ML13304A595
| ML13304A595 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 01/18/1980 |
| From: | Chandler L NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| To: | Raynard Wharton WHARTON & POGALIES |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8002050165 | |
| Download: ML13304A595 (4) | |
Text
January 18, 1980 Docket Nos. 50-361 OL 50-362 OL Richard J. Wharton, Esq.
Wharton and Pogalies 2667 Camino Del Rio South Suite 106 San Diego, CA 92108
Dear Mr. Wharton:
This is in reply to your letter of December 20, 1979, requesting that future meetings between the Applicants and Staff regarding the seismic design of San Onofre Units 2 and 3, be.held in California so that Intervenors may attend, and further requesting that a meeting between Intervenors and the Staff to discuss seismic design and "evacuation requirements" be arranged.
I have discussed your requests with the appropriate Staff members and have.
been advised that they are generally agreeable to both. With.respect to the meeting between Applicants and Staff, the meeting will not take place during the week of January 14th as initially thought, but,.rather, will likely.
occur at the end of February or in early March. This timeframe is based on Applicants submittal of responses to the Staff's latest questions on seismology, on or about February 15, 1980; a delay in that submittal would likely delay the meeting further. While the Staff is willing to conduct this meeting in Califor nia, its final decision must await a determination of the date and the manpower availability for-that date, taking into consideration the need for travel time and other Staff commitments. Assuming that these factors are.resolved favorably, the meeting would likely be held somewhere in Southern California.
The Staff is also generally agreeable tomeeting with Intervenors FOE et al.
to discuss seismic matters and emergency planning. We would, of course, like to schedule this meeting to coincide with the Staff's meeting with Applicants on seismic matters to minimize the.time away from the office involved. In regard to seismic matters, the Staff considers it imperative that, for such meeting to have a mutual benefit, Intervenors FOE et al. have a person quali-.
fied by education and experience on this subject attend on its behalf; please let me know who you will have attend. As with meetings between the Staff and Applicants, any meeting with.Intervenors FOE, et al. will be open to all interested persons, including the Applicants, who may attend and observe.
NC POM 318 (9-76), NRCM 0240
'u.G.
GOVRUNa PnRINTING O o
e -
s65 - 769
Docket Nos. 50-361 OL 50-362 OL Richard J. Wharton, Esq.,
Wharton and Pogalies 2667 Camino Del Rio South Suite 106 San Diego, CA 92108 Dear Mr.
rton:
This is in reply o your letter of Decembe 20, 1979, requesting that future meetings.between th Applicants and Staf regarding.'the seismic design of San Onofre Units 2 an 3, be held in Ca ifornia so that Int'ervenors may attend, and further requesting at a meeting etween Intervenors and the Staff to discuss seismic design an "evacuatio requirements" be arranged.
I have discussed your requests it the appropriate Staff members and have been advised that they are gener y agreeable to both. With respect to the meeting between Applicants an taff, the meeting will not take place during the week of January 14th ts in tially thought, but, rather, will likely occur-at the end of February o in ear March. This timeframe is based on Applicants submittal of respo ss to the taff's latest questions on seismology, abdhib=ehe -perie4A Februar 0 5, 1980; delay in that submittal would likely
- g delay the.meeting further.
e the Staff willing to conduct this meeting in.California, its final d cision-must await a determination of the date and the manpower availability for that date, taking nto consideration the need for travel time and other St ff commitments. Assumin that these factors are resolved favorably, the meeting would likely be he somewhere in Southern California.
The Staff is also ge erally agreeable to-meeting-with I tervenors FOE et al.
to discuss seismic atters and emergency planning. We w ld,'of course, like to schedule this m eting to coincide with the Staff's meet ng with Applicants on-seismic matter to minimize the time away from the offic involved. In regard toseismi matters, the Staff considers it imperative hat, for such meeting to.have a mutual benefit, Intervenors FOE et al. have person quali fied by educati n and experience on this subject attend on its half; leas let me know wh ou will have attend.
meeting with Interven OE, et al. will be open all interested qkwbr X including theA
.licants.*.
tan...
a a
fla
~
nn~
n'ttfl
.n-Vi PnT*NO oirPIC: 1970 - 1165 769
Docket Nos. 50-361 OL 50-362 OL Richard J harton, Esq.
Wharton and ogalies 2667 Camino Del Rio South Suite 106 San Diego, CA 92108
Dear Mr. Wharton:
This is in reply to your letter of December 20 1979, requesting that future meetings between the Applicants and' Staff re arding the seismic design of San Onofre Units 2 and "3, be held in California so that Intervenors may attend, and further requesting that a meeting between Intervenors and the Staff to discuss seismic design and "evacuation requirements" be arranged.
I have discussed your requests with the appropriate Staff members and have been advised that they are general~y agreeable to both.' With respect to the meeting between Applicaits and Staff, the meeting will not :take place during the week of January 14th as initially thought, but, rather, will likely occur at the end of February or in early March., This timeframe is based on Applicants submittal, of responses to the Staff's latest questions on seismology, within the period of February 8-15, 1980; a delay in'that submittal would likely delay the meeting furthr. While the Staff is willing to conduct this meeting in California, its final decisiod must await a determination of the date and the manpower availability for thai date, taking into consideration the need for travel time and other Staff commitments. Assuming that these factors are resolved favorab, the meeting would likely be held.somewhere in Southern California.
The Staff is also generally agreeabl to meeting with Intervenors FOE et al.
to discuss seismic matters and emergency planning. We would, of course, like to schedule this meeting to coincide with 'the Staff's meeting with Applicants.
on seismic matters to minimize the time away from the office involved. In regard to seismic matters, the Staff considers it imperative that, for such meeting to have a mutual benefit, Intervenors FOE et al. have a person quali fied by education and experience on this subject attend on its behalf; please let me know who you will have attend.
S S-e to ORK 316 (9.76) NRdM 0240 U..
ovIMaTnN-e PRNNG c:
a7e
-as7 5 - 789
-2 When the date, time and place for the Staff's meeting with the Applicants has been set, I will notify you so that you can make appropriate arrangements and we can schedule a meeting between Intervenor FOE et al. and the Staff.
Sincerely, Lawrence J. Chandler Counsel for NRC Staff DISTRIBUTION:
L.Chandler H.McGurren S.Treby HKS/TFE/ESC H.Rood 147-Phillips R.Baer 147-Phillips DScaletti, P-522 DSells, P-522 EXxXxx nxRhung~
D&SS ELD FF.(2)
Chron.
RSIAME 1
J~hadlerBa ol/ /79 SA~r RSL B DKuni iro PF OELD 0
~LWR-2 LWR-2 D
0U H ~~...........................................A k.o......... ga...
JiChandler:as SATrv HRood RBaer R
kson aga 01//
/79 01/../79 0
79 OAT~........
8...
0........
....... a.
1 MC PORM 318 (9Q.76do MILM 0240 V.6 GOVERNMGUNT PRINTING OPPICEZ: 1,978 - 26 5 -*760