ML13148A162
| ML13148A162 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 04/26/2013 |
| From: | Collins M, Gray J, Lewis M - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Cindy Bladey Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch |
| References | |
| 04/16/2013; 78 FR 22576, 78FR22576 00337, NRC-2013-0070 | |
| Download: ML13148A162 (103) | |
Text
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey i-I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
F-1 We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track rest-art decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by Physicians for Social Responsibility -
Los Angeles, Committee to Bridge the Gap, Sierra Club and a host of environmental organizations for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Michael Collins 2820 Arizona Ave Apt 3 Santa Monica, CA 90404-1531 L.C=
mn N.)
Y2 11)
C-MZ CA
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey
% J U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i-T1 Washington, DC 20555-0001 C10
Dear Ms Bladey,
7-l The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
C-)
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action A could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befor_
r the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides C
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by" the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
What's the hurry? You are here to protect the public from a potential disaster before it happens.
They haven't fixed the problem that led to the shut down.
Edison wants to get back to making money, we get that, but that is no reason to pur our lives and our environment at risk.
Those of us who live close to the reactor do not want it to go on line until we are sure it is safe.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Jayne Gray 97 Abbeywood Ln Aliso Viejo, CA 92656-2908
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 K-Cl)
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
C-)-
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t<
F could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesl iF full opportunity for public participation and independent expert mn testimony.
CO Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Please protect all citizens in this crucial matter by your support of further comprehensive investigation and subsequent, thorough repair of the San Onofre facility. Thank you.
I Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Marcia Lewis 2550 Pacific Coast Hwy Spc 35
- Torrance, CA 90505-7717
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforf-l the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert
\\,.,
testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
HELLOOOO???
EVER HEARD OF FUKISHIMA????
IT'S A NUCLEAR WASTELAND FOR GOD'S SAKE!!!!
How about you move the damn thing 250 feet further up the hill, so it can't get swamped by a TSUNAMI.
Oh?
You can't do that?
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU GREEDY MONSTERS???
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I'support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Jeff Spellerberg 8200 Wilshire Blvd Ste 400 Beverly Hillsi CA 90211-2315 I-n C/)
crm "t:7 00
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The ct l
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action
__h-_
CD could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before<
m the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides C) full opportunity for public participation and independent expert F I.--
testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
The future threat of plant failure due to a natural or human-made disaster as evidenced in Japan and elsewhere should be a huge example that even the best efforts made to contain and correct a contamination are no match for the extreme danger it will cause to the surrounding area and it's impact on residents, all lifeforms, minerals, air and water.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart
,of the failed San Onofre generators at this time.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Lynettte Lee Pasadena, CA
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission JJ=
Washington, DC 20555-0001 m
Dear Ms Bladey,
-T-The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.F-7 7I-C We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t MC-)
could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befor4-l the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert es C/
testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
As I live close to the San Onofre plant I have been anxious and worried about any restart. It should be closed permanently. Please consider my request for a permanent shutdown.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Elizabeth Rudrigues 1211 Avenida Buena Suerte San Clemente, CA 92672-2349
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey C=
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission' Washington, DC 20555-0001 m
m
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action C-could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befor" the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides%-./
93 full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
I live in the area that would become devastated in the event of a nuclear "accident" or "act of God" at the SONGS plant. I also own rental property that is even closer (in Dana Point).
This directly affects me and my family.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator. It is situated on a beautiful beach...why can't it be used as a tidal power generation plant or solar collector site? If a Solar Power Plant has a spill, all we get is a sunny day!!
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Jeffrey Gothard 24471 Jutewood P1 Lake Forest, CA 92630-3833
2[3J Apr 26, 2013
=)
Ms Cindy Bladey
-T-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission c
=
Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
m m
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
It's time that the government "of business, for business, and by business" revert to the citizenry.
It's wrong to take any action that could endanger the populace.
