ML13308B093

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Verification of Encl Evacuation Time Estimates & Population Data for Facility by 890717
ML13308B093
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 06/28/1989
From: Boley K
Public Citizen's Critical Mass Energy Project
To: Trammell C
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8907100025
Download: ML13308B093 (6)


Text

ACCELERATED DI BUTION DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:8907100025 DOC.DATE: 89/06/28 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET #

FACIL:50-206 San OnofreNuclear Station, Unit 1, Southern Californ 0.5000206 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION BOLEY,K.

.,Public Citizen's Critical Mass Energy, Projept RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION TRAMMELL,C.

NRC - No Detailed Affiliation Given R

SUBJECT:

Requests verification of encl ETE & population data for facility by 890717.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: YEO3D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR _

ENCL SIZE:

D TITLE: Request for NRR Action (e.g. 2.206 Petitions) & Related Correspondenc S NOTES:Li,cense Exp data in acoriance witli 10CFR2,2.1l9

.05000206 I,

1

'I f

5 0

0 0

0 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES A

IDCODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD5 LA 1

1 PD5 PD 1

1 TRAMMEL,C 1

1 INTERNAL: EDO/BRIDGERS 1

1 NRR DIR 1

1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1

1 OGC/HDS 1

1 OGC/ROED 1

1 REGFILE l

1 1

EXTERNAL: LPDR 1

1.

NRC PDR 1

1 R

A S

/

D Nor ALL "RIDS" RECIPIIS:

PLEASE EP US TO R MSTE!

00NACI' THE DOCUMEN CNTROL DESK ROCK P1-37 (Exr. 20079) W snmaf '

00R HM FAN DISTRIBUTION e

LISTS ROR D*CU** I: YOU DON'T NEEI TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 11 ENCL 11

'PUBLIC l~ZN Buyers Up O Congress Watch 0 Critical Mass O Health Research Group 3 Litigation Group June 28, 1989 Charles Trammell 50-20 or Project Manager for San Onofre-1 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Dear Charles Trammell:

In its Nuclear Power Safety Report for 1987, Public Citizen's Critical Mass Energy Project published Evacuation Time Estimates (ETEs) for almost every commercial reactor site in the country. The data was culled from the NRC's Public Document Room dockets and from NUREG/CR-1856, dated 1981.

Most of the ETEs in the PDR were from the early '80s.

We are writing you now to update that information for the San Onofre-l site specifically.

Public Citizen is a non-profit research and advocacy organization founded in 1971 to address a wide range of consumer and environmental issues.

The Critical Mass Energy Project is the energy policy arm of Public Citizen.

Because ETEs are usually calculated by contractors for individual utilities and can utilize many different methods and include numerous evacuation scenarios, Public Citizen has chosen one standard approach for comparing ETEs. We are interested in knowing the utility's latest estimate for the amount of time it will take to fully notify and evacuate all civilians within any segment of the 10-mile zone around San Onofre-1 on a regular weekday, during daylight hours, with fair weather.

This standardized figure is provided in Appendix M (enclosed) of our report.

We would greatly appreciate your verifying the ETE and the population data (if possible) and responding to our query.

It is important that all ETEs be dated so that our readers will know when it was calculated. This is especially important with older estimates and sites that are in rapidly changing areas.

If you do not have the latest ETE for San Onofre-1, please call your contact at the site and ask for it.

For documentation purposes, please provide us with the time of your call and the name of the person that gave you the ETE and its date. Finally, if possible, please ask that the contact send the cover sheet of the ETE document with the pertinent page.

- 215-Pennsylvania Ave. SE O Washington, DC 20003 O (202) 546-4996 8E907100025 89-;0628..:-3 PDR ADOCK 05000206 PDC

Thank you very much for your help in this matter. Please respond by July 17, 1989. We appreciate your cooperation in helping the public stay informed of the status of their neighboring nuclear power stations.

Sincerely,

  • nnethBoley Nuclear Safety Analyst Critical Mass Energy Project of Public Citizen Enclosure

Evacuation Time Estimate (ETE) Update For San Onofre-1 If the data on the enclosed Appendix M is accurate for this site, please so indicate and skip to number 5. Is the data in Appendix M correct? ___YES /

NO If no:

1. Estimated time for full notification and evacuation of all civilians within any sector of the 10-mile zone surrounding the reactor site on normal weekday, daylight hours, fair weather:

hours

2. Date of above ETE calculation:

19

3. Name of firm (contractor) that calculated the above ETE:
4. Population within 10 miles of the site:

people in permanent population people in transient population (summer tourists, etc.)

