ML13165A155

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2013 Braidwood Station Initial License Examination Outline Submittal
ML13165A155
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/25/2013
From:
NRC/RGN-III
To:
Exelon Generation Co
Shared Package
ML11354A332 List:
References
ES-201-2
Download: ML13165A155 (2)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:2013 BRAIDWOOD STATION INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION OUTLINE SUBMITTAL

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: (3,z A'I.Dl.) b c::. o Date of Examination: 3)z">/zc/3 Initials Item Task Description a b* c#

1.
a.

Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. IJ! *fJ.. ~~ w R

b.

Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Iii ~ r:m' CV) I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. T V4' A rem T

c.

Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. E w ~~ N

d.

Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. (+.

2.
a.

Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number ~{ of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, If f-s and major transients. ~ I

b.

Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number ~ M u and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule A L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated

A A

from the applicants' audit test(s), and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. ~ T 0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative II' I R

c.

)1 fL and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. elt'7

3.
a.

Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: (1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form fl I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) v (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria (}(!) on the form

b.

Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: ~- (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form tJ fl. (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified I~ (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c.

Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix

( (J... ~

of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4.
a.

Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered

I I~ ~~

in the appropriate exam section. G

b.

Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. 1,4' I~ ~~ E N

c.

Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

f I~ ~~

E fr I~ r"'c6 R

d.

Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. A

e.

Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

  1. '_ I~ ~~

L

f.

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). I~ ~etli

a. Author

)(pP1 /Lh c }~JL'si& V//'; ~N' ~Afe:Ne,"/ t-;.Lzt /t:orz,. L ~ .-;.t~,hlll'2., i-!Ov NOTE:

  1. Independent NRC Reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.

ES-201, Page 26 of 28 .>t \\, be <e\\JitwtJ w\\u."" 'S*~l... q *~co~ 2-v~ r-l~'ok. ~*' e~,~ (~) LPhtv-. ~~£1;+ k~t isf<P"*~el.J-}}