Laws are in place, and it's unconscionable they be ignored for a business' profit.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
A Oreilly 3090 Via Serena Laguna Woods, CA 92637
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
CI)m rn CD C-)
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t Z could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforýfl the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I wholeheartedly support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Please block the San Onofre restart.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Anne Dugaw 385 Ogle St # C Costa Mesa, CA 92627-3207
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission F I Washington, DC 20555-0001
()
Dear Ms Bladey,
mn The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action th could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of, the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
WITH MANY EUROPEAN COUNTRIES SHUTTING DOWN THEIR OLD NUCLEAR PLANTS AND MOVING TOWARD BETTER FORMS OF ENERGY I THINK WE SHOULD FOLLOW THAT PATH AND SHUT DOWN SAN ONOFRE FOREVER.
NOW IS THE PERFECT TIME AND WE SHOULD TAKE ADVANTAGE OF IT.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Diane Olson 521 Montana Ave Apt 305 Santa Monica, CA 90403-1370
Apr 26, 2013 C0 Ms Cindy Bladey
-in U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 K..o
Dear Ms Bladey,
rn The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
n We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action th o0 could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
I Terrorism:
unless you put the U S Navy around the water side, the US army/marines on the land side and constant fly bys from the US Air Force--it's a serious risk Earthquakes:
really, need I say more Tsunamis:
- JAPAN, JAPAN, JAPAN there comes a point where you "JUST SAY NO" I am so surprised this is even under consideration Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Margo Marsh 29 Almeria Irvine, CA 92614-5347
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
I The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befor the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesll1 full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
For many.years we have been made aware of close disaster. We cannot afford the chances any more.....as time closes on the dangers so obvious.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Jan Steward 2219 Ben Lomond Dr Los Angeles, CA 90027-2904 C__
C/)
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
J The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
, n We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforem '_
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
fag)
C/'
C/?
Please protect the disaster.
We know happen. We need to millions of people in California from a nuclear it can happen.
We have to make sure it won't be intelligent about it and have a full review.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Cathy Schlesinger 4133 Vantage Ave Studio City, CA 91604-2063
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
C )
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action tH could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforelh I
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
As a physician, I am concerned that the health of the public should not be placed at serious risk by any possibility of a release of radioactivity.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
William Perkins 1347 Avenida De Cortez Pacific Palisades, CA 90272-2124 M
C):
C-)
Cf.)
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey P-j U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission J
Washington, DC 20555-0001 j
Dear Ms Bladey,
C-)
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
rn We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action C-)
could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befori the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
I retain grave concerns regarding the use of nuclear power because it poisons our environment.
The mining of uranium is dangerous to life, the well-being of the earth and the general health of its inhabitants.
The terrible accidents at Three Mile Island and level 7 nuclear disasters at Chernobyl, Ukraine and Fukushima Daiichi, Japan make it clear that the continued use of nuclear technology is totally unfeasible. I support the call for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process, taking all of the above issues into consideration.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Greg Foisie PO Box 134 Lancaster, CA 93584-0134
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 m
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t<
could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before f the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evlidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
The public deserves a FULL review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator. Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, this should not be waived at the request of the plant owner.
I I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Nicole Siskind 836 Wonder View Dr Calabasas, CA 91302-2247 r_
C/)
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
F-l-E We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no actionrhgt could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befo!
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides....
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
n C
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the lico M
review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart C/)
decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a c~mprehensive and open review process.
I live only 3 miles away from the nuclear power plant and am uncomfortable with the thought of it being used again. With the recent nuclear disaster in Japan my senses are hightened to the extent of the pollution and radiation exposure a meltdown could release.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Kelly Bartels 102 Avenida Dolores Apt 1 San Clemente, CA 92672-3480
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey Cr--
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission III Washington, DC 20555-0001 r-
-Z
Dear Ms Bladey,
M t-°-
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
F-C-)
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action "t t could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befor's.-'
%1./
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
It's too dangerous, too close to too many homes and cities, to take even a tiny chance with it.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Petrea Sandel 551 Eldora Rd
- Pasadena, CA 91104-3614
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
Co We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action Oqa r
could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before--
M-C the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides'<
m full opportunity for public participation and independent expert C -)
testimony.
