ML13304A965
| ML13304A965 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 09/13/1980 |
| From: | Scaletti D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Wall L US Advisory Council On Historic Preservation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13304A967 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8009250451 | |
| Download: ML13304A965 (10) | |
Text
S 1980 DISTRIBUTION:L Docket Files NRC PDR Local PDR DL:LB #3 Files Docket Nos.:
50 -36 361.
RTedesco FMiraglia HRood DScaletti Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Lake Plaza, South - Suite 616 44[UnionBoulevard Lakewood, Colorado 80228 ATTN:
Louis S. Wall, Chief Western Division of Projects Review.
Dear Mr. Wall:
Enclosed are copies of the proposed Memorandum of Agreement for the San Onofre transmission lines and two letters from the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation relating to the proposed MOA.
Copies of this correspondence are being sent per our telephone Conversation on September 9, 1980. The formal request for ACHP concurrence on the MOA will follow shortly.
Should there be any questions relating to the proposed MOA please contact me at (301) 492-8443.
Sincerely, riginai Signe D. C. Scaletti, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing
Enclosures:
As stated 8009250451 O FFICE sURNAME
.. P.
.m.U gli...........
DATE (9
N.C F O R M.
91/
NRC FORM 318 (9-76) NRCM 0240
- U.S.
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE-:1979-289-369
+ F UNITED STATES a
NUCCEAR,1 REGl)LATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 SEP 13 31980 Docket Nos.:
50-361/362 Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Lake Plaza, South - Suite 616 44 Union Boulevard Lakewood, Colorado 80228 ATTN:
Louis S. Wall, Chief Western Division of Projects Review
Dear Mr. Wall:
Enclosed are copies of the proposed Memorandum of Agreement for the San Onofre transmission lines and two letters from the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation relating to the proposed MOA. Copies of this correspondence are being sent per our telephone conversation on September 9, 1980. The formal request for ACHP concurrence on the MOA will follow shortly.
Should there be any questions relating to the proposed MOA please contact me at (301) 492-8443.
Sincerely, D. C. Scaletti, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing
Enclosures:
As stated
PRO'OS.D MEMORANDUM OF AGR EEM ENT With regard to cultural resources potentially subject to impact as a u
of operation of the transmission Iines for San Onofre nuclear Generating Station, Units 233.
Docket Nos.-50-361 and 50-362 Applicants (Southern California Edison Company)
(San Diego Gas & Electric Company)
Parties to the Agreement:
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission California Office of Historic Preservation T.
The bases for this Memorandum of Agreement are the results of Applicants' studies of the Ethnigraphy, Arenaeclogy, and History of the vicinity of the Applicants' transmis sion lines associated with the Zan Onofre nuclear Generat ing Station, Units 2 and 3. These cultural resources studies were conducted in compliance with the National.
Historic Preservation Act and the National E-vircrmental Policy Act fdr the licensing of' San Onofre Juclear Genera tion Station, Units 2 and 3, and fulfillmnt of The terms of this Memorandum of Agreement will constitute full compliance thereof.
- 2.
For purposes of this Memorandum of Agreement.
the "area of potential environmental impact" shall be defined as tre "right of way" as purchrased, leased, or otherwise encum bered for development and maintenance of the transmi.ssicn lines associated with Units 2 and 3 of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.
- 3.
The following archaeological sites are considered to oe eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places:
CSRI-36 (Ora-640)
CSRI-205 (Ora-419)
CSRI-228 (Ora-498)
CSRI-249 CSRI-250
-2 CSRI-256 CSRI-257 CSRI-321 (Ora-495)
CSRI-352 (Ora-4-7 CSRI-358
(
ra-4
- 5)
CSRI-421 SDI-4538 W-120
- 4.
The following archaeological sites are considered to not be eligible or 4 inclusion on the Mational ?eZister of HistoriC Places or are consid-ere to be outs.3ie the "area of potential environmental impact" of
.is undertaking:
CSRI-47 CSRI-49 CSRI-50 CSRI-51 CSRI-109 (Ora-370)
CSRI-223 (Ora-+/-72)
CSRI-223 (Ora-474 CSRI-227 (Ora-4'7)
CSRI-255 CSRI-3C3 (Ora-341)
CSRI-334 (CD-a-7)
CSRI-339 (Ora-385)
CSRI-357 CSRI-475 CSRI-476 CSRI-480 CSRI-481 W-119 W-121 W-210 W-1527 W-1781 W-1806 W-1833
- 5.
