Text

Attachment 3 - Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Clinton Power Station Plume Exposure Pathway and ETE Review Criteria Checklist
	ML13254A116
Person / Time
Site:	Clinton
Issue date:	09/05/2013
From:	; Exelon Generation Co
To:	; NRC/FSME, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	RA-13-085, RS-13-221, TMI-13-137
	Download: ML13254A116 (145)
	v • d • e

ATTACHMENT 3 Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Clinton Power Station Plume Exposure Pathway and ETE Review Criteria Checklist

Clinton Power Station ETE Review Criteria Checklist

Table B-1 ETE Review Criteria Checklist Clinton Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) 1.0 Introduction

a. The emergency planning zone (EPZ) and surrounding area should be described, yes Sect 1.2

b. A map should be included that identifies primary features of the site, including major roadways, significant topographical yes Figure 1-1, Figure 1-2 and Figure 4-1 features, boundaries of counties, and population centers within the EPZ.

c. A comparison of the current and previous ETE should be provided and includes similar information as identified in yes Table 1-3 Table 1-1, "ETE Comparison," of NUREG/CR-7002.

1.1 Approach

a. A discussion of the approach and level of detail obtained during the field survey of the roadway network should be yes Section 4.3 and Appendix C provided. __

b. Sources of demographic data for schools, special facilities,

,P large employers, and special events should be identified. yes Sect 2.1, Sect 2.2, Sect 3.3, and Sect 3.4

c. Discussion should be presented on use of traffic control plans in the analysis. yes Sect 2.1 and Sect 4.3

d. Traffic simulation models used for the analyses should be identified by name and version. yes Sect 5.5.2 and Table 1-3

e. Methods used to address data uncertainties should be described, yes Sect 3 (avoid double counts), App B (confidence level) 1.2 Assumptions

a. The planning basis for the ETE includes the assumption that the evacuation is ordered promptly and no early protective yes Sect 1.4, Sect 2.1, Sect 3, and Sect 5.4 actions have been implemented.

b. Assumptions consistent with Table 1-2, "General Assumptions," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided and yes Sect 2.1 include the basis to support their use.

1.3 Scenario Development

a. The ten scenarios in Table 1-3, Evacuation Scenarios, should be developed for the ETE analysis, or a reason yes Sect 2.4, Table 6-1, Table 6-2 should be provided for use of other scenarios.

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) 1.3.1 Staged Evacuation

a. A discussion should be provided on the approach used in development of a staged evacuation. yes Section 6.4. (Zone 1 extends to 5 miles.)

1.4 Evacuation Planning Areas

a. A map of the EPZ with emergency response planning areas yes Figure 1.1 and Figure 4-1 (ERPAs) should be included.

b. A table should be provided identifying the ERPAs considered for each ETE calculation by downwind direction yes Table 5-1 and Table 6-2 in each sector.

c. A table similar to Table 1-4, "Evacuation Areas for a Staged Evacuation Keyhole," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be N/A Section 6.4 (Zone 1 extends to 5 miles) provided and includes the complete evacuation of the 2, 5, and 10 mile areas and for the 2 mile area/5 mile keyhole evacuations.

2.0 Demand Estimation

a. Demand estimation should be developed for the four population groups, including permanent residents of the yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4 oo EPZ, transients, special facilities, and schools.

2.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. The US Census should be the source of the population values, or another credible source should be provided, yes Sect 2.1 and Sect 3

b. Population values should be adjusted as necessary for growth to reflect population estimates to the year of the ETE. yes 2010 Census released in Oct 2011 and is most recent

c. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1, "Population by Sector," of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the yes Figure 1-2 population distribution for permanent residents.

2.1.1 Permanent Residents with Vehicles

a. The persons per vehicle value should be between 1 and 2 or y justification should be provided for other values, yes Sect 3.1.1

b. Major employers should be listed. yes Table A-1 2.1.2 Transient Population

a. A list of facilities which attract transient populations should be included, and peak and average attendance for these yes Table A-2 and A-3 facilities should be listed. The source of information used to develop attendance values should be provided.

b. The average population during the season should be used, yes Sect 3.3

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (YeslNo) itemized and totaled for each scenario.

c. The percent of permanent residents assumed to be at yes Sect 3.3, Table A-1 and A-2 facilities should be estimated.

d. The number of people per vehicle should be provided.

Numbers may vary by scenario, and if so, discussion on why yes Sect 2.1, Sect 3.3, Tables A-i, A-2, A-3 values vary should be provided.

e. A sector diagram should be included, similar to Figure 2-1 of NUREG/CR-7002, showing the population distribution for yes Distribution by ERPA by scenario in Table 3-2 the transient population.

2.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Residents

a. The methodology used to determine the number of transit dependent residents should be discussed. yes Sect 3.1.2

b. Transportation resources needed to evacuate this group yes Sect 3.1.2, Sect 3.6, Table 3-5 should be quantified.

c. The county/local evacuation plans for transit dependent residents should be used in the analysis. yes Sect 3.1.2

d. The methodology used to determine the number of people

1. with disabilities and those with access and functional needs yes Sect 3.1.2 who may need assistance and do not reside in special facilities should be provided. Data from local/county registration programs should be used in the estimate, but should not be the only set of data.

e. Capacities should be provided for all types of transportation resources. Bus seating capacity of 50% should be used or yes Sect 2.1, Sect 3.1.2 justification should be provided for higher values.

f. An estimate of this population should be provided and information should be provided that the existing registration yes Sect 3.1.2 programs were used in developing the estimate.

g. A summary table of the total number of buses, ambulances, or other transport needed to support evacuation should be yes Table 3-5.

provided and the quantification of resources should be detailed enough to assure double counting has not occurred.

2.3 Special Facility Residents

a. A list of special facilities, including the type of facility, location, and average population should be provided. yes Table A-4, Table A-5 Special facility staff should be included in the total special

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) facility population.

b. A discussion should be provided on how special facility data yes was obtained. Sect 3.4

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided, yes Table A-4

d. An estimate of the number and capacity of vehicles needed to support the evacuation of the facility should be provided, yes Table A-4

e. The logistics for mobilizing specially trained staff (e.g.,

medical support or security support for prisons, jails, and N/A Sect 3.4.1, Sect 5.4.3 other correctional facilities) should be discussed when appropriate.

2.4 Schools

a. A list of schools including name, location, student population, and transportation resources required to support yes Sect 3.4.2, Table 3-3 & Table A-5 the evacuation, should be provided. The source of this information should be provided.

b. Transportation resources for elementary and middle schools yes Sect 3.4.2, Table A-5 w0 are based on 100% of the school capacity.

c. The estimate of high school students who will use their personal vehicle to evacuate should be provided and a basis yes Sect 3.4 Plans assume all students by bus for the values used should be provided.

d. The need for return trips should be identified if necessary. yes Sect 3.6 and Sect 6.7 (no return trips) 2.5.1 Special Events

a. A complete list of special events should be provided and includes information on the population, estimated duration, yes Sect 2.4.4 and season of the event.

b. The special event that encompasses the peak transient population should be analyzed in the ETE. yes Sect 2.4.4, Sect 6.5

c. The percent of permanent residents attending the event should be estimated. yes Sect 6.5 2.5.2 Shadow Evacuation

a. A shadow evacuation of 20 percent should be included for areas outside the evacuation area extending to 15 miles yes Figure 1-2 and Sect 3.1.1 from the NPP.

b. Population estimates for the shadow evacuation in the 10 to 15 mile area beyond the EPZ are provided by sector. yes Figure 1-2

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No)

c. The loading of the shadow evacuation onto the roadway network should be consistent with the trip generation time yes Sect 5 generated for the permanent resident population.

2.5.3

a. The Background and Pass Through volume of background traffic andTraffic pass-through traffic ye should be based on the average daytime traffic. Values may yes Sect 2.1 and Sect 4.3 be reduced for nighttime scenarios.

b. Pass-through traffic should be assumed to have stopped yes Sect 2.1 and Sect 4.3 entering the EPZ about two hours after the initial notification.

2.6 Summary of Demand Estimation

a. A summary table should be provided that identifies the total y populations and total vehicles used in the analysis for yes Table 3-1 thru 3-4; vehicle demand for shadow permanent residents, transients, transit dependent population is discussed in Section 3.1.1 residents, special facilities, schools, shadow population, and pass-through demand used in each scenario.

3.0 Roadway Capacity

a. The method(s) used to assess roadway capacity should be es discussed. ySect 4 3.1 Roadway Characteristics

a. A field survey of key routes within the EPZ has been conducted. yes Sect 4.1

b. Information should be provided describing the extent of the survey, and types of information gathered and used in the yes Sect 4.3 analysis.

c. A table similar to that in Appendix A, "Roadway Characteristics," of NUREG/CR-7002 should be provided, yes Appendix C

d. Calculations be provided,.efor a representative roadway segment should Appendix ppni C

e. A legible map of the roadway system that identifies node numbers and segments used to develop the ETE should be yes Map in Appendix C provided and should be similar to Figure 3-1, "Roadway Network Identifying Nodes and Segments," of NUREG/CR-7002.

3.2 Capacity Analysis

a. The approach used to calculate the roadway capacity for the es transportation network should be described in detail and ySect 4.3 and Appendix C

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) identifies factors that are expressly used in the modeling.

b. The capacity analysis identifies where field information should be used in the ETE calculation. yes Sect 4.3 3.3 Intersection Control

a. A list of intersections should be provided that includes the total numbers of intersections modeled that are yes Appendix C (Node Data Table) unsignalized, signalized, or manned by response personnel.

b. Characteristics for the 10 highest volume intersections within the EPZ are provided including the location, signal cycle yes Table 7-1 length, and turn lane queue capacity.

c. Discussion should be provided on how time signal cycle is used in the calculations. yes Sect 4.3 3.4 Adverse Weather

a. The adverse weather condition should be identified and the effect of adverse weather on mobilization should be yes Sect 2.4 considered.

b. The speed and capacity reduction factors identified in Table 3-1, "Weather Capacity Factors," of NUREG/CR-7002 yes Sect 2.4 should be used or a basis should be provided for other values.

c. The study identifies assumptions for snow removal on N/A Part of Protective Action Decision process streets and driveways, when applicable.

4.0 Development of Evacuation Times 4.1 Trip Generation Time

a. The process used to develop trip generation times should be yes Sect 5 identified.

b. When telephone surveys are used, the scope of the survey, area of the survey, number of participants, and statistical yes Appendix B relevance should be provided.

c. Data obtained from telephone surveys should be summarized, yes Appendix B

d. The trip generation time for each population group should be yes Sect 5 developed from site specific information.

4.1.1 Permanent Residents and Transient Population

a. Permanent residents are assumed to evacuate from their y homes but are not assumed to be at home at all times. Trip yes Sect 5.4.1

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) generation time includes the assumption that a percentage of residents will need to return home prior to evacuating.

b. Discussion should be provided on the time and method used to notify transients. The trip generation time discusses any yes Sect 5 difficulties notifying persons in hard to reach areas such as on lakes or in campgrounds.

c. The trip generation time accounts for transients potentially returning to hotels prior to evacuating, yes Sect 5

d. Effect of public transportation resources used during special events where a large number of transients are expected yes Sect 6.5 should be considered.

e. The trip generation time for the transient population should be integrated and loaded onto the transportation network yes Sect 5 with the general public.

4.1.2 Transit Dependent Residents

a. Ifavailable, existing plans and bus routes are used in theyeS ct53 a d et6.

ETE analysis. If new plans are developed with the ETE, they yes Sect 5.3 and Sect 6.8 "4 should have been agreed upon by the responsible authorities.

b. Discussion should be included on the means of evacuating ambulatory and non-ambulatory residents. yes Sect 5.3 and Section 6.8

c. The number, location and availability of buses, and other resources needed to support the demand estimation are yes Table 3-5 provided.

d. Logistical details, such as the time to obtain buses, brief drivers and initiate the bus route are provided. yes Sect 5.4.3, Sect 6.8

e. Discussion should identify the time estimated for transit dependent residents to prepare and then travel to a bus yes Sect 6.8; means of travel to pick up points not pickup point, and describes the expected means of travel to addressed. Transportation Assistance phone numbers the pickup point, provided for the public.

f. The number of bus stops and time needed to load passengers should be discussed. yes Sect 6.8

g. A map of bus routes should be included. N/A Existing plans do not include bus routes.

h. The trip generation time for non-ambulatory persons includes the time to mobilize ambulances or special yes Sect 5.3 and Section 6.8 vehicles, time to drive to the home of residents, loading time,

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) and time to drive out of the EPZ should be provided.

i. Information should be provided to support analysis of return yes Sect 6.8 (Return trips are not anticipated.)

trips, if necessary.

4.1.3 Special Facilities

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times should be provided, yes Sect 6.8

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound yes Sect 6.8 speeds.

c. The number of wheelchair and bed-bound individuals should be provided, and the logistics of evacuating these residents yes Sect 6.8 and Table A-4 should be discussed.

d. Time for loading of residents should be provided, yes Sect 6.8

e. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Sect 3.6 and Sect 6.8 Return trips are not anticipated trips are needed.

f. If return trips are needed, the destination of vehicles should N/A Sect 3.6 and Sect 6.8 Return trips are not anticipated be provided.

g. Discussion should be provided on whether special facility wo residents are expected to pass through the reception center yes Sect 5.4.3 prior to being evacuated to their final destination.

h. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the time elements for the return trips, yes Sect 6.8.

4.1.4 Schools

a. Information on evacuation logistics and mobilization times should be provided, yes Sect 6.8

b. Discussion should be provided on the inbound and outbound yes Sect 6.8 speeds.

c. Time for loading of students should be provided, yes Sect 6.8

d. Information should be provided that indicates whether the evacuation can be completed in a single trip or if additional yes Sect 3.6 and Sect 6.8 Return trips are not anticipated trips are needed.

e. If return trips are needed, the destination of school buses N/A Sect 6.8 should be provided. oup Sect 5.4

f. If used, reception centers should be identified. Discussion should be provided on whether students are expected to yes Sect 5.4.3 pass through the reception center prior to being evacuated

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (Yes/No) to their final destination.

g. Supporting information should be provided to quantify the N/A Sect 6.8 Return trips are not anticipated.

time elements for the return trips. N/_et68_euntiproatcptd 4.2 ETE Modeling

a. General information about the model should be provided yes Sect 5.5 and demonstrates its use in ETE studies.

b. If a traffic simulation model is not used to conduct the ETE calculation, sufficient detail should be provided to validate N/A Traffic simulation model used.

the analytical approach used. All criteria elements should have been met, as appropriate.

4.2.1 Traffic Simulation Model Input

a. Traffic simulation model assumptions and a representative Sect 5.5 set of model inputs should be provided. yes

b. A glossary of terms should be provided for the key performance measures and parameters used in the yes page v analysis.

4.2.2 Traffic Simulation Model Output

a. A discussion regarding whether the traffic simulation model 0w used must be in equilibration prior to calculating the ETE yes Sect 5.5 should be provided.

b. The minimum following model outputs should be provided to support review: yes Sect 6, Table 7-1,Appendix C and Appendix D

1. Total volume and percent by hour at each EPZ exit mode.

2. Network wide average travel time.

3. Longest Queue length for the 10 intersections with the highest traffic volume.

4. Total vehicles exiting the network.

5. A plot that provides both the mobilization curve and evacuation curve identifying the cumulative percentage of evacuees who have mobilized and exited the EPZ.

6. Average speed for each major evacuation route that exits the EPZ.

c. Color coded roadway maps should be provided for various times (i.e., at 2, 4, 6 hrs., etc.) during a full EPZ evacuation yes Appendix D scenario, identifying areas where long queues exist including level of service (LOS) "E" and LOS "F" conditions,

Criterion Addressed in Comments ETE Analysis (YesINo) if they occur.

4.3 Evacuation Time Estimates for the General Public

a. The ETE should include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent resident and transient yes Table 6-1 and Table 6-2 population.

b. The ETE for 100% of the general public should include all members of the general public. Any reductions or truncated yes Table 6-1 and Table 6-2 data should be explained.

c. Tables should be provided for the 90 and 100 percent ETEs similar to Table 4-3, "ETEs for Staged Evacuation Keyhole," N/A Zone 1 extends to 5 miles of NUREG/CR-7002.

d. ETEs should be provided for the 100 percent evacuation of special facilities, transit dependent, and school populations. yes Sect 6 5.0 Other Considerations 5.1 Development of Traffic Control Plans

a. Information that responsible authorities have approved the traffic control plan used in the analysis should be provided, yes Sect 7

b. A discussion of adjustments or additions to the traffic control yes Sect 7 C

plan that affect the ETE should be provided, 5.2 Enhancements in Evacuation Time

a. The results of assessments for improvement of evacuation time should be provided, yes Sect 7

b. A statement or discussion regarding presentation of enhancements to local authorities should be provided.

5.3 State and Local Review

a. A list of agencies contacted and the extent of interaction with yes Sect 2.2 these agencies should be discussed.

b. Information should be provided on any unresolved issues that may affect the ETE. yes No unresolved issues.

5.4 Reviews and Updates

a. A discussion of when an updated ETE analysis is required to yes Sect 6.6 be performed and submitted to the NRC.

5.5 Reception Centers and Congregate Care Center

a. A map of congregate care centers and reception centers should be provided. yes Host communities are shown in Figure 4-1

b. If return trips are required, assumptions used to estimate N/A Return trips are not anticipated.

Mretni times for buses should beDr~ovided __________ _____________________

.cIt..hV. uldbecl;ea. stated .. iti*

t assm at passengers

..are:teftat ,therebeption centera .aretakeh by separate yes Sect 3.1.2 busfestothi6e'.congregate6,are !center. _ _ __-_._'

Technical Reviewer \ate Z0\1 Supervisory Review &L-Pa U4-1-4ý Date

ýr 4.Zan

-b

.--.. .*. r.............-.

Clinton Power Station Evacuation Time Estimates

ARCADIS Infrastructure Water Environment Buildings Imagine the result Evacuation Time Estimates for Clinton Power Station Plume Exposure Pathway Emergency Planning Zone Prepared for:

Exelon Generation Warrenville, IL Prepared by:

ARCADIS U.S., Inc.

1 Executive Drive Suite 303 Chelmsford Massachusetts 01824 Tel 978.937.9999 Fax 978.937.7555 Our Ref.:

B0033739.0001 Date:

I August 2013

ARCADIS Executive Summary Executive Summary This report documents the Evacuation Time Estimate (ETE) study prepared by ARCADIS I for the Clinton Power Station (Clinton Station or CPS) in rural DeWitt County, Illinois, about 7 miles east of the city of Clinton. The study reflects the current definition of the I Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ), which is the region within a nominal 10-mile distance of CPS. The most recent previous study of evacuation time estimates for Clinton Station was performed in 2005. The present study was performed using population data from the 2010 census.

PTV VisionTM software was used to perform evacuation modeling for different scenarios.

The PTV Vision traffic simulation software package includes VISUM (macroscopic traffic simulation) and VISSIM (microscopic traffic simulation). VISUM is a comprehensive, flexible software system for transportation planning, travel demand modeling, and network data management. VISSIM is capable of performing detailed microscopic simulation of traffic and can model any type of traffic signal control and geometric configuration.

The road network used in the evacuation simulations consists of designated evacuation routes plus any additional roadways needed to accurately simulate conditions during an evacuation. Roadway capacities were determined using NAVTEQ TM digital data, updated by ARCADIS based on actual road and intersection data collected in the field in 2011.

Evacuees were generally assumed to proceed out of the EPZ via recommended evacuation routes and to make their way to designated reception centers after leaving the EPZ.

The EPZ for CPS includes parts of four counties in Illinois (DeWitt, Macon, McLean, Piatt).

The resident population of the Clinton EPZ is estimated at 12,511 permanent residents.

Based on housing data from the 2010 U.S. Census, there are fewer than 100 estimated seasonal (summer) residents in the EPZ. The 2010 U.S. Census data at block level was used to determine population in each EPZ Sub-Area.

The transient population, which includes larger workplaces, recreational facilities, and motels, was estimated at 3,325 persons for a winter weekday and 10,690 persons for a summer weekend day. The special facilities population, including nursing homes and hospitals, was estimated at 393 persons for weekday scenarios. The estimated population of schools and day care centers for a winter weekday is 2,560, including children and staff.

These population estimates include intrinsic double counting, as some persons in the transient and special facility populations are also included in the permanent and seasonal resident counts. Thus, evacuation times using these population figures are considered conservative.

E-1

Q ARCADIS Executive Summary Vehicle demand for the resident population was developed based on estimated vehicle occupancy, using data obtained from a telephone survey of EPZ residents. The vehicle occupancy factor estimated from survey responses is 1.86 persons per vehicle, which represents 1.30 vehicles per household. For the 2005 study, vehicle occupancy was 2.44 persons per vehicle (one vehicle per household).

Vehicle demand for the transient population was estimated using vehicle occupancy factors ranging from 1.0 person per vehicle for the workforce population up to 3.0 persons per vehicle for some recreational areas. Vehicle demand for the school population was based on bus occupancy of 55 students. For nursing homes, vehicle occupancy is 20 persons per bus or van for residents, and two persons per ambulance for non-ambulatory patients. For nights and weekends, all facility staff would accompany patients; during weekdays, one vehicle per person was assigned for additional staff. Total vehicle demand for all population categories ranges from 7,591 (winter weeknight) to 10,881 (summer weekday).

Vehicle demand was also assigned to account for the potential "shadow evacuation" of the population residing immediately outside the EPZ, to a distance of 15 miles. The permanent resident population within this region is 16,586. Itwas assumed that 20% of the population in this region would evacuate. The occupancy factor for EPZ residents (1.86 persons per vehicle) was applied to estimate vehicle demand for this population. Shadow evacuees residing outside the EPZ add vehicle demand of 1,783 vehicles.

Evacuation times were estimated for evacuation of the entire EPZ for winter weekday (daytime and evening), winter weekend day, summer weekday (daytime and evening), and summer weekend cases under fair weather conditions. The weekday daytime cases were also evaluated for adverse weather conditions (snow and rain, respectively, for winter and summer). The Clinton Apple & Pork Festival was included as a Special Event scenario.

Simulations were also performed to assess the potential impact of population growth on predicted evacuation times. This sensitivity analysis is used to define a threshold population figure that would trigger another ETE update study.

I Evacuation time estimates for 90% of vehicles to depart from the designated evacuation zone are summarized in Table E-1, for zone 1 (which encompasses the area out to 5 miles I from the plant) and for the full 10-mile EPZ. The 90% evacuation times for all scenarios are under 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months . The times to evacuate Zone 1 are 45 to 60 minutes shorter than times to evacuate the full EPZ. Results for "keyhole" evacuation scenarios (Zone 1 plus downwind zones to 10 miles) indicate that zone 7, which includes the city of Clinton, takes the longest time to evacuate. No significant traffic congestion in the EPZ is predicted for any scenarios.

The Apple & Pork Festival represents an estimated vehicle demand of up to 8,000 vehicles, in addition to normal weekend traffic. An estimated 4,500 vehicles will use remote parking E-2

0 ARCADIS Executive Summary areas in the city center and at the high school, on the southwest side of Clinton. These lots are served by trams and shuttle buses. During an emergency evacuation, up to 5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months would be required before all vehicles are able to depart from the remote lots. The estimated 90% ETE during the festival is 5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months 5 minutes, almost double the weekend day ETE of 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months 40 minutes. The ETE to evacuate 100% of the EPZ population during the festival is 11 hours1.273148e-4 days 0.00306 hours 1.818783e-5 weeks 4.1855e-6 months .