F1 rn Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license
/:
review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
As an avid surfer who enjoys being in the water just off shore from the facility, I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Gabriel Rosello 1145 W 2nd St San Pedro, CA 90731-2306
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
%A%
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action-could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before--
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides<
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert r
testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license ACO review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I strongly support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
The American Public deserves to know the TRUTH!
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Rosemary Graham-Gardner PO Box 3335 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266-1335
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission C=
Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
-tj The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
71 We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t<
N M
could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befor Q
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides' '
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert
\\J Cl testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
This is very close to home for me.
Yes, and in earthquake country. G.
D.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Glenn Ducat 203 Savona Walk Apt 302 Long Beach, CA 90803-5028
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action tha-could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beores the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesi-1 CD full opportunity for public participation and independent expert C FZD testimony.
M::io Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the lice*
review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart
%..n decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
0_
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to.
follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
I know you are probably under pressure from special interest groups who stand to benefit substantially from restarting this catastrophe waiting to happen, and probably even being offered personal remuneration for helping it along. But we the people do not want this highly suspect, extremely dangerous, and endless problem of what to do with the waste around anymore.
Do the right thing for us. Quash this bad idea now.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Richard McGonagle 201 N Myers St
- Burbank, CA 91506-2316
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
=
JJ We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action tht could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before',-)
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides f
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert i-t'.3 testimony.
A C i Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licehsb 7
review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart
=J decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
If you were driving your car and the engine started smoking, would you consider just slowing down a bit and keep on the highway?
And cars can't threaten the health of 8 million people nor close our harbor.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Roy Tuckman 3661 Regal P1 Apt 5 Los Angeles, CA 90068-1239
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action Oha) could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforT*fl the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides
Z full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
M-)
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the lice se review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart Cl) decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
At some point, safety will have to win over profits and convenience.
I hope that point comes by way of common sense, and not some horrific disaster.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
T'Keyah Crystal Keymah 10061 Riverside Dr # 714 Toluca Lake, CA 91602-2560
Apr 26, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 S
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
Z:
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befor 1*
n the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providel full opportunity for public participation and independent expert flJ testimony.
CO9 Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart aý either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Please hear our requests and honor them Rhoda Gemignani Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Rhoda Gemignani 12938 Valleyheart Dr Apt 7 Studio City, CA 91604-1912
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 71mO m
C':
-<M
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action Plat could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befor&--/
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre. through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
My children and grandchildren all live within a one mile radius of each other and we are the people close enough to the San Onofre facility that regularly receive iodine tablets every few years in case of a nuclear disaster.
Think Japan last year.........
this REALLY scares me and I am in total disbelief that this restart of the nuclear plant is even being considered!!!!!
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Colleen Jorde 37 New York Ct Dana Point, CA 92629-4524
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides-Q full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
.- 7 Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license-1 review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart Ii decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not t---
follow such a course.
t l We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
There's just no good or compelling reason to go nuclear, when we have better alternatives.
We have untapped solar, wind and geothermal resources in plentiful supply in California.
Let's tap into those instead, and spare ourselves the agony of a Fukushima-Daiichi type meltdown here that simply does not have to happen.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Derek Iversen 6249 Whitsett Ave North Hollywood, CA 91606-3129 cr.
M-:.
-H C)
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
ccn We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t
)
Li could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before --,.n the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides 5 :
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
'S Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licenseQ...)
review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
I am appalled that opening this old plant with a history of issues would even be considered. This plant is in a densely populated area with limited access to evacuation routes. There are so many people living in this general area that if there was a Fukishima type disaster the roads would be so severley congested there would be no way out. I live in this area, there are many families with young children in the area and neighboring areas due to all the new construction and children are one of the most susceptible to life long health problems and cancers from radiation incidents like these. its time to pull the plug permanently on this antiquated plant before a disaster happens here...
I can not and will never support anyone that supports re opening this plant.This is an accident waiting to happen, that will cause irreversible damage to human life, the landscape, the economy..
