ML13309A299
| ML13309A299 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 08/14/1992 |
| From: | Morgan H Southern California Edison Co |
| To: | NRC/IRM |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9208240093 | |
| Download: ML13309A299 (7) | |
Text
Southern California Edison Company P. 0.
BOX 128 SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA 92672 H.
E. MORGAN TELEPHONE VICE PRESIDENT AND SITE MANAGER August 17 199 SAN ONOFRE U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.
20555
Subject:
Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361 and 50-362 Semiannual 10 CFR 26 Fitness For Duty Program Data San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 & 3 Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.71(d), this submittal provides the required semiannual Fitness For Duty program performance data for the period January 1, 1992 to June 30, 1992.
The data is arranged as follows: is the six month data including all pertinent program statistics. provides a summary of data and management actions for the reporting period. graphically illustrates key data elements included in.
If you require any additional information, please so advise.
Sincerely, Attachments:
10CFR26 Performance Data cc:
C. W. Caldwell (USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, Units 1, 2 and 3)
J. B. Martin (Regional Administrator, USNRC Region V)
Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) 9208240093 920814 PDR ADOCK 05000206 R
Fitness for Duty Program ATTACKMENT 1 Performance Data Page 1 of 2 Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 Southern California Edison January 1 to June 30, 1992 Company 6 Months Ending San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Location T.M. Calloway, Mgr., Access Authorization (714) 368-9554 Contact Name Phone Number Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml)
Marijuana 50/10 Barbiturates 300/200 Cocaine 300/150 Benzodizaepine 300/300 Opiates 300/300 Methadone 300/200 Amphetamines 1000/500 Propoxyphene 300/200 Methamphetamines 1000/500 Phencyclindine 25/25 Amphetamine
/200 Alcohol (%BAC)
.04 Testing Results Employees Contractor Personnel Total Average Number with Unescorted Access 2479 1392 3871 Test Types
- Tests
- Failures
- Tests
- Failures Pre-Badging 197 1
966 12 For Cause 1
0 2
2 Post Accident 0
0 0
0 Random 1148 1
838 3
Follow-Up 70 1
82 1
Other 54 1
26 0
Total 1470 4
1914 18 See Attachment 3, Figure 1 Number of Employees Referred To Mandatory Treatment 2
Number of Personnel With Access Restored Employees 2
Contract 16 Total Number of Random Tests 1986 Random Testing Rate 51.3%
E-4 4-4 VVo cv4 00 02o a)4 0
aN H
U
')
w
~
I-E-1 o
0 004 4-E4 4-)
H (3) m-I N
N.
m 0g 000 0l 144 kH H
O E-4 HHH H
0 0
0P0 0
PH r-0\\0 m
E-1a 0
-W 0q 000 H0
- 00) 02
'da)
Id 0D
('.4 Hr (NJ if O r-m.0A Oia i~ CN a) o 44
.0 0
00 0 rz4 0
)
0 C
E~
0 Id 8
H H
0
>v 04 ri Hd a)
-d H T E-i c rT4
~'
0
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of 3 (January 1, 1992 - June 30, 1992 period)
- 1.
There were no temporary suspensions or other administrative actions taken against individuals based upon on-site presumptive positives for marijuana and/or cocaine.
- 2.
A total of nine (9) individuals (6 contract workers and 3 employees) had unescorted protected area access withdrawn for a minimum of 14 days following a substance test failure.
Twelve (12) contract workers and one (1) employee were denied unescorted protected area access following pre badging substance test failures.
- 3.
As a result of test(s) failures, two (2) employees were permanently denied site access and their employment was terminated. A total of four (4) contract workers were permanently denied site access following test failures.
- 4.
There were no transfers of licensee employees to non-nuclear positions (away from the San Onofre site) during this time frame as a result of failed substance tests.
- 5.
Two (2) employees were required to enroll in a treatment program.
- 6.
Two (2) employees and sixteen (16) contract personnel were granted (reinstated) unescorted access with a single test failure on record.
- 7.
The MRO reviewed 21 appeal results and 1 retest (one failure did not have an appeal sample and the original sample was retested) for four (4) employees and eighteen (18) contract workers.
In all cases, the original results were confirmed.
Each of the 22 individuals were provided with detailed instructions regarding their right to appeal management actions which resulted in access denial.
Two (2) of the employees pursued an appeal through the union grievance process and, to date, the management actions have been upheld.
- 8.
There were no identified deficiencies in the Fitness For Duty program. Program modifications were not required during the current reporting period. As a result of an NRC inspection concern, clarification was requested on the 10CFR26, Appendix A, Section 2.7(e)(1) requirement to report results of screening analyses for both the NRC and lower utility cutoff levels at the on-site pre-screening stage.