Table E-1: Evacuation Time Estimate Summary for Clinton Station EPZ Summer Winter Weekend Weekend Midweek Daytime Daytime I~Dytm MiweDDyieytime_

vening Midweek Daytime Daytime Evening Scenario: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)

Weather: Normal Adverse Normal Normal Normal Adverse Normal Normal Evacuation 90% Evacuation Time Area 2&5-mile Zone 2:30 2:40 2:40 2:20 2:25 2:50 2:35 2:25 10-mile EPZ 3:25 3:35 3:20 3:05 3:30 3:50 3:20 3:10 100% Evacuation Time 2&5-mile Zone I 4:00 4:15 4:00 4:00 4:05 4:35 4:00 4:10 10-mile EPZ 1 4:40 4:55 4:30 4:20 4:45 5:15 4:25 4:35 E-3

0 ARCADIS Table of Contents

1. Introduction 1-1 1.1 General 1-1 1.2 Site Location and Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) 1-2 1.3 Designated Reception Centers 1-3 1.4 Overview of Changes from Previous ETE Study 1-4

2. Methodology and Assumptions 2-1 2.1 Sources of Data and General Assumptions 2-1 2.2 Interaction with Agencies 2-4 2.3 Summary of Methodology for Traffic Simulation 2-4 2.4 Conditions Modeled 2-5 2.4.1 Week Day 2-5 2.4.2 Week Night 2-6 2.4.3 Weekend 2-6 2.4.4 Special Event Consideration 2-7 2.4.5 Sensitivity to Population Growth and Roadway Impact 2-7

3. Population and Vehicle Demand Estimation 3-1 3.1 Permanent Residents 3-1 3.1.1 Auto-Owning Permanent Population 3-2 3.1.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Population 3-2 3.2 Seasonal Residents 3-3 3.3 Transient Population 3-3 3.4 Special Facilities Population 3-4 3.4.1 Medical, Nursing Care and Correctional Facilities 3-4 3.4.2 Schools and Day Care 3-5 3.5 Emergency Response Planning Area Population Totals 3-5 3.6 Transportation Resources 3-6

4. Evacuation Roadway Network 4-1

ARCADIS Table of Contents 4.1 Network Definition 4-1 4.2 Evacuation Route Descriptions 4-1 4.3 Characterizing the Evacuation Network 4-1

5. Evacuation Time Estimate Methodology 5-1 5.1 Evacuation Analysis Cases 5-1 5.2 Initial Notification 5-2 5.3 Transportation Dependent Population 5-2 5.4 Evacuation Preparation Times and Departure Distributions 5-3 5.4.1 Permanent and Seasonal Population 5-3 5.4.2 Transient Population 5-4 5.4.3 Special Facilities 5-4 5.5 Evacuation Simulation 5-6 5.5.1 General Structure 5-6 5.5.2 Simulation Process 5-7

6. Analysis of Evacuation Times 6-1 6.1 Evacuation Time Estimate Summary 6-1 6.2 Comparison with Previous Study 6-1 6.3 All Conditions 6-1 6.4 Staged Evacuation Scenarios 6-1 6.5 Special Event - Apple & Pork Festival 6-2 6.6 Sensitivity to Population Growth and Roadway Impact 6-2 6.6.1 Population Growth 6-2 6.6.2 Roadway Impact 6-3 6.7 Performance Metrics for Simulation Model 6-4 6.8 ETE for Transit Dependent, Special Facilities and Schools 6-4

7. Traffic Control and Evacuation Confirmation 7-1 7.1 General 7-1 ii

ARCADIS Table of Contents 7.2 Evacuation Access Control Locations 7-1 7.3 Traffic Management Locations and Tactics to Facilitate Evacuation 7-1

8. References 8-1 Tables Table E-1: Evacuation Time Estimate Summary for Clinton Station EPZ E-3 Table 1-1: Permanent Resident Population in the Clinton Station EPZ 1-7 Table 1-2: Designated Reception Centers for Evacuation 1-8 Table 1-3: ETE Comparison 1-9 Table 3-1: Resident Population and Vehicle Demand by EPZ Subarea 3-6 Table 3-2: Transient Population and Vehicle Demand within the Clinton Station EPZ 3-7 Table 3-3: Population and Vehicle Demand for Schools and Special Facilities in the Clinton Station EPZ 3-8 Table 3-4: Summary of Population and Vehicle Demand within the Clinton Station EPZ 3-9 Table 3-5: Summary of Transportation Resources 3-10 Table 4-1: Clinton Station EPZ Primary Evacuation Routes Out of EPZ 4-3 Table 5-1: Potential Evacuation Areas for Clinton Station EPZ 5-2 Table 6-1: Evacuation Times for General Population (90%) 6-6 Table 6-2: Evacuation Times for General Population (100%) 6-7 Table 6-3: Summary of Network Performance (Full 10-mile EPZ, Winter Weekday, Normal Weather) 6-12 Table 6-4: ETE for Special Facilities, Clinton EPZ (Full 10-mile EPZ, Winter Weekday, Normal Weather) 6-12 Table 6-5: ETE for School and Daycare Facilities in Clinton EPZ (Full 10-mile EPZ, Winter Weekday, Normal Weather) 6-13 Table 7-1: Predicted Queuing at Intersections (Full 10-mile EPZ, Winter Weekday, Normal Weather) 7-2 iii

ARCADIS Table of Contents Figures Figure 1-1. Clinton Station EPZ Area 1-5 Figure 1-2. Resident Population by Sector within 15 Miles of Clinton Generating Station 1-6 Figure 4-1. Clinton Generating Station Evacuation Roadway Network 4-4 Figure 5-1. Departure Time Distributions for the Clinton Station EPZ 5-5 Figure 5-2. Evacuation Modeling and Simulation using PTV Vision Suite 5-6 Figure 6-1. Clinton Sensitivity of ETE to Population Growth (Winter Weekday, Normal Weather, Full EPZ) 6-8 Figure 6-2. Clinton Predicted Traffic Volume by Link with US 51 SB Link Removed (Summer Weekday, Normal Weather, Full EPZ) 6-9 Figure 6-3. Time Distribution of Vehicles on the Network (Full 10-mile EPZ, Winter Weekday, Normal Weather) 6-10 Figure 6-4. Comparison of Vehicle Mobilization and Departure Rates (total vehicles 9,234) 6-11 Appendices A Transient and Special Facility Population Data B Telephone Survey of EPZ Residents C Roadway Network Map and Data Table D Maps of Average Speed by Hour on Clinton Road Network (Winter Day, Normal Weather, Full EPZ) iv

CA ARCADIS Table of Contents List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ADT Average daily traffic BAO ESRI Business Analyst Online CPS Clinton Power Station EAS Emergency Alert System EPZ Exposure Pathway Emergency Planning Zone ERPA Emergency Response Protection Area ETE Evacuation time estimate GIS Geographic information system GPS Global Positioning System IEMA Illinois Emergency Management Agency IPRA Illinois Parks and Recreation Association LOS Level-of-service NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission PAR Protective Action Recommendation TAR Tone alert radios WC wheelchair V

Exelon Generation ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates

1. Introduction 1.1 General Evacuation time studies analyze the manner in which the population within the Plume Exposure Pathway Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) surrounding a nuclear power plant site would evacuate during a radiological emergency. Evacuation time studies provide licensees and State and local governments with site-specific information helpful for protective action decision-making. The studies estimate the time necessary to evacuate the EPZ for a range of evacuation scenarios. Analysis of the evacuation simulation results also identifies locations where traffic management and control measures can facilitate the evacuation, and may identify unique evacuation constraints or conditions.

Estimates of the time required to evacuate from areas around nuclear power plant sites are required for all operating plants in the United States. Federal guidance has been prepared to outline the format and content of these evacuation time estimates (NUREG-0654, Rev. 1 (Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), 1980), NUREG/CR-4831 (NRC, 1992) and NUREG/CR-7002 (NRC, 2011)).

Evacuation time estimate (ETE) studies were last updated for the Clinton Power Station (CPS) Plume Exposure Pathway EPZ in 2005 (Earth Tech, 2005). The guidance presented in NUREG/CR-7002 indicates that the evacuation time estimates should be updated as local conditions change, but at least once each decade, following release of the federal census. The current update study was prompted by the issuance of revised ETE guidance (CR-7002) and the availability of population data from the 2010 census.

Census data indicate that the population residing within the EPZ for CPS decreased by 319 between 2000 and 2010, which represents a 2.5% population change. (Population data are discussed further below in section 1.4.)

The evacuation time estimates have been developed using current population, local roadway network characteristics and the PTV VisionTM traffic simulation software package to perform evacuation modeling for different scenarios. PTV Vision includes the VISSIM (microscopic traffic simulation) and VISUM (macroscopic traffic simulation) models.

Evacuation times have been estimated for various areas, times and weather conditions, as outlined in CR-7002. These evacuation times represent the times required for completing the following actions:

0 Public notification; 1-1

Exelon Generation V2 ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates

" Preparation and mobilization; and

Actual movement out of the EPZ (i.e., on-road travel time, including delays associated with vehicle queuing).

1.2 Site Location and Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ)

This report describes the analyses undertaken, and the results obtained, in a study to I update the existing ETEs for CPS. The emergency response plan is designed to protect the health and safety of the public in the event that an evacuation is ordered as a protective action in response to an accident at CPS.

The Clinton Station site is located in Harp Township, DeWitt County, IL, about 7 miles east of Clinton, IL. The plant location is shown in Figure 1-1.

The plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone (EPZ) is the geographic area surrounding a nuclear power plant within which the NRC requires advance planning for evacuation or other short-term protective actions in the event of a radiological emergency.

The Clinton Station EPZ consists of the area within an approximate 10-mile radius of CPS. The EPZ includes part of four counties (DeWitt, Macon, McLean, Piatt). The Clinton Station EPZ is subdivided into a total of 8 Sub-Areas, or Emergency Response Protection Areas (ERPAs). These ERPAs are the basic units for which protective action recommendations are issued. Sub-Area boundaries often follow geographic (township) boundaries, and reflect distance and direction from CPS. The distance ranges of concern are 0-2 miles, 2-5 miles, and beyond 5 miles. EPZ and ERPA boundaries are shown in Figure 1-1. Most of the EPZ population resides in DeWitt County. ERPAs 2 and 3 extend into McLean County; ERPAs 3 and 4 extend into Piatt County; and ERPA 5 extends 1 mile into Macon County. The ERPAs are described in more detail in Section 3.

A listing of the 2010 permanent resident population by ERPA within the Clinton Station EPZ is shown in Figure 1-1. Table 1-1 compares the EPZ population from the 2010 and the 2000 census. The EPZ is largely rural and sparsely populated, with a total population of 12,511 residents. ERPA 7, which includes most of the city of Clinton, contains the majority of EPZ residents. The population residing in the EPZ declined by 319 between 2000 and 2010, a decrease of 2.5%. ERPA 7 lost 349 residents, while the adjacent ERPA 6 gained 220. The rest of the EPZ experienced a small net loss, with small gains or losses in individual ERPAs.

1-2

Exelon Generation V ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Clinton Lake, the cooling lake for CPS, extends east-west for 12 miles across the center of the EPZ from east to west. The area in the immediate plant vicinity is sparsely populated. ERPA 1, which contains CPS, has 1,649 residents. ERPA 1, the only Sub-Area within 5 miles of CPS, contains about 8% of the EPZ resident population. The zones beyond 5 miles contain over 90% of EPZ residents. Because of the small population and few roads within 5 miles of the plant, this area is defined as a single ERPA. It is not sub-divided into a 0-to-2 mile zone and surrounding 2-to-5 mile zones, as standard NRC guidance suggests.

NRC guidance also requires consideration of potential "shadow evacuation" of the population residing immediately outside the EPZ, to a distance of 15 miles. The estimated permanent resident population in the region surrounding the EPZ is 16,586.

The area is sparsely populated; the largest villages are LeRoy (pop. 3,560) and Heyworth (pop. 2,841), both in McLean County. Shadow evacuees residing outside the EPZ add vehicle demand of 1,783 vehicles. A map showing the population by distance and direction sector within 15 miles of Clinton Station is provided in Figure 1-2. (Due to roundoff errors that propagate when sector boundaries cut across census block boundaries, the population numbers disagree slightly between Figure 1-1 and Figure 1-2.

(Figure 1-1 is more accurate for the EPZ population.)

1.3 Designated Reception Centers The Clinton Station emergency response evacuation plan directs residents of communities within the EPZ to evacuate to specified reception centers. If evacuation is initiated while schools are in session, students will be transported directly to designated reception centers, and families are instructed to meet up with the students at those locations.

The designated receiving communities for ERPAs within the Clinton Station EPZ are Champaign, Decatur and Normal, IL. The preferred reception community for each ERPA is listed in Table 1-2. (Some ERPAs may evacuate differently, depending upon the prevailing wind direction.) The roadway network used to develop evacuation time estimates includes the major roadways recommended to the public as evacuation routes from individual communities to designated reception centers. The roadway network is designed to utilize all available major roadways, with traffic flow directed radially outward from CPS toward the EPZ boundaries. The roadway network is described in detail in Section 4.

1-3

Exelon Generation ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates 1.4 Overview of Changes from Previous ETE Study The changes in residential population within the EPZ are summarized in Table 1-1. The revised NRC guidance and newly acquired data led to a number of other changes in the ETE methodology and assumptions. Table 1-3 provides a summary comparing the main features and assumptions of the current study to the 2005 ETE study. The telephone survey of EPZ residents provides a new basis for estimating vehicle occupancy and departure times, while new NRC guidance has specified different assumptions regarding background and "shadow" traffic. The ETE methodology and assumptions for the current study are discussed in greater detail in following sections of the report.

The revised vehicle occupancy for residents (1.86 persons per vehicle, based on survey),

revised departure times for schools and special facilities (no "early warning") and the revised departure time curves for residents (based on survey responses and estimated time for warning diffusion) are expected to have the greatest influence on estimated evacuation times. The "shadow evacuation" adds vehicle demand of 1,783 vehicles in the area immediately outside the EPZ. Each of these issues is discussed in detail in following sections of the report.

1-4

SB Wilson Rutledge (52)

(55)

Rutledge (81)

Willson Rutledge (84)

Do Witt (114) 2010 ERPA Population Ci~ntonia (7832)

Har Do WItt (331) 1 2

1,649 207 DOWitt (34) 3 324 4 158 5 170 6 1,227 creak Nixon 7 7,832 (3*S7) (482) 8 944 TOTAL: 12,511 Texas (1227) creek (84) 0 2 4 Legend Miles X Clinton Plant Q ~ARICADIS EXO GEEATO

-88.834167 140.172083 DISTANCE POPULATION DISTANCE POPULATION EPZ 1 9 NA EPZ 2 59 NA EPZ 3 344 NA EPZ4 337 NA EPZ 5 311 NA EPZ 6 1,191 NA EPZ 7 4,279 NA EPZ 8 4,274 NA EPZ 9 778 OUT9 2 EPZ 10 533 OUT 10 90 EPZ 11 258 OUT 11 1,609 EPZ 12 109 OUT 12 4,720 EPZ 13 6 OUT 13 6,324 OUT 14 2,171 OUT 15 1,692 EPZTOTAL: 12,488 EPZ-15 TOTAL 16,608 TOTAL POPULATION: 29,096 NOTE:

EPZ total population varies from 2011 draft report totals by less than1% due to the rounding of population calculations from additional block processing.

Plant to 1 mile population not summarized in any sector direction OpeWsree IhUp5 so.rc: Arfl5 On,. Seno. A-o. 4

ý,Wg OW92*112.-

Am=005 ThW kA w w . wdWo n Oft - 00* POF RC

%~AIKAIS I EXLOGEEATO

Exelon Generation ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Table 1-1: Permanent Resident Population in the Clinton Station EPZ County Subdivision (township) Census 2000a_ 1Census Percent 2 0 1 0 b Change 1 (2-mi, 5-mi) Harp (all); Wilson, Rutledge, Creek, Nixon (part of each) 1,595 1,649 2 (10-mi) Wilson, Rutledge, Downs, Empire (part of each) 211 207 3 (10-mi) Rutledge, Empire, DeWitt, Santa Anna, Blue Ridge (part of each) 477 324 4 (10-mi) DeWitt, Santa Anna, Nixon, Goose Creek (part of each) 174 158 5 (10-mi) Creek, Nixon, Friends Creek (part of each) 181 170 6 (10-mi) Texas township (part) 1,007 1,227 7 (10-mi) Clintonia township 8,181 7,832 8 (10-mi) Wapella township 1,004 944 Clinton Station EPZ Total 12,830 12,511 -2.5%

Sources: a) 2000 census data from 2005 ETE study report b) 2010 census data (block level) 1-7

Exelon Generation ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Table 1-2: Designated Reception Centers for Evacuation ERPAs Receiving Community ERPA 1 Normal, Champaign, or Decatur.

ERPA 2 Normal or Champaign.

ERPA 3 Champaign.

ERPA 4 Champaign.

ERPA 5 Decatur.

ERPA 6 Decatur.

ERPA 7 Decatur or Normal.

ERPA 8 Normal.

1-8

Exelon Generation ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Table 1-3: ETE Comparison ETE Element 2005 ETE Study Current Study Permanent Residents

- Total population - 12,830 - 12,511

- Vehicle occupancy - 2.44 (one vehicle per - 1.86 (persons per vehicle) household).

Transit dependent Evacuation of transit dependent - 250 persons, 25 non-ambulatory

- Population estimate population was not addressed in 2 bes

- Number of buses 2005 study 11 buses

- Number of ambulances 5 ambulance, 5 wheelchair bus Transient facilities winter day/summer weekend) (winter day/summer weekend)

- Estimated population - 3,639/15,676 - 3,325/10,690

- Vehicle demand - 2,423/5,308 - 2,128/3,788

- Adjust for double-count - No adjustment - No adjustment Special facilities (winter weekday) (winter weekday)

- Estimated population - 308 - 393

- number bus, van - 14 bus/van - 12 bus/van

- Ambulance, other - 18 ambulance - 5 ambulances, 3 wheelchair bus Schools (winter weekday) (winter weekday)

- Population (includes staff) - 3,076 - 2,560 (day care included)

- Number of buses - 48 bus/van - 42 bus/8 van Background traffic None Average traffic by time of day Shadow evacuation None 20% of resident population outside (assumed basis) designated zones Special event(s) Apple & Pork Festival Apple & Pork Festival Scenarios Winter weekday - Weekday (winter, summer)

Winter weeknight - Weeknight (winter, summer)

Summer weekend - Weekend (winter, summer)

Both normal and adverse weather - Adverse weather weekday only for all three cases - Staged evacuation (weekday)

Adverse weather Snow for winter, rain for summer Snow for winter, rain for summer Evacuation model name NetVac2 PTV Vision VISUM 11.5, VISSIM 5.3 and version Departure times - Residential based on literature - Warning based on literature

- Transient based on literature - Residential based on survey

- Specials based on notification - Transient based on survey at alert - Specials notified with public Evacuation times Estimates provided for primarily Estimates provided for 90 and 100%

for 100%

1-9

Exelon Generation ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates

2. Methodology and Assumptions 2.1 Sources of Data and General Assumptions The following data sources were reviewed and assumptions made in order to develop the appropriate population and roadway databases used for the evacuation analysis:

Population estimates for permanent residents were developed from 2010 U.S.

Census Bureau data.

" Population estimates for seasonal residents were developed from 2010 United States Census Bureau data on housing units. Census data identify the number of seasonal housing units (vacant housing units for "seasonal or occasional use") at different geographic levels (e.g., by township, census tract, block group, block). A conservative estimate of seasonal population was developed by assigning six (6) persons per seasonal housing unit.

Population estimates for major employers were developed from ESRI list and the facility list from the 2005 study report. ARCADIS conducted internet searches and telephone surveys to estimate facility employment and staffing levels for different scenarios. Only facilities with potential staffing level of at least 50 persons per work shift were pursued.

" Information relating to hotels, motels and recreational facilities was obtained from tourism websites, 2011 AAA TourBook listings, and the 2005 study report. For parks, visitation information was obtained from state park agencies.

" Current population estimates for schools were obtained primarily from county emergency response agencies, plus enrollment information available on the internet.

Lists of hospitals, rest homes and incarceration facilities were obtained from each county emergency management agency.

The staffing levels at CPS reflect estimated peak personnel onsite during outage conditions. These data were provided by Exelon Generation.

2-1

Exelon Generation ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates

" Initial estimates of roadway characteristics were obtained from the NAVTEQ database. Roadway geometric and operational data were compiled based on field surveys performed by ARCADIS in 2011.

Average traffic volumes by time of day for weekday and weekend for designated evacuation routes were obtained from state and county transportation agencies.

These data were used to assign background traffic volumes for the roadway network. It was assumed that access control would be established within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months following the public notice to evacuate.

Preparation and mobilization times for the permanent resident population were developed based on the results of a telephone survey, combined with published time estimates for warning diffusion. The survey provided estimates of the time to depart from home following notification, and commuting times for household members who would return from work before departing. Median departure times for residents are longer than the times assumed in the previous study.

Departure times for transient facilities were estimated assuming relatively prompt evacuation of most workplaces and recreational facilities once notification is received. The distribution of departure times also reflects information gathered from the telephone survey of EPZ residents, as discussed in Section 3.

" The evacuation time estimates represent the time required to evacuate the Clinton Station EPZ and designated analysis areas and include the time required for initial notification.

I

Evacuation time estimates are presented for 90% and 100% of evacuating vehicles. It is assumed that all persons within the EPZ area will evacuate. For the 100% evacuation time, evacuation of the EPZ will be considered complete after all evacuating vehicles are outside of the EPZ or analysis area.

" The general public will evacuate using designated evacuation routes and will proceed to the reception centers listed in Table 1-2 after leaving the EPZ. When schools are in session, children attending school will be transported directly to designated reception centers.

" It is assumed that existing lane utilization will prevail during the course of the evacuation. Traffic control signals will be over-ridden or converted to flashing mode as necessary to give preference to flow on all major outbound roadways. It 2-2

Exelon Generation ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates is also assumed that State and municipal personnel will restrict unauthorized access into the EPZ, consistent with existing traffic management plans.

The evacuation analysis cases are described in Section 2.3 and represent a range of conditions, per guidance presented in CR-7002. These cases have been chosen to provide information for an appropriate range of conditions (i.e., low, typical and high population; fair and adverse weather) to guide the protective action decision-making process. Potential "special events" such as holiday parades and sporting events occurring within the EPZ were considered, based on input from state and county agencies. The Clinton Apple & Pork Festival was chosen for a Special Event scenario.

Vehicle occupancy rates used for the various population categories are as follows:

- Permanent residents - 1.86 persons per vehicle, based on telephone survey results

- Major places of employment - 1 vehicle per employee.

- Motels - 1 vehicle (1 to 2 persons) per occupied room.

- Recreational areas - 1 vehicle (3 persons) per campsite; 1.5 persons per vehicle at visitor centers and museums.

- Schools - 55 students and 3 staff per bus; one vehicle per additional staff person.

- Hospitals/Nursing Homes/Correctional Facilities - 2 persons per ambulance/medical van for non-ambulatory patients and 20 people per bus or van for ambulatory residents.

- Transit dependent general population - 20 persons per bus for ambulatory residents, 2 per ambulance or 3 per wheelchair (WC) bus/van for non-ambulatory.

The transit dependent population will be evacuated by bus or ambulance through efforts coordinated by state and municipal emergency preparedness officials.

2-3

Exelon Generation ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Adverse weather refers to moderate to heavy rainstorms for summer conditions, and a moderate snowstorm for winter conditions.

2.2 Interaction with Agencies Emergency management agencies responsible for planning and implementing the emergency response procedures during a radiological emergency were consulted during the development of this ETE study. The Illinois Emergency Management Agency (IEMA) and emergency agencies for DeWitt, Macon, McLean and Piatt Counties were contacted to obtain information regarding special and transient facilities in the EPZ, transportation resources available to evacuate special facilities, and the transit dependent general public. IEMA specifically recommended consideration of the Apple & Pork Festival as a Special Event; the Police Department of Clinton, IL provided information on attendance and traffic management for the festival. The Illinois Parks and Recreation Association (IPRA) list of special and transient facilities for all six Exelon nuclear stations in Illinois was provided to ARCADIS by Exelon. IEMA and the county agencies reviewed the draft report and the facility databases used in this study.

Representative background traffic volumes for the EPZ roadway network were obtained from state and county transportation agencies.

2.3 Summary of Methodology for Traffic Simulation The evacuation time estimates developed for the Clinton Station EPZ are based upon a time distribution of evacuation events as opposed to a summation of sequential events. This methodology assumes that the various time components in an evacuation (i.e., the time associated with preparation, mobilization, etc.) overlap and occur within certain time ranges. The time distribution approach is based upon assumptions consistent with the NRC guidance of CR-7002.

Trip generation times are used to develop vehicle loading curves for different population types within the permanent, transient, and special facility populations. A trip generation time consists of two main components: warning diffusion time and mobilization time. Warning diffusion time is the time it takes for people to receive an emergency notification. The type of warning systems employed in the EPZ, such as emergency alert system (EAS), sirens, and tone alert radios (TARs) affects the distribution of warning times. Availability of more waming systems leads to faster warning diffusion to the public.

2-4

Exelon Generation ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Mobilization time is the time between the receipt of notification and when individuals leave for evacuation. Mobilization time depends on the type of population and activity.

Warning diffusion time and mobilization time distributions are used to develop composite loading distribution or trip generation curves for different population segments. Trip generation times for transit dependent facilities, special facilities and schools were developed separately from those for the general public.

2.4 Conditions Modeled Pursuant to the guidance in CR-7002 and NUREG-0654, Rev. 1, evacuation time estimates have been prepared for a range of temporal, seasonal and weather conditions. Estimates have been prepared for weekday, weeknight and weekend scenarios during winter and summer. All scenarios are simulated with fair weather conditions; weekday scenarios are also simulated assuming adverse weather. Fair weather refers to conditions where roadways are clear and dry, and visibility is not impaired. Adverse weather during summer periods is defined as heavy rain, with impaired visibility; roadway capacities are reduced by 10% and speeds are reduced by 15%. Adverse weather during winter periods is defined as a snowstorm condition where roadway capacities and speeds are reduced by 15%.

The various population components which have been incorporated in the evacuation scenarios are summarized below:

2.4.1 Week Day This situation represents a typical weekday period with the work force is at a full daytime level. During winter, schools are in session. Vehicle demand estimates for weekday scenarios reflect the following conditions:

Most permanent residents within the EPZ will evacuate from their places of residence;

" Major work places are fully staffed at typical daytime levels;

CPS employment is at an estimated peak daytime level, representative of operation during outage conditions;

Schools and daycares are at current enrollment; 2-5

Exelon Generation ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates

Hospitals and nursing homes are at current enrollment or typical occupancy;

Motel facilities are occupied at peak (winter or summer) levels; and

Recreational facilities are at winter or summer weekday levels.

2.4.2 Week Night This situation reflects a typical night period when most permanent residents are home and the work force is at evening shift level. Assumptions on the population levels for this condition include the following:

Permanent residents within the EPZ will evacuate from their places of residence;

Major work places are at typical evening levels;

CPS employment is at an estimated peak night-time level; and

" Day schools and daycares are closed;

" Hospitals and nursing homes are at current enrollment or typical occupancy, and staffing is at typical night-time levels;

Motel facilities are occupied at (winter or summer) weekday levels; and

Recreational facilities are at typical (winter or summer) evening levels.

2.4.3 Weekend The weekend scenario represents a daytime period when most residents are at home and major work places are at typical weekend levels. Assumptions on the population levels for this condition include the following:

Residents within the EPZ will evacuate from their places of residence;

Major work places are at typical weekend levels;

" Day schools and daycares are closed; 2-6

Exelon Generation Va ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates

Hospitals and nursing homes are occupied and staffed at weekend levels;

Motel facilities are occupied at weekend (winter or summer) levels; and

Recreational facilities are at (winter or summer) weekend levels.

2.4.4 Special Event Consideration Based on discussions with the Illinois Emergency Management Agency and county agencies, the event that draws the largest traffic volume and poses the greatest challenge for evacuation of the EPZ for the Clinton EPZ was identified as the Apple &

Pork Festival, which is held every September in the city of Clinton. A Special Event scenario based on the summer weekend scenario was developed to assess evacuation times for this event. Details are discussed in Section 6.5.

