a follow-up test, this was the second failure for this individual. One (1) contract worker was denied unescorted protected area access following a pre-badging substance test failure. One (1) contract worker was permanently denied unescorted protected area access after failing a For Cause test.
- 3.
One (1) disciplinary suspension from employment was exercised during the reporting period. As a result of a second test failure, one (1) employee was permanently denied site and protected area access. This individual resigned prior to termination of employment.
- 4.
There were no transfers of licensee employees to non-nuclear positions (away from the San Onofre site) as a result of failed substance tests.
- 5.
One (1) employee was required to enroll in a treatment program during this period.
- 6.
One (1) employee was granted (reinstated) unescorted access with a single test failure on record.
- 7.
The MRO reviewed a total of five (5) appeal results for two (2) employees and three (3) contract workers. The original test results were confirmed. These individuals were provided with detailed instructions regarding their rights to appeal management actions which resulted in access denial.
Two (2) workers pursued appeals through the management review process. One worker appealed the denial of access for a test failure, the management action was upheld. The other was an FFD (non test failure) issue, and this individual had site and protected area access restored.
- 8.
The annual testing rate was reduced to 50% during this reporting period.
There were no identified deficiencies in the Fitness For Duty program.
- 9.
As depicted in Table 2, there were 34 samples collected confirmed by the lab as positive. As shown in Table 3, only five (5) individuals were associated with MRO failed test declarations. Due to the SCE recollection procedure, several individuals submitted multiple positive samples resulting in a single declared individual failure. Positive tests for prescription medications were declared responsible use by the MRO.
- 10.
There were no events reported to the Commission during this reporting period.
e0 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 1 of 1 Random Failure Rates 1989 - June 30, 1994 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Figure 1 Test Types Causing Failures January 1, - June 30, 1994 PRE-BADGING 1 RANDOM 2 FOR-CAUSE 1 FOUrOW-UP 1 Figure 2
ENCLOSURE 1
ENCLOSURE 2
ENCLOSURE 2 PAGE 1 OF 1 EMERGENCY PLAN REFERENCED ORDERS AND TRAINING PROCEDURES DOCUMENT REV. #
TCN TITLE S0123-NP-1 REV. 0 TCN 0-1 NUCLEAR AFFAIRS AND EMERGENCY PLANNING RESPONSIBILITIES AND OFFSITE INTERFACES S0123-XXI-1.11.3 REV. 2 TCN 2-7 EMERGENCY PLAN TRAINING PROGRAM DESCRIPTION