ML13304B019

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 810421 Resolution of Greater Ventura Chamber of Commerce Supporting Licensing of Facilities.Nrc Is Taking Every Reasonable Action to Expedite Licensing Process
ML13304B019
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  
Issue date: 05/12/1981
From: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Barroca J
CALIFORNIA, STATE OF
References
NUDOCS 8105180416
Download: ML13304B019 (10)


Text

MAY 1 2 1981 Mr. James A. Barroca, Executive Vice President Greater Ventura Chamber of Commerce 785 Seaward Avenue Ventura, California 93003

Dear Mr. Barroca:

The April 21, 1981 resolution of the Greater Ventura Chamber of Commerce supporting the licensing of the San Onofre 2 and 3 nuclear power plants has been referred to me for reply. I am pleased to provide the following information regarding nuclear power plant licensing in general, and licensing of San Onofre 2 and 3 in particular.

Since the TMI-2 accident, a significant amount of the NRC resources have been concentrated on identifying the lessons to be learned from that accident and the associated requirements that are necessary and sufficient for the continued operation of licensed facilities and for the issuance of new operating licenses.

That effort culminated with the issuance of the NRC's TMI Action Plan, approved in June 1980.

The development of that document and the NRC's increased attention to the safety in the 70 operating reactors took so much of our attention and our resources that we were unable to license new plants for a year after the accident. Following the issuance of the Action Plan, new operating licenses were issued to Sequoyah and North Anna units late last summer and to Farley, Unit 2 in March of this year.

In addition, a low power test authorization was issued to Salem Unit 2. We anticipate Salem 2 going to full power in the near future.

Currently, the overall picture is one of a licensing process that is returning to predictability at a considerably enhanced level of safety. However, the implementation of this enhanced level of safety has raised a number of potential new issues in the contested hearings for both operating licenses and construction permits around the country. Some of these units were substantially complete at the time of the Three Mile Island accident or have been completed since then.

Thus, we do face a situation in which, for the first time, our hearings are or will be continuing for a significant number of plants that will be complete and ready to operate before the hearings conclude.

This situation is an indirect consequence of the TMI accident, which required a re-examination of the entire regulatory structure. We are not satisfied with the present situation and we are working to find ways to accelerate the hearings on these plants whose continued idleness prevents a substantial invest ment from benefiting either the consumers or the operating utilities.

8105180%16 1

4J*

MAY 29g

-2 To that end, major improvements in the licensing process are underway or being considered. These improvements include:

Expedited and rescheduled review by the NRC staff for plants in the short term category--those presently complete and those to be completed In 1981 and 1982.

Increased efficiency of the hearing process and subsequent Commission and Appeals Board review. The time now being taken between issuance of the supplemental staff evaluation report and initial decisions by licensing boards averages 18 months. The NRC believes it can compress that time to about 10 months by tightening up the times allowed for each part of the prehearing process and by providing firmer time management of the whole process. The Commission is publishing for public comment proposed changes to its rules which would accomplish this.

Changes in the review process the Commission itself exercises over these cases. The Commission is considering two alternatives to shorten this.review period which could save at least two months in each case that has been in hearing.

Early.completion of NRC staff review for plants to be completed in 1983 and beyond.

This will require better scheduling of reviews and increased staff resources applied to casework.

Some staff resources can be redirected by deferring lower priority work and shifting some work to other NRC offices.

Before making such a change, the Commission will carefully review the impact on other essential safety-related activities.

One further step to be considered is legislation to authorize the Commission to issue limited, interim operating licenses before completion of hearings where all applicable safety requirements have been met.

In summary, we are confident the actions we have taken and those we will take will provide major improvements in ltcensing schedules without compromising the regulatory requirements for safety.

With regard to licensing of the San Onofre Units 2 and 3, the staff has completed the major part of its review.

Staff safety evaluations were issued on December 31, 1980, February 6, 1981 and February 25, '1981.

The review of the San Onofre Units 2 and 3 by the Advisory Committee on'Reactor Safeguards was completed on March 12, 1981.

A supplement to the Safety Evaluation Report addressing issues identified by the ACRS and the remaining outstanding issues is in preparation and is scheduled to be issued in early May. The hearing on this project is scheduled to begin on June 15, 1981

MAY 1 2 19 81

-3 We appreciate your interest in the San Onofre project. Please be assured that the NRC is taking every reasonable action to expedite the licensing process, consistent with our commitment to ensure the public health and safety.

Sincerely Original signed by Darrell G. Eisenhut Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation OFFICEO L:LB#3 DL D

Lt(.

L DL:D SURNAME HRood:jb irglia sc 0 UtI DATEN 5

/91.