2.4.5 Sensitivity to Population Growth and Roadway Impact Additional scenarios were evaluated to assess the sensitivity of ETEs to population growth and roadway impact. These sensitivity cases used the Summer Weekday, Normal Weather case for the Full EPZ as the base case. The population growth analysis is used to determine how rapidly the ETE would increase as the resident population in the EPZ is increased.

For the roadway impact scenario, a major evacuation route is removed or reduced in capacity. Specifically, one of the five highest volume roadways is removed from service, or capacity is reduced by one lane (for a multi-lane, limited-access roadway such as an interstate highway). A more detailed description of the sensitivity analysis is provided in Section 6.6.

2-7

Exelon Generation ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates

3. Population and Vehicle Demand Estimation The development of vehicle demand estimates for the Clinton Station EPZ consisted of two primary steps. The first step was the determination of the number and distribution of the population to be evacuated. The second step was the determination of the appropriate number of vehicles for each of the population categories. Federal guidance (CR-7002) indicates that three population categories should be considered:

permanent residents, transients, and persons in schools and special facilities (such as medical facilities/ nursing homes, and day care facilities).

The methodology used to develop the total population and vehicle demand estimates within the Clinton Station EPZ incorporates intrinsic double counting. For example, a portion of the identified employees and visitors to recreational areas are also permanent residents within the EPZ. In addition, school children are counted in the resident population, but are also counted in the special facility population. While population and vehicle demand estimates incorporate some adjustments for double-counting, the estimates are considered to be conservative (i.e., they over-estimate actual population and vehicle levels which may be in the area at any given time).

Population and vehicle demand estimates for each of the population categories are summarized below.

3.1 Permanent Residents Permanent residents are those persons identified by the census as having a permanent residence within the EPZ. The Census 2010 population data for census tracts, block groups and blocks were used to determine the permanent resident population within the EPZ and within each municipality and Sub-Area. The allocation of the resident population to entry nodes on the roadway network was based on detailed census block maps.

An estimated 12,511 persons reside permanently within the Clinton Station EPZ.

Table 3-1 presents the resident population and vehicle demand by Sub-Area. The EPZ Sub-Areas are defined based on distance and direction from CPS, and generally follow geographic (township) boundaries. The 5-mile ERPA 1 consists of Harp Township, plus parts of five adjacent townships in DeWitt County. The 10-mile ERPA 2 includes part of Wilson and Rutledge Townships, plus part of Downs and Empire Townships in McLean County. ERPA 3 includes part of five townships in three counties. ERPA 4 includes the southeast corner of DeWitt County, and extends south and east into Piatt County. ERPA 5 includes part of Nixon and Creek Townships, and a one-mile wide strip in Macon County. ERPAs 6, 7 and 8 form the west side of the 3-1

Exelon Generation ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates EPZ. The city of Clinton, in ERPA 7, is the only significant municipality in the EPZ.

Over 90% of the population resides more than 5 miles from CPS.

A telephone survey of EPZ residents was conducted to obtain information relating to how many vehicles residents would use to evacuate and how long it would take them to depart following notification. The survey questionnaire and a summary of survey results are provided in Appendix B.

3.1.1 Auto-Owning Permanent Population Vehicle demand associated with the permanent resident population was estimated based on telephone survey responses. After adjusting survey results to reflect the age distribution of the EPZ, the estimated occupancy factor is 1.86 persons per vehicle, which corresponds to 1.30 vehicles per household. Total vehicle demand for EPZ residents for all scenarios is 6,726. "Shadow evacuation" of 20% of the population residing outside the EPZ within 15 miles of CPS adds vehicle demand of another 1,783 vehicles.

For the 2005 ETE study, evacuation times were determined for vehicle demand assumption of one vehicle per household, or 2.44 persons per vehicle, for permanent residents.

3.1.2 Transit Dependent Permanent Population Emergency response plans specify that the transit dependent population will receive transportation assistance. Provisions for evacuating transit-dependent members of the general population in Illinois do not rely on published pickup points and bus routes.

County emergency response planners maintain lists of residences (self-identified) requiring transportation assistance. For ETE analysis, the estimated size of the transit-dependent population was based on NRC guidance and results of the telephone survey. The NRC guidance in CR-7002 sets a target range between 1.5% and 5%.

That population size is much higher than the number who have self-identified in advance. Based on telephone survey results, about 4% of households (with phones) had either no vehicle or no licensed driver. NRC guidance (CR-7002) indicates that up to half of residents without an available vehicle plan to evacuate with friends or neighbors. ETE estimates are based on evacuation of 250 transit dependent residents, representing 2% of the population. Based on estimates provided by county agencies, this population includes up to 25 non-ambulatory residents.

3-2

Exelon Generation V2 ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Individuals requiring transit from reception centers to congregate care centers will be transported in a separate set of vehicles from those designated to transport the transit dependent and special facilities out of the EPZ.

3.2 Seasonal Residents The seasonal population category addresses those who reside in the EPZ on a temporary basis, particularly during the summer period. The 2010 U.S. Census of Population and Housing reports the number of vacant households classified as "for seasonal or occasional use". Census data identified less than 50 such housing units in the Clinton Station EPZ, and less than 10 in any ERPA. These low numbers indicate that the number of seasonal residents in the Clinton EPZ is not significant, relative to the permanent resident population.

3.3 Transient Population The transient population segment includes persons in the work force, hotels/motels, and recreational areas. Regional maps and mapping software were used to determine facility locations and assign entry nodes. Significant employers within the EPZ were identified using ESRI Business Analyst Online (BAO). BAO is a web-based analytical and mapping tool that facilitates location-specific queries about business and demographic data. Data available on BAO includes information on business location and number of employees. ESRI extracts business data from a comprehensive list of businesses (over 12 million U.S. businesses) licensed from Infogroup. ARCADIS used BAO to search for all employers with 50 or more employees located within an 11-mile radius of CPS. CR-7002 recommends consideration of "large employers" with 50 or more employees on a single shift.

The list from BAO was screened to eliminate businesses where workers do not remain on-site (e.g., transportation and trucking companies, construction, realtors, home health care). Employment at schools and special facilities (e.g., hospitals, nursing homes) is generally tracked as part of the special facilities database. The reduced list was then reviewed to exclude facilities located outside the EPZ, and to determine the ERPA for those located in the EPZ. The new list of employers was compared to the list from the 2005 study and the IPRA Special Facilities list provided by IEMA.

Telephone calls were made to selected large employers to verify employment numbers and to estimate staffing levels during weekday, weeknight and weekend periods. The results from those calls confirmed that BAO listings provided accurate locations and current, reliable employment numbers for most establishments. Workforce numbers for 3-3

Exelon Generation V ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates CPS were provided by Exelon Generation and reflect the peak work force during outage conditions.

Numbers of units and campsites for motels and recreational areas were obtained from the TripAdvisor website, the 2011 AAA TourBook for Illinois, and from state and county tourism websites. Seasonal occupancy was estimated based on capacity figures (e.g.,

number of campsites) and a telephone survey of selected facilities. State and local parks agencies also provided visitation numbers for parks and campgrounds.

For purposes of estimating the total number of vehicles associated with the transient population segment, an occupancy factor of 1.0 employee per vehicle was used for most work places. For the hotel/motel and recreational populations, it was assumed I that there would be 1.0 vehicle (1 to 2 persons) per hotel/motel unit, and 1.0 vehicle (3 to 4 persons) per campsite. For parks, visitation numbers were generally obtained as numbers of vehicles, and an occupancy factor of 3.0 persons per vehicle was assumed. For museums and visitor centers, 1.5 persons per vehicle was assumed.

Campgrounds were assumed to be fully occupied during summer. Motels were assumed to be fully occupied for all scenarios.

Table 3-2 presents a summary of the transient population by Sub-Area for each scenario. The largest employer in the Clinton EPZ is Exelon (at CPS), and recreational facilities center around Clinton Lake. ERPA 1 therefore has the largest population and vehicle demand from transient facilities. Population data and vehicle demand estimates for the transient population segment, including the work force, hotels and motels, and recreational areas are presented by facility in Appendix A.

3.4 Special Facilities Population The special facility population segment includes persons in schools, hospitals, nursing homes and correctional facilities who will require transportation assistance during an evacuation. Most of these facilities are located in Clinton (ERPA 7 and 6). The special facilities population is summarized by ERPA in Table 3-3, with data by facility in Appendix A.

3.4.1 Medical, Nursing Care and Correctional Facilities One hospital, two nursing homes and one home for the developmentally disabled are located in the EPZ. The DeWitt County jail is also located in Clinton. Vehicle occupancy for nursing home patients is two non-ambulatory patients and one staff per I ambulance, 3 patients and 1 staff per WC bus, 20 residents or patients plus 3 staff per 3-4

Exelon Generation Va ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates vehicle (bus or van) for ambulatory patients, plus one vehicle per staff person who does not evacuate with patients. Prisoners will evacuate via bus (20 prisoners and 2 guards per bus).

3.4.2 Schools and Day Care Eight (8) public schools, one private school and three pre-school/daycare facilities have been identified within the Clinton Station EPZ, with a total population of 2,426 students and staff. None of the identified schools is residential, so students are only present on weekdays during the school year. Vehicle occupancy for public schools is based on 58 persons (55 students, 3 staff) per bus, plus one vehicle per additional school staff.

Student population for public schools was determined from state-published enrollment information.

Three licensed child care (large daycare) facilities were identified in the EPZ, with an estimated daytime population of 134. Facilities were identified from internet listing of licensed childcare establishments. The population estimates represent the licensed capacity of each facility. Smaller home-based daycare facilities (capacity 10 or less) were not tabulated; those facilities contribute little vehicle demand beyond that assigned to EPZ residents.

3.5 Emergency Response Planning Area Population Totals Population and vehicle demand totals for each Sub-Area are summarized in Table 3-4.

The totals listed in the table represent the peak number of people to be evacuated for each analysis case discussed in Section 6 of this report.

The largest population and vehicle demand in the Clinton Station EPZ are located in ERPA 1 and 7 for all cases. As noted above, ERPA 1 has the highest population and vehicle demand for transient facilities, while ERPA 7 has the most permanent residents and special facilities. The differences in vehicle demand between the Weekday, Weeknight and Weekend scenarios (summer and winter) are relatively large, reflecting the dominant role of recreation (summer peak) for this EPZ. Total vehicle demand for the EPZ is 50% higher for the summer weekday scenario, compared to the winter weekend scenario. The vehicle demand listed in Tables 3-2, 3-3 and 3-4 reflects the data used as input for the ETE traffic simulations.

3-5

Exelon Generation ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates 3.6 Transportation Resources The estimated inventory of transportation resources available to support evacuation of special facilities and residents for the Clinton EPZ was determined from information provided by county agencies, plus data developed by surveying school systems, transportation companies and EMS providers in the surrounding region. Identified transportation resources are summarized and compared to identified vehicle demand in Table 3-5. The number of available vehicles in each category (bus, WC bus or van, ambulance) is more than sufficient to evacuate facilities and EPZ residents in a single wave.

Table 3-1: Resident Population and Vehicle Demand by EPZ Subarea Perma~nent Vehilel Sub-Area Distan~ce Resident Dmn

___________Population 1 2- and 5-mile 1,649 887 2 10-mile 207 111 3 10-mile 324 174 4 10-mile 158 85 5 10-mile 170 91 6 10-mile 1,227 660 7 10-mile 7,832 4,211 8 10-mile 944 508 EPZ total 12,511 6,726 3-6

ARCADIS Exelon Generation Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Table 3-2: Transient Population and Vehicle Demand within the Clinton Station EPZ Population Vehicles Sub-Area Winter Summer Winter Summer Day Night Weekend Day Night Weekend Day Night Weekend Day Night Weekend 1 2,275 625 1,630 6,085 2,110 8,065 1,425 355 585 2,695 850 2,730 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 150 0 450 45 0 45 50 0 150 15 0 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 300 228 600 1,410 816 1,710 100 76 200 500 272 600 7 600 412 337 750 525 450 553 353 278 603 378 303 8 0 0 0 420 420 420 0 0 0 140 140 140 EPZ total 3,325 1,265 3,017 8,710 3,871 10,690 2,128 784 1,213 3,953 1,640 3,788 3-7

Q ARCADIS Exelon Generation Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Table 3-3: Population and Vehicle Demand for Schools and Special Facilities in the Clinton Station EPZ Population Vehicles Sub-Area Winter - umme Winter Summer SDay Night Weekend iDay:.. Night Weekend Day Night Weekend Day Night Weekend 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 88 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 2,865 287 287 507 283 283 502 81 81 202 81 81 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EPZ total 2,953 287 287 507 283 283 512 81 81 202 81 81 3-8

0 ARCADIS Exelon Generation Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Table 3-4: Summary of Population and Vehicle Demand within the Clinton Station EPZ Population Vehicles Sub-Area Winter Summer Winter Summer

____Day Night Weekend 'Day Night Weekend Da Nih Weekend Day. Night Weekend 1 3,924 2,274 3,279 7,734 3,759 9,714 2,312 1,242 1,472 3,582 1,737 3,617 2 207 207 207 207 207 207 111 111 111 111 111 111 3 474 324 774 369 324 369 224 174 324 189 174 189 4 246 158 158 158 158 158 94 85 85 85 85 85 5 170 170 170 170 170 170 91 91 91 91 91 91 6 1,527 1,455 1,827 2,637 2,043 2,937 760 736 860 1,160 932 1,260 7 11,297 8,531 8,456 9,089 8,640 8,565 5,266 4,645 4,570 5,015 4,670 4,595 8 944 944 944 1,364 1,364 1,364 508 508 508 648 648 648 EPZ total 18,789 14,063 15,815 21,728 16,665 23,484 9,366 7,591 8,020 10,881 8,447 10,595 Population numbers reflect some double-counting between categories (residents, workforce, schools, etc.).

3-9

0 ARCADIS Exelon Generation Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Table 3-5: Summary of Transportation Resources County or Municipality Bus Van WC Bus/Van Ambulance DeWitt County 23 9 1 4 Decatur 86 6 12 Champaign 10 Bloomington 185 27 7 Total Available 294 9 34 33 Identified Vehicle Need Schools and Day Care 42 8 Special Facilities 12 3 5 Transit Dependent Public 11 5 5 Total Identified Need 65 8 8 10 3-10

ARCADIS Exelon Generation Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates

4. Evacuation Roadway Network 4.1 Network Definition In order to estimate evacuation times for the Clinton Station EPZ, an evaluation of the roadway network likely to be used by departing vehicles was undertaken. ARCADIS relied on several sources of information to define the evacuation roadway network:

" Evacuation routes described in the existing State emergency response plan;

Maps of highways and local roadways for the EPZ area;

A field survey of the roadways in the Clinton Station EPZ.

The primary evacuation routings used in the modeling are indicated in Figure 4.1.

4.2 Evacuation Route Descriptions The evacuation routings were developed to simulate travel out of the EPZ using available roadways. The network relies primarily on the evacuation routings depicted in the public information brochure. Descriptions of the primary evacuation routes for different geographic areas within the EPZ are outlined in Table 4-1.

4.3 Characterizing the Evacuation Network Roadway characteristics such as roadway class, number of lanes, lane and shoulder width, speed limit, lane configuration near intersections, and traffic control are key factors in determining how fast an evacuation can be completed. These roadway attributes control roadway capacity, which in turn governs operating traffic conditions measured in terms of level-of-service (LOS). LOS is measured from A to F for roadway segments and intersections. LOS A represents free-flow conditions, and LOS F represents force or breakdown flow conditions.

ARCADIS used NAVTEQTm roadway data with detailed information, including local streets, to build the evacuation roadway network for the study. NAVTEQ data was imported into geographic information system (GIS) software (ESRI ArcGIS TM ) for conducting field surveys to verify evacuation roadway segment attributes. The information provided in the public information brochure for the site was used to highlight evacuation routes in GIS. ARCADIS has developed an integrated GIS-Global 4-1

ARCADIS Exelon Clinton Generation Station Evacuation Time Estimates Positioning System (GPS) tool that allows field personnel to record observations in an efficient and effective manner. The evacuation network, including traffic controls, was verified to a 15-mile radius from the plant, and along designated routes to the receptions centers. Once the NAVTEQ data was verified through the field survey, the evacuation roadway network was transferred to the traffic simulation software VISUM for modeling different evacuation scenarios.

Having accurate traffic control information is important to accurately estimate evacuation times because intersections have potential to create bottleneck points.

During an evacuation scenario, intersections might be manually controlled by officials, operated with existing traffic signal timing plans, or adjusted according to changing I vehicular demand. In general, the emergency response plans for Clinton Station call for signal override, i.e., signals set to flashing to give priority to outbound travel on designated evacuation routes. Traffic control information is coded as part of the evacuation network database.

Background and pass-through traffic in the EPZ could account for significant number of vehicles and could influence evacuation depending on the direction of travel. As recommended in CR-7002, average daily traffic (ADT) volumes, representative of typical background levels, were obtained from state and county transportation agencies. During the simulations, background traffic will be included during the initial 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months of the evacuation scenario, up to the time when access control is established to prevent vehicles from entering the EPZ.

A map of the evacuation network showing node numbers and links, as recommended by the latest guidance, is provided in Appendix C. Detailed attributes of each roadway segment, such as link number, number of lanes, speed limit, length, and roadway type are also tabulated in Appendix C, and traffic controls are listed for each intersection.

4-2

Exelon Generation ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Table 4-1: Clinton Station EPZ Primary Evacuation Routes Out of EPZ EPZ Sub-Areas Evacuation Routes ERPA 1: (0-5 mi) Co. Hwy. 10 West to US 51 North or IL 54 West to US 51 North to Normal; IL 54 East to 1-74 East to Champaign; Co. Hwy. 15 West to US 51 South to Decatur.

ERPA 2 US 136 West to US 51 North to Normal; US 136 East to 1-74 East to Champaign.

ERPA 3 US 136 East to 1-74 East, or IL 54 East to 1-74 East, or IL 10 East to Champaign.

ERPA 4 IL 10 East to Champaign.

ERPA 5 US 51 South or IL 48 South to Decatur.

ERPA 6 US 51 South to Decatur.

ERPA 7 US 51 South to Decatur; US 51 North to Normal.

ERPA 8 US 51 North to Normal.

4-3

IN-- - Mc C.-i,,

2Ontv De,V.- C -t Waynesvllle To ChMP14" Legend Station Location A Reception Community Emergency Evacuation Route

[] ERPA Division Interstate & US Highways 7/I 7b Ctuuspatgn

-- Major Roads Minor Roads 5 10 Cisco I I MUM IVesdale I EXELON GEN CLINTON GENERATING STATION EVACUATION ROADWAY NETWORK Path:U: pWQM*MPAZMZU~Ov WnRawyNhk U:Wp*ýZ.OW.AdpD.M2O2

ARCADIS Exelon Generation Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates

5. Evacuation Time Estimate Methodology 5.1 Evacuation Analysis Cases Time estimates have been prepared for a general evacuation scenario for each of these analysis cases:

Winter Weekday, Fair Weather and Adverse Weather Conditions

Winter Weeknight, Fair Weather Conditions

Winter Weekend, Fair Weather Conditions

Summer Weekday, Fair Weather and Adverse Weather Conditions

Summer Weeknight, Fair Weather Conditions

Summer Weekend, Fair Weather Conditions Areas for evacuation are selected based on the "keyhole" configuration (0-2 mile zone plus 2-5 mile or 0-5 mile plus 5-10 mile downwind zone). The partial-EPZ evacuation areas for CPS are reproduced in Table 5-1, based on the Protective Action Response (PAR) chart. Separate simulations may not be necessary for each of the areas listed in Table 5-1. ETE estimates will generally be controlled by whether one or two critical Sub-Areas (e.g., ERPA 7) are included. Enough cases will be run to ensure that representative ETE estimates are obtained for all potential scenarios.

For all partial-EPZ evacuation cases, "shadow" vehicle demand (20% of residents) is assigned to all Sub-Areas which are not included in the evacuation region, in addition to the region outside of the EPZ.

Time estimates were also determined for a Special Event scenario, the Apple & Pork Festival, as discussed below in Section 6.5. For this scenario, the entire EPZ evacuates, with vehicle demand from the Festival added to the Summer Weekend case.

5-1

Exelon Generation V2 ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Table 5-1: Potential Evacuation Areas for Clinton Station EPZ Distance Wn Directio Z~one 02) Zonies (2-5) Zones (5-10)

(from) __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

0 - 2 mile All 1 1 0 - 5 mile All 1 1 0- 10 mile 021 to 048 1 1 5,6 049 to 066 1 1 6 067 to 090 1 1 6,7 091 to 094 1 1 7 095 to 132 1 1 7,8 133 to 157 1 1 8,2 158 to 196 1 1 2 197 to 228 1 1 2, 3 229 to 251 1 1 3 252 to 281 1 1 3, 4 282 to 308 1 1 4 309 to 338 1 1 4,5 339 to 020 1 1 5 Entire EPZ All 1 1 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 5.2 Initial Notification The EPZ surrounding CPS has an outdoor siren notification system consistent with the requirements of NUREG-0654, Rev. 1/FEMA-REP-1 Appendix 3. This system will be used by state and local officials to alert the population to turn on their radios and television sets. Pursuant to NUREG 0654, Rev. 1 guidance, notification messages will commence on the designated television and Emergency Alert System (EAS) radio stations concurrent with sounding of the sirens. Within 15 minutes of alert notification, essentially all of the population within the EPZ will begin to receive an informational or instructional message. If evacuation is deemed necessary, the timing of the order to evacuate and notification measures will be controlled by the state and local emergency preparedness officials. Those officials may choose to alert and mobilize an emergency response work force to control and expedite evacuation prior to the evacuation order.

5.3 Transportation Dependent Population The transportation dependent population includes individuals without access to transportation, as well as those requiring special transportation assistance.

5-2

SARCADIS Exelon Generation Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Transportation dependent persons will be notified of a protective action recommendation in the same manner as the general public. If evacuation is recommended, persons needing transportation assistance will be informed through the EAS to contact the appropriate officials for assistance. Evacuees who do not have access to transportation and confined persons who require special transportation assistance will be provided transportation by the appropriate agency.

5.4 Evacuation Preparation Times and Departure Distributions It is assumed that no vehicles will begin to evacuate during the 15-minute initial notification period. Accordingly, in the model simulations, vehicles will begin to evacuate at 15 minutes following the initial notification. After the initial 15-minute time period, vehicles are loaded at a linear rate over each 5-minute time interval, in accordance with the network loading distributions for each population type. For I example, if 2% of 2500 vehicles (50 vehicles) are to be loaded at a specific location over a 5-minute period, PTV Vision will load 10 vehicles per minute at that location during the specified interval. Network loading distribution assumptions for the permanent population, transient population, and special facilities are based on the anticipated response of different population sectors to an evacuation order.

Mobilization times for residents and workers reflect the data acquired by the telephone survey of EPZ residents, and are consistent with published data from actual historical events (ORNL, 1990). Loading distributions are explained below, and summarized in Figure 5-1.

5.4.1 Permanent and Seasonal Population Permanent and seasonal residents with access to automobiles will take varying amounts of time to begin evacuating. Some persons will leave as quickly as possible; most will take some time to prepare, pack valuables and clothes and then depart; some will take added time to secure property before departing; and some may require transportation assistance. In addition, actual departure and preparation times may vary according to the perceived severity of a particular evacuation order.

Based upon these factors, it was assumed that there would be a period of up to 3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months over which the permanent residents would begin to evacuate. That is, permanent resident households would begin to evacuate between 15 and 180 minutes after the decision to notify the population to evacuate is made. Based on estimated warning diffusion and survey results from EPZ residents, during a weekday, 50% would depart within 75 minutes, 90% within 110 minutes, and 99% within 180 minutes. At night, with 5-3

ARCADIS Exelon Generation Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates most household members at home, 50% would depart within 60 minutes, 90% within 95 minutes, and 99% within 165 minutes. These time profiles are generally consistent with observed behavior during evacuations for chemical releases.

5.4.2 Transient Population It was assumed that the work force would be subject to the same warning diffusion as the general public. Based on estimated warning diffusion and survey results from EPZ residents, it was estimated that 50% of the work force would evacuate within 40 minutes following the decision to evacuate, 90% within 65 minutes, and 99% within 105 minutes. For a few facilities, it may be necessary for a limited number of workers to remain on the job in order to safely shut down processes, secure the facility or maintain essential operations. The evacuation time estimates do not address those workers who remain behind, since there is no reliable basis for predicting whether or how soon they will evacuate. The assumption that all workers evacuate provides a conservative estimate of vehicle demand. Discussions with emergency preparedness officials indicate that the same time distribution is also reasonable for the other transient population categories within the EPZ, including motels and recreation areas.

5.4.3 Special Facilities It was assumed that special facilities (i.e., schools, nursing homes) within the EPZ would also receive initial notification promptly. Based upon data obtained from previous studies, vehicle departure times were developed that reflect a distribution of notification, preparation and mobilization times.

Consistent with the current off-site emergency response plans, the schools will be evacuated via bus to the designated reception center using the same evacuation routes as the public. For school facilities, it was assumed that up to 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months may be required to assemble buses, transport vehicles to schools and to load students onto buses. Vehicles stationed at the facilities at the time of the ordered evacuation could be loaded in as little as 15 minutes following notification. Accordingly, 50% of school buses depart onto the evacuation network during the period between 15 and 75 minutes, 90% by 135 minutes, and 99% by 180 minutes. The school profile was also applied for daycare facilities.

Evacuation of special facilities (nursing homes, hospitals, and special care facilities) would also require additional time associated with preparation and transport of vehicles to the respective facilities. Those special facilities will evacuate directly to designated 5-4

Exelon Generation ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates I host facilities. Based upon previous studies, it was assumed that these facilities would begin to evacuate between 30 minutes and 3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months following notification. The first I 50% will depart within 90 minutes, 90% within 150 minutes, and 99% within 165 minutes.

