ML13149A153
| ML13149A153 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 04/17/2013 |
| From: | Jones G, Messer D, Parrish D - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Cindy Bladey Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch |
| References | |
| 78FR22576 00345, NRC-2013-0070 | |
| Download: ML13149A153 (39) | |
Text
Apr 17, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better. Ensuring safety for all well into the future demands that this request be denied!
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Diane H.
Messer 10157 Collett Ave North Hills, CA 91343-1428
Apr 17, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the.NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mr. David Parrish 12410 W Westgate Dr Sun City West, AZ 85375-5135
Apr 17, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, HD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidenceshowing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms.
Gila Jones 31221 Belford Dr San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675-1832
Apr 17, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims'it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "1-icense amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
The public in California demands adjudicated public hearing under oath here in Southern California, Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mr.
Gene Stone 1203 Via Presa San Clemente, CA 92672-9486
Apr 23, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mr.
c nygaard 1933 Tamarind Ave Los Angeles, CA 90068-3536
Apr 22, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mrs.
Nancy Casady 8412 Sugarman Dr La Jolla, CA 92037-2225
Apr 22, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station has outlived its usefulness, and it is time to keep it closed. The example of Fukoshima should be a warning to us.
This is such a dangerous business that no insurance company will insure it, and its location on the ocean on a fault line and in an area with such a large population is madness.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms.
Amy McQuillan 20391 Rancho Villa Rd
- Ramona, CA 92065-7656
Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org) on behalf of Shaileen Martinez [sc-martinez@hotmail.com]
Sent:
Sunday, April 21, 2013 2:22 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 21, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms.
Shaileen Martinez 60 S Roosevelt Ave
- Pasadena, CA 91107-4193 1
Apr 23, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms.
joy cash 3657 Vermont St San Diego, CA 92103-4414
Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Kristin Van Der Kar
[kristinvdk@yahoo.com]
Sent:
Monday, April 22, 2013 8:56 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC To Not Approve Restart of San Onofre Unit Apr 22, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) has been seeking to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision.
We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S. Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk. It is not clear whether this assessment comes only from NRC technical personnel or has Commission buy-in.
Either way, the public has 30 days from April 10 to appeal the NRC's preliminary decision.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to conduct a comprehensive and open review process prior to making any decision about a restart given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Miss Kristin Van Der Kar 6800 Rincon Rd
Carpinteria, CA 93013-3153 2
V/
Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of DAVID KRIEG [anne.dave23
@gmail.com]
Sent:
Saturday, April 20, 2013 9:53 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC To Not Approve Restart of San Onofre Unit Apr 20, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) has been seeking to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S. Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk. It is not clear whether this assessment comes only from NRC technical personnel or has Commission buy-in.
Either way, the public has 30 days from April 10 to appeal the NRC's preliminary decision.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to conduct a comprehensive and open review process prior to making any decision about a restart given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
DAVID KRIEG 367b Avenida Castilla
Unit B Laguna Woods, CA 92637-6660 2
Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Laura Lynch
[artistlauralynch@yahoo. com]
Sent:
Saturday, April 20, 2013 1:18 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 20, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
With family and friends who live within 50 miles of San Onofre, I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public, our environment and humanity deserve better! Thank you for your critical review and consideration of this urgent request.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms.
Laura Lynch 908 W Islay St Santa Barbara, CA 93101-4602 1
vi Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Lillian Champion
[shadyflwrs@yahoo. corn]
Sent:
Saturday, April 20, 2013 1:18 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 20, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms.
Lillian Champion PO Box 1798 601 Friendly Lane Crestline, CA 92325-1798 1
Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Dinda Evans [dindamcp4@yahoo.com]
Sent:
Saturday, April 20, 2013 12:18 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC To Not Approve Restart of San Onofre Unit Apr 20, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) has been seeking to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision.
We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S. Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk. It is not clear whether this assessment comes only from NRC technical personnel or has Commission buy-in.