The following arcnaeological site3 cannot be evaluated for their eligibility for inclusion in the National Register due to a current lack of sufficient information:
CSRI-37 (Ora-700)
CSRI-48 CSRI-251 CSRI-253 CSRI-254
-3 CSRI-322 (Ora--96)
CSRI-323 (Ora-499)
CSRI-343 (Cra-438)
CSRI-410 (Ora-725)
CSRI-418 CSRI-419 CSRI-420 CSRI-422 CSRI-423 CSRI-424 CSRI-425 W-185 W-281 W-1528 (SDI-5444)
W-1777 W-1778 W-1779 W-1780 W-1782 W-1955 W-1956 W-1957 H-1958
- 6.
Those sites listed under points (3) and (5) above will be documented by the applicants to determine their eliibil ity.
For those sites listed under point (3), this docu mentation will consist of micromapping. For those sites listing under point (5), documentation will conform to 36 CFR Part 63 and consist of at least an understanding of the surface and subsurface comoonents of the sites and firm boundary and locationa. determinations.
All sites will be entered into the California Archaeological Survey and will be referred to by their appropriate State Trinomial Numbers.
- 7.
To facilitate the processing of this document and maximize benefit of this effort, the following points should be followed:
- a.
The applicants shall, on behalf of Contractor, obtain permission for Contractor to enter upon and make all necessary tests and examinations required under the terms of this Agreement for all properties located within "rights of ways." For sites partially located within "right-of-way73" applicants shall attemDt to obtain permission to perform such work on the entire site.
This stipulation is subject to existing legal constraints.
- b.
Principal Investigators shall meet the.3pecfications In 36 CFR S6 (proposed).
- a.
A research design will be developed to incorporate those researon questions whi on can be addressed with out increase in costs ceyond that wnicn is necessary for adequately documenting site eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.
- d.
The scope of work and research design will be devel oped in consultation with the local Native Americans' representative(s) designated by the California Native American Heritage Commission.
- e.
Within 10 working days of receipt of the research design, the office of Historic Preservation snail comment to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission regard ing the acceptability of the researcn design.
- f.
The scope of work shall designate the specific dis position of all artifactual materials recoverea during this program in accordance with the following points:
- 1)
Cultural materials will be curated in accordance with the desires of the local Native Americans (as defined in 7.d.) and current professional standards, except as noted in paragraph 7.f.3 below.
- 2)
Human remains and objects determined to be sacred to Native Americans. if discovered. shall be treated in accordance with plans aevelopea in consultation with local Native Americans (7.d.).
- 3)
If the property owner is other than the appli cants and refuses to relinquish possession of the materials, these materials will be fully analyzed and documented prior to being returned to the owner.
- g.
The Cultural Resource Report shall deal with the specifics of properties, their eligibility, current and future effects, and possible mitigating actions where appropriate.
- h.
Applicant will disseminate the report to the con cerned Native American groups (7.d.), concerned academic communities and the governmental
organizations who.ave regulatory or management concerns in the zeneral area of thi3 project.
The Archaeological Report without technical appencices shall be made available to the general puolic.
- i.
The scope of work shall discuss the extent of local Native American involvement in this program, includ ing the process of analysis ana report preparation.
J.
The scope of work and research design shall be guided by Attachment A, ?rofessional Standards for Data Recovery ?rograms.
The applicants 3hall forward these reports to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the State Office of Historic Preservation along with a proposed management plan by August of 1980.
This management plan shall consist of the following elements:
- a.
The applicants' assessment of current and future impacts to the sites.
- b.
The applicants' proposed mitigating measures to reduce or eliminate those impact3.
The Management Plan resulting from the evaluation process defined in this Memorandum of Agreement is to be developed in accordance with the following general principles:
- a.
The sole category of impacts to be addressed are those identified as potentially occurring due to operation and maintenance of the subject transmission lines (including Applicant usage of access rcads for maintenance purposes).
- b.
All resource management activitie3 siall be confined to transmission line rights of,.ay and associated transmission line access roaas.
- c.
Mitigation measures.are to be predicated upon the expectably minimal impacts resulting from operation and maintenance of the subject transmission lines.