Departure times - Clinton EPZ

-o 1 M

tq W00.8 -resident day C

"0 "5 0.6 / " al.4ýr -resident night

, 0.4 11,144 -worker Ifjr_YAZVf Z -schools E 0.2 It - special U

0 'Awl - transit depend 0 50 100 150 200 time (minutes)

Figure 5-1. Departure Time Distributions for the Clinton Station EPZ 5-5

Exelon Generation ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates 5.5 Evacuation Simulation Traffic simulation provides the ability to analyze evacuation of an area in great detail. In most traffic simulation models, there are two main inputs: supply (roadway) network data and demand (population and vehicular) data. Traffic models use different types of algorithms to predict traffic flow and provide measures of effectiveness (MOEs) such as average travel times, total number of vehicles exiting the system, and queue lengths at various times and points.

5.5.1 General Structure ARCADIS used PTV Vision to perform evacuation modeling for different scenarios.

The PTV Vision traffic simulation software package includes VISSIM (microscopic traffic simulation) and VISUM (macroscopic traffic simulation). VISUM is a comprehensive, flexible software system for transportation planning, travel demand modeling, and network data management. VISSIM is capable of performing detailed microscopic simulation of traffic, public transport, and pedestrian simulations, and can model any type of traffic control and geometric configuration. Both VISUM and VISSIM are capable of performing multi-modal analysis including car, commercial vehicle, bus, train, motorcycles, bicycles, and pedestrians. The two programs work together seamlessly, saving valuable time and resources.

. Verified Evacuation I 'Travel Times Network ' Queue Lengths

O-D Matrices "Bottlenecks

-Traffic Demand Volumes I

Figure 5-2. Evacuation Modeling and Simulation using PTV Vision Suite 5-6

SARCADIS Exelon Generation Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates VISUM was used to develop the evacuation network and population entry nodes (centroids). One of the key features of VISUM is its ability to interact seamlessly with GIS-data such as ESRI ArcGIS database. The field verified evacuation network data and demand data developed in ArcGIS were imported directly into VISUM. Origin-I Destination trip tables were developed for the evacuation and imported into VISUM.

VISUM software was then used to route the Origin-Destination information on the network using a dynamic equilibrium algorithm. This algorithm ensured that traffic levels on the network were realistic given the capacities available on individual links.

Once an initial solution was found in VISUM, the information was exported into VISSIM for microsimulation. A microsimulation was deemed a necessary step in order to obtain detailed and realistic results on queuing and average travel times. VISSIM can model intersection with different type of traffic control such as yield signs, stop signs, and signals. VISSIM also provides a better understating of critical and congested part of the network.

5.5.2 Simulation Process The ETE results include the time to evacuate 90% and 100% of the total permanent and transient population. Based on the current guidance, ETEs for special facilities, schools, and the transit dependent population are developed separately; only the time to evacuate 100% of these population groups was needed.

Consistent with current guidance, vehicle demand for each scenario was based on 100% of the population residing in areas designated for evacuation, plus 20% of the population residing in Sub-Areas outside the designated evacuation area, and 20% of the population residing outside of the EPZ, out to a distance of 15 miles. Vehicle demand outside of the designated evacuation area is intended to account for the impact of "shadow evacuees". A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of changes different input parameters and assumptions such as changes in lane closures, trip generation times, vehicular demand, evacuation routes, and background traffic.

The simulation process can be summarized as follows:

VISUM

1. Create every scenario based on

a. Background traffic

b. Time of day 5-7

ARCADIS Exelon Generation Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates

c. Day of week

d. Weather condition

e. Season

f. Wind Direction

g. Shadow traffic

2. Run Dynamic Traffic Assign to and calculate Permanent and Transient, Shadow, Special Needs/Schools volumes

3. Assignment process will last until suitable convergence is reached. VISUM provides output on the goodness of convergence after assignment. The convergence fit is not as critical because this is an evacuation model of a no-notice event, therefore full user equilibrium cannot be expected.

4. Export to VISSIM.

VISSIM

1. Warm-up time built into background/pass-through traffic generation.

2. Check for any local calibration parameters.

3. Run the final multimodal Dynamic Traffic Assignment in VISSIM to consider queues and intersection delays

4. Sensitivity analysis and count evacuees at 2, 5, and 10 miles

5. Prepare ETE times MOEs

1. 90% evacuation time (for all wind directions and scenarios, staged and normal evacuations)

a. This applies to evacuation of the PUBLIC only

2. 100% evacuation time (for all wind directions and scenarios, stage and normal evacuations)

3. Color-coded roadway map at various times (2, 4, 6 hrs) which identifies where long queues exist, including LOS E and F conditions.

5-8

Exelon Generation V ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates

6. Analysis of Evacuation Times 6.1 Evacuation Time Estimate Summary Predicted ETEs for the general population in the EPZ are summarized by scenario in I Table 6-1 (times for 90% of vehicles to depart) and Table 6-2 (times for 100% of vehicles to depart). The small differences in evacuation times are consistent with the differences in vehicle demand and travel time for different scenarios. The 5-mile zone involves shorter travel distance and fewer vehicles; 90% ETEs for the 5-mile zone are 2:20 to 2:40 for normal weather, and 100% ETEs are 4:00 to 4:10. For the full EPZ, 90% ETEs are 3:05 to 3:30, and 100% ETEs are 4:25 to 4:45. ETEs for the Apple &

Pork Festival are much longer, as discussed below in Section 6.5.

6.2 Comparison with Previous Study The ETEs for the current study are somewhat longer than the ETEs from the 2005 study. Vehicle demand for the current study (10,881 for Summer Weekday) is about 9% higher than the corresponding case from 2005 (9,998), and the new 100% ETE is 4:40, compared to 3:15 in 2005. The longer ETEs reflect longer departure times (based on the survey of residents) and the addition of background traffic.

6.3 All Conditions Vehicle demand for the full EPZ varies between scenarios from a low of 7,591 (winter weeknight) to 10,881 (summer weekday). Most of this difference reflects recreational demand in zone 1. ETEs for zone 1 did not increase significantly, even though vehicle demand increased by almost a factor of 3. Within zone 7, demand only varies by 10 to 15%. Results for the keyhole scenarios listed in Tables 6-1 and 6-2 demonstrate that zone 7 controls the ETEs for the total EPZ. All of the keyhole configurations that include zone 7 have the same ETEs (within 5 minutes) as the full EPZ. All of the configurations that do not include zone 7 have shorter (90%) ETEs. Adverse weather adds 10 minutes for the summer weekday ETEs, and 20 to 25 minutes for the winter ETEs.

6.4 Staged Evacuation Scenarios Staged evacuation scenarios were not evaluated for CPS. The NRC guidance (CR-7002) specifies staged evacuation scenarios in which the 2-mile zone evacuates, while the surrounding 5-mile zones shelter in place until the 2-mile zone has departed. For 6-1

Exelon Generation ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates the Clinton EPZ, there is a single zone extending out to 5 miles. Without a separate 2-mile zone, there is no basis for a staged scenario.

6.5 Special Event - Apple & Pork Festival The Apple and Pork Festival is held annually in late September in the city of Clinton.

The estimated peak attendance at the festival is 17,000, including 15,000 visitors, 1,000 vendors, and 1,000 workers (primarily local residents). The central location for the festival is the DeWitt County Museum, located on the north side of the city. The festival represents an estimated vehicle demand of up to 8,000 vehicles, in addition to normal weekend traffic. An estimated 3,500 vehicles will park in lots north of the city, within walking distance of festival events. The festival also provides trams and shuttle buses to remote parking areas in the city center and at the high school, on the southwest side of Clinton. An estimated 4,500 vehicles will use the remote lots.

During an emergency evacuation, vehicles within walking distance would depart within one to two hours. Up to 5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months would be required before all vehicles are able to depart from the remote lots. (The capacity of the trams and shuttle buses is the limiting factor.)

The estimated 90% ETE during the festival is 5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months 5 minutes, almost double the weekend day ETE of 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months 40 minutes. The ETE to evacuate 100% of the EPZ population during the festival is 11 hours1.273148e-4 days 0.00306 hours 1.818783e-5 weeks 4.1855e-6 months .

6.6 Sensitivity to Population Growth and Roadway Impact 6.6.1 Population Growth NRC guidance (CR-7002) for updating ETE studies more frequently than the 10-year federal census includes criteria based on population growth. Specifically, if the residential population growth in the EPZ since the last ETE update is sufficient to cause an increase in the ETE by 25% or by 30 minutes, whichever is less, then a full ETE update study must be performed.

A sensitivity analysis was performed by determining the 90% ETEs for increases of 10 and 20% of the EPZ residential population for the Winter Weekday, Normal Weather scenario. This scenario produced the longest ETE by season or time of day. The population was increased in the same manner in the surrounding region, out to 15 miles. Results are illustrated in Figure 6-1. With a 20% increase in residential population above the 2010 census values, the 90% ETE for the full EPZ increased to 6-2

Exelon Generation Clinton Station V2 ARCADIS Evacuation Time Estimates 3:53, an increase of 24 minutes. Since the EPZ residential population for Clinton changed by less than 3% between 2000 and 2010, it appears extremely unlikely that an increase of 20% will occur before 2020.

The 100% ETEs increased more rapidly than the 90% ETEs, consistent with the general pattern of all ETE results. With a 20% increase in population, the 100% ETE for the full EPZ increased by 31 minutes, from 4:46 to 5:17. NRC guidance (CR-7002)

I indicates that emergency planning decisions should be based on the 90% ETEs. The recommended "update threshold" for the Clinton EPZ, based on population growth, is therefore 20%.

6.6.2 Roadway Impact NRC guidance (CR-7002) also requires analysis of a "roadway impact" scenario. For this scenario, a major evacuation route is removed or reduced in capacity. Specifically, one of the 5 highest volume roadways is removed from service, or capacity is reduced by one lane (for a multi-lane, limited-access roadway such as an interstate highway).

This scenario is specified as Summer Weekday, Normal Weather for the Full EPZ. For Clinton, the five highest-volume roadways for this scenario are listed below:

US 51 southbound - 3,800 vehicles

US 51 northbound - 3,700 vehicles 0 IL 10- 1,540 vehicles

IL 48 - 1,280 vehicles

1200 N - 1,100 vehicles Since the highest volume roadway was a multi-lane highway (US 51 southbound), the roadway impact tested was a closure of one lane of the highway. The lane closure did not cause significant re-routing of evacuees compared to the summer day scenario with no lane closure. The impact location is shown in Figure 6-2.

With this roadway unavailable, the ETEs increased from 3:25 (90%) and 4:40 (100%)

to 3:40 (90%) and 4:50 (100%). Note that the increase ETEs are due to the bottleneck queue generated by the lane closure rather than evacuees taking alternate routes to 6-3

Exelon Generation V2 ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates avoid the queue. The traffic flow by link for the roadway impact scenario is also shown in Figure 6-2.

6.7 Performance Metrics for Simulation Model The performance of VISSIM is assessed using standard metrics, consistent with the guidance provided in CR-7002. Table 6-3 provides a summary of simulation parameters for Winter Day Normal Weather scenario for the full EPZ. Figure 6-3 illustrates the number of vehicles on the network over the course of the simulation, while Figure 6-4 compares the rate of vehicles loading onto the network to the frequency of departures.

6.8 ETE for Transit Dependent, Special Facilities and Schools The ETE for transit dependent members of the general public is estimated based on the assumption of a single set of bus runs from Clinton. The run would begin 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months after the evacuation notice, allowing time for evacuees to prepare and to travel to designated pickup points. The time sequence would then proceed in the following steps:

45 minutes for the bus to traverse up to ten pickup points (5 miles @ 20 mph) and load passengers (3 minutes per stop)

14 minutes to travel out of the EPZ (up to 10 miles @ 45 mph). Total time 2:59.

For non-ambulatory residents, ambulances and WC vans would also mobilize within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months . For a WC van with three pickups, loading would take 15 minutes per stop, transit between stops could take up to 30 minutes (10 miles at 20 mph), and travel out of the EPZ another 14 minutes (10 miles @ 45 mph): total time 3:29. An ambulance making two pickups would take 15 to 30 minutes less time to evacuate.

Estimated evacuation times for special facilities, schools and daycares located in the EPZ are summarized in Tables 6-4 and 6-5. These times are shorter than the 100%

ETEs for the general population. Facility-specific estimates are based on a three-step time sequence: (1) mobilization, (2) loading, and (3) travel out of the EPZ. Mobilization and loading times are generally the largest components. At nursing homes and assisted living facilities, each vehicle will require 10 to 15 minutes to load, with two vehicles loading simultaneously. Mobilization times for school buses range from 90 to 120 minutes. Local vans can mobilize within 60 minutes. For travel time, average speeds were estimated for the anticipated evacuation route, based on the traffic 6-4

Exelon Generation Clinton Station ARCADIS Evacuation Time Estimates simulation for the Winter Day scenario. The simplified stepwise methodology used to determine these estimates provides a typical evacuation time, rather than an upper bound 100% value.

6-5

ARCADIS Exelon Generation Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Table 6-1: Evacuation Times for General Population (90%)

90% Evacuation of Affected Areas Summer Winter Week Day Weekend Day Evening Week Day Weekend Day Evening Affected ERPAst Scenario: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)

Weather: Normal Adverse Normal Normal Normal Adverse Normal Normal 1 2&5-mile Zone 2:30 2:40 2:40 2:20 2:25 2:50 2:35 2:25 ALL 10-mile EPZ 3:25 3:35 3:20 3:05 3:30 3:50 3:20 3:10 Evacuate 5-Mile Zone and 10 Miles Downwind 1,5,6 NNE 2:45 2:55 2:45 2:35 2:40 3:05 2:55 2:40 1,6 NE 2:45 2:55 2:45 2:35 2:40 3:05 2:55 2:40 1,6,7 ENE 3:20 3:30 3:20 3:05 3:25 3:50 3:20 3:10 1,7 E 3:25 3:35 3:20 3:05 3:30 3:50 3:20 3:10 1,7,8 ESE 3:25 3:35 3:20 3:05 3:30 3:50 3:20 3:10 1,2,8 SE,SSE 2:45 2:55 2:45 2:35 2:40 3:05 2:55 2:40 1,2 S 2:45 2:55 2:45 2:35 2:40 3:05 2:55 2:40 1,2,3 SSW,SW 2:45 2:55 2:45 2:35 2:40 3:05 2:55 2:40 1,3 WSW 2:45 2:55 2:45 2:35 2:40 3:05 2:55 2:40 1,3,4 W 2:45 2:55 2:45 2:35 2:40 3:05 2:55 2:40 1,4 WNW 2:45 2:55 2:45 2:35 2:40 3:05 2:55 2:40 1,4,5 NW,NNW 2:45 2:55 2:45 2:35 2:40 3:05 2:55 2:40 1,5 N 2:45 2:55 2:45 2:35 2:40 3:05 2:55 2:40 6-6

ARCADIS Exelon Generation Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Table 6-2: Evacuation Times for General Population (100%)

100% Evacuation of Affected Areas Summer Winter Week Day Weekend Day Evening Week Day Weekend Day Evening Affected ERPAs Scenario: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)

Weather: Normal Adverse Normal Normal Normal Adverse Normal Normal 1 2&5-mile Zone 4:00 4:15 4:00 4:00 4:05 4:35 4:00 4:10 ALL 10-mile EPZ 4:40 4:55 4:30 4:20 4:45 5:15 4:25 4:35 Evacuate 5 mile zone and 10 miles downwind 1,5,6 NNE 4:30 4:45 4:25 4:20 4:30 5:00 4:25 4:35 1,6 NE 4:30 4:45 4:25 4:20 4:30 5:00 4:25 4:35 1,6,7 ENE 4:30 4:45 4:25 4:20 4:40 5:10 4:25 4:35 1,7 E 4:40 4:55 4:30 4:20 4:40 5:15 4:25 4:35 1,7,8 ESE 4:40 4:55 4:30 4:20 4:40 5:15 4:25 4:35 1,2,8 SE,SSE 4:30 4:45 4:25 4:20 4:30 5:00 4:25 4:35 1,2 S 4:30 4:45 4:25 4:20 4:30 5:00 4:25 4:35 1,2,3 SSWSW 4:30 4:45 4:25 4:20 4:30 5:00 4:25 4:35 1,3 WSW 4:30 4:45 4:25 4:20 4:30 5:00 4:25 4:35 1,3,4 W 4:30 4:45 4:25 4:20 4:30 5:00 4:25 4:35 1,4 WNW 4:30 4:45 4:25 4:20 4:30 5:00 4:25 4:35 1,4,5 NW,NNW 4:30 4:45 4:25 4:20 4:30 5:00 4:25 4:35 1,5 N 4:30 4:45 4:25 4:20 4:30 5:00 4:25 4:35 6-7

ARCADIS Exelon Generation Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Clinton -- Population Growth vs ETE (Full EPZ) 4:00 -

3:50 3:40 0 lOmile M - Upper 3:30 _-

Linear (lOmile) 3:20 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

Pop Increase %

Figure 6-1. Clinton Sensitivity of ETE to Population Growth (Winter Weekday, Normal Weather, Full EPZ) 6-8

14 ARCADIS Exelon Generation Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates I Figure 6-2. Clinton Predicted Traffic Volume by Link with US 51 SB Link Removed (Summer Weekday, Normal Weather, Full EPZ) 6-9

ARCADIS Exelon Generation Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Exiting EPZ Vehicles by Hour 5000 4500 4000 0

3500

a. 3000 2500

5 mile

E 2000

1500 lOmile 1000 500 0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Simulation Hour Figure 6-3. Time Distribution of Vehicles on the Network (Full 10-mile EPZ, Winter Weekday, Normal Weather) 6-10

ARCADIS Exelon Generation Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Mobilization and Cumulative EPZ Evacuation 10 10000 9 9000 8 8000 7 7000 IA 6000 U o5 5000

- Simulation 4 4000 - Mobilization 3 3000 2 2000 Simulation 1 1000 departure curve represents Winter, Fair 0 0 Weather, Full 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Time after Evacuation Order Issued (mins)

Figure 6-4. Comparison of Vehicle Mobilization and Departure Rates (total vehicles 9,234) 6-11

ARCADIS Exelon Generation Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Table 6-3: Summary of Network Performance (Full 10-mile EPZ, Winter Weekday, Normal Weather)

Network Parameter All Vehicles Background/ Evacuation Shadow Traffic Avg Delay (s) 1,883.045 187.658 2,912.213 Avg Stop Delay (s) 456.123 49.641 702.874 Avg # of Stops 257.367 9.94 407.565 Avg Speed (mph) 38.1 50.99 33.05 Avg Travel Time (min) 2.46 1.83 2.85 Vehicle Hours Traveled 35,767. 10,059. 25,708.

Table 6-4: ETE for Special Facilities, Clinton EPZ (Full 10-mile EPZ, Winter Weekday, Normal Weather)

Vehicles Distance to Travel Time OutboundTrvlim Population Mobilization Loading EPZ to EPZ (residents) # Type Time (min) Time (min) Boundary (mph) Boundary (mi) (min)

Warner Hospital 19 1 Bus/Van 90 15 6 51.5 7 112 6 non-ambulatory 3 Ambulance 90 15 to 30 6 51.5 7 112 to 142 Manor Court 90 5 Bus/Van 90 30 5 51.5 6 126 2 Ambulance 90 15 5 51.5 6 121 13 non-ambulatory 3 WC bus 90 30 5 51.5 6 126 Allen Court 16 1 Van 60 15 5 51.5 6 81 Dewitt County Jail 105 5 Bus 90 30 6 51.5 7 127 6-12

ARCADIS Exelon Generation Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Table 6-5: ETE for School and Daycare Facilities in Clinton EPZ (Full 10-mile EPZ, Winter Weekday, Normal Weather)

Vehicles Mobilization Loading Distance to Outbound Travel Time to Facility Population Time Time EPZ Boundary Travel Speed EPZ Boundary ETE (min)

Type (min) (min) (mi) (mph) (min)

Clinton HS 582 11 Bus 90 to 120 30 5 51.5 6 126 to 156 Clinton Jr HS 449 9 Bus 90 to 120 30 10 46.2 13 133 to 163 Douglass ES 191 4 Bus 90 30 12 43.4 17 137 Lincoln ES 316 6 Bus 90 30 5 51.5 6 126 Washington ES 183 4 Bus 90 30 10 46.2 13 133 Webster ES 325 6 Bus 90 30 10 46.2 13 133 Head Start 30 2 Van 60 15 12 43.4 17 92 Deland-Weldon HS 52 1 Bus 90 15 3 46.2 4 109 Deland-Weldon ES 26 1 Bus 90 15 3 46.2 4 109 Clinton Christian Acad 29 2 Van 60 15 5 51.5 6 81 Christ Lutheran 20 1 Van 60 15 5 51.5 6 81 Kid Konnection 60 3 Van 60 15 5 51.5 6 81 6-13

Exelon Generation V2 ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates

7. Traffic Control and Evacuation Confirmation 7.1 General Evacuation simulation results have been reviewed to assess access control locations, traffic management locations and recommendations for the Clinton EPZ. Traffic control plans for each county were reviewed to confirm that traffic management will be implemented at key intersections on all designated evacuation routes. Predicted queuing at network intersections is summarized in Table 7-1. The results indicate that average queue length is less than 100 feet at all intersections. The signalized intersection at Grant and Washington Streets in Clinton has an average queue length of 93 feet, and handles traffic volume of 7,250 vehicles. The higher traffic volume shown for intersections outside the EPZ reflects contributions from background and shadow traffic.

7.2 Evacuation Access Control Locations Access control measures were not specifically addressed in the conduct of this study.

Background traffic within the EPZ was not found to be a significant contributor to traffic congestion during the early stages of evacuation.

7.3 Traffic Management Locations and Tactics to Facilitate Evacuation The traffic simulations for the Clinton EPZ show minimal traffic congestion during all scenarios. The traffic flow maps provided in Appendix D and the data in Table 7-1 help to pinpoint locations where traffic management can be deployed to best effect.

Standard traffic management strategies should be effective without any extra measures. Tactics to facilitate evacuation should focus on mobilization procedures related to timely notification for emergency responders and transportation companies that will provide the ambulances, vans and buses to support those requiring transport assistance.

7-1

Exelon Generation ARCADIS Clinton Station Evacuation Time Estimates Table 7-1: Predicted Queuing at Intersections (Full 10-mile EPZ, Winter Weekday, Normal Weather)

Average Intersection Name County or City Inside EPZ? Control Type Queue Volume (feet)

N Grant & E. Washington/Main St Clinton In EPZ Signalized 93.8 7,250 Entrance to Stephen Decatur Middle School Decatur >15 miles Manned Control 54.8 12,728 N Grant & W Van Buren St Clinton In EPZ Signalized 33.0 6,010 Main St & W College Ave Bloomington >15 miles Signalized 22.9 5,582 US 51 & W Forsyth Rd/Shaffer St Forsyth/Decatur >15 miles Signalized 20.2 6,350 US 51 & 950E Clinton In EPZ Signalized 4.7 5,420 US 51 & Main St Wapella In EPZ Two Way Stop 1.1 6,080 US 51 & 1-74 WB Ramp Bloomington >15 miles Uncontrolled 0.3 6,574 E Mound Rd & Greenswitch Rd Decatur >15 miles Signalized 0.1 12,728 Main St & W Vernon Ave Bloomington >15 miles Signalized 0.1 5,690 7-2

Exelon Generation Clinton Station ARCADIS Evacuation Time Estimates

8. References Earth Tech, 2005: Evacuation Time Estimatesfor the Clinton Station Plume Exposure Pathway Emergency PlanningZone, prepared by Earth Tech, Inc. for Exelon Nuclear, June 2005.

NRC, 1980: Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG-0654, FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Emergency Management Agency, November 1980.

NRC, 1992: State of the Art in Evacuation Time Estimate Studies for Nuclear Power Plants, NUREG/CR-4831, T. E. Urbanik and J. D. Jamison, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, March 1992.

NRC, 2011: Criteria for Development of Evacuation Time Estimate Studies, NUREG/CR-7002, J. Jones and F. Walton, Sandia National Laboratories, and B. Wolshon, Louisiana State University, November 2011.

ORNL, 1990: Evaluating Protective Actions for Chemical Agent Emergencies, ORNL-6615, G.O. Rogers, et al., Oak Ridge National Laboratory, prepared for U.S. Department of the Army and Federal Emergency Management Agency, April 1990.