Either way, the public has 30 days from April 10 to appeal the NRC's preliminary decision.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to conduct a comprehensive and open review process prior to making any decision about a restart given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms.
Dinda Evans PO Box 178695 San Diego, CA 92177-8695
Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Mark Thormahlen
[mthor@mindspring.com]
Sent:
Friday, April 19, 2013 8:47 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 19, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mr.
Mark Thormahlen 10399 Lilac Ridge Rd Escondido, CA 92026-5407 I
Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Dawn Gifford [dawngifford@gmail.com]
Sent:
Thursday, April 18, 2013 2:20 AM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 18, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
SDGE needs to do the right thing for the environment and their customers, and enter the 21st century by investing in solar and wind, instead of archaic, expensive dangerous nuclear reactors.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms.
Dawn Gifford 4560 North Ave Apt 4 San Diego, CA 92116-2614 1
Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Susan Peinado
[sbpeinado@hotmail.com]
Sent:
Thursday, April 18, 2013 3:50 AM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 18, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Susan Peinado 1314 Trieste Dr San Diego, CA 92107-3950 1
V Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Jeffrey Steinmetz Deffmsteinmetz@yahoo.com]
Sent:
Thursday, April 18, 2013 2:51 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 18, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
"No Significant Hazards" cannot be used in this case when we know it is a defective design.
"No Significant Hazards" cannot be used when this design already failed and they still have not fixed the issues that caused it to fail. "No Significant Hazards" cannot be used because San Onofre has the worst employee safety complaint record of all Nuclear Power Plants in the US.
It is very obvious to employees working at San Onofre, and people in the communities around San Onofre the plant is a significant hazard.
If the NRC determines the otherwise, then we will know the bigger hazard is the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
1
I a
Ms.
Jeffrey Steinmetz 346 Plaza Estival San Clemente, CA 92672-4863 2
Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Evie Kosower [ekosower@cox.net]
Sent:
Wednesday, April 17, 2013 12:28 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Follow Up Flag:
Follow up Flag Status:
Flagged Apr 17, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
Why are we so willing to destroy.our earth and it's people despite knowing better?.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Dr. Evie Kosower 2309 Shamrock St San Diego, CA 92105-4569 I
V Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Grace van Thillo [gracea@earthlink.net]
Sent:
Wednesday, April 17, 2013 1:28 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 17, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
We have ALL attended NRC Public Meetings where there was admission by the NRC and SCE that the steam generators' DESIGN FLAWS are well-documented!
It is well-documented also about the FABRICATION CHANGES were made! Your own OVERSIGHT PANEL on 2/27 stated the inconsistencies of SCE's responses on especially REI #32 and many others.
With unknown consequences if re-started, we 8.4 million PEOPLE, ENVIRONMENT and the California ECONOMY become EXPERIMENTS by re-starting defective reactor and steam generators.
Congress has CALLED for your prudent actions in the name of SAFETY!!
We're praying that you will do the right thing!!
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mrs.
Grace van Thillo 120 Avenida San Pablo San Clemente, CA 92672-3234
Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Susan Willhoit [susan.willhoit@cox.net]
Sent:
Wednesday, April 17, 2013 4:33 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 17, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full Opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms.
Susan Willhoit 326 Chesterfield Dr Cardiff By The Sea, CA 92007-1905 1
VI Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of JENIFER & JOHN MASSEY Difmassey@gmail.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, April 17, 2013 4:34 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 17, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full.opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mrs.
JENIFER & JOHN MASSEY 211 W Avenida Valencia San Clemente, CA 92672-4243
Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Beverly Findlay-Kaneko
[blfkaneko@yahoo.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, April 17, 2013 12:01 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 17, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
I am an evacuee from Japan after the Fukushima nuclear meltdowns.
I am deeply concerned to see the same kind of reluctance to make the regulatory process transparent here as in Japan.
The tsunami and earthquake may have triggered the accident in Fukushima, but it was human arrogance and folly that was the root cause.