Date when this population data was current

5. Name, title, and affiliation of contact at San Onofre-l that provided the above information:
6. Date on which the above information was provided by contact listed in number 5 above:

1989

7. Is contact (__)

or NRC representative (-_)

sending documentation to Public Citizen?

YES_ / NO_

8.

Your name and title:

Thank you very much for your help in this endeavor. Please return this form by July 17, 1989 to:

Kenneth Boley Public Citizen 215 Pennsylvania Ave., SE Washington, DC 20003

Appendix M Evacuation Time Estimates PERMANENT RANK BY TRANSIENT RANK BY TOTAL R R NEAREST CENTER REACTOR POPULATION PERMANENT POPULATION TRANSIENT POPULATION OF POPULATION POPULATION POPULATION Arkansas.

25,394 37 6,000 33 31,394 42 4.8 31 Russellville, AR Beaver Valley *142,268 5

3,400 45 145,668 6

5.8 25 E. Liverpool, OH Big Rock Point 9,274 58 9,274 64 5.3 26 Charlevoix, MI Braidwood 26,015 36 8,105 30 34,120 38 3.0 55 Bradwood, IL Browns Ferry *27,678 34 19,600 23 47,278 31 1.5 67 Decatur, AL Brunswick *10,583 57 21,000 19 31,583 41 Southport, NC Byron 21,393 43 43,762 10 65,155 25 3.2 53 Rockford, IL Callaway 5,759 64 4,545 40 10,304 61 3.4 48 Fulton, MO Calvert Cliffs *19,972 46 1,150 56 21,22 49 9.1 9

Annapolis, MD Catawba *81,423 9

46,879 9

128,302 10 3.4 48 Rock Hill, SC Clinton 12,666 54 28,472 15 41,138 34 3.2 53 Clinton, IL Cook 53,755 19 16,089 24 69,844 22 6.1 17 Benton Harbor, MI Cooper *[5,417 66 3,000 47 8,417 65 NC Crystal River-3 13,595 53 1,010 58 14,605 55 6.8 15 Neb Ciy, NL Davis-Besse

  • 16,427 48 Diablo Canyon *18,099 47 53,700 1,7 53 7.0 14 RedL FL Dresden *392925,07179 143TldO Drse 9292

,0 4

45,189 32 8.0 11 San Luis Obispo, CA Duane Arnold *79,323 10 79,323 16 10.6 3

Morris, IL Farley 10,681 56 1,420 53 12,101 57 4.0 37 Cedar Rapids, IA Fermi-2 71,517 14 71,517 19 4.0 37 Dothan, AL Fitzpatrick

  • 35,155 28 20,790 20 55,945 27 3.8 42 Laguana Beach, MI Oswego, NY Ft. Calhoun
  • 15,254 51 871 59 16,125 54 4.2 36 Omaha, NE Ft. St. Vrain 16,373 49 350 60 16,723 52 10.0 4

Denver, CO.

Ginna 39,162 25 5,863 35 45,025 33 4.6 33 Rochester, NY Grand Gulf-1 7,255 63 2,873 48 10,128 62 2.4 62 Vicksburg, MS Haddam Neck *74,08 11 29,415 14 103,495 13 8.3 10 Me n CT Hatch

  • 5,312 67 150 62 5,462 69 10.0 en, Hope Creek *22,556 40 5,539 36 28,095 43 6.0 20 Baley o

GA Indian Point *240,455 2

92,852 1

333,307 1

5.2 28

wlio, DE Kewaunee 11,086 55 11,086 58 4.0 37 Ne y,

NY La Crosse 7,307 62 7,307 67 2.0 64 Gre sa, WI LaSalle

  • 13,913 52 3,130 46 17,043 51 10.0 LaOrtss, I Limerick-1 164,870 3

23,165 18 188,035 4

4.8 31 Philadelphia, PA Maine Yankee *28,730 32 42,338 11 71,068 20 3.8 42 Bh ME McGuire 46,233 22 31,178 13 77,411 17 4.0 3