8-1

ARCADIS Appendix A Transient and Special Facility Population Data

v~wsN& VINSW ungf~ Regend U3

"~~~Ma ' .... *m" Fa FciittTy UPON I ; '

o.FwuBsnDt S

, ;.C LegendEC FATO Facility Type vema EMPLOYMENT Bit *N HOTEL I~~SAAC5TC5 UM__AUTO__moil RECREATION MOATAICMWNO. DoSWtU nm Base Data Legend Clinton Plant MooS

/ 10 Miles from Plant U

a an rn~

41L..j Township Boundary J,. T Sub-Area Boundary SEPZ Boundary Goo** I' CmCro ok c CNv ," 0 2 4 44 ARCADIS EXELON GENER Appendix A - Page 1 of 7

a I

"son i

2 Z I RUN**

L~9 L bWlson i

Legend

0. WIg Facility Type

SCHOOL/DAYCARE 00Witt

SPECIAL FACILITY DoC Base Data Legend Do WNlt

Clinton Plant 10 Miles from Plant L*J Township Boundary Sub-Area Boundary

= EPZ Boundary T

,r*ndp I

Kenney Creek a 2 4 Mod I

LI

~ ~ARCADIS EXELON GENERATION Appendix A - Page2 of 7

Table A-I. Facility Data for Employers in Clinton Station EPZ Population Vehicles Winter Summer Winter Summer week- week- week- week- week- week- week- week- week- week- week- week- Occ description zone day night end day night end I day night end day night end factor Action Tech 7 70 30 0 70 30 0 70 30 0 70 30 0 1.0 Miller Container 7 50 0 0 50 0 0 50 0 0 50 0 0 1.0 Wallace Computer 7 80 80 60 80 80 60 80 80 60 80 80 60 1.0 McElroy Metals 7 35 15 15 35 15 15 35 15 15 35 15 15 1.0 Clinton Power Stn 1 1700 400 100 1700 400 100 1200 280 75 1200 280 75 0.7 Plastic Specialties 7 50 25 0 50 25 0 50 25 0 50 25 0 1.0 Syngenta Seeds 1 50 0 0 50 0 0 50 0 0 50 0 0 1.0 Altorfer 7 50 0 0 50 0 0 50 0 0 50 0 0 1.0 Baum Auto 7 40 12 12 40 12 12 40 12 12 40 12 12 1.0 YMCA 7 20 8 8 20 8 8 20 8 8 20 8 8 1.0 Appendix A - Page 3 of 7

Table A-2. Recreation Facilities in Clinton Station EPZ Population Vehicles Winter Summer Winter Summer week- week- weeek- week- week- week- week- week- week- week- week- week-description zone dav night ernd dav night end dav night end day night end Occ factor I. - .1 - - I.- I Camp Quest 0 0 0 960 960 960 0 0 0 320 320 320 3 Clinton Marine 0 0 0 900 0 1080 0 0 0 300 0 360 3 Mascoutin SRA 225 225 900 900 750 3600 75 75 300 300 250 1200 3 Northfork Boat Acc 30 0 90 240 0 240 10 0 30 80 0 80 3 Northfork C Acc 0 0 0 15 0 15 0 0 0 5 0 5 3 Spillway Access 30 0 90 450 0 450 10 0 30 150 0 150 3 Visitor Center 120 0 150 120 0 120 40 0 50 40 0 40 3 Weldon Boat Acc 60 0 150 375 0 750 20 0 50 125 0 250 3 Westside Boat Acc 60 0 150 375 0 750 20 0 50 125 0 250 3 Peninsula BA 3 150 0 450 45 0 45 50 0 150 15 0 15 3 Arrowhead Acres 6 0 0 0 240 240 300 0 0 0 80 80 100 3 Clinton CC 6 0 0 0 90 0 90 0 0 0 60 0 60 1.5 Little Galilee Camp 6 0 0 0 120 120 120 0 0 0 40 40 40 3 Weldon Springs SP 6 300 228 600 960 456 1200 100 76 200 320 152 400 3 Green Acres Camp 7 0 0 0 150 150 150 0 0 0 50 50 50 3 YMCA 7 75 113 113 75 75 75 50 75 75 50 50 50 1.5 Calvary UC Camp 8 0 0 0 420 420 420 0 0 0 140 140 140 3 Appendix A - Page 4 of 7

Table A-3. Motels in Clinton Station EPZ Population Vehicles Winter Summer Winter Summer week- week- week- week- week- week- week- week- week- week- week- week-description zone rooms day night end day night end day night end I day night end Town & Country 7 26 31 31 31 31 31 31 26 26 26 26 26 26 Wye Motel 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 Sunset Inn 7 76 91 91 91 91 91 91 76 76 76 76 76 76 Appendix A - Page 5 of 7

Table A4. Special Facilities in Clinton Station EPZ population automobiles staff wheel-week- week- week- ambu- chair bus or week- week- week- week- week- week-description zone resident day night end lance bus van day night end day night end Warner Hospital 7 25 100 40 40 3 1 125 45 45 95 15 15 Manor Court 7 103 40 16 16 2 3 5 143 119 119 15 0 0 Hawthorne Inn (included in numbers for Manor Court)

Allen Court 7 16 4 2 2 1 20 18 18 2 0 0 Dewitt County Jail 7 95 10 10 10 5 105 105 105 0 0 0 Appendix A - Page 6 of 7

Table A-5. Schools and Daycare Facilities in Clinton Station EPZ Population winter summer description zone student staff bus van auto weekday weekday Deland-Weldon HS 4 52 7 1 4 59 Deland-Weldon ES 4 26 3 1 0 29 Clinton HS 7 582 73 11 40 655 Clinton JrHS 7 449 56 9 29 505 Douglass ES 7 191 24 4 12 215 Lincoln ES 7 316 40 6 22 356 Washington ES 7 183 23 4 11 206 Webster ES 7 325 40 6 22 365 Head Start 7 30 7 2 1 37 37 Clinton Christian Acad 7 29 7 2 1 36 Christ Lutheran 7 20 5 1 2 25 25 Kid Konnection 7 60 12 3 3 72 72 Appendix A - Page 7 of 7

ARCADIS Appendix B Telephone Survey of EPZ Residents

Clinton EPZ Summary of Telephone Survey Results Completed surveys N = 373 Data Uncertainty + or - 5% Demographic Adjustment at 95% confidence level census 2010 SURVEY age for head adjustment Age Mix Response of household factor total population 12511 (percent) (percent) total HH 5163 persons per HH 2.42 under 55 27.1 55.5 2.05 55-64 22.5 18.0 0.80 Results (after adjustment) 65 and over 50.4 26.5 0.53 vehicles used when all at home 1.30 fraction taking 1 vehicle 0.740 fraction taking 2 veh 0.225 fraction taking 3 or more 0.035 Work Outside Home (%of HH) one or more work outside 70.4 Of those who work outside percent take vehicle to work 94.8 evacuate direct from work 24.1 stay outside EPZ 20.0 return home to evacuate 55.9 one returns 28.6 2 or more return 27.3 Shifts (percent)

Weekday 85.5 Swing shift 2.1 Graveyard 2.1 evening/weekend 4.3 rotate 5.9 time distribution (fraction) 0 to 15 15 to 30 30 to 45 45 to 60 > 60 minutes minutes minutes minutes minutes leave work after notice 0.78 0.17 0.02 0.01 0.02 travel home 0.46 0.38 0.13 0.02 0.02 depart after work return 0.37 0.42 0.10 0.07 0.04 0 to 20 20 to 40 40 to 60 60 to 90 > 90 depart (all at home) 0.33 0.43 0.13 0.05 0.05 Appendix B page 1 of 7

13662 LH/CH ARCADIS Exelon Survey Final v6 - August 23, 2011 INTRODUCTION Hello, my name is and I am callingfrom MDC Research, a public opinionfirm. We are conducting a briefsurvey to gather informationfrom households in your area about emergency responseplanning, and we'd like to include your opinions. This survey is being conducted on behalf of the (insertfacility name) Nuclear Facility, and will take approximately 5 minutes to complete. We are not trying to sell you anything. The information gatheredfrom this survey will help local agencies more effectively provide community assistanceshould an emergency situation arise.

Can 1please speak with an adult member of the household?

SCREENER S1. What is the zip code of your primary residence? This is the home where you live the majority of the time. DO NOT READ ZIP CODE LIST List of appropriate zip codes will be displayed here 99999 Location outside the EPZ - THANK & TERMINATE S2. Which of the following categories best describes your age?

11 Under 18 yrs of age - ASK FOR REFERRAL or THANK & TERMINATE 12 18 to 24 13 25 to 34 14 35 to 44 15 45 to 54 16 55 to 64 17 65 to 74 18 75 or older 98 (DO NOT READ) Refused QUESTIONNAIRE QI How many people currently reside in your household?

Record: # of residents 998 (DO NOT READ) Refused - THANK & TERMINATE Q2 How many motor vehicles are nonrmally based at your home?

Arcadis Exelon 1 02011. Market Decisions Corporation Appendix B - Page 2 of 7

13662 LH/CH Record: # of vehicles 997 None - SKIP TO Q14 998 (DO NOT READ) Refused Q3 How many members of your household are over the age of 16?

Record: # of residents 998 (DO NOT READ) Refused Q4 How many members of your household are licensed drivers?

Record: # of drivers 998 (DO NOT READ) Refused Q5 How many of the adults in your household work outside the home?

Record --) Skip to Q6A 997 None - Continue to Q5A 998 (DO NOT READ) Refused If refused, explain; The nature of this project is to estimate traffic volumes and flow in the event of an emergency evacuation, so this data is necessary in order for us to continue with the survey.

If still refused - THANK & TERMINATE Q5A (ONLY ASK IF Q5=997) Which of the following best describes the non-working adults in your household? MULTIPLE MENTION - IP NOTE: No more mentions than Q3 mentions.

11 Currently unemployed/actively looking for work 12 Retired 13 On Disability or leave of absence 14 Student/continuing education 15 Homemaker 99 Other - please specify SKIP TO Q1l Repeat the following Q6A-F sequence for each working adult cited in Q5 For each of the working adults you just referenced, I'd like to ask a few questions related to what their likely actions would be in the case of an emergency evacuation. I understand that I will be asking you to speculate on what other members of the household may do in this situation, but your best guesses are just fine for our purposes.

Q6A Who is the first working adult in the household that you are thinking about? What is their relationship to you?

13662 LH/CH 1 Self 2 Spouse or significant other 3 Parent of child 4 Other relative or in-law 5 Roommate 6 Boarder 7 Other Q6B Which of the following best describes this person's usual work schedule?

1 Monday - Friday, 8:00am to 5:00prm 2 Swing Shift 3 Graveyard 4 Evenings and weekends 5 Rotating shifts 6 Other or irregular schedule 7 (DO NOT READ) Don't know Q6C Does this person generally use a personal vehicle to commute back and forth to work?

1 Yes 2 No 7 (DO NOT READ) Don't know Q6D If an evacuation notice were given while this person was at work, do you think they would most likely...

I Evacuate directly from work 2 Come home first and then evacuate, or 3 Stay outside the evacuation zone where they work -- Skip to Q7 7 (DO NOT READ) Don't know Q6E How long do you think it would take this person to get prepared and actually leave work?

(Read list if necessary)

I Less than 15 minutes 2 15 to 30 minutes 3 30 to 45 minutes 4 45 to 60 minutes 5 More than 60 minutes 7 (DO NOT READ) Don't know Arcadis Exelon 3 ©2011. Market Decisions Corporation Appendix B - Page 4 of 7

13662 LH/CH If response at 6D is 1, skip from here to Q7 Q6F About how long does it take this household member to get from work to home?

(Read list if necessary) 1 Less than 15 minutes 2 15 to 30 minutes 3 30 to 45 minutes 4 45 to 60 minutes 5 More than 60 minutes 7 (DO NOT READ) Don't know Q7A-F Repeat Q6 sequence for worker #2 Q8A-F Repeat Q6 sequence for worker #3 Q9A-F Repeat Q6 sequence for worker #4 Q10 And once everyone who is coming home from work has arrived, how long would it take to prepare and depart from home, taking into consideration whether or not someone else is usually home who may be starting these preparation while they are travelling?

1 Less than 15 minutes 2 15 to 30 minutes 3 30 to 45 minutes 4 45 to 60 minutes 5 More than 60 minutes 7 (DO NOT READ) Don't know Q11 Are any of the licensed drivers in your household restricted to daytime driving only?

1 Yes 2 No 9 (DO NOT READ) Refused Q12 If an evacuation were ordered when all household members were at home (for example, at night or on a weekend), approximately how long would it take your household to Arcadis Exelon 4 ©2011. Market Decisions Corporation Appendix B - Page 5 of 7

13662 LH/CH prepare to depart? Please assume that you are advised to plan to be away from your home for 3 days. Would you say that it would take... READ LIST 1 Less than 20 minutes to depart 2 20 to 40 minutes to depart 3 40 to 60 minutes to depart 4 60 to 90 minutes to depart; or 5 More than 90 minutes to depart Q13 How many vehicles would your household take if an evacuation were ordered when all household members were at home?

Record: # of vehicles 998 (DO NOT READ) Refused Q14 Are any members of your household seasonal residents? And by seasonal we mean any people who do not reside in your home the majority of the year.

1 Yes 2 No - SKIP TO Q15 9 (DO NOT READ) Refused Q14A (ASK IF Q14=l) How many of your <insert Q1 response> household members are seasonal?

Record: # of seasonal household members 998 (DO NOT READ) Refused Q14B (ASK IF Q14=1) What seasons do they live in another location away from your home?

READ LIST - Multiple Mention 1 Spring 2 Summer 3 Fall 4 Winter Q15 Would any member of your household require a specialized vehicle, such as a wheelchair, van or ambulance, to evacuate from your home in case of an emergency?

13662 LH/CH 9 (DO NOT READ) Refused This is all the questions we have for you today/tonight. Thank you for participating in this survey. Your responses will help us to make an accurate prediction of traffic conditions during an emergency situation. If you have any questions about this survey, please feel free to contact

<insert contact name, job title, and phone number/email>.

ARCADIS Appendix C Roadway Network Map and Data Table

Clinton Station Tor ETE Analysis

/ August 2012

/ LI Legend 9 Clinton Station

Nodes 13 .Road Classification Freeway

- Principal Arterial 12 -2 Major Arterial

_____ Minor Arterial Collector Local Rd Clinton EPZ 31 330 Intrasermlu ARCADIS er wFva oment . uildk s Exelen.

AppendixC Page 1 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node 0-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

_______(ml) Width (ft) Lanes ___________ Rate (vehlhr) _____

1 556 555 0.096 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 2 564 565 0.267 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 3 565 564 0.267 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 4 606 607 0.04 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 5 607 606 0.04 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 6 609 608 0.999 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 7 610 611 0.897 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 8 613 614 0.202 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 9 616 615 0.378 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 10 617 618 0.265 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 11 613 619 0.304 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 12 617 619 0.067 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 13 619 617 0.067 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 14 618 620 0.069 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 15 619 623 0.258 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 16 620 617 0.31 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 17 625 624 0.467 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 18 627 626 0.377 1 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 19 627 628 0.247 12 2 Freeway 4100 45 20 563 628 0.272 12 1 Ram p 1500 55 21 563 626 0.308 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 22 559 562 0.062 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 23 628 629 0.236 12 2 Freeway 4100 45 24 630 631 0.322 12 2 Freeway 4100 45 25 629 559 0.325 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 26 560 631 0.385 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 27 562 630 0.285 12 1 Ram p 1500 35 28 632 630 0.292 12 2 Freeway 4100 45 29 632 561 0.439 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 30 629 633 0.587 12 2 Ramp 3000 45 31 634 632 0.332 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 32 636 637 0.982 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 33 638 639 0.439 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 34 635 640 0.333 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 35 641 557 0.259 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 36 642 556 0.263 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 37 564 644 0.052 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 38 644 564 0.052 12 1 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 39 645 646 0.219 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 40 648 649 0.11 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 41 648 650 0.032 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 42 649 650 0.099 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 43 650 649 0.099 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 44 651 652 1.072 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 45 653 566 0.894 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 46 567 654 0.343 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 47 657 656 0.058 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 48 659 658 1.858 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 49 656 658 1.134 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 50 663 662 0.075 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 51 664 570 1.194 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 52 662 571 1.2 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 53 667 666 0.011 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 54 600 668 0.24 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 55 599 669 0.482 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 Page 1 of 36 Page 1of36Appendix C Page 2 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Roadway Network Data Table Saturation Flow Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Rrae Flow FFS (mph)

Link#

U-ode D-oe (mi) Width (ft) Lanes Rate (vehlhr) 56 666 669 0.223 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 57 671 603 0.498 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 58 602 672 0.331 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 59 673 603 0.233 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 60 675 674 0.261 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 61 676 677 0.265 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 62 674 574 0.403 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 63 678 574 0.222 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 64 674 679 0.26 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 65 678 679 0.28 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 66 680 676 0.239 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 67 579 678 0.076 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 68 679 681 0.064 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 69 582 680 0.066 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 70 680 579 0.255 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 71 681 575 0.263 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 72 580 582 0.26 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 73 580 577 0.218 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 74 681 682 0.704 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 75 576 682 1.407 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 76 578 676 0.469 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 77 581 577 0.406 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 78 683 684 0.016 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 79 684 683 0.016 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 80 685 583 0.658 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 81 597 686 0.302 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 82 683 596 0.309 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 83 687 598 0.521 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 84 688 595 0.671 12 2 Freeway 4100 55 85 685 591 0.85 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 86 591 688 0.299 12 2 Freeway 4100 55 87 585 583 1.293 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 88 593 584 0.633 12 2 Freeway 4100 55 89 587 685 0.247 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 90 689 598 0.283 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 91 683 689 0.235 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 92 689 683 0.235 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 93 690 689 0.008 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 94 589 592 0.805 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 95 593 587 0.859 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 96 586 584 1.295 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 97 594 691 1.298 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 98 693 694 0.05 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 99 696 695 0.064 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 100 698 697 1.162 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 101 699 700 0.011 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 102 700 699 0.011 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 103 605 700 0.495 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 104 699 604 0.495 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 105 664 703 0.066 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 106 703 664 0.066 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 107 635 636 0.86 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 108 636 635 0.86 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 109 639 636 0.067 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 110 636 706 0.076 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 111 706 636 0.076 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 Page 2 of 36 Appendix C Page 3 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network Data Table ClntonNGSRoadway Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

S(mi) Width (ft) Lanes Rate (vehlhr) ____

112 686 683 0.014 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 113 686 684 0.022 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 114 687 690 0.296 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 115 689 707 0.006 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 116 707 689 0.006 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 117 690 707 0.011 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 118 673 708 0.081 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 119 708 673 0.081 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 120 673 709 0.24 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 121 709 673 0.24 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 122 709 710 0.021 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 123 710 709 0.021 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 124 671 673 0.337 12 1 Ram p 1500 35 125 672 709 0.031 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 126 672 710 0.039 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 127 666 711 0.191 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 128 711 666 0.191 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 129 711 712 0.016 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 130 712 711 0.016 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 131 599 667 0.296 12 1 Ram p 1500 35 132 667 713 0.019 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 133 668 711 0.024 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 134 668 712 0.03 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 135 714 664 0.072 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 136 714 703 0.086 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 137 572 663 0.263 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 138 662 715 0.061 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 139 715 662 0.061 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 140 663 715 0.085 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 141 716 717 0.262 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 45 142 718 719 0.301 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 143 719 718 0.301 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 144 657 720 0.084 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 145 656 720 0.049 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 146 720 656 0.049 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 147 720 721 0.364 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 148 721 720 0.364 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 149 722 723 0.064 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 150 723 722 0.064 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 151 724 722 0.062 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 152 724 723 0.09 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 153 696 725 0.089 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 154 695 725 0.056 12 2 Principal Arterial 2800 35 155 725 695 0.056 12 2 Principal Arterial 2800 35 156 646 644 0.057 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 157 646 564 0.084 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 158 726 727 0.113 12 2 Major Arterial 2700 35 159 727 726 0.113 12 2 Major Arterial 2700 35 160 86 85 0.452 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 161 87 88 0.462 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 162 87 89 0.349 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 163 90 91 0.226 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 164 92 93 0.013 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 165 93 92 0.013 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 166 97 98 0.341 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 167 100 99 0.825 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 Page 3 of 36 of36Appendix Page C Page 4 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

_______(mi) Width (ft) Lanes Rate (vehlhr) ____

168 102 101 1.176 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 169 103 104 0.017 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 170 104 103 0.017 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 171 105 106 1.399 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 172 107 108 1.088 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 173 109 110 0.859 12 1 Ram p 1500 55 174 96 ill 1.334 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 175 112 113 0.052 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 176 114 101 0.012 12 1 Collector /LocaliRoad 1300 45 177 101 115 0.011 12 1 Collector/ LocaliRoad 1300 45 178 113 116 1.04 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 179 117 112 1.015 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 180 118 119 1.293 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 181 117 120 0.782 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 182 121 120 1.397 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 183 122 123 0.03 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 184 122 124 1.05 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 185 125 126 1.133 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 186 127 128 0.053 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 187 130 127 0.074 12 1 Ram p 1500 35 188 131 126 1.34 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 189 131 127 0.025 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 190 133 134 0.484 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 191 134 133 0.484 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 192 135 136 0.009 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 45 193 136 135 0.009 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 45 194 138 137 0.01 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 195 139 138 0.01 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 196 140 139 0.009 1 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 197 137 140 0.009 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 50 198 143 142 0.088 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 199 144 143 0.009 12 3 Principal Arterial 5025 40 200 145 144 0.089 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 201 142 145 0.011 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 202 146 147 0.008 12 1 Minor Arterial 1700 35 203 151 150 0.011 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 50 204 150 152 0.324 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 50 205 152 153 0.5 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 206 154 155 0.318 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 207 156 157 0.279 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 208 158 159 0.345 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 209 158 160 0.239 12 2 Freeway 4100 60 210 161 162 0.011 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 211 162 161 0.011 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 212 148 163 0.013 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 213 163 148 0.013 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 214 164 165 0.014 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 50 215 150 164 0.017 12 2 Minor Arterial 3400 40 216 165 151 0.017 12 2 Minor Arterial 3400 40 217 132 166 0.009 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 218 166 132 0.009 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 219 167 168 0.019 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 220 168 167 0.019 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 221 115 169 1.765 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 222 115 114 0.013 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 223 170 114 0.018 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 Page 4 of 36 o36Appendix Page4 C Page 5 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

_____ (ml) Width (ft) Lanes Rate (vehlhr) 224 114 171 0.015 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 225 102 100 0.034 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 45 226 172 102 0.036 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 45 227 100 172 0.043 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 228 174 175 0.009 12 1 Minor Arterial 1700 35 229 179 180 1.141 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 230 180 179 1.141 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 231 182 183 0.101 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 232 183 182 0.101 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 233 184 185 0.031 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 234 185 184 0.031 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 235 186 187 0.281 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 236 188 186 0.318 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 237 186 189 0.258 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 238 189 186 0.258 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 239 194 195 0.199 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 240 194 196 0.229 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 241 196 194 0.229 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 242 196 198 0.194 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 243 199 194 0.336 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 244 200 201 0.014 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 245 201 200 0.014 12 _1 Major Arterial 1300 45 246 202 203 0.234 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 247 203 202 0.234 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 248 202 205 0.27 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 249 206 207 0.328 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 250 203 208 0.291 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 251 209 210 0.015 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 252 212 211 0.384 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 253 209 211 0.262 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 254 213 214 0.386 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 255 215 214 0.487 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 256 215 216 0.007 12 1 MinorArterial 1300 40 257 220 219 0.007 1 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1300 40 258 221 219 0.117 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 259 222 223 0.007 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1300 40 260 219 222 0.26 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 261 225 224 0.529 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 262 219 224 0.283 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 263 226 227 0.304 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 264 228 229 0.041 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 265 229 228 0.041 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 266 231 230 0.123 12 1 Major Arterial ___1300 55 267 232 233 0.292 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 268 230 234 0.311 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 269 235 236 0.006 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1300 40 270 230 235 0.262 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 271 237 235 0.019 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 272 238 239 0.014 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 273 239 238 0.014 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 274 241 242 0.014 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 275 242 241 0.014 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 276 245 244 0.091 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 277 251 252 0.062 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 278 252 251 0.062 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 279 244 236 0.114 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 Page 5 of 36 PageSof36Appendix C Page 6 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Lik#

U-oe D-oe Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

Lin_#______DNod (mi) Width (ft) Lanes Rate (vehlhr) _____

280 254 255 0.011 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 _

281 236 254 0.262 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 _

282 236 253 0.292 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 283 254 230 0.004 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1300 40 284 257 256 0.08 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 285 256 223 0.093 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 286 223 220 0.261 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 287 223 258 0.313 1 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 288 259 215 0.006 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 289 261 260 0.162 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 _

290 260 262 0.015 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 _

291 262 209 0.007 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1300 40 _

292 210 260 0.007 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1300 40 293 216 259 0.006 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1300 40 294 189 263 0.316 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 295 264 265 0.847 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 296 267 268 0.03 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 297 268 267 0.03 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 298 116 107 0.041 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 299 270 271 0.016 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 300 271 270 0.016 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 301 272 273 0.042 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 302 273 272 0.042 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 303 274 275 0.046 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 304 275 274 0.046 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 305 128 122 0.86 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 306 125 130 0.355 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 307 130 128 0.027 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 308 127 276 0.036 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1300 45 309 276 131 0.035 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1300 45 310 277 123 1.36 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 311 279 278 0.162 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 312 123 278 0.041 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1300 45 313 278 122 0.036 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1300 45 314 98 172 0.019 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 315 98 280 0.069 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 316 172 280 0.054 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 _

317 281 170 0.532 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 _

318 170 171 0.018 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 319 91 282 0.112 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 320 86 91 0.349 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 321 282 87 0.112 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 322 283 86 0.123 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 323 89 86 0.004 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1300 40 324 91 87 0.004 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1300 40 325 284 89 0.227 12 1Ramp 1500 35 326 89 283 0.123 12 1Major Arterial 1300 55 327 285 237 0.294 12 1Ramp 1500 35 328 235 245 0.024 12 1Major Arterial 1300 55 329 237 245 0.03 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 330 255 231 0.112 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 331 233 254 0.016 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 332 233 255 0.019 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 333 227 222 0.014 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 334 222 257 0.014 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 335 227 257 0.02 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 Page 6 of 36 Page6of36Appendix C Page 7 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix NetworkClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

_______ (mi) Width (ft) Lanes ___________ Rate (vehlhr) ____

336 225 220 0.314 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 337 220 221 0.118 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 338 210 261 0.162 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 339 213 216 0.435 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 340 207 286 0.021 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 341 202 286 0.019 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 342 286 202 0.019 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 343 207 202 0.017 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 344 287 196 0.34 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 345 289 189 0.304 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 346 177 180 0.043 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 35 347 180 177 0.043 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 35 348 171 100 1.082 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 349 726 728 0.108 12 2 Major Arterial 2700 35 350 728 726 0.108 12 2 Major Arterial 2700 35 351 304 305 1.007 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 352 305 304 1.007 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 353 304 306 1.016 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 354 306 304 1.016 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 355 317 318 0.101 11 1 Minor Arterial 1700 30 356 318 317 0.101 11 1 Minor Arterial 1700 30 357 217 334 1.019 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 358 334 217 1.019 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 359 335 336 1.002 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 360 336 335 1.002 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 361 338 339 0.082 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 362 339 338 0.082 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 363 244 292 0.106 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 364 292 244 0.106 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 365 343 344 0.065 11 1 Minor Arterial 1300 20 366 344 343 0.065 11 1 Minor Arterial 1300 20 367 354 355 0.062 12 1 Principal Arterial ___1700 35 368 355 354 0.062 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 35 369 295 356 0.034 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 30 370 356 295 0.034 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 30 371 358 359 0.029 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 35 372 359 358 0.029 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 35 373 364 365 0.076 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 374 365 364 0.076 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 375 249 377 0.452 12 3 Principal Arterial 5025 45 376 377 249 0.452 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 377 385 386 0.062 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 30 378 386 385 0.062 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 30 379 392 393 0.099 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 380 393 392 0.099 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 381 401 402 0.298 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 382 402 401 0.298 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 383 410 411 0.198 12 1 1 Major Arterial 1300 40 384 411 410 0.198 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 40 385 413 414 0.176 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 386 414 413 0.176 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 387 423 424 0.811 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 388 424 423 0.811 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 389 291 429 1.008 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 390 429 291 1.008 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 391 305 433 1.012 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 Page 7 of 36 Page 7of 36Appendix C Page 8 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Ratraeio Fvelow FFS (mph)

