ML13149A084

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2013 Byron Nuclear Station Initial License Examination Form ES-301-4
ML13149A084
Person / Time
Site: Byron  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/29/2013
From: Mcneil D
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Exelon Generation Co
Shared Package
ML11354a426 List:
References
ES-301, ES-301-4 50-454/13-301, 50-455/13-301
Download: ML13149A084 (1)


Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Byron Date of Exam: 04/29/2013 Scenario Numbers: 1 I 2 I 3 Operating Test Number: 2013301 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a

b*

c#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of ~

ft.-

service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

~

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

I~ *It, ~

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

~ ~

the expected operator actions (by shift position) fc_

the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario lf!Jii ~

~

without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

tML l:?v- ~

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain f1XiJ ~

~

complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

fJv Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

~ ~

Cues are given.

8.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

/)Jf(jJ. 'V ~

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10CFR55.46(d), any open simulator

!JM performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated

~

)>I,M-to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

~

I~ ~

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.

11.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 WI] ~ ~

(submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events ti~ 10 )\\V\\

specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

lA *11

~

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d)

Actual Attributes

1.

Total malfunctions (5-8) f) '5' 5

~ ~ ~~

2.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)

I I I I I

~ *- I~

3.

Abnormal events (2-4)

s I 4 I 5" (lJJt -~ ~
4.

Major transients (1-2)

I I J I I Wll 1!.-- )fV'o

5.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2)

J I I I I lt1 ~ ~

6.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)

(J I I I I

~

I~ ~

7.

Critical tasks (2-3) 131c9.

~

  • ~ ~

ES-301, Page 25 of 27