If our processes here in the U.S. are truly to be the "gold standard" in nuclear regulation, then we need to be truly transparent and take our time to make the right decisions about this dangerous technology. With actions like the "no significant hazards" ruling, the NRC and SCE seem to be demonstrating to the public an unwillingness to follow the steps required in a rigorous, fully transparent review.
My child does not deserve to have to evacuate from yet another home because safety has been sacrificed on the altar of human arrogance and greed.
Please do the job that our taxpayer money pays you for:
Serve the public good, not the whims of those who sit in the corporate boardroom.
Thank you, Beverly Findlay-Kaneko Huntington Beach, CA 92648 Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms.
Beverly Findlay-Kaneko 19495 Mountainview Ln Huntington Beach, CA 92648-5527 2
V, Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Christine Johnston
[chris.j.therapy@gmail.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, April 17, 2013 12:01 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 17, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Can we not learn from history? SONGS has a terrible history record, by a fault line, has destroyed marine life and is on prime property for a tsunami. What do you (NRC) people not understand about the fact that human lives are more important than money..or ate your consciences just seared. May God help you if that is the case. DO NOT use us as an experiment.
Do you really want to displace 8 million people and condemn their homes and have them live in desert tent cities-oh, that's right-they'll never make it to the desert because there is NO EVACUATION route...so they will be trapped like rats and see a future of cancer and homelessness.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mrs. Christine Johnston
178 W Avenida Junipero San Clemente, CA 92672-4338 2
V Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of joy cash [hilobliss@yahoo.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, April 17, 2013 11:59 AM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 17, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms.
joy cash 3657 Vermont St San Diego, CA 92103-4414
V/
Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Sandra Silverstein
[sasilverstein@att. net]
Sent:
Wednesday, April 17, 2013 11:28 AM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 17, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Sandra Silverstein 4857 Orchard Ave San Diego, CA 92107-3411 1
Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Don Gummow [dgummow@mac.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, April 17, 2013 11:37 AM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 17, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and, transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mr.
Don Gummow 119 Lamplighter Way 0 Fallon, MO 63368-7307 I
Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Kelly Rogers [steppintojoyl963
@hotmail.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, April 17, 2013 12:11 AM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC To Not Approve Restart of San Onofre Unit Apr 16, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
We support Senator Barbara Boxer, Chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013, "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature.
It makes absolutely no sense to even consider taking any steps to reopen San Onofre until these investigations look at every aspect of reopening the plant given the failure of the tubes that carry radioactive water.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process in order to restart one of the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Kelly Rogers 6521 Raymond Ave Los Angeles, CA 90044-2637 I
Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Martha Sullivan
[marthasullivan@mac.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, April 17, 2013 7:32 AM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 17, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms.
Martha Sullivan 2354 Carmel Valley Rd Del Mar, CA 92014-3702 1
V Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Marcia Patt [marciapatt@cox.net]
Sent:
Wednesday, April 17, 2013 11:06 AM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 17, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms.
Marcia Patt 3511 Park Blvd Apt 3 San Diego, CA 92103-5232 1
V/
Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Patti Davis [valhala@cox.net]
Sent:
Wednesday, April 17, 2013 11:11 AM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San.Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 17, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to. declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mrs. Patti Davis 23 Chapital San Clemente, CA 92672-9311 1
Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of John & Martha Stoltenberg Upstolten@frontier.com]
Sent:
Tuesday, April 16, 2013 11:06 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 16, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mr.
3ohn & Martha Stoltenberg PO Box 596 N8362 State Highway 67 Elkhart Lake, WI 53820-0596 I
/
Joosten, Sandy From:
Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Cheryl Kline [cherylkline@verizon.net]
Sent:
Tuesday, April 16, 2013 12:56 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 16, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards.
We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request.
This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mrs. Cheryl Kline 6168 Saddleback Way Camarillo, CA 93012-4421 1