_______ (ml) Width (ft) Lanes Rate________ ________

392 433 305 1.012 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 393 339 439 0.07 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 394 439 339 0.07 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45

-395 745 746 0.071 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55

-396 746 745 0.071 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 397 748 739 0.256 12 2 Ramp 3000 45 398 752 756 0.044 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 35 399 756 752 0.044 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 35

-400 759 760 0.755 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 1 55 401 760 759 0.755 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 402 387 761 0.754 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 403 761 387 0.754 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 404 760 761 0.508 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55

-405 761 760 0.508 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 406 702 792 0.292 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 45 407 792 702 0.292 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 45 408 647 793 0.021 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45

-409 793 647 0.021 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 410 797 705 1.465 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 411 798 634 0.462 12 3 Freeway 6150 65 412 799 800 0.026 12 1 Minor Arterial 1700 40 413 800 799 0.026 12 1 Minor Arterial 1700 40 414 799 801 0.017 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 415 801 799 0.017 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 416 813 815 0.226 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 417 815 813 0.226 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 418 818 819 0.057 12 2 Collector /Local Road 3400 40

-419 819 818 0.057 12 2 Collector /Local Road 3400 40 420 826 827 0.053 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1700 40 421 827 826 0.053 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1700 40

-422 829 830 0.178 12 1 Minor Arterial 1700 35 423 830 829 0.178 12 1 Minor Arterial 1700 35

-424 644 695 0.278 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 425 695 644 0.278 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 426 834 696 0.19 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 427 838 840 0.08 12 2 Collector / Local Road 2600 40 428 840 838 0.08 12 2 Collector/ Local Road 2600 40

-429 845 844 0.178 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 430 843 846 0.173 12 4 Principal Arterial 5600 30

-431 846 847 0.123 12 3 Principal Arterial 4200 30 432 856 857 0.488 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 433 857 856 0.488 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45

-434 846 845 0.175 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1700 40 435 844 843 0.172 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 436 852 853 0.05 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 437 853 852 0.05 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 438 851 850 0.05 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45

-439 446 447 0.026 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1300 40 440 447 448 0.035 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1300 40 441 308 450 0.014 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1300 40 442 450 308 0.014 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1300 40 443 344 451 0.057 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 444 451 344 0.057 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 445 376 377 0.014 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1300 40 446 377 376 0.014 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1300 40 447 465 468 0.619 12 1Major Arterial 1300 55 Page 8 of 36 Page 8of 36Appendix C Page 9 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

_______ (mi) Width (ft) Lanes Rate (vehlhr) ____

448 468 465 0.619 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 449 278 276 0.286 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 450 747 867 0.128 12 1 Collector! Local Road 1300 40 451 867 747 0.128 12 1 Collector!/ Local Road 1300 40 452 662 664 0.938 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 453 664 662 0.938 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 454 656 722 0.861 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 455 722 656 0.861 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 456 874 578 0.191 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 457 608 610 0.485 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 458 610 608 0.485 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 459 872 648 0.25 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 460 645 834 0.436 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 461 834 645 0.436 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 462 561 877 1.08 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 463 644 834 0.688 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 464 695 645 0.774 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 465 793 794 2.217 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 55 466 794 793 2.217 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 55 467 870 878 0.153 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 468 801 802 0.054 12 1 Collector!/ Local Road 1700 40 469 802 801 0.054 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 470 622 614 0.389 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 471 709 737 0.233 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 472 772 879 0.224 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 473 879 772 0.224 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 474 1 880 881 0.262 12 1 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 475 881 880 0.262 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 476 757 763 0.208 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 477 763 757 0.208 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 478 723 763 0.408 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 479 763 723 0.408 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 480 722 770 1.104 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 481 769 770 1.872 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 482 653 654 0.24 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 483 654 653 0.24 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 484 641 642 0.258 12 2 Major Arterial 3600 50 485 642 641 0.258 12 2 Major Arterial 3600 50 486 705 640 0.677 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 487 637 798 1.502 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 488 631 885 0.1 12 2 Freeway 4100 45 489 888 699 0.558 12 2 Freeway 4100 45 490 700 888 0.558 12 2 Freeway 4100 45 491 889 887 0.862 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 492 651 779 0.25 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 493 779 651 0.25 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 494 889 886 0.824 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 495 649 698 0.021 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 496 698 649 0.02 1 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 497 829 833 0.189 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 498 833 829 0.189 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 499 894 895 0.262 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 500 620 624 0.208 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 501 894 623 0.205 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 502 623 613 0.071 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 503 622 895 0.066 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 Page 9 of 36 Page 9of36Appendix C Page 10 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

___________ ______ (mi) Width (ft) Lanes ___________ Rate (vehlhr) ____

504 895 622 0.066 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 505 619 895 0.121 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 506 895 619 0.121 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 507 615 617 0.222 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 508 617 615 0.222 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 509 615 625 0.047 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 510 625 615 0.047 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 511 614 896 0.026 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 512 897 894 0.01 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 513 856 898 0.051 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 514 898 856 0.051 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 515 899 900 0.092 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 516 900 899 0.092 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 517 899 901 0.066 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 518 901 899 0.066 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 519 590 595 1.317 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 520 589 691 0.649 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 521 688 588 0.836 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 522 880 904 0.198 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 523 904 880 0.198 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 524 718 904 0.622 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 45 525 904 718 0.622 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 45 526 565 841 0.127 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 527 866 907 0.295 12 2 Major Arterial 2700 35 528 907 866 0.295 12 2 Major Arterial 2700 35 529 758 764 0.084 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 530 764 758 0.084 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 531 884 908 0.198 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 532 908 884 0.198 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 533 666 713 0.017 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 534 713 666 0.017 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 535 711 601 0.279 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 536 877 890 0.316 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 537 651 890 0.089 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 538 890 651 0.089 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 539 558 641 0.579 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 540 639 706 0.102 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 541 340 470 0.727 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 542 470 340 0.727 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 543 153 129 0.177 12 2 Freeway 4100 60 544 137 476 0.127 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 545 141 477 0.057 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 546 478 139 0.134 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 50 547 389 483 0.252 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 548 483 389 0.252 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 549 247 436 2.35 1 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 550 469 247 0.72 1 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 551 256 317 0.126 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 552 317 256 0.126 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 553 216 209 0.345 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 554 287 198 0.47 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 555 199 195 0.473 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 556 205 199 2.279 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 557 188 187 0.523 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 558 315 330 1.263 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 559 1-330 315 1.263 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 Page 10 of 36 C Page 11 of 43 o 36Appendix Page10

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

______ ______ (ml) Width (ft) Lanes ___________ Rate (vehlhr) ____

560 464 484 0.111 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 561 484 464 0.111 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 562 318 464 0.409 11 1 Minor Arterial 1300 30 563 464 318 0.409 11 1 Minor Arterial 1300 30 564 109 ill 0.628 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 565 389 444 1.054 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 566 444 389 1.054 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 567 486 487 0.023 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 568 487 486 0.023 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 569 486 488 0.024 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 570 488 486 0.024 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 571 487 488 0.016 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 572 488 487 0.016 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 573 427 489 0.994 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 574 489 427 0.994 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 575 191 431 1.53 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 576 431 191 1.53 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 577 346 347 0.16 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 578 347 346 0.16 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 579 355 356 0.116 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 30 580 356 355 0.116 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 30 581 359 453 0.795 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 40 582 453 359 0.795 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 40 583 490 491 2.012 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 584 491 490 2.012 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 585 307 491 0.068 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 40 586 491 307 0.068 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 40 587 191 401 4.926 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 588 401 191 4.926 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 589 312 494 0.078 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 590 494 312 0.078 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 591 247 363 0.18 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 592 363 247 0.18 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 593 290 383 0.144 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 55 594 383 290 0.144 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 55 595 350 497 0.071 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 55 596 497 350 0.071 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 55 597 248 498 0.124 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 45 598 498 248 0.124 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 45 599 250 500 0.077 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 600 500 250 0.077 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 601 250 499 0.065 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 602 499 250 0.065 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 603 499 500 0.124 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 604 265 502 0.007 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 605 412 502 0.137 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 606 502 503 0.842 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 607 503 432 0.426 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 608 300 503 1.189 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 609 503 264 0.02 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 610 502 301 1.005 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 611 265 412 0.136 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 612 398 504 0.853 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 613 504 398 0.853 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 614 504 505 0.15 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 615 505 504 0.15 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55_

Page I I of 36 o 36Appendix Page11 C Page 12 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

_______(mi) Width (ft) Lanes ___________ Rate (vehlhr) 616 367 369 0.27 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 617 369 367 0.27 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 618 94 366 0.174 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 619 506 507 0.158 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 620 279 506 0.01 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 35 621 506 279 0.01 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 35 622 507 279 0.162 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 623 123 506 0.522 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 624 420 508 0.03 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 625 508 420 0.03 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 626 477 140 0.082 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 627 476 141 0.016 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 628 510 509 0.027 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 50 629 140 510 0.087 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 50 630 477 476 0.043 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 45 631 478 510 0.044 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 45 632 266 333 0.252 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 55 633 333 266 0.252 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 55 634 905 831 0.157 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 635 832 905 0.152 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 636 899 914 0.143 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1300 40 637 914 899 0.143 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1300 40 638 484 511 0.51 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 639 511 484 0.51 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 640 316 511 0.247 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 35 641 511 316 0.247 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 35 642 136 513 0.076 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 643 515 516 0.03 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 35 644 516 515 0.03 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 35 645 113 119 0.715 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 646 517 518 0.007 12 2 Collector /Local Road 1600 40 647 519 517 0.009 12 2 Minor Arterial 2600 40 648 520 519 0.007 12 2 Collector!/ Local Road 1600 40 649 441 523 0.007 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 650 524 94 0.168 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 651 517 527 0.131 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 35 652 527 518 0.131 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 35 653 409 528 0.007 12 2 Collector!/ Local Road 1600 40 654 528 409 0.007 12 2 Collector!/ Local Road 1600 40 655 520 531 0.17 12 2 Minor Arterial 2600 40 656 531 528 0.276 12 2 Minor Arterial 3400 40 657 532 174 0.007 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 658 175 529 0.007 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 659 518 520 0.009 12 2 Minor Arterial 2600 40 660 529 532 0.009 12 1 Minor Arterial 1700 35 661 533 519 0.036 12 2 Minor Arterial 2600 40 662 907 920 0.09 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 35 663 920 907 0.09 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 35 664 922 594 1.836 12 2 Freeway 4100 55 665 917 918 0.088 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 666 918 917 0.088 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 667 733 862 0.077 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 55 668 862 733 0.077 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 55 669 730 863 0.294 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 40 670 863 730 0.294 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 40 671 536 146 0.008 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 Page 12 of 36 Page12 o36Appendix C Page 13 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Ratraeio Felhw FFS (mph)

______ ______ (mi) Width (ft) Lanes Rate________

672 147 535 0.008 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 673 535 536 0.008 12 1 Minor Arterial 1700 35 674 538 542 0.039 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 675 542 538 0.039 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40_

676 541 542 .0.025 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 677 542 541 0.025 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 678 539 541 0.004 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 679 541 539 0.004 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 680 479 512 0.233 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 681 512 479 0.233 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 682 329 479 0.014 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 683 479 329 0.014 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 684 481 489 0.004 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 685 489 481 0.004 12 1 -Major Arterial 1300 45 686 460 505 0.003 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 687 505 460 0.003 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 688 456 458 0.075 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 35 689 458 456 0.075 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 35 690 358 456 0.002 12 1 -Principal Arterial 1700 45 691 456 358 0.002 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 45 692 249 545 0.359 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 693 545 249 0.359 12 3 Principal Arterial 5025 45 694 370 480 0.075 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 695 480 370 0.075 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 696 296 547 0.318 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 697 546 246 0.318 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 698 392 549 1.116 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 699 549 392 1.116 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 700 363 550 . 0.076 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 701 550 363 0.076 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 702 295 553 0.021 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 703 553 295 0.021 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 704 356 553 0.047 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 55 705 247 554 0.569 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 55 706 554 247 0.569 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 55 707 549 928 0.754 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 708 928 549 0.754 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 709 401 929 3.285 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 710 929 401 3.285 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 711 313 931 2.869 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 712 931 313 2.869 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 713 311 932 5.107 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 714 932 311 5.107 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 715 489 933 4.092 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 716 933 489 4.092 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 717 483 935 1.095 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 718 935 483 1.095 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 719 404 936 6.801 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 720 936 404 6.801 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 721 393 937 3.31 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 722 937 393 3.31 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 723 761 939 3.207 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 724 939 761 3.207 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 725 760 940 4.836 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 726 940 760 4.836 10 1 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 77 764 941 1.209 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 Page 13 of 36 Page13 o 36Appendix C Page 14 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

_______ (ml) Width (ft) Lanes ___________ Rate (vehlhr) ____

728 941 764 1.209 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 729 403 938 5.791 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 730 938 403 5.791 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 731 391 942 2.868 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 732 942 391 2.868 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 733 943 944 6.607 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 734 944 943 6.607 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 735 661 944 3.381 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 736 944 661 3.381 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 737 246 296 0.047 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 738 296 246 0.047 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 739 296 946 3.547 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 740 946 296 3.547 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 741 777 947 10.896 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15

-742 947 777 10.896 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 743 749 949 0.786 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 744 949 749 0.786 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 745 778 950 7.03 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 746 950 778 7.03 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 747 781 951 9.476 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15

-748 951 781 9.476 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 749 350 953 3.045 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 750 953 350 3.045 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 751 362 954 0.812 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15

-752 954 362 0.812 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 753 354 955 0.74 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 754 955 354 0.74 1 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 755 459 956 0.547 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 756 956 459 0.547 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 757 457 957 0.857 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 758 957 457 0.857 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 759 354 959 0.618 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 760 959 354 0.618 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 761 385 959 1.036 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 762 959 385 1.036 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 763 956 959 0.605 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 764 959 956 0.605 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 765 459 958 1.045 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 766 958 459 1.045 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 767 436 961 3.204 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 768 961 436 3.204 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15

-769 436 469 0.047 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 770 469 436 0.047 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 771 962 963 2.887 10 -1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 772 963 962 2.887 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 773 480 963 0.156 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 774 963 480 0.156 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 775 370 963 0.187 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 776 963 370 0.187 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 777 461 965 1.013 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 778 965 461 1.013 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 779 433 966 3.35 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 780 966 433 3.35 10 -1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 781 430 967 5.435 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 782 967 430 - 5.435 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 783 3-04 969 9.455 10O- 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 Page 14 of 36 Page14 o 36Appendix C Page 15 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

______________ (mi) Width (ft) Lanes ___________ Rate (vehlhr) _____

784 969 304 9.455 10 1 Collector/ Locai Road 800 15 785 306 970 5.245 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 786 970 306 5.245 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 787 326 971 1.598 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 788 971 326 1.598 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 789 269 972 5.333 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 790 972 269 5.333 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 791 238 973 6.944 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 792 973 238 6.944 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 793 336 974 8.182 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 794 974 336 8.182 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 795 443 975 3.31 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 796 975 443 3.31 10 1 Collector / Local Road .800 15 797 442 443 0.045 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 798 443 442 0.045 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 799 416 976 0.869 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 800 976 416 0.869 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 801 309 977 7.569 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 802 977 309 7.569 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 803 424 978 4.683 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 804 978 424 4.683 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 805 1 926 1.405 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 806 926 1 1.405 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 807 2 400 1.252 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 808 400 2 1.252 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 809 3 928 0.637 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 810 928 3 0.637 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 811 4 927 0.416 10 -1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 812 927 4 0.416 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 813 5 964 0.365 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 814 964 5 0.365 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 815 6 504 1.675 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 816 504 6 1.675 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 817 7 965 0.31 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 818 965 7 0.31 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 819 8 942 0.256 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 25 820 942 8 0.256 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 821 9 937 0.468 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 822 937 9 0.468 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 823 10 943 1.405 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 824 943 10 1.405 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 825 11 938 0.761 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 826 938 11 0.761 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 827 12 940 0.606 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 828 940 12 0.606 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 829 13 944 0.472 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 830 944 13 0.472 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 831 14 939 0.278 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 832 939 14 0.278 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 833 15 978 2.197 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 25 834 978 15 2.197 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 25 835 16 936 0.635 10 1 Collector/ILocal Road 800 25 836 936 16 0.635 10 1 Collector/I Local Road 800 25 837 17 929 1.42 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 838 929 17 1.42 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 839 18 930 0.646 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 Page 15 of 36 Page15 o 36Appendix C Page 16 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

S~~~(mi) Width (ft) Lanes ___________ Rate (vehlhr) ____

840 930 18 0.646 10 1 Collector! Local Road 800 25 841 19 493 1.205 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 842 493 19 1.205 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 843 20 967 1.32 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 25 844 967 20 1.32 10 1 Collector! Local Road 800 25 845 21 931 0.917 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 846 931 21 0.917 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 847 22 429 1.732 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 848 429 22 1.732 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 25 849 23 966 0.896 10 1 Collector! Local Road 800 25 850 966 23 0.896 10 1 Collector! Local Road 800 25 851 24 969 0.712 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 852 969 24 0.7 12 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 853 25 334 1.934 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 25 854 334 25 1.934 10 1 Collector! Local Road 800 25 855 26 970 0.924 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 856 970 26 0.924 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 857 27 974 2.737 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 858 974 27 2.737 10 1 Collector! Local Road 800 25 859 28 961 1.214 10 1 Collector! Local Road 800 25 860 961 28 1.214 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 861 29 554 0.676 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 862 554 29 0.676 10 1 Collector! Local Road 800 25 863 30 962 0.693 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 864 962 30 0.693 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 865 31 975 0.993 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 866 975 31 0.993 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 867 32 953 0.232 10 1 Collector! Local Road 800 25 868 953 32 0.232 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 869 33 952 0.542 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 870 952 33 0.542 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 871 34 957 0.117 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 872 957 34 0.117 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 873 35 954 0.315 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 874 954 35 0.315 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 875 36 956 0.064 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 876 956 36 0.064 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 877 37 955 0.15 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 878 955 37 0.15 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 879 38 357 0.243 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 880 357 38 0.243 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 881 39 958 0.129 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 882 958 39 0.129 10 1 Collector! Local Road 800 25 883 40 945 0.449 10 1 Collector! Local Road 800 25 884 945 40 0.449 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 885 41 378 0.151 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 886 378 41 0.151 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 887 42 946 0.415 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 25 888 946 42 0.415 10 1 Collector! Local Road 800 25 889 43 327 0.888 10 1 Collector! Local Road 800 25 890 327 43 0.888 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 891 44 484 0.261 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 892 484 44 0.261 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 893 45 968 2.283 10 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 894 968 45 2.283 10 1 Collector! Local Road 800 25 895 46 462 0.524 10 1- Collector!/ Local Road 800 25 Page 16 of 36 Page16 o 36Appendix C Page 17 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

_____ ______ (ml) Width (ft) Lanes ___________ Rate (vehlhr) ____

896 462 46 0.524 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 897 47 971 0.234 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 898 971 47 - 0.234 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25

-899 48 465 0.324 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 900 465 48 0.324 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 901 49 972 1.225 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 902 972 49 1.225 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 903 50 439 0.083 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25

-904 439 50 0.083 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 905 51 973 1.091 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 25 906 973 51 1.091 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 907 52 960 0.96 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 908 960 52 0.96 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25

-909 53 348 0.76 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 910 348 53 0.76 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 911 54 947 2.25 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 912 947 54 2.25 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 913 55 949 0.512 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25

-914 949 55 0.512 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 915 56 950 2.982 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 916 950 56 2.982 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 25 917 57 948 1.113 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 918 948 57 1.113 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 919 58 951 1.3 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 920 951 58 1.3 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 921 59 941 0.184 10 _1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 922 941 59 0.184 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 25 923 60 789 0.52 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25

-924 789 60 0.52 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25

-925 61 788 1.525 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 926 788 61 1.525 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 927 62 765 0.498 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 928 765 62 0.498 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 929 63 935 0.833 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25

-930 935 63 0.833 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 931 64 445 0.411 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 932 445 64 0.411 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 933 65 934 0.372 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 934 934 65 0.372 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25

-935 66 449 0.32 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 936 449 66 0.32 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 937 67 933 0.866 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 938 933 67 0.866 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 939 68 977 1.434 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 940 977 68 1.434 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 941 69 932 1.193 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25

-942 932 69 1.193 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 25 943 70 872 1.362 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 944 872 70 1.362 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 945 71 920 1.414 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 946 920 71 1.414 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 25 947 72 744 0.631 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 948 744 72 0.631 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 949 73 918 0.943 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25

-950 918 73 0.943 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 25 951 74 408 0.512 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 Page 17 of 36 Page17 o 36Appendix C Page 18 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix NetworkClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Ratraeio Fhlhw FFS (mph)

_____(ml) Width (ft) Lanes Rate______r 952 408 74 0.512 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 953 75 421 2.284 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 954 421 75 2.284 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 955 76 413 1.822 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 956 413 76 1.822 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 25 957 77 525 0.695 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 958 525 77 0.695 10 1 Collector/I Local Road 800 25 959 78 816 0.207 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 960 816 78 0.207 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 961 79 825 0.368 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 962 825 79 0.368 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 963 80 828 0.344 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 964 828 80 0.344 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 965 81 917 0.8 10 1 Collector/I Local Road 800 25 966 917 81 0.8 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 967 82 976 0.475 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 25 968 976 82 0.475 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 969 83 857 0.548 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 970 857 83 0.548 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 971 84 335 1.782 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 25 972 335 84 1.782 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 25 973 173 410 1.572 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 974 410 173 1.572 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1 975 530 174 0.048 12 1 Minor Arterial 1700 35 976 183 191 1.013 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 977 191 183 1.013 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 978 193 380 2.085 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 979 380 193 2.085 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 980 196 197 0.434 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 981 197 196 0.434 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 982 204 203 0.245 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 983 217 306 1.986 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 984 306 217 1.986 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 985 240 386 0.275 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 40 986 386 240 0.275 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 40 987 295 501 0.112 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 30 988 501 295 0.112 __12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 30 989 152 155 0.349 12 2 Freeway 4100 60 990 297 164 0.431 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 50 991 298 154 0.292 12 2 Freeway 4100 60 992 514 299 0.082 12 2 Freeway 4100 60 993 107 106 0.732 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 994 96 110 0.736 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 995 110 117 0.152 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 996 281 169 0.876 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 997 97 99 0.81 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 998 90 88 0.617 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 999 284 85 0.608 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1000 232 234 0.546 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1001 300 302 0.569 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1002 198 204 2.363 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1003 206 205 0.307 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1004 204 208 0.266 12 -2 Freeway 4100 65 1005 217 231 1.419 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1006 231 217 1.419 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1007 189 307 0.368 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 Page 18 of 36 o 36Appendix Page18 C Page 19 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

_______(ml) Width (ft) Lanes Rate (vehlhr) ____

1008 307 189 0.368 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1009 190 492 0.309 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 40 1010 492 190 0.309 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 40 1011 179 308 1.979 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1012 308 179 1.979 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1013 311 312 4.873 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1014 312 311 4.873 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1015 312 313 4.364 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1016 313 312 4.364 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1017 313 493 1.751 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1018 493 313 1.751 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1019 243 494 0.314 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1020 1 494 243 0.314 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1021 319 488 1.528 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 1022 488 319 1.528 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 1023 321 322 0.562 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1024 322 321 0.562 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1025 229 322 0.156 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1026 322 229 0.156 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1027 326 333 1.787 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 45 1028 333 326 1.787 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 45 1029 317 327 0.508 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 55 1030 327 317 0.508 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 55 1031 317 328 0.154 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1032 328 317 0.154 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1033 330 331 1.723 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1034 331 330 1.723 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1035 221 331 0.243 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1036 331 221 0.243 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1037 229 332 0.249 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1038 332 229 0.249 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1039 218 334 5.381 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1040 334 218 5.381 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1041 218 335 4.294 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1042 335 218 4.294 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1043 336 337 2.061 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1044 337 336 2.061 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1045 273 338 0.973 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1046 338 273 0.973 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1047 92 340 6.521 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1048 340 92 6.521 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1049 341 342 0.056 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 20 1050 342 341 0.056 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 20 1051 251 342 0.496 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1052 342 251 0.496 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1053 251 485 0.095 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1054 485 251 0.095 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1055 252 343 0.124 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 35 1056 343 252 0.124 12 1 1 Minor Arterial 1300 35 1057 344 452 0.158 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 20 1058 452 344 0.158 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 20 1059 345 452 7.157 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1060 452 345 7.157 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1061 148 151 0.376 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 50 1062 165 163 0.364 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 50 1063 248 545 0.209 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 Page 19 of 36 Page19 o 36Appendix C Page 20 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

