ML13308A709

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of JW Hunt Reaction to FEMA Interim Findings & Determinations Re Power Plants.Requests Response to FEMA Comments
ML13308A709
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 07/28/1981
From: Grimes B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Hunt J
SAN DIEGO, CA
Shared Package
ML13308A710 List:
References
NUDOCS 8108120053
Download: ML13308A709 (2)


Text

TERA 1E FILE Copy JUL 2 8 1981 Docket Nos. 50-206 50-361 and 50-362

/\\ U G 0 5 1981 g

Mr. James W. Hunt Mss N i m

Manager, Office of Disaster 3

Preparedness Unified San Diego County Emergency Services Organization 5201-Q Ruffin Road San Diego, California, 92123

Dear Mr.. Hunt:

I have reviewed your reaction to the FEMA interim findings and determinations relating to the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station contained in your June 26, 1981 letter to me. Federal regulations atIO CFR 50.47 require that no operating license for a nuclear power reactor will be issued unless a finding is made by NRC that the state of onsite and offsite emergency preparedness provides reasonable assurance that adequate protective measures can and will be taken in the event of a radiological emergency. pThe regulation states that NRC will base its finding on a review of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) findings and determinations as to whether State and local plans are adequate and capable of being implemented, and the NRC assessment of the applicant's plans.

To carry out the Nj licensing responsibility, I asked FENA Headquarters to specify which of the indicated deficiencies must be removed to allow a FEMA finding of adequate offsite preparedness. Furthermore, I requested that FEMA provide NRC with a schedule for the actions FEMA is planning in order to reassess the offsite preparedness. I also asked FEMA to take into account a letter received from Mr. Ken Baskin of the Southern California Edison Company which outlined the deficiencies identified by FEMA, summarized their planned actions and established a schedule for curing the deficiencies.

I understand that SCE met and reached an understanding with all affected local jurisdictions and FEMA Region IX in the development of their action plan. I subsequently have received a letter from FEMA Headquarters which endorses the course of action laid out in the SCE letter. I believe that this matter is well on its way to resolution and I thank you for your efforts and cooperation.

PDR.ADOC 8 ~,

OFFICE SURNAME DATE.

NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Mr. James W. Hunt 2

Your letter indicated that you intend responding to the FEMA comments. We would appreciate your forwarding a copy of your response to us.

Sincerely, Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Emergency Preparedness Office of Inspection & Enforcement

Enclosures:

DISTRIBUTION:

1. Letter to John Dickey, FEMA, Docket Files dtd. 6/18/81 IE Files
2. Letter from Southern California IE Reading Edison Company dtd. 6/26/81 EPLB Reading
3.

Letter from FEMA dtd. 7/14/81 VStello RCDeYoung cc w/enclosures:

BGrimes Federal Emergency Management Agency SSchwartz County of Orange, Emergency Management Division FPagano City of San Clemente JSears City of San Juan Captstrano SWelch USM, Camp Pendleton EPeyton San Onofre State Parks and Beaches NRC PDR (w/incoming)

Aouthern California Edison Company Local PDR (w/incoming)

VState Office of Emergency Services DEisenhut HRood SNowicki OFFICE)

E

DDIR AD D.D.

3URNAMEO JSears:esi.FagAn.......

5boq...

DATE

/

/81 7/

/81 87/

/817 NRC FORM 318 (10-80)

NRCM 0240 OFFICIALRECORD COPY