ML13308B577
| ML13308B577 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 03/06/1979 |
| From: | Lewis M AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7903140231 | |
| Download: ML13308B577 (2) | |
Text
R EG 0LJA 4T NF G MA T 10N t)1 IT'RIn uT 10x
(~l 5,r S)
ACCESSIONJ NbfR:790314O0231.
DO0C.L)A T E 7 9/U/
0 PIJGAfIZED: NO 0OCKET=
FACIL:50-20b SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR STAT ION, UNI T 1, 6UTHE.-qN CAL IFURN O0 0 ) a0o S(
0-SAN' ONOFRE NUCLEAR STA rIoN, UNIT 2p SO'JTHiER," CALIFPN 05,000361 0
ONGFRE NUCLIEAR STATIONi UN
'IT 3,
3OUTHt.RiN C.ALIFURN 050(,03b2
"'b Uf
-AUTHOR 4FFILiAriu'j L EWS13, M-. I.
AFIL IA TIO~ N,~~
R EC I P. NA'iE PEC IP IE'.4T AFF ILIA TION DIVISION OF SITE SAFETY
.& ENVIr ON1E-NTAL ANALYSIS SUBJEr-CT :
FO; v4AROS UOPI1NiO N R E PL A NT L IC EN61 Si G.A L L :GiES 'Y*UM'E G - 04 90 0E5 NOT JUSTIFY OPERATION OF FACILITY.FAWLT3 FAILURE TO RELY ON SEISMOLOGY AND TOTAL RELIANCE ON, ASH-1400.
DISTRIBUTION CODE: C0026 C OP IES3 R E CEI VE0: LTR _L-NC L SIZl TITLE: ENVIRON.
COIMMENTS.
y A~f L AL So",
C
" IEM "
eM. 455PO A41 FW. *-C-1 "rII)S
-Fg L..Cv~~
NOTES:__
RECIPIENT COPIES kECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CUPE/NAME LTTR ENCL A C TION:
05s P 1 0 1 ocA1 17 5C 6Pl34:k-I 18 ~-~~~?-
1AL) mo 1
I NTERiNAL:
4 D
1 3
02 NRC Pok 07 I&E 2
09~ ENvN SPEC BR 1
10 CST 81\\FT ANL 1
11 TA/EDO 1
12 AD SITE TECMi 2
14 ACOENT ANALY I
15 EFLT TRT SYS 1
19 UIR DSiE 1
AD ENVIN" TECH 1
AD S11E ANALY 1
OELD 1
EXTERNAL: 03 LPDR 1
0LJ N5IC 1
20 N AT L L A 6 o.jalL 5
ACRS i
O
~
GI rJC-1 iAkLLo cg6i le 1 TOTAL NUje48E.i OF COPIES REUUIRED:
LTTIR 28 E 4EL C
Marvin I. Lewis 6504 Brad. d Terrace Phila. PA l149 3-6-79.
Director, Division of Site Safety Environmental Analysis Office of nuclear Reactor Regdkation USNRC Washington. /d.C. 20555 Sir:
NUREG 0490 does a lot of things, but it does not in any way justify the eeration of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.
Although the NUREG does provide a lot of good information, this information actually contradicts the usefulness of the SONGS, Sa n Onefre Nuclear Generating Station, For instance, the growth rate in Table 2.2,Page 2-2, is 3.5 % or less for the period 1976 to 1990.
The growth rate in Table 8.3 and 8.4 on Pages i 8-4and 8-5 is dose to 5% for the same period. Inetherwords, the growth rates in various parts of the report are 'selected I to provide justification for whatever the writer wishes to fustify is s-4:
=t partilular patt of the report. This technique is called 'fiction'.
In Appendix D-23 Page 2.5 Seismology is dismissed in a few paragraphs.
Considering the recent and continuing xl seismic discoveries at the Hoagri fault at Diablo Canyon (which is in a similar -in fact same-gelological domain),
passing off seismology this cavAlierly in is indefensible.
Page 5-37. First you state in a Table that the Commissioner has directed that Radon 222 will be reconsidered elsewhere; then, the Staff includes Radon 222 in this Nureg in a convoluted and artificial manner which does not in any way investigate or acknowledge Radon 222's full period of toxicity as required by NEPA.
Page 5-39 Tailings are not required to be stabilized forever, and even is it xzm were required, forever stabilization is a God like requirementj which may be impossible to mortal men%.
Ahapter 7.
This is based entirely on the Rasmussen Wash 1400 Commisssioner Kennedy has already stated on October 11, 1978, "It ( Rasmussen Report) found some deficiendies which suggest that the absolute values of the risks presented in the Study should not be used uncritically either ign the regulatory process or for public policy purposes."
The DES for operation of SONGS proves unequivocally that this nuclear power plant is unnecessary and dangerous.
This is despite the Stall evaluation which ignores all important negative effects.
DO NOT LICENSE THIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT TO OPERATE AT THE EXPENSE OF HUMAN LIVES.
Marvin I. Lewis 7903 140 231(