________(ml) Width (ft) Lanes Rate (vehlhr) _____

1064 545 248 0.209 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1065 349 350 2.39 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 1066 350 349 2.39 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 1067 351 352 0.76 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 1068 352 351 0.76 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 1069 240 353 0.59 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 35 1070 353 240 0.59 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 35 1071 240 354 0.451 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 35 1072 354 240 0.451 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 35 1073 357 . 458 0.16 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 35 1074 458 357 0.16 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 -35 1075 193 453 3.274 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 1076 453 193 3.274 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 1077 353 360 0.3d9 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 35 1078 360 353 0.39 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 35 1079 139 517 0.368 12 2 Collector/ Local Road 1600 40 1080 103 507 1.127 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 1081 507 103 1.127 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 1082 363 495 0.978 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 35 1083 495 363 0.978 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 35 1084 95 364 2.435 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1085 364 95 2.435 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1086 94 95 2.953 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1087 95 94 2.953 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1088 106 366 1.91 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 1089 367 368 3.484 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1090 368 367 3.484 12 1 -Major Arterial 1300 55 1091 269 367 0.204 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 1092 367 269 0.204 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 1093 283 369 1.067 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1094 369 283 1.067 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1095 372 500 2.503 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1096 184 373 1.079 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1097 374 185 1.078 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1098 500 375 1.179 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1099 185 378 0.393 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1100 378 185 0.393 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1101 378 379 0.477 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1102 379 378 0.477 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1103 181 379 5.159 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1104 379 181 5.159 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1105 381 457 0.19 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 30 1106 457 381 0.19 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 30 1107 290 382 0.299 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 40 1108 382 290 0.299 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 40 1109 384 385 0.188 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 30 1110 385 384 0.188 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 30 1111 390 521 5.127 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 55 1112 521 390 5.127 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 55 1113 293 521 0.618 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 45 1114 521 293 0.618 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 45 1115 134 167 1.796 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1116 167 134 1.796 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1117 133 166 0.235 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1118 166 133 0.235 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1119 181 391 1.389 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55=

Page 20 of 36 o 36Appendix Page20 C Page 21 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

S (mi) Width (ft) Lanes Rate (vehlhr) _____

1120 391 181 1.389 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1121 391 393 2.508 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1122 393 391 2.508 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1123 182 392 1.915 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1124 392 182 1.915 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1125 192 549 1.466 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1126 549 192 1.466 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1127 192 394 0.561 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 1128 394 192 0.561 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 1129 395 396 0.187 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 1130 396 395 0.187 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 1131 397 398 3.693 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1132 398 397 3.693 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1133 181 400 1.423 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1134 400 181 1.423 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1135 192 380 2.386 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 1136 380 192 2.386 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 1137 191 192 5.406 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 1138 192 191 5.406 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 1139 387 403 1.005 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1140 403 387 1.005 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1141 182 403 3.029 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1142 403 182 3.029 12 1_ Major Arterial 1300 45 1143 183 404 1.159 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1144 404 183 1.159 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1145 405 538 0.158 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 1146 538 405 0.158 12 -2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 1147 407 540 0.608 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1148 540 407 0.608 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1149 175 409 0.149 12 2 Minor Arterial 3400 40 1150 101 168 0.621 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1151 167 115 0.619 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1152 176 388 2.576 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1153 388 176 2.576 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1154 264 302 0.744 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 1155 418 265 0.389 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 1156 176 303 0.225 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 40 1157 303 176 0.225 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 40 1158 303 548 0.108 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 40 1159 548 303 0.108 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 40 1160 132 419 0.862 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1161 419 132 0.862 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1162 419 530 0.668 12 1 Minor Arterial 1700 35 1163 530 419 0.668 12 1 1 Minor Arterial 1700 35 1164 420 421 2.096 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1165 161 536 0.454 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1166 535 162 0.454 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1167 144 422 0.361 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1168 402 404 0.383 12 1 -Major Arterial 1300 55 1169 404 402 0.383 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1170 402 423 1.724 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 1171 423 402 1.724 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 1172 424 425 0.527 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 1173 425 424 0.527 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 1174 425 449 0.665 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 35 1175 449 4-25 0.665 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 35 Page 21 of 36 Page21 o36Appendix C Page 22 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

____________ (mi) Width (ft) Lanes ___________ Rate (vehlhr) 1176 426 449 0.249 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 35 1177 449 426 0.249 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 35 1178 178 426 0.209 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 35 1179 426 178 0.209 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 35 1180 149 428 0.149 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 50 1181 428 149 0.149 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 50 1182 435 136 0.297 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 1183 291 430 1.997 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1184 430 291 1.997 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1185 430 431 3.189 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1186 431 430 3.189 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1187 177 178 0.605 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 35 1188 178 177 0.605 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 35 1189 432 264 0.309 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1190 305 434 6.339 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1191 434 305 6.339 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1192 397 434 6.644 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1193 434 397 6.644 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1194 218 434 8.635 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1195 434 218 8.635 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1196 440 435 0.432 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 1197 435 534 0.809 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 1198 436 200 2.019 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1199 200 241 1.009 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1200 437 294 0.25 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1201 103 364 2.257 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 1202 364 103 2.257 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 1203 523 407 0.454 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1204 422 143 0.362 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1205 241 442 0.511 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 55 1206 443 242 0.511 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 55 1207 417 444 1.267 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 35 1208 444 417 1.267 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 35 1209 445 446 0.099 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1300 40 1210 446 445 0.099 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1300 40 1211 448 446 0.067 12 1 Collector/I Local Road 1300 40 1212 178 448 0.141 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1300 40 1213 448 178 0.141 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1300 40 1214 176 426 0.911 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1300 40 1215 426 176 0.911 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1300 40 1216 342 343 0.701 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 20 1217 343 342 0.701 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 20 1218 252 344 0.181 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1300 40 1219 344 252 0.181 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1300 40 1220 190 309 0.4 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1221 309 190 0.4 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1222 394 395 0.087 10 1 Collector / Local Road 1300 30 1223 395 394 0.087 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 1300 30 1224 454 455 0.321 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1225 455 454 0.32 1 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1226 384 459 0.5 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1227 459 384 0.5 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1228 370 495 0.269 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1229 495 370 0.269 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1230 197 310 1.068 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1231 310 197 1.068 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 Page 22 of 36 o36Appendix Page22 C Page 23 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

________ ~(ml) Width (ft) Lanes ___________ Rate (vehlhr) ____

1232 337 463 4.015 12 1 Collector / Local Road 800 45 1233 463 337 4.015 12 1 Collector / Local Road 800 45 1234 328 464 0.509 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 30 1235 464 328 0.509 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 30 1236 322 332 0.407 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 30 1237 332 322 0.407 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 30 1238 274 338 0.811 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 1239 338 274 0.811 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 1240 266 323 2.268 12 1 Ma~jor Arterial 1300 45 1241 323 266 2.268 12 1_ Major Arterial 1300 45 1242 368 411 0.353 12 1_ Major Arterial 1700 40 1243 411 368 0.353 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 40 1244 280 173 0.613 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1245 408 522 0.077 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1246 522 408 0.077 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1247 406 441 0.463 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1248 441 406 0.463 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1249 407 441 0.468 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1250 149 405 1.231 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 50 1251 405 149 1.231 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 50 1252 95 506 2.544 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 35 1253 506 95 2.544 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 35 1254 298 297 0.477 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 1255 159 297 0.34 12 2 Freeway 4100 60 1256 299 160 0.563 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 1257 299 159 0.42 12 2 Freeway 4100 60 1258 155 156 0.124 12 2 Freeway 4100 60 1259 248 554 0.964 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1260 554 248 0.964 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1261 212 210 0.358 12 1 -Ramp 1500 35 1262 258 213 1.722 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1263 351 470 3.301 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1264 470 351 3.301 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1265 218 269 6.237 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1266 269 218 6.237 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1267 92 364 1.646 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 1268 364 92 1.646 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 1269 135 415 0.8 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1270 415 135 0.8 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1271 475 157 0.437 12 2 Freeway 4100 60 1272 434 463 7.396 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1273 463 434 7.396 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1274 291 398 1.993 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1275 398 291 1.993 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1276 347 496 5.166 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1277 496 347 5.166 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1278 289 263 0.544 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1279 105 108 0.748 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1280 118 116 0.343 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 1281 108 109 0.131 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1282 121 112 0.345 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1283 418 301 0.726 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1284 190 307 0.272 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 40 1285 307 190 0.272 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 40 1286 427 493 1.353 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1287 493 427 1.353 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 Page 23 of 36 Page23 o36Appendix C Page 24 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network Data Table ClntonNGSRoadway Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

______ ______ (mi) Width (ft) Lanes ___________ Rate (vehlhr) ____

1288 243 544 0.281 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1289 544 243 0.281 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1290 314 462 1.945 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1291 462 314 1.945 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1292 315 462 1.8 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1293 462 315 1.8 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1294 285 253 0.536 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1295 534 142 0.291 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1296 345 346 0.594 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 1297 346 345 0.594 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 1298 347 348 1.264 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1299 348 347 1.264 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1300 248 497 0.251 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 45 1301 497 248 0.251 1 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 45 1302 242 201 1.011 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1303 240 551 0.154 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 40 1304 551 240 0.154 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 40 1305 383 499 0.552 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 1306 499 383 0.552 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 1307 458 459 0.722 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1700 40 1308 459 458 0.722 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1309 357 501 0.554 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 35 1310 501 357 0.554 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 35 1311 412 417 0.843 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1312 417 412 0.843 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1313 193 400 2.296 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1314 400 193 2.296 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1315 178 482 0.296 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 1316 482 178 0.296 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 1317 367 468 0.676 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 40 1318 468 367 0.676 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 40 1319 308 492 3.46 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1320 492 308 3.46 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1321 316 330 1.658 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1322 330 316 1.658 12 1_ Major Arterial 1300 45 1323 328 512 0.217 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1324 512 328 0.217 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1325 349 352 3.13 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 1326 352 349 3.13 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 1327 311 319 2.268 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1328 319 311 2.268 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1329 282 390 4.89 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1330 390 282 4.89 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1331 ill 277 2.609 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1332 156 474 0.47 12 2 Freeway 4100 60 1333 473 129 0.894 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1334 475 474 0.753 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1335 253 226 7.543 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1336 224 232 7.525 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1337 226 258 0.564 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1338 208 212 2.304 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1339 214 206 2.351 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1340 187 418 6.583 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1341 302 289 6.752 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1342 99 105 3.4 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1343 119 281 3.191 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 Page 24 of 36 o36Appendix Page24 C Page 25 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

_______ _______ (mi) Width (ft) Lanes ___________ Rate (vehlhr) _____

1344 173 102 0.686 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1345 234 284 5.71 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1346 88 285 5.736 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1347 277 124 0.423 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1348 85 97 4.49 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1349 169 90 4.683 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1350 154 153 0.346 12 2 Freeway 4100 60 1351 157 158 0.085 12 2 Freeway 4100 60 1352 124 475 4.948 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1353 129 125 4.124 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1354 149 438 0.304 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1355 471 272 0.413 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1356 273 472 1.293 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1357 272 275 1.854 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1358 274 273 1.314 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1359 337 439 1.949 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1360 439 337 1.949 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1361 275 238 2.34 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1362 239 274 1.427 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1363 238 270 2.023 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1364 271 239 2.022 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1365 270 466 1.011 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1366 467 271 1.012 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1367 524 467 2.619 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1368 466 524 1.855 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1369 292 465 3.694 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1370 465 292 3.694 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1371 134 293 0.761 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1372 293 134 0.761 12 -1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1373 166 167 2.122 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1374 168 132 2.126 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1375 132 532 0.559 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1376 529 166 0.565 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1377 141 526 0.515 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 1378 526 141 0.515 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 1379 422 526 0.608 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1380 526 422 0.608 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1381 509 522 0.07 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1382 141 509 0.167 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 45 1383 522 478 0.053 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1384 510 477 0.098 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 45 1385 528 529 0.157 12 2 Minor Arterial 3400 40 1386 532 530 0.044 12 1 Minor Arterial 1700 35 1387 409 533 0.411 12 2 Minor Arterial 3400 40 1388 120 513 1.222 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 1389 513 118 0.818 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 1390 519 138 0.364 12 2 Collector /Local Road 1600 40 1391 293 537 1.271 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1392 537 293 1.271 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1393 146 145 0.399 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1394 142 147 0.399 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1395 413 508 1.084 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1396 508 413 1.084 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1397 414 415 0.255 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1398 415 414 0.255 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1399 366 96 1.383 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 40 Page 25 of 36 Page25 o36Appendix C Page 26 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

_______ (ml) Width (ft) Lanes ___________ Rate (vehlhr) ____

1400 421 161 0.425 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1401 162 508 1.637 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1402 438 437 0.578 12 4 Principal Arterial 6700 45 1403 145 428 2.127 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1404 294 144 1.003 12 4 Principal Arterial 6700 45 1405 408 539 1.866 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1406 539 408 1.866 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1407 540 542 0.038 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1408 542 540 0.038 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1409 126 121 5.82 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1410 136 416 0.735 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 45 1411 416 136 0.735 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 45 1412 416 525 0.81 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 45 1413 525 416 0.81 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 45 1414 419 525 0.923 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 45 1415 525 419 0.923 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 45 1416 143 440 0.28 12 3 Principal Arterial 5025 40 1417 288 428 1.041 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 50 1418 428 288 1.041 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 50 1419 406 537 0.891 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1420 537 406 0.891 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1421 276 420 0.684 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1422 508 131 1.165 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1423 138 175 0.699 1 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1424 174 137 0.71 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1425 163 288 2.879 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 50 1426 288 148 2.884 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 50 1427 228 325 0.42 12 1 Minor Arterial 1700 35 1428 325 228 0.42 12 1 Minor Arterial 1700 35 1429 322 543 0.153 11 1 Major Arterial 1700 30 1430 543 322 0.153 11 1 Major Arterial 1700 30 1431 429 544 4.133 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1432 544 429 4.133 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1433 243 314 0.614 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 1434 314 243 0.614 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 1435 266 292 1.065 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1436 292 266 1.065 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1437 326 327 4.676 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 55 1438 327 326 4.676 12 -1 Minor Arterial 1300 55 1439 329 543 0.279 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 35 1440 543 329 0.279 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 35 1441 320 321 1.183 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1442 321 320 1.183 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1443 320 215 0.228 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1444 259 320 0.226 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1445 261 486 2.402 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 1446 486 261 2.402 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 1447 203 487 0.303 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 1448 487 203 0.303 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 1449 197 286 2.355 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 1450 286 197 2.355 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 1451 310 319 1.099 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1452 319 310 1.099 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1453 267 323 4.303 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 1454 323 267 4.303 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 1455 267 324 4.569 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 Page 26 of 36 C Page 27 of 43 o 36Appendix Page26

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

S(ml) Width (ft) Lanes Rate (vehlhr) ____

1456 324 267 4.569 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1457 324 325 0.261 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1458 325 324 0.261 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1459 211 225 1.723 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1460 262 259 0.349 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1461 309 310 8.83 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1462 310 309 8.83 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1463 482 552 0.46 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 40 1464 552 482 0.46 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 40 1465 384 457 0.126 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 30 1466 457 384 0.126 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 30 1467 348 351 3.147 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1468 351 348 3.147 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1469 176 444 0.911 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1470 444 176 0.911 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1471 303 445 0.395 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1300 40 1472 445 303 0.395 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1300 40 1473 177 432 0.426 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1474 432 177 0.426 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1475 397 399 2.433 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1476 399 397 2.433 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1477 396 460 2.457 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1478 460 396 2.457 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1479 381 382 0.301 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 30 1480 382 381 0.301 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 30 1481 362 551 0.308 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 45 1482 551 362 0.308 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 45 1483 353 498 0.66 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 35 1484 498 353 0.66 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 35 1485 250 377 1.535 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 55 1486 377 250 1.535 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 55 1487 377 455 0.395 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1300 40 1488 455 377 0.395 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1300 40 1489 371 495 1.006 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 35 1490 495 371 1.006 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 35 1491 371 553 0.96 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 55 1492 553 371 0.96 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 55 1493 371 399 5.586 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1494 399 371 5.586 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1495 249 496 0.183 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1496 496 249 0.183 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1497 249 361 0.101 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1498 361 249 0.101 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1499 360 361 0.509 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1500 361 360 0.509 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1501 201 469 2.017 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1502 362 550 0.761 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 45 1503 550 362 0.761 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 45 1504 381 454 0.316 12 1 Collector/I Local Road 1700 40 1505 454 381 0.316 12 1 Collector/I Local Road 1700 40 1506 463 480 2.947 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1507 480 463 2.947 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1508 291 461 0.405 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1509 461 291 0.405 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1510 177 548 0.796 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 35 1511 548 177 0.796 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 35 Page 27 of 36 o 36Appendix Page27 C Page 28 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

S(mi) Width (ft) Lanes Rate (vehlhr) 1512 481 552 1.178 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1513 552 481 1.178 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1514 246 184 2.69 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1515 185 296 2.689 12 2 Principal Arterial 3800 65 1516 373 372 1.477 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1517 375 374 1.479 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1518 433 461 0.609 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1519 461 433 0.609 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1520 442 471 1.61 1 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 55 1521 472 443 1.623 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 55 1522 558 557 0.745 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1523 562 561 0.186 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1524 560 563 0.244 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1525 572 571 1.583 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1526 573 570 1.598 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1527 576 575 0.257 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1528 577 875 0.229 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1529 578 579 0.26 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1530 575 580 0.099 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1531 581 582 0.245 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1532 586 587 0.286 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1533 588 589 0.254 12 . 2 Freeway 4100 65 1534 590 588 0.699 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1535 585 591 0.286 12 2 Freeway 4100 55 1536 592 593 0.286 12 2 Freeway 4100 55 1537 594 592 0.72 12 2 Freeway 4100 55 1538 595 921 1.898 12 2 Freeway 4100 55 1539 597 596 0.561 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1540 600 601 0.501 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1541 602 737 0.53 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1542 705 635 0.413 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 1543 704 642 0.479 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 1544 643 881 0.767 12 2 Major Arterial 3600 55 1545 881 643 0.767 12 2 Major Arterial 3600 55 1546 643 909 0.167 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 45 1547 909 643 0.167 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 45 1548 655 757 0.173 11 1 Major Arterial 1700 30 1549 757 655 0.173 11 1 Major Arterial 1700 30 1550 703 883 1.51 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 1551 883 703 1.51 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 1552 702 785 1.028 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 45 1553 785 702 1.028 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 45 1554 621 812 0.116 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1555 812 621 0.116 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1556 921 597 3.019 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1557 598 922 3.048 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1558 670 729 0.186 1 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 35 1559 729 670 0.186 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 35 1560 734 876 0.422 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 40 1561 876 734 0.422 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 40 1562 670 735 0.254 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 45 1563 735 670 0.254 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 45 1564 684 736 2.374 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1565 736 684 2.374 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1566 737 600 1.41 12 1 2 1 Freeway 4100 65 1-567 732 738 0.883 12 1 2 1 Minor Arterial 3400 40 Page 28 of 36 Page28 o 36Appendix C Page 29 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node 0-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

_____(mi) Width (ft) Lanes Rate (vehlhr) 1568 738 732 0.883 12 2 Minor Arterial 3400 40 1569 739 740 0.369 12 2 Major Arterial 3600 50 1570 740 739 0.369 12 2 Major Arterial 3600 50 1571 741 742 1.729 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1572 742 741 1.729 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1573 742 743 0.273 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1574 743 742 0.273 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1575 744 746 0.914 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1576 746 744 0.914 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1577 752 766 0.273 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 35 1578 766 752 0.273 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 35 1579 753 754 0.118 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 55 1580 754 753 0.118 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 55 1581 752 753 0.249 11 1 Major Arterial 1700 30 1582 753 752 0.249 11 1 Major Arterial 1700 30 1583 721 758 0.158 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1584 758 721 0.158 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1585 759 762 2.514 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1586 762 759 2.514 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1587 755 768 0.181 11 1 Major Arterial 1700 30 1588 768 755 0.181 11 1 Major Arterial 1700 30 1589 756 765 0.181 11 1 Major Arterial 1700 30 1590 765 756 0.181 11 1 Major Arterial 1700 30 1591 655 755 0.502 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 35 1592 755 655 0.502 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 35 1593 751 753 0.593 11 1 Major Arterial 1700 30 1594 753 751 0.593 11 1 Major Arterial 1700 30 1595 721 767 0.4 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 45 1596 767 721 0.4 12 1 Collector / Local Road 800 45 1597 883 908 3.227 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1598 908 883 3.227 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1599 570 769 2.58 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1600 658 572 2.192 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1601 653 776 0.39 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1602 776 653 0.39 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1603 775 879 0.578 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1604 879 775 0.578 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1605 774 776 0.439 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1606 776 774 0.439 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1607 654 569 0.8 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 1608 772 774 0.326 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1609 774 772 0.326 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1610 568 653 0.293 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 1611 483 665 2.005 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1612 665 483 2.005 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1613 771 777 3.794 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 1614 777 771 3.794 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 1615 777 778 1.279 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 1616 778 777 1.279 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 1617 606 605 3.934 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 55 1618 604 607 3.933 12 2 Principal Arterial 3700 55 1619 608 780 0.794 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 1620 781 782 5.31 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1621 782 781 5.31 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1622 784 785 1.149 12 2 Major Arterial 3600 55 1623 785 784 1.149 12 2 Major Arterial 3600 55__

Page 29 of 36 Page29 o 36Appendix C Page 30 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

______ ______ (mi) Width (ft) Lanes ___________ Rate (vehlhr) 1624 786 883 1.615 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 1625 883 786 1.615 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 55 1626 665 786 1.519 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 1627 786 665 1.519 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 1628 788 882 1.518 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1629 882 788 1.518 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1630 773 781 2.012 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1631 781 773 2.012 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1632 388 883 2.372 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1633 883 388 2.372 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1634 762 767 2.039 12 1 Collector!/ Local Road 800 55 1635 767 762 2.039 12 1 Collector! Local Road 800 55 1636 661 762 3.603 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1637 762 661 3.603 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1638 780 546 5.715 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1639 547 790 3.638 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1640 790 610 0.622 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 1641 715 759 1.096 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1642 759 715 1.096 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1643 770 568 6.286 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1644 566 872 6.723 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1645 719 791 1.015 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1646 791 719 1.015 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1647 791 891 0.512 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 45 1648 891 791 0.512 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 45 1649 792 909 0.566 12 2 Major Arterial 3600 55 1650 909 792 0.566 12 2 Major Arterial 3600 55 1651 772 787 5.459 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1652 787 772 5.459 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1653 702 901 0.954 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1654 901 702 0.954 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1655 612 796 1.022 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1656 796 612 1.022 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1657 625 796 1.312 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1658 796 625 1.312 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1659 802 803 0.396 12 1 Minor Arterial 1700 40 1660 803 802 0.396 12 1 Minor Arterial 1700 40 1661 717 891 0.897 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1662 891 717 0.897 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1663 805 804 0.167 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1664 694 805 0.482 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1665 805 806 0.739 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1666 806 805 0.739 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1667 806 807 0.459 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1668 807 806 0.459 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1669 809 810 0.829 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 40 1670 810 809 0.829 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 40 1671 783 810 3.239 12 1 Major Arterial ___1300 55 1672 810 783 3.239 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1673 621 811 0.73 12 1 Major Arterial ___1700 45 1674 811 621 0.73 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1675 811 693 0.151 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1676 814 906 0.797 12 2 Collector!/ Local Road 3400 40 1677 906 814 0.797 12 2 Collector! Local Road 3400 40 1678 816 906 0.352 12 1 Collector! Local Road 1700 40 1--679 I 90 816 0.352 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1700 40 Page 30 of 36 Page30o36Appendix C Page 31 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

___________________ (mi) Width (ft) Lanes ___________ Rate (vehlhr) ____

1680 717 813 1.202 12 2 Collector/ Local Road 3400 40 1681 813 717 1.202 12 2 Collector/ Local Road 3400 40 1682 804 816 0.244 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 1683 816 804 0.244 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1684 818 821 0.114 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 1685 821 819 0.146 12 1 Collector/I Local Road 1700 40 1686 820 856 0.378 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1687 856 820 0.378 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 1688 817 822 0.386 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 1689 822 817 0.386 12 1 Collector/ILocal Road 1700 40 1690 814 854 0.72 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 1691 854 814 0.72 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1700 40 1692 819 820 0.471 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1693 820 818 0.478 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 1694 814 818 0.38 12 2 Collector /Local Road 3400 40 1695 818 814 0.38 12 2 Collector/ Local Road 3400 40 1696 815 822 0.532 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1697 822 815 0.532 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1698 621 825 0.797 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1699 825 621 0.797 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1700 823 855 0.779 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1701 855 823 0.779 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1700 40 1702 812 827 0.896 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1703 827 812 0.896 12 1 Collector / Local Road ___1700 40 1704 622 812 0.689 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1705 812 622 0.689 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1706 830 833 0.075 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1707 833 830 0.075 12 1 Collector / Local Road ___1700 40 1708 831 627 0.145 12 2 Freeway 4100 45 1709 885 832 0.216 12 2 Freeway 4100 45 1710 725 861 0.568 12 2 Principal Arterial 2800 35 1711 861 725 0.568 12 2 Principal Arterial 2800 35 1712 829 834 0.309 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1713 834 829 0.309 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45

-1714 836 903 0.532 12 2 Collector / Local Road - 3400 40 1715 903 836 0.532 12 2 Collector / Local Road 3400 40 1716 815 891 1 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1717 891 815 1 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1718 838 839 0.256 12 1 -MajorArterial 1300 45

-1719 839 838 0.256 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1720 791 803 1.045 12 2 Collector /Local Road 3400 40 1721 803 791 1.045 12 2 Collector /Local Road 3400 40 1722 843 860 0.324 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1700 40 1723 726 910 0.994 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45

-1724 910 726 0.994 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1725 645 726 1.604 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1726 726 645 1.604 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1727 841 842 0.457 12 3 Principal Arterial 4200 30 1728 842 843 0.362 12 4 Principal Arterial 5600 30 1729 849 701 0.064 12 4 Principal Arterial 5600 30

-1730 858 859 0.154 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1700 40 1731 859 858 0.154 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 1732 694 851 0.249 12 3 Principal Arterial 5025 45

-1733 851 853 0.36 12 3 Principal Arterial 5025 45 1734 852 850 0.359 12 3 Principal Arterial 5025 45 1735 853 854 _ 0.644 12 3 Principal Arterial 5025 45 Page 31 of 36 Page31 C Page 32 of 43 o 36Appendix

