ML13169A435
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| ML13169A435 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 04/15/2013 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-III |
| To: | Exelon Generation Co |
| Zoia, C. | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML11354A318 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML13169A435 (1) | |
Text
OUTLINE COMMENTS (initial)
- 1. Verified the number of applicants to determine if the number of scenarios was adequate.
(There are currently 13 applicants - 9 SROi, 4 RO). SATISFACTORY
- 2. Noted that the exam date on the outline transmittal letter was incorrect. Typo noted - the correct exam dates are the weeks of 3/25 and 4/1/2013.
- 3. Questioned whether the RO Equipment Control Admin JPM, R-203, was significantly different from R-204 on the 2011 NRC Exam and R-200 on the 2009 NRC Exam. Verified SATISFACTORY - R-204 was an airline break whereas R-203 involved the hoggers. R-200 involved changing a filter.
- 4. Questioned whether the SRO Equipment Control Admin JPM, S-205, was significantly different from R-101 on the 2011 NRC Exam. Verified SATISFACTORY - R-101 was a QPTR performance without errors whereas S-205 review with errors present.
- 5. Questioned whether the SRO JPM, S-107, was significantly different from R-110 on the 2009 NRC Exam. Verified SATISFACTORY - R-110 was a D/G surveillance whereas S-107 reviewed offsite power sources.
- 6. Questioned whether the JPM, SIM-102, was significantly different from SIM-111 on the 2009 NRC Exam. Verified SATISFACTORY - SIM-102 was not faulted, whereas SIM-111 was alternate path with a stuck rod.
- 7. Noted that SIM-601 was previously used on the 2011 NRC Exam. A P was added to the Outlines Type Code - Exam Criteria still found to be SATISFACTORY.
- 8. Questioned whether the JPM, SIM-707, was significantly different from R-304 on the 20011 NRC Exam. Verified SATISFACTORY - SIM-707 requires the applicant to manipulate the RM controls, whereas R-304 involves verification only.
- 9. Noted that SIM-805 was previously used on the 2009 NRC Exam. A P was added to the Outlines Type Code - Exam Criteria still found to be SATISFACTORY.
- 10. Questioned whether Scenario NRC 2013-3, Event 4, 1A Letdown (LD) HX Tube Leak, might be better if re-sequenced with Event 5, 1LT-112 Failure. Verified SATISFACTORY as-is at OV.
- 11. Questioned why Scenario NRC 2013-4, Event 3, 1LT-459 Failure, allowed Excess Letdown LD to be established. Verified SATISFACTORY at OV - Scenario Overview removed the reference to establishing Excess LD.
- 12. Questioned why Scenarios were not used under Low Power Conditions. Verified SATISFACTORY at OV - Low Power Conditions were addressed adequately in the exam as a whole.