ML13254A112

10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis Supplemental Response for Braidwood, Byron, Clinton, Dresden, LaSalle, Limerick, Oyster Creek, Peach Bottom, Quad Cities and Three Mile Island

ML13254A112
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden, Peach Bottom, Oyster Creek, Byron, Braidwood, Limerick, Clinton, Quad Cities, LaSalle, Crane
Issue date:	09/05/2013
From:	Jim Barstow Exelon Generation Co
To:	Document Control Desk, NRC/FSME, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RA-13-085, RS-13-221, TMI-13-137
Download: ML13254A112 (5)

Text

200 Exelon Way Kennett Square, PA 19348 www.exeloncorp.comn Exeton Generation 10 CFR 50, Appendix E 10 CFR 50.4 RS-1 3-221 RA-13-085 TMI-13-137 September 5, 2013 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-72 and NPF-77 NRC Docket Nos. 50-456 and 50-457 Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-37 and NPF-66 NRC Docket Nos. 50-454, 50-455, and 72-68 Clinton Power Station, Unit 1 Facility Operating License No. NPF-62 NRC Docket No. 50-461 Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 Facility Operating License No. DPR-2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-19 and DPR-25 NRC Docket Nos.50-010, 50-237, 50-249, and 72-37 LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-1 1 and NPF-18 NRC Docket Nos. 50-373, 50-374, and 72-70 Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-39 and NPF-85 NRC Docket Nos. 50-352, 50-353, and 72-65 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-16 NRC Docket Nos. 50-219 and 72-15 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 1, 2 and 3 Facility Operating [Possession Only] License No. DPR-12 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-44 and DPR-56 NRC Docket Nos. 50-171, 50-277, 50-278, and 72-79

/4,k§AS k) M

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis Supplemental Information September 5, 2013 Page 2 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-29 and DPR-30 NRC Docket Nos. 50-254, 50-265, and 72-53 Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-50 NRC Docket No. 50-289 Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Facility Possession-Only License No. DPR-73 NRC Docket No. 50-320

Subject:

10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis Supplemental Response for Braidwood Station, Byron Station, Clinton Power Station, Dresden Nuclear Power Station, LaSalle County Station, Limerick Generating Station, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, and Three Mile Island Nuclear Station

References:

1)

Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Braidwood Station," dated December 12, 2012

2)

Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Byron Station," dated December 12, 2012

3)

Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Clinton Power Station," dated December 12, 2012

4)

Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Dresden Nuclear Power Station," dated December 12, 2012

5)

Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for LaSalle County Station," dated December 12, 2012

6)

Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Limerick Generating Station," dated December 12, 2012

7)

Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station," dated December 12, 2012

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis Supplemental Information September 5, 2013 Page 3

8)

Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station," dated December 12, 2012

9)

Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station," dated December 12, 2012

10)

Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station," dated December 12, 2012

11)

Letter from D. M. Gullott (Exelon Generation Company, LLC) to U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "10 CFR 50 Appendix E Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis Checklists," date January 23, 2013 By letters dated December 12, 2012 (References 1 through 10), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) submitted Evacuation Time Estimate (ETE) analysis information for the plants listed below. This information was submitted in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50 Appendix E, Section IV, "Content of Emergency Plans," paragraph 4.

Braidwood Station Byron Station Clinton Power Station Dresden Nuclear Power Station LaSalle County Station Limerick Generating Station Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station

" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Quad Cities Nuclear Station Three Mile Island Nuclear Station By letter January 23, 2013 (Reference 11), Exelon submitted the associated ETE analysis checklists for these plants in order to facilitate the NRC's further review of the ETE analyses.

Subsequently, through discussions between and NRC and Exelon representatives, the NRC provided preliminary feedback and observations regarding the ETE analyses and checklist information that was submitted. As a result of these discussions, Exelon is submitting supplemental information to support the NRC's continued review of the ETE analyses. The updated information is included in the attachments to this letter as noted below. The attachments contain a complete updated copy of the ETE analysis and corresponding checklist for each of the stations.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis Supplemental Information September 5, 2013 Page 4 Attachments

---Attachment 2

...Attachment 5 t

1................0. 0 Subject Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Braidwood Station Plume Exposure

.. P a thw........

a n E T E R e v ie w C rite C h e c k list....

a........

Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Byron Station Plume Exposure

.. P a thw......

a n E T E RE v C r i e r i C h e c k lis C h e ck..........................................................................................

Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Clinton Power Station Plume Exposure Pathway and ETE Review Criteria Checklist Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Dresden Nuclear Power Station Plume E xpo..

sure Pathway andc! ETE Review Criteria. Ch.ec.klist...............................................................

Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for LaSalle County Station Plume P a th w a y Ia n

E T E

.R e v ie w C riteria C h e ck li.st Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Limerick Generating Station PueExposure Pathway and ETE Review Criteria Checklist p d....

.~m

.x

~ ~

a R.~g i..a..h.! § Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Statio. Plumne Expo.sure Path.way an.d ETE Review Criteria Checklist....................................

Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Plum e.........

P...me.Expo.sure P.ath.way a !E T E R e w.C.it..i..C h C....................................................e.k.

Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Pl.......

P.ume Expo

.SUre Path.way and ETE Review Criteria Ch.ec.klist Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Pl...u.m Expo su....

re x...

athway...

an...d ET. E Review Cr.itr.. ia Checklist.......................................................

There are no regulatory commitments contained in this submittal.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Richard Gropp at (610) 765-5557.

Respectfully, James Btow Director, Licensing and Regulatory Affairs Exelon Generation Company, LLC Attachments:

1)

Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Braidwood Station Plume Exposure Pathway and ETE Review Criteria Checklist

2)

Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Byron Station Plume Exposure Pathway and ETE Review Criteria Checklist

3)

Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Clinton Power Station Plume Exposure Pathway and ETE Review Criteria Checklist

4)

Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Dresden Nuclear Power Station Plume Exposure Pathway and ETE Review Criteria Checklist

5)

Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for LaSalle County Station Plume Exposure Pathway and ETE Review Criteria Checklist

6)

Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Limerick Generating Station Plume Exposure Pathway and ETE Review Criteria Checklist

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Evacuation Time Estimate Analysis Supplemental Information September 5, 2013 Page 5 Attachments (continued)

7)

Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Plume Exposure Pathway and ETE Review Criteria Checklist

8)

Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Plume Exposure Pathway and ETE Review Criteria Checklist

9)

Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Plume Exposure Pathway and ETE Review Criteria Checklist

10)

Updated Evacuation Time Estimates for Three Mile Nuclear Station Plume Exposure Pathway and ETE Review Criteria Checklist cc:

w/o Attachments Regional Administrator - NRC Region I Regional Administrator - NRC Region III NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Braidwood NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Byron NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Clinton NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Dresden NRC Senior Resident Inspector - LaSalle NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Limerick NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Oyster Creek NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Peach Bottom NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Quad Cities NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Three Mile Island NRC Project Manager, NRR - Exelon Fleet NRC Project Manager, NRR - Braidwood NRC Project Manager, NRR - Byron NRC Project Manager, NRR - Clinton NRC Project Manager, NRR - Dresden NRC Project Manager, NRR - LaSalle NRC Project Manager, NRR - Limerick NRC Project Manager, NRR - Oyster Creek NRC Project Manager, NRR - Peach Bottom NRC Project Manager, NRR - Quad Cities NRC Project Manager, NRR - Three Mile Island R. R. Janati, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania S. Gray, State of Maryland Director, Bureau of Nuclear Engineering, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Illinois Emergency Management Agency Division of Nuclear Safety