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Lik#

U-oe D-oe Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

Ln# -oe DNd (ml) Width (ft) Lanes Rate (vehlhr) ____

1736 854 898 0.548 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1737 845 827 0.639 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1738 859 694 0.355 12 4 Principal Arterial 6700 45 1739 693 858 0.357 12 4 Principal Arterial 6700 45 1740 848 845 0.166 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1741 701 859 0.188 12 4 Principal Arterial 6700 45 1742 860 846 0.281 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 1743 858 848 0.251 12 4 Principal Arterial 6700 45 1744 847 849 0.129 12 2 Principal Arterial 2800 30 1745 826 844 0.767 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1700 40 1746 806 860 0.34 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1747 860 806 0.34 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 1748 855 852 0.664 12 3 Principal Arterial 5025 45 1749 854 855 0.086 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1700 40 1750 855 854 0.086 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1751 824 856 1.092 12 -1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1752 856 824 1.092 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1753 490 862 1.941 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1754 862 490 1.941 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1755 670 734 0.235 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 35 1756 734 670 0.235 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 35 1757 729 730 0.162 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 40 1758 730 729 0.162 12 1 Principal Arterial 1700 40 1759 732 916 0.717 10 2 Collector /Local Road 1600 15 1760 916 732 0.717 10 2 Collector/ Local Road 1600 15 1761 916 918 0.008 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 1762 918 916 0.008 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 1763 738 870 0.343 12 1 Ramp 1500 50 1764 746 864 1.007 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 1765 864 746 1.007 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 1766 869 586 0.409 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1767 569 659 6.357 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1768 731 923 0.932 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 1769 923 731 0.932 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 1770 790 611 1.465 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1771 698 861 1.011 1 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1772 861 698 1.011 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1773 741 919 1.663 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1774 919 741 1.663 12 1 M-ajor Arterial 1300 45 1775 669 671 1.413 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1776 567 569 1.123 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1777 568 566 1.012 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1778 865 918 0.463 10 2 Collector /Local Road 1600 15 1779 918 865 0.463 10 2 Collector /Local Road 1600 15 1780 863 912 0.317 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1781 912 863 0.317 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1782 341 771 4.569 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1783 771 341 4.569 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1784 661 782 4.14 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1785 782 661 4.14 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1786 647 702 5.022 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 35 1787 702 647 5.022 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 35 1788 754 787 2.913 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1789 787 754 2.913 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1--790 787 794 4.007 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1791 794 787 4.007 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 Page 32 of 36 Page32 o 36Appendix C Page 33 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

______ ______ (ml) Width (ft) Lanes ___________ Rate (vehlhr) _____

1792 751 882 0.31 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 1793 882 751 0.31 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 1794 768 884 0.087 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 1795 884 768 0.087 11 1 Major Arterial 1300 30 1796 764 911 0.765 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1797 911 764 0.765 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1798 759 911 1.409 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1799 911 759 1.409 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1800 766 789 4.67 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1801 789 766 4.67 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1802 774 789 1.304 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1803 789 774 1.304 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1804 775 783 1.422 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1805 783 775 1.422 12 1 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1806 704 556 0.729 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1807 557 638 8.389 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1808 750 778 2.141 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 1809 778 750 2.141 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 1810 610 749 0.734 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 1811 749 610 0.734 12 1 M~ajor Arterial 1300 50 1812 660 749 0.29 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 1813 749 660 0.29 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 1814 660 782 4.008 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 1815 782 660 4.008 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 1816 606 773 6.148 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1817 773 606 6.148 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1818 640 704 8.321 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1819 638 637 0.684 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1820 633 797 0.558 12 3 Freeway 6150 65 1821 624 892 2.213 12 3 Freeway 6150 65 1822 652 567 6.502 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1823 872 886 0.708 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1824 697 560 1.244 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1825 877 887 0.729 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1826 770 888 0.951 1 12 2 Freeway 4100 45 1827 888 779 0.951 12 2 Freeway 4100 45 1828 889 890 0.104 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1829 890 889 0.104 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1830 650 889 0.1 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1831 889 650 0.1 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1832 886 697 0.797 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1833 844 565 0.965 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1834 807 808 1.11 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1835 808 807 1.11 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1836 892 559 0.727 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1837 892 633 1.113 12 3 Freeway 6150 65 1838 634 893 1.281 12 3 Freeway 6150 65 1839 616 618 0.235 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1840 800 807 1.447 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1841 807 800 1.447 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1842 803 840 0.923 12 2 Collector / Local Road 3400 40 1843 840 803 0.923 12 2 Collector/ Local Road 3400 40 1844 898 855 0.584 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1845 850 693 0.25 12 3 Principal Arterial 5025 45 1846 804 716 0.495 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1847 691 873 0.533 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 Page 33 of 36 o 36Appendix Page33 C Page 34 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

S~~~~~(mi) Width (ft) Lanes ___________ Rate (vehlhr) _____

1848 823 824 0.508 12 1 Collector/I Local Road 1700 40 1849 824 823 0.508 12 1 Collector!/ Local Road 1700 40 1850 835 903 0.396 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1851 903 835 0.396 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1852 833 905 0.663 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1853 905 833 0.663 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1854 727 808 0.259 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 35 1855 808 727 0.259 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 35 1856 795 803 0.992 12 1 Minor Arterial 1700 40 1857 803 795 0.992 12 1 Minor Arterial 1700 40 1858 655 765 0.487 11 1 Major Arterial 1700 30 1859 765 655 0.487 11 1 Major Arterial 1700 30 1860 609 780 0.704 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1861 626 893 0.376 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1862 824 902 0.828 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1863 902 824 0.828 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1864 817 821 1.03 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 1865 821 817 1.03 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 1866 815 837 0.76 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1700 40 1867 837 815 0.76 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1700 40 1868 837 903 0.76 12 1 Collector!/ Local Road 1700 40 1869 903 837 0.76 12 1 Collector!/ Local Road 1700 40 1870 573 714 0.262 12 1 Ramp 1500 55 1871 659 657 0.273 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 1872 769 724 0.287 12 1 Ramp 1500 35 1873 776 879 0.335 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1874 879 776 0.335 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1875 654 773 1.348 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1876 773 654 1.348 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1877 608 750 0.507 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 1878 750 608 0.507 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 1879 641 771 1.508 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1880 771 641 1.508 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1881 699 706 3.502 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1882 706 699 3.502 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1883 893 897 2.184 12 3 Freeway 6150 65 1884 887 652 0.816 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1885 838 910 0.94 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1886 910 838 0.94 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1887 826 828 0.533 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1700 40 1888 828 826 0.533 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 1889 708 912 1.378 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1890 912 708 1.378 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1891 736 913 1.632 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1892 913 736 1.632 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1893 864 865 1.998 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 1894 865 864 1.998 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 1895 301 573 7.1 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1896 571 300 6.77 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1897 195 687 4.26 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1898 596 287 4.263 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1899 612 902 1.941 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1300 40 1900 902 612 1.941 12 1 Collector! Local Road 1300 40 1901 822 836 1.521 12 1 Collector!/ Local Road 1700 40 1902 836 822 1.521 12 1 Collector!/ Local Road 1700 40 1903 791 837 1.116 12 2 Collector /Local Road 3400 40 Page 34 of 36 o 36Appendix Page34 C Page 35 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network ClntonNGSRoadway Data Table Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

________(mi) Width (ft) Lanes Rate (veh/hr) _____

1904 837 791 1.116 12 2 Collector /Local Road 3400 40 1905 719 835 0.593 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1300 40 1906 835 719 0.593 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1300 40 1907 813 817 0.572 12 2 Collector / Local Road 3400 40 1908 817 813 0.572 12 2 Collector / Local Road 3400 40 1909 813 814 1.363 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 1910 814 813 1.363 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 1911 823 825 0.512 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 1912 825 823 0.512 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1700 40 1913 828 830 0.412 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1700 40 1914 830 828 0.412 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 1915 773 783 2.341 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1916 783 773 2.341 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1917 783 784 0.538 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 45 1918 784 783 0.538 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 45 1919 607 609 5.467 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1920 611 606 5.578 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1921 795 914 0.976 12 1 Collector / Local Road 1700 40 1922 914 795 0.976 12 1 Collector /Local Road 1700 40 1923 839 900 0.797 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1924 900 839 0.797 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1925 728 809 0.679 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 40 1926 809 728 0.679 12 2 Major Arterial 3100 40 1927 800 910 0.761 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1928 910 800 0.761 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1929 800 891 1.016 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1930 891 800 1.016 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1931 738 739 0.138 12 2 Major Arterial 3600 50 1932 739 738 0.138 12 2 Major Arterial 3600 50 1933 865 866 1.26 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 1934 866 865 1.26 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 1935 920 924 0.177 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 35 1936 924 920 0.177 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 35 1937 263 599 5.115 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1938 601 188 5.092 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1939 713 730 0.392 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1940 730 713 0.392 12 2 Principal Arterial 3350 45 1941 692 924 0.652 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1942 924 692 0.652 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1943 574 602 4.728 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1944 603 576 4.713 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1945 731 868 3.73 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1946 868 731 3.73 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1947 864 871 1.913 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 1948 871 864 1.913 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 1949 736 871 4.012 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 1950 871 736 4.012 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 1951 708 868 0.597 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 1952 868 708 0.597 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 50 1953 915 923 0.438 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 50 1954 923 915 0.438 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 50 1955 743 871 1 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 1956 871 743 1 12 1 Minor Arterial 1300 40 1957 692 745 0.915 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1958 745 692 0.915 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 199 735 913 0.544 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 Page 35 of 36 C Page 36 of 43 o 36Appendix Page35

Appendix C Clinton NGS Appedix Network Data Table ClntonNGSRoadway Link # U-Node D-Node Length Lane Number of Roadway Type Saturation Flow FFS (mph)

_________(mi) Width (ft) Lanes ___________ Rate (vehlhr) _____

1960 913 735 0.544 12 1 Principal Arterial 1600 45 1961 194 919 2.706 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1962 919 194 2.706 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1963 692 747 1.003 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1964 747 692 1.003 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1965 925 748 0.314 12 2 Ramp 3000 55 1966 878 585 0.734 12 2 Freeway 4100 55 1967 584 925 0.788 12 2 Freeway 4100 55 1968 743 744 1.012 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1969 744 743 1.012 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 55 1970 740 867 2.997 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1700 40 1971 867 740 2.997 12 1 Collector/ Local Road 1700 40 1972 740 866 1.364 12 2 Major Arterial 2700 35 1973 866 740 1.364 12 2 Major Arterial 2700 35 1974 733 876 0.38 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1975 876 733 0.38 12 1 Major Arterial 1700 45 1976 682 590 1.748 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1977 583 581 1.773 12 2 Freeway 4100 65 1978 732 915 1.05 12 2 Minor Arterial 3400 40 1979 915 732 1.05 12 2 Minor Arterial 3400 40 1980 707 741 0.372 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1981 741 707 0.372 12 1 Major Arterial 1300 45 1982 380 926 7.797 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 1983 926 380 7.797 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 1984 394 927 2.56 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 1985 927 394 2.56 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 1986 427 930 7.603 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 1987 930 427 7.603 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 1988 412 934 7.216 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 1989 934 412 7.216 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 1990 246 945 4.361 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 1991 945 246 4.361 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 1992 660 948 3.449 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 1993 948 660 3.449 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 1994 376 952 4.099 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 1995 952 376 4.099 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 1996 381 958 1.631 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 1997 958 381 1.631 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 1998 454 957 0.825 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 1999 957 454 0.825 10 1 Collector /Local Road 800 15 2000 352 960 8.789 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 2001 960 352 8.789 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 2002 399 964 4.088 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 2003 964 399 4.088 10 1 Collector/ Local Road 800 15 2004 315 968 ý4.ý805 10 1 collector/ Local Road 800 15 2005 968 315 14.805 10 1 Collector / Local Road 800 15 Page 36 of 36 Page36 o 36Appendix C Page 37 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Node Data Table Note: Coordinatesin NAD83 State Plane Illinois East Node # X-Coord Y-Coord Control Type 86 847046.71 1198913.3 Two-way stop 87 847061.86 1197073.6 Two-way stop 89 847066.33 1198913.2 Two-way stop 91 847045.03 1197073.6 Two-way stop 94 809713.08 1190825.5 Signalized - Actuated 97 829254.48 1181862.8 Diverge - Uncontrolled 98 827764.28 1182673.5 Diverge - Uncontrolled 99 827648.61 1181805.1 Two-way yield 100 827627.64 1182652.4 Two-way stop 101 826450.63 1181210 Two-way yield 102 827611.6 1182705 Two-way yield 106 809794.08 1182432 Two-way yield 108 809887.67 1181138.4 Two-way yield 110 809738.85 1181299.3 Two-way yield 111 808539.83 1181112.7 Two-way yield 112 809731.85 1181047.7 Two-way yield 114 826515.17 1181213.3 Two-way stop 115 826472.76 1181158.9 Two-way stop 116 809785.96 1181060.8 Two-way yield 119 810964.21 1181112.7 Two-way yield 120 809748.19 1179632.9 Two-way yield 122 794797.92 1176548.2 Two-way stop 123 794761.01 1176579.7 Two-way stop 124 795256.08 1176241.7 Two-way yield 126 796802.66 1177453.3 Two-way yield 127 795927.29 1175608.4 Two-way stop 128 795860.31 1175661.9 Two-way yield 130 795992.57 1175708.2 Diverge - Uncontrolled 131 795958.56 1175584.4 Two-way stop 136 809804.34 1174930.7 Signalized - Flashing 167 825604.89 1180069.1 Two-way stop 168 825578.2 1180085.6 Two-way stop 169 828822.65 1181738.4 Two-way yield 170 826607.62 1181190.8 Diverge - Uncontrolled 171 826563.26 1181274.9 Two-way yield 172 827669.13 1182706.9 Two-way stop 173 828557.32 1183888.9 Diverge - Uncontrolled 176 896976.52 1306427.7 Two-way stop 177 900943.83 1302574.3 All-way stop 178 897927.34 1302136.6 All-way stop 181 837589.95 1296107 Two-way stop 182 868880.53 1295759.4 Two-way stop Page 1 of 6 Appendix C Page 38 of 43

Appendix C Clinton INGS Node Data Table Node # X-Coord Y-Coord Control Type 183 869416.68 1295760.6 Two-way stop 184 807965.01 1294831.1 Two-way stop 185 808015.13 1294837.1 Two-way stop 191 869392.52 1290675.3 Two-way stop 192 857780.13 1283099.5 Two-way stop 193 834733.81 1278597.3 Two-way stop 197 937223.54 1252327.1 Two-way stop 200 807285.96 1246744.3 Two-way stop 201 807361.6 1246754.7 Two-way stop 217 868968 1229034.7 Two-way stop 218 847305.71 1228964.9 Two-way stop 238 809703.02 1217481.1 Two-way stop 239 809778.69 1217484.3 Two-way stop 240 807970.87 1268457.3 Signalized - Actuated 241 807234.19 1241425.9 Two-way stop 242 807309.75 1241425.3 Two-way stop 243 897024.58 1260363.6 Two-way stop 246 804635.67 1306925.6 Two-way stop 247 807226.2 1261145.8 Signalized -Actuated 248 802494.63 1267661 Signalized - Actuated 249 802194.06 1270519.4 Signalized - Actuated 250 808451.82 1278237.7 Signalized - Actuated 264 902597.29 1305010.2 Two-way stop 265 903033.04 1306301.5 Two-way stop 272 807287.74 1228077.4 Two-way stop 273 807355.16 1228081 Two-way stop 274 809166.51 1224862 Two-way stop 275 809115.36 1224807.5 Two-way stop 276 795912.81 1175552.2 Two-way yield 278 794749.93 1176515.4 Two-way yield 279 794094.72 1177070.5 Two-way stop 280 827720.67 1182776.2 Two-way yield 281 826882.72 1181666.3 Diverge - Uncontrolled 291 869101.31 1260866 All-way stop 295 810754.1 1268574.6 Two-way stop 296 804711.07 1306928.7 Two-way stop 301 901528.25 1306823.4 Two-way yield 302 903746.44 1304784.5 Two-way yield 303 897939.87 1305732.2 Two-way stop 304 868974.09 1244870.4 Two-way stop 305 869001.47 1250181.7 Two-way stop 306 868957.66 1239511.8 Two-way stop 310 931680.97 1252310.7 Two-way stop 311 916877.18 1255783.6 Two-way stop Page 2 of 6 Appendix C Page 39 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Node Data Table Node # X-Coord Y-Coord Control Type 312 898352.18 1260344.9 Two-way stop 313 898542.92 1271027.3 Two-way stop 315 903123.97 1241795.9 Two-way stop 319 927880.64 1252306.4 Two-way stop 330 907424.4 1236984.7 Two-way stop 336 831375.54 1228639.4 Two-way stop 337 820469.35 1228668.6 Two-way stop 338 809838.75 1228131.9 Two-way stop 347 773892.41 1270185.6 Two-way stop 350 800886.01 1267140.9 Two-way stop 351 773719.18 1248725.2 Two-way stop 352 776654.64 1251454.7 Two-way stop 353 806295.98 1268418.4 Two-way stop 354 809629.78 1268506 Two-way stop 356 810574.97 1268543.1 Two-way stop 362 807560.14 1266422.2 Two-way stop 363 807517.57 1262007.1 Two-way stop 366 809712.3 1189907.4 Diverge - Uncontrolled 367 847173.01 1206610 Two-way stop 370 812817.69 1260523.7 Two-way stop 371 813027.68 1266103.3 Two-way stop 377 802705.89 1272847.2 Two-way stop 380 845383.96 1281184 Two-way stop 381 807938.86 1272117.3 Two-way stop 384 807929.85 1270452.5 Two-way stop 385 807939.59 1269461.5 Two-way stop 391 844939.55 1296071.9 Two-way stop 392 858738.98 1295899.8 Two-way stop 393 858216.85 1295909.7 Two-way stop 394 857759.48 1280145.1 Two-way stop 397 847856.2 1260932.5 Two-way stop 398 858547.83 1260891.6 Two-way stop 399 838245.2 1260791.2 Two-way stop 401 876084.21 1294925.4 Two-way stop 402 877522.3 1295560.4 Two-way stop 403 869058.2 1311733.2 Two-way stop 404 875545.89 1295707.4 Two-way stop 412 903197.23 1307000.4 Two-way stop 416 813688.94 1175057 Signalized - Flashing 419 820327.88 1175259.7 Signalized - Flashing 420 797669.09 1174084.6 Two-way stop 424 890253.6 1298630.8 Two-way stop 426 896948.43 1301622.7 Two-way stop 427 897332.3 1286896.5 Two-way stop Page 3 of 6 Appendix C Page 40 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Node Data Table Node # X-Coord Y-Coord Control Type 430 869208.81 1271397.2 Two-way stop 432 902217.4 1304435.3 Diverge - Uncontrolled 433 869034.57 1255518.4 Two-way stop 434 847598.67 1250243.2 Two-way stop 435 809779.42 1173364.4 Diverge - Uncontrolled 436 807467.91 1257384.4 Two-way stop 442 807215.02 1238730.2 Two-way stop 443 807287.83 1238733.3 Two-way stop 446 897914.02 1303123.9 Diverge - Uncontrolled 448 897915.97 1302879.8 Diverge - Uncontrolled 454 806270.05 1272111 Two-way stop 457 807931.8 1271119.2 Two-way stop 458 814385.5 1270596.9 Two-way stop 459 810566.45 1270521.4 Two-way stop 461 869074.65 1258735 Two-way stop 463 820737.14 1249836.4 Two-way stop 469 807543.47 1257387.5 Two-way stop 480 813073.03 1260245.1 Two-way stop 489 897367.43 1292138.6 Two-way stop 495 812482.72 1261830.2 Two-way stop 499 808645.46 1277955.8 Diverge - Uncontrolled 500 808683.35 1278571.3 Two-way yield 502 902996.77 1306308.8 Two-way stop 503 902568.12 1305024 Two-way stop 506 794114.72 1177117.7 Two-way stop 507 793464.96 1177643.6 Diverge - Uncontrolled 508 797700.89 1174121.7 Two-way stop 513 809798.71 1175331.5 Diverge - Uncontrolled 524 809708.08 1191714.4 Diverge - Uncontrolled 549 858700.82 1290016.5 Two-way stop 553 810815.02 1268490.4 Two-way yield 564 800704.91 1382173.6 Two-way yield 570 873761.53 1328500.1 Two-way yield 571 875285.13 1326719.6 Two-way yield 583 992200.39 1258916.2 Two-way yield 584 993469.44 1257551.3 Two-way yield 587 992212.63 1257460 Two-way yield 588 992102.5 1257848.5 Two-way yield 591 992353.35 1257674.2 Two-way yield 592 991915.89 1257576.3 Two-way yield 595 990793.18 1257707.8 Two-way yield 606 801448.34 1350423.1 Two-way stop 607 801383.59 1350427.2 Two-way stop 608 800867.98 1328250.7 Two-way stop Page 4 of 6 Appendix C Page 41 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Node Data Table Node # X-Coord Y-Coord Control Type 610 801648.98 1328242.5 Two-way stop 611 801333.07 1329633.9 Two-way yield 635 782833.75 1363487.6 Two-way stop 636 784212.52 1363372.8 Two-way stop 639 784202.19 1363265.1 Diverge - Uncontrolled 644 800707.69 1382089.3 Signalized - Flashing 646 800799.27 1382077.3 Diverge - Uncontrolled 651 801286.82 1372429.9 Diverge - Uncontrolled 652 802448.02 1373356.3 Two-way yield 655 865175.77 1339986.9 All-way stop 656 863424.09 1337035.5 Two-way stop 657 863372.29 1337112.5 Diverge - Uncontrolled 658 865180.48 1336721.9 Two-way yield 660 805852.79 1328203.9 Two-way stop 661 836878.31 1328032 Two-way stop 662 873769.11 1327620.6 Two-way stop 663 873742.74 1327737.6 Diverge - Uncontrolled 664 875278.4 1327606.9 Two-way stop 682 997185.76 1266226.6 Two-way yield 691 992113.13 1256332.4 Two-way yield 695 800715.89 1381641.9 Signalized - Flashing 696 800612.4 1381648.8 Diverge - Uncontrolled 697 800052.7 1373524.6 Two-way yield 699 801515.88 1363163.3 Two-way stop 700 801571.58 1363162.9 Two-way stop 703 875385.11 1327607.9 Two-way yield 706 784334.08 1363363 Two-way yield 714 875306.19 1327493.8 Diverge - Uncontrolled 715 873670.98 1327621.3 Two-way yield 720 863370.99 1336977.2 Two-way yield 721 862987.5 1336535.1 Two-way stop 722 864324.11 1338088.3 Two-way stop 723 864387.56 1338169.9 Two-way yield 724 864402.62 1338025.5 Diverge - Uncontrolled 725 800718.01 1381552.5 Two-way yield 726 806931.44 1382023 Signalized - Flashing 732 1000013.5 1260311.4 Signalized - Flashing 739 1000052.8 1256338.5 Signalized - Flashing 740 1000068 1255024.1 Signalized - Flashing 749 804310.55 1328211.4 Two-way stop 752 864169.71 1342292.7 Two-way stop 753 864134.31 1343608 Two-way stop 759 869257.93 1327663.3 Two-way stop 760 869186.37 1323681.81 Two-way stop Page 5 of 6 Appendix C Page 42 of 43

Appendix C Clinton NGS Node Data Table Node # X-Coord Y-Coord Control Type 761 869154.38 1321004.3 Two-way stop 762 855944.5 1327790.9 Two-way stop 764 864029.42 1335808.7 Two-way stop 770 862651.89 1338409.2 Two-way yield 771 761549.15 1328487.1 Two-way stop 773 826117.34 1354770.2 All-way stop 777 781634.84 1328390.7 Two-way stop 778 788409.16 1328376.1 Two-way stop 780 801291.25 1327046.8 Two-way yield 781 826174.66 1344157.3 Two-way stop 782 826271.12 1328166.7 Two-way stop 807 804754.14 1387253.3 Signalized - Flashing 829 797997.37 1381770.4 Two-way stop 830 797059.87 1381814 Two-way stop 833 797067.96 1381416.8 Two-way stop 856 800265.85 1400686.2 Signalized - Flashing 866 994847.76 1255080.1 Signalized - Flashing 883 881826.73 1327538.8 All-way stop 886 801336.09 1373493.3 Two-way yield 887 801135.41 1373392.9 Two-way yield 888 801456.96 1366103.8 Diverge - Uncontrolled 889 801244.3 1373450.3 Diverge - Uncontrolled 898 800267.5 1400603.9 Diverge - Uncontrolled 959 809607.04 1269500.4 Two-way stop 963 812822.95 1260222.2 Two-way stop Note: Coordinatesin NAD83 State Plane Illinois East Nodes which reflect changes in roadway properties (numberof lanes, speed limit, capacity, etc.) at points along the link are omitted from this list.

Page 6 of 6 Appendix C Page 43 of 43

ARCADIS Appendix D Maps of Average Speed by Hour on Clinton Road Network (Winter Day, Normal Weather, Full EPZ)

Evacuation Hour 1 Avg Speed (mph)

Links

<= 0.00

<= 20.00

<= 40.00

<= 60.00

> 60.00 Appendix D - Page 1 of 7

Appendix D - Page 2 of 7 Appendix D - Page 3 of 7 Evacuation Hour 4 Avg Speed (mph)

Links

____ Af n n-

<= 20.00

<= 40.00

<= 60.00

> 60.00 Appendix D - Page 4 of 7

Evacuation Hour 5 Avg Speed (mph)

Links I <= 0.00

<= 20.00

<= 40.00

<= 60.00

> 60.00 Appendix D - Page 5 of 7

Appendix D - Page 6 of 7 Evacuation Hour 7 Avg Speed (mph)

Links

<= 0.00

<= 20.00

<= 40.00

<= 60.00

> 60.00 Appendix D - Page 7 of 7

ML13254A116

Text

Navigation menu

Search