ML13155A047

Comment (435) of Nancy Nolan Opposing Restart of San Onofre, Unit 2, Until NRC Completes Comprehensive Investigation

ML13155A047
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	05/02/2013
From:	Nolan N - No Known Affiliation
To:	Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR22576 00435
Download: ML13155A047 (1)

Text

Wright, Darlene From: Nancy Nolan [nancy@nolanconsulting.net]

Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 10:51 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource; CMRSVINICKI Resource; CMRAPOSTOLAKIS Resource; CMRMAGWOOD Resource; CMROSTENDORFF Resource Cc: Hipschman, Thomas; Lantz, Ryan; Andersen, James

Subject:

NO-RESTART for SanO

Dear Government workers,

working for the protection & safety of the citizens of the United States, I register my strong objections to the re-start of the crippled, mis-managed, corrupt, inept, aged San Onofre Nuclear Power (less) Generating Station.

Nancy Nolan San Clemente, California

Cý From: Nancy Nolan [mailto: nancvynolanconsuItina. net] -.

Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 7:38 AM C2 To: 'Nancy Nolan' r-r -:7

Subject:

W It is frightening & appalling to consider the re-start of SanOnofre Nuclear Power Plant. I do not believe it is safe to start.

If there isn't any problems with it, why doesn't Edison agree to a license amendment process with independent testimony from expert witnesses & a vetting from the community who are subjected to any possible problems that another bungled re-start would entail. Problems to include leaking more radiation than we have already experienced from the "allowable" releases to the January '12 "tube failure" radiation leak. Let's not forget there is no radiation that is NOT absorbed into our bodies, it doesn't flush out in our urine, we don't exhale radiation, we don't excrete radiation. It is absorbed in our bones & other places as a toxin. This plant is a menace to not only our community but also the entirety of Southern California. I can not believe our own government is placing it's own citizens in this dangerous position, when we don't need it as a source of energy (California Independent Systems Operator). I can only believe the answer lies with the fact that money & power will not allow it. Edison has schmoozed many city governments, especially San Clemente, by offering money to any civic group with their hand held out. By the way, not their money, OUR money.

If the citizens of Fukushima could do it over again, I'm sure they would have been writing letters like this to their government, so i do appreciate the chance I'm getting right now to say how much I object to the ecological, emotional &

financial tyranny Edison is placing on me and 8.5 million people who live within the 50 mile evacuation zone. No re-start, begin the de-commissioning process so that no more highly irradiated material "spent fuel" is produced, thus subsequently needing storage on the active earthquake fault lines at the plant itself.

Years into the future, when we're all dead, that place will continue to be a poisonous threat to generations to come.

CLOSE IT DOWN!!

SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= B. Benney (bjb)