58 0

/81245 O

/81 5E

/81 NRC FORM-318 (1 0/80) NRCMO. 240 OFIIL RE ORDP COPY2982 OFII Et R USP:O9032-2

MAY 1 2 1981 DISTRIBUTION:

Docket File 50-361/362 PDR LPDR NSIC TERA LB#3 Files HDenton ECase DGEisenhut RLTedesco FJMiraglia HRood JLee (w/cy of incoming)

S. Cavanaugh (NRR-81-220).

EHughes (w/cy of incoming)

LBerry PPAS SHanauer RMattson TMurley RVollmer BSnyder OFFICE SURNAMEP DATE

'arC FRMso 36 n0.an80o naRnM0 FFIC IAL RECOR'fD COPYfD

S O152-

PLEAS REVEW TE U

DA E IN 'E.,~

I If the due date dtes not allow quate time to respond to this ticket, you may request a revised due date. The reques must include a valid justification, mu!

accompany the next WITS update and be submitted through your correspondence coordinator.

The revised due date, if approved by PPAS, will be used to track division coorespondence completion schedules.

FROM:'

DAT DOCUMENT..

DATERECEIVED Jai~es A

i~a~Qca4/24/81 TR MEMO REPORT OTHER TOnR CC

.fOTHER ACTION NECESSARY CONCURRENCE DATE ANSWERED

'NO ACTION NECESSARY COMME w

BY CLASSIF POST OFFICE FILE CODE:.

REG NO DESCRIPTION: (Must Be Unclassified)

.REFERRED TO

-,DATE RECEIVED BY

.,DATE submits Tesolutien, ladcatiug support for the licensin of San.

ENCLOSURES:'

4.urley for approp act 5

Vl a

6.

Snyder

'REMARKS:

US. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

  • FORM NRC-326S MAilCONTROL FORM e-

FROM:

DATE OF DOCUMENT DATE RECEIVED NO f&9*81-220 Jams A. Baseia 4/24/81 4/29/81 S

LTR.

MEMO:

REPORT:

OTHER:

TO:

ORIG.:

CC:

OTHER:

ACTION NECESSARY E

CONCURRENCE DATE ANSWERED:

1 COB NO ACTION NECESSARY E

COMMENT BYXia =

CLASSIF.:

POST OFFICE FILE CODE:

REG. NO.:

DESCRIPTION: (Must Be Unclassified)

REFERRED TO DATE RECEIVED BY DATE submits resolution ladicatia as but

/29 av Case support for the licensing of San 2

onefre Units 11 a$ III ENCLOSURES:

2.

Ham**r 4.Marleyn for approp. action Vol-er

6.

Snyder REMARKS:

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION FORM NRC-326S MAIL CONTROL FORM (6-76)

FROM:

DATE OF DOCUMENT DATE RECEIVED NO.:

Jaes A.

zaosa 4/24/81 4/20/81 LTR.

MEMO:

REPORT:

OTHER:

TO:

ORIG.:

CC:

OTHER:

ACTION NECESSARY CONCURRENCE O

DATE ANSWERED:

H~.

Dnt~l NO ACTION NECESSARY COMMENT BY:

CLASSIF.:

POST OFFICE FILE CODE:

REG. NO.:

DESCRIPTION: (Must Be Unclassified)

REFERRED TO DATE RECEIVED BY DATE subaits vesolution indicating support for the licensing of Sa i/29 e: -case Onofr iUnits 11 and ID n

ENCLOSURES:

2.

flamber

4.

arley for pr action 1,, vtI Imer

6.

SnyiIo' REMARKS:

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION FORM NRC-326S MAIL CONTROL FORM (6-76)

VENTURA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE April 24, 1981 Mr.'Harold Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Mr. Denton:

Attached is a resolution from the Greater Ventura Chamber of Commerce indicating our support for the licensing of San Onofre Units II and III nuclear power plants.

Yours truly, James A. Barroca Executive Vice President JAB/b Encl.

785 SOUTH SEAWARD AVENUE N

VENTURA, CALIFORNIA 93001 U PHONE (805) 648-2875

Geater VENTURA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE RESOLUTION

WHEREAS, The Greater Ventura Chamber of Commerce is vitally concerned that the economic, environmental and social well being of the State of California be maintained; and
WHEREAS, an adequate supply of energy is critical to meeting California's economic and social needs while preserving the environmental gains of the past decade; and
WHEREAS, this nation's continued overdependence on foreign oil has caused major adverse economic impacts; and
WHEREAS, there is a probability that instability in the Middle East will, at some near future time, result in reduced supplies of oil, thereby causing further social and economic chaos here at home, and
WHEREAS, there must be astrong commitment to conservation of the nation's limited resources and development of efficient and secure new sources of energy here at home, and
WHEREAS, regulatory delays in the planning-and licensing of needed energy facilities are costly to the consumer, damaging to the environment, and result in greater importation of foreign oil; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT The Greater Ventura Chamber of Commerce supports
1.

licensing San Onofre Units II and III nuclear power plants

2.

developing alternative forms of energy such as, solar, geothermal and wind

3. a continued commitment to conservation of our energy resources

-James A.

Barroca E&ecutive Vice President April 21, 1981 785 SOUTH SEAWARD AVENUE U VENTURA, CALIFORNIA 93001 U PHONE (805) 648-2875