After NRC review, it was concluded that the intent of the rule is not to require initial screening tests by the utility at the site pre-screening stage and reporting of results for both the NRC cutoff levels and the more conservative utility cutoff levels. Only the off-site NIDA laboratory must report the results for NRC cutoff levels and the more conservative utility cutoff levels.
- 9.
For (4)ATTACHMENT 2
Page 2 of 3
- 9.
Four (4) events were reported to the Commission (3 substance failures and 1 drug find) pursuant to 10 CFR 26 during this reporting period. The text of those reports is duplicated below:
A. A non-emergency twenty-four hour notification was made on February 5, 1992.
"After being observed to be potentially unfit for duty, a non-SCE employee, who is a Bechtel Supervising Nuclear Maintenance foreman, submitted to a for-cause/impairment test with positive results for alcohol. The employee's protected and vital area unescorted access authorization was immediately terminated based upon results of the breath test positive results at 1814 hours0.021 days <br />0.504 hours <br />0.003 weeks <br />6.90227e-4 months <br />, PST, on February 4, 1992.
On the day of the positive test, the individual was reporting for work and had not entered the Protected Area.
"At 0930 hours0.0108 days <br />0.258 hours <br />0.00154 weeks <br />3.53865e-4 months <br />, PST, on February 5, 1992, following evaluation of records in support of the breath tests results, the test was declared to be a failure. As a result of the failure, the worker's site access has been permanently denied, in accordance with SCE's policy. The individual has been employed on-site by Bechtel Power Corporation since January 22, 1992.
"Unit 1 is currently operating at 93%, Unit 2 is operating at 100%, and Unit 3 is in a refueling outage."
B. A non-emergency twenty-four hour notification was made on February 27, 1992.
"At 1418 hours0.0164 days <br />0.394 hours <br />0.00234 weeks <br />5.39549e-4 months <br />, PST, on February 26, 1992, it was determined that a contract worker, who is a Bechtel supervising pipefitter in the maintenance organization at San Onofre assigned to Units 1, 2 and 3, has been confirmed by the Medical Review Officer as having tested positive on a substance screen test. The worker's protected and vital area unescorted access authorization was terminated within ten minutes.
"The individual has worked at SONGS periodically since 1981.
He originally failed a substance screen test on 8/21/89, and in accordance with SCE's program, was placed on a periodic monitoring testing program while employed at SONGS.
"The individual has currently been working onsite since January 17, 1992.
The substance screen test was part of a periodic monitoring testing program administered on February 20, 1992.
The individual's site access has been suspended pending receipt of appeal results.
"Unit 1 is at 93% power, Unit 2 is at 100% power, and Unit 3 is in a refueling outage."
C. A ATTACHMENT 2 C.
A non-emergency twenty-four notification was made on May 15, 1992.
"A suspect material was discovered in the Protected Area at 13:05 on May 13, 1992.
It was located in a generally accessible but remote area on the Unit 3 Safety Equipment Building Roof 50' elevation. The material was discovered by contract personnel while they were performing routine maintenance tasks.
"At 1430 hours0.0166 days <br />0.397 hours <br />0.00236 weeks <br />5.44115e-4 months <br /> PDT, May 14, 1992, an offsite laboratory confirmed that it was a controlled substance, marijuana (the remains of one marijuana cigarette).
"There have been no individuals identified as being responsible for the material.
"Unit 1 was operating at 92% power, Unit 2 was operating at 100% power and Unit 3 was operating at 65% power when the substance was discovered."
D. A non-emergency twenty-four notification was made on May 20, 1992.
"At 0815 hours0.00943 days <br />0.226 hours <br />0.00135 weeks <br />3.101075e-4 months <br />, PDT, on May 20, 1992, it was determined, following a Medical Review Officer's review, that an employee, who is a licensed reactor operator assigned to the nuclear training division, had tested positive on a drug screen urinalysis test. The employee's protected and vital area unescorted access authorization was terminated within ten minutes. The individual is a Nuclear Training Instructor and holds a Senior Reactor Operator's license for San Onofre Unit 1, and as such is not presently performing licensed operator duties.
"The employee, who has been employed by Southern California Edison since September 28, 1970, has not previously failed a drug screen urinalysis test. The employee is currently on investigatory suspension, awaiting further management review. The drug screen urinalysis test was administered as part of the random testing program on May 14, 1992.
"Unit 1 was operating at 92%, Unit 2 was at 100%, and Unit 3 was at 65% power when the drug failure determination was made."
ATTACMIENT 3 Page 1 of 1 Failures by Test Type Includes Refusals OhrRefusal 1ilow-up 2
13 1 3 W
R a n d o m 4
01/01/92 - 06/30/92 Fiqure 1 Random Failure Rate 1989 - 6130/92 0.8%
0.7%
0.7%
0.6%
0e 0.4%
- 0.
0.2%
0.1%1 2%
1 2
1 2
1 IM l
1000 1
1991 l
1902 Biannual Periods 199 represented only two months of testing.
Figure 2