Millstone *110,166 6

83,129 2

193,295 8

CharLotte, C

Monticello 20,153 45 20,153 50 0.9 68 Minneapolis, MN Nine Mile Point *35,155 28 20,790 21 55,945 27 3.8 42 Oswego, NY North Anna *8,688 60 1,166 55 9,854 63 8.0 11 Richmond, VA Oconee

  • 50,841 21 20,000 22 70,841

.21 3.5 47 Greenville, SC tPyster Creek *71,440 15 73,676 4

145,116 7

6.0 20 Forked River, NJ Palisades 32,773 30 32,773 39 2.0 65 South Haven, MI Palo Verde 70 3.0 55 POPULATIONZ

Appendix M (cont'd)

PERMANENT RANK BY TRANSIENT RANK BY TOTAL NEAREST CENTER REACTOR POPULATION PERMANENT POPULATION TRANSIENT POPULATION 4

OF POPULATION POPULATION POPULATION e

Peach Bottom

  • 28,647 33 9,858 29 38,505 35 6.0 20 Lancaster, PA Perry-1
  • 71,902 13 53,271 8

125,173 11 3.7 45 North Perry, OH Pilgrim-1 41,401 23 83,085 3

124,486 12 5.1 29 Plymouth, MA Point Beach

  • 20,994 44 1,200 54 22,194 47 4.0 37 Manitowoc, WI Prairie Island
  • 21,462 42 21,462 48 1.8 66 Minneapolis, MN Quad Cities
  • 36,445 27 12,035 26 48,480 30 12.0 2

Moline, IL Rancho Seco

  • 8,552 61 2,234 50 10,786 60 3.7 45 Sacramento, CA River Bend-i 22,872 39 13,700 25 36,572 36 3.3 51 Baton Rouge, LA Robinson-2 26,908 35 5,000 38 31,908 40 4.5 34 Hartsville, SC Salem
  • 22,556 40 5,539 36 28,095 43 6.0 20 Wilmington, DE San Onofre 57,150 18 25,900 16 83,050 15 5.0 30 San Clemente, CA Sequoyah
  • 38,972 26 24,000 17 62,972 26 2.2 63 Chattanooga, TN Shearon Harris-1 15,795 50 11,000 28 26,795 46 3.4 48 Newhill, NC St. Lucie
  • 94,854 7

40,000 12 134,854 9

6.3 16 Fort Pierce, FL Summer 8,869 59 2,000 51 10,869 59 3.3 51 Columbia, SC Surry

  • 73,411 12 63,755 6

137,166 8

10.0 4

Newport News, VA Susquehanna 51,232 20 3,720 43 54,952 29 6.1 17 Berwick, PA Three Mile Island-1 161,509 4

6,335 32 167,844 5

8.0 11 Harrisburg, PA Trojan 65,346 16 1,500 52 66,846 24 6.0 20 Portland, OR Turkey Point

  • 92,664 8

4,500 41 97,164 14 6.1 17 Miami, FL Vermont Yankee 31,909 31 3,544 44 35,453 37 3.0 55 Brattleboro, VT Vogtle 2,669 69 200 61 2,869 71 3.0 55 Waynesboro, GA Washington Nuclear-2

  • 1,338 70 11,824 27 13,162 56 2.8 59 Richland, WA Waterford-3 60,009 17 7,000 31 67,009 23 5.3 26 New Orleans, LA Wolf Creek-1
  • 5,520 65 1,100 57 6,620 68 Burlington, KS Yankee-Rowe 24,718 38 2,443 49 27,161 45 2.6 61 Pittsfield, MA Zion
  • 245,006 1

65,750 5

310,756 2

21.0 1

Chicago, IL TOTALS:

3,080,956 1,185,800 4,266,756 AVERAGES:

44,014 19,439 60,954 5.1 INCLUDING SEABROOK AND SHOREHAM:

Seabrook-1 100,720 116,988 217,708 Shoreham 108,804 21,420 130,224 Totals:

3,290,480 1,324,208 4,614,688 Averages:

45,701 21,019 64,093 Indicates source is individual Evacuation Time Estimate.

Otherwise from NRC's NUREG/CR-1856, "An Analysis of Evacuation Time Estimates Around 52 Nuclear Power Plant Sites" (July 1981).

Evacuation Time Estimates not available in NRC's Public Document Room.