ML13231A221
| ML13231A221 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 06/26/2013 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-III |
| To: | Exelon Generation Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML11354A437 | List: |
| References | |
| ES-301-4 50-461/13-301 | |
| Download: ML13231A221 (2) | |
Text
2013 CLINTON POWER STATION INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION PROPOSED EXAMINATION FILES 2013 CLINTON POWER STATION INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION PROPOSED EXAMINATION FORM ES-301-4
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Clinton Date of Exam: 8119113 Scenario Numbers: 1 1213 Operating Test Number: 2013301 Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a
b*
c#
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of
~~ ~* Sl-'
service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
~
~~ 51/
- 3.
Each event description consists of f
i the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew tJ( r the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
- 4.
No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario "
1{/) y without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
- 5.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
'I Cit ~
- 6.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain I
~'y ~
complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
- 7.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so Indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
I irJ{ vv Cues are given.
8.
The simulator modeling Is not altered.
I'( ~' V6V
- 9.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10CFR55.46(d), any open simulator I'
performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated 11 otr s-to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
- 10.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
I'( t/Jr ~
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.
- 11.
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 14_ a)_ r "3-"
(submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
- 12.
Each applicant will be significantly involved In the minimum number of transients and events
~ tJ. {/ v ~
specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
- 13.
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
l'<f u
~
Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d)
Actual Attributes
- 1.
Total malfunctions (5-8) i l'i l<t d
~ J2
- 2.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)
') I I I J C1k
~
- 3.
Abnormal events (2-4) y lt.l I J..
~, t/J' $.
- 4.
Major transients (1-2)
I I I I f
,_ (J JZ-
- 5.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1 ll l}
7 &1.1.z..
- 6.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)
I I).. I I
(
/)
- 52-
- 7.
Critical tasks (2-3) j I ').. I ?-
~~ ~ a I
ES-301, Page 25 of 27