ML13308B075
| ML13308B075 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 05/20/1988 |
| From: | Geismar B AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Stello V NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8805310359 | |
| Download: ML13308B075 (2) | |
Text
REGULAT eY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTIO YSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:8805310359 DOC.DATE: 88/05/20 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET 4f FACIL:50-206 San Onofre Nuclear Station, Unit 1, Southern Californ 05000206 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION GEISMAR,B.
Affiliation Not Assigned RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION STELLO,V.
Ofc of the Executive Director for Operations
SUBJECT:
Inquires about review & decision made re licensee proposed installation of thermocouple in upper region of reactor vessel above core & guide structure to provide indication of conditions during inadequate core cooling condition.
DISTRIBUTION CODE: Y002D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR I ENCL D SIZE:
TITLE: Distribution for Atypical 50 Dkt Material NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109.
05000206 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD5 LA 1
PD5 PD 1
TRAMMELLC i
STELLO.-V.
1 INTERNAL: ACRS 1
AEOD/DOA I
AEOD/DSP/TPAB 1
N
-ABSTRACT 1
OC 15-B-18 I
l&EG FI01 RON5 1
4 0
EXTERNAL: LPDR 1
1 NRC PDR 1
NSIC 1
1 6
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 14 ENCL
'r4
May 20, 1988 Mr. Victor Stello, Jr.
Executive Director for Operations United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
Dear Mr. Stello:
On January 15, 1988 you wrote Senator Alan Cranston who had written you on December 7, 1987 in my behalf.
I was attempting to determine the status of the installation or non-installation of a reactor vessel level indicator at San Onofre6Unit 1.
In your letter to Senator Cranston you mentioned that SCE was proposing installing a thermocouple in the upper region of the reactor vessel above the core and its guide structure, which thermocouple would provide some indication of conditions in that region during a potential inadequate core cooling condition.
At the time of your letter the NRC staff was reviewing this proposal to determine if it would be an adequate alternative in terms of providing sufficient information on inadequate core cooling.
You stated that "We expect to complete this review in the near future.
You also went on to say that because of my expressed interest in this subject, you would inform me of the results of your decision on this issue.
I have no way of knowing how long the words "the near future" mean so am writing to inquire if a decision has been made.
If so, can you please let me know what it is.
If a decision has still not been made, I would very much appreciate being told its results when one is reached.
Sincerely, (Mrs.)
etty Geismar P. 0. Box 2000-302 Mission Viejo, CA 92690 geo53ib 359 860520 PDR ADOCK' 05000206 PDR
_