ML13149A084
| ML13149A084 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron |
| Issue date: | 04/29/2013 |
| From: | Mcneil D NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | Exelon Generation Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML11354a426 | List: |
| References | |
| ES-301, ES-301-4 50-454/13-301, 50-455/13-301 | |
| Download: ML13149A084 (1) | |
Text
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Byron Date of Exam: 04/29/2013 Scenario Numbers: 1 I 2 I 3 Operating Test Number: 2013301 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a
b*
c#
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of ~
ft.-
service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
~
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
I~ *It, ~
- 3.
Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
~ ~
the expected operator actions (by shift position) fc_
the event termination point (if applicable)
- 4.
No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario lf!Jii ~
~
without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
- 5.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
tML l:?v- ~
- 6.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain f1XiJ ~
~
complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
- 7.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
fJv Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
~ ~
Cues are given.
8.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
/)Jf(jJ. 'V ~
- 9.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10CFR55.46(d), any open simulator
!JM performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated
~
)>I,M-to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
- 10.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
~
I~ ~
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section 0.5 of ES-301.
- 11.
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 WI] ~ ~
(submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
- 12.
Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events ti~ 10 )\\V\\
specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
- 13.
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
lA *11
~
Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.S.d)
Actual Attributes
- 1.
Total malfunctions (5-8) f) '5' 5
~ ~ ~~
- 2.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)
I I I I I
~ *- I~
- 3.
Abnormal events (2-4)
- s I 4 I 5" (lJJt -~ ~
- 4.
Major transients (1-2)
I I J I I Wll 1!.-- )fV'o
- 5.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2)
J I I I I lt1 ~ ~
- 6.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2)
(J I I I I
~
I~ ~
- 7.
Critical tasks (2-3) 131c9.
~
- ~ ~
ES-301, Page 25 of 27