- d.
Mitigation measures are to be focused on resource preservation rather than data recovery.
- e.
Mitigation measures should balance considerations of cost with resource protection benefits.
- f.
Mitigaticn measures mav include surface collection of imperiled resources.
- g.
Mitigation measures may include rerouting, abandon ment, or stabilization of access roads wh-en feasible, if an eligible property is theraoy protected from significant adverse effect.
- h.
Mitigation measures may include the stabilization of areas subject to erosion as a result of transmission line maintenance. if an eligible property is thereby protected from significanz adverse effect.
I.
The Management Plan shall address the too of disposition of cultural materials collected during mitigation work.
- 10.
Within 30 working days of receipt of this material.
the Office of Historic Preservation 3hall comment to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission concerning eligibility,
.effects, and mitigation.
- 11.
Should the NEC concur with the Office of Historic Preser
- vation, it shall seek determinations of elisilibity from the Keeper of the Register and shall recuire the appli cants to implement the proposed management progra=.
- 12.
Should the NRC disagree with the position of the California Office of Historic Preservation, it shall seek determinations of eligibilitv on the appropriate sites and shall request the Advisory Council's comments.
1DLC889.B
ATTACHMENT A Profesinal Ztandards fo, Data Thcovery Proara-s
- 1.
The data recovery proram shoul be ccnducted in accor dance with a nrofessionallv adecuate recovery plan (research desizn).
- a.
The plan shall be nronared or aDoroved y the Prin cipal Investizator(s) and shall reflect a faciliarity with previous relevant research.
- b.
The plan slall include a definite set of research objectives, takinq into account previous relevant research, to be answered in analysis of the data to be recovered.
- a.
The plan shall provide for recovery of a usable sam pie of data on sinificant research tonics that can reasonably be addressed usinz the orooert-.
- d.
The olan shall soecify and justify the methods ard techniques to be used for recovery of the data con tained in the orooertv.
(;'Inthods destructive of dnta or inJurious to the natural features of the nronertv should not be emoloved if nondestructive methods are feasible.)
- 2.
The data recovery nrceram should crovide for Pdequate oer sonnel, facilities, and ecuioment to fully implement the recovery plan.
- 3.
The data recovery oroaram shculd insure that full, accurate, and intelligible records will be made and main tained of all field observations ?nd ooerations, including but not limited to excavation and recordina techniques, stratiqraphic, and/or issociaticnal relationshios where appropriate, and siznificant environmental relaticnships.
- 4.
Particularly when a data recoverv crozram is conducted upon a potentially complex historic or orehistoric Dro perty (e.g., an historic town site; a orehistoric site that may contain many occuuation layers, cemeteries, or architectural rmains), situations may arise or 'ita he encountered that, were not anticinated in desianinz the program.
Adeonate orovision should be nade for rodifica tion of the data recover,y)lan to cooe with unforeseen discoveries or other unexpected circumstances.
- 5.
The data recovery prowram should be oreservation "rien ted, as noted in 1.d above.
Therefore, accurate mapOinz
ir~c.~~i er+/-o~an a rpult of
~')
)v prnfesgional 4 :u7mernt -tt~i~i dissprnination of ts-"=
-avuits &Te nrr-rn7.v tIhe P!fl2' rern'rt 2!oumi, "ue avqi',
c o h
?pC h
State ~
~
~
~
~
ol 7i~hvit sh 2.t reoo t, the nirt'-,QtaJ.
Consli1 tirz Arn 9eonlcis+t
' hoa Dnrtrrt of h
Irterl'nr, Pr(
th e C-Thirnpr, Denartrnt~rt Of.1~~ov T'he recnm-oned nrofpsnicn-3.
treatr-t of' r'coverer! raterials is cur;t'l.or ea' i 4+orR7,e if The Lr'c~a i.i i.'1ir~-4 nan
~rte iv nsure The1-ir tnresprvnti.n
-And t-qt Will
'ne 1~-14.a availal e for reneirc-Pr. ~u~ve.
-f 'I
. ri~i not in F-(4-re1 nwn-r -i7, t"e-cons-nt of Thep o wrr 7u~t ),p oh taine~i, in accor.i--rce with, i1a1 cncernin-, the-Ain5 position of the matierials after coyrpletion of the reort.