There is no upside worth the risk here... They disassembled the plant in Long Island NY, we can do the same here. Thanks for your time regarding this VERY important matter..
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Linda Nitti
24 Pleasanton Ln Ladera Ranch, CA 92694-0222
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
m3 C-C=:)
Cn The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action~t could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befo ej_
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
It is absolutely foolish, especially after knowing what happened in Japan, to risk this beautiful coastline being uninhabitable for years and years, to say nothing of the danger to those of us living near the plant now.
PLEASE be reasonable, rather than swayed by economic concerns.
Prioritize.
Thanks Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Joanne Tatham 54 Seton Rd Irvine, CA 92612-2116
Apr 27, 2013 TI Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission "n
Washington, DC 20555-0001 k
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
I swim at San Ofofre every summer.
I don't want the plant reopened. We can't afford a disaster like Fukashima on the California coast, a highly active earthquake area.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Emilie Small 6614 Colbath Ave Van Nuys, CA 91405-4807
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
-o Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
J-The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t~rBo CI) could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before'-
O0 the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Focus needs to shift to renewable sources, not wasteful and dangerous nuclear energy, look at the facts and fukushima, japan, Legalize hemp and big oil bow down to your new master.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
George Fry 6245 Crestwood Way Los Angeles, CA 90042-1351
Apr 27, 2013 r--
Ms Cindy Bladey if i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
.I--
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
r--
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no actio nat could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
I live with my wife and young children in an area which could be significantly impacted by another radiation leak from San Onofre.
I would encourage considering the under-realized potential of solar, wind, and other responsible sources of power as an alternative to creating more radioactive waste and greenhouse gasses.
Nuclear power is the dirtiest power available, because we have no place to safely hold decaying radioactive waste.
In today's climate of terror we need a whole new approach to power production from generation to distribution and decentralization with emphasis on renewable sources is the key to safe power.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Gordon Brown PO Box 127
- Topanga, CA 90290-0127
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey rFn U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission--
""-i Washington, DC 20555-0001 K.)
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Do we really need increased power generation with a possible chance of a nuclear accident at SONGS 2?
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Gary Hoover 1806 Vuelta Grande Ave Long Beach, CA 90815-3652
Apr 28, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
C=
=0 The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
-T-We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action Qt could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before--l-
-C the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides---
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert m
testimony.
m Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licQ M
review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart
.C/:
decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
It is so fundamental.
Let the NRC not lose its vision.
Let it take a moment and think and look back at all the hard work that has gone before, to arrive at its REGULATORY protocals, procedures, and policies.
This is so basic.
Let the NRC follow its mandate and not cave into pressure by issuing "License amendments".
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Stephen Hara 724 S Sycamore Ave Apt 202 Los Angeles, CA 90036-4337
Apr 28, 2013=
-LU Ms Cindy Bladey r
I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
-_J Washington, DC 20555-0001
-13
Dear Ms Bladey,
AJ The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
Cf.)
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
Prior to coming to California, I worked for a research institute with gov't contracts With my course work, PhD in Inorganic Chemistry and scientific expertise, I had a Q clearance. So I am not just writing from ignorance.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Emil Lawton, 13025 Hesby St Sherman Oaks, CA 91423-2133
Apr 28, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
__O
Dear Ms Bladey,
C)
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thIfl could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
I would rather live with occasional outages until more power can be generated by wind and solar. I urge you not to allow the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant..
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
V K Bergfalk 685 Mayflower Rd Claremont, CA 91711-4240
_4 55c
Apr 28, 2013
-33 Fnl Ms Cindy Bladey C->
O U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission O
Washington, DC 20555-0001 m
Dear Ms Bladey,
.C3 The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
Fri We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process. The results of a failure would mean that I and my family would be at risk as well as hundreds of thousands more who live in the Southern California area.
We cannot accept even the possibility of a failure.
We live in one of the largest earthquake zones in the world, and I would think that Japan's nuclear reactor story would give us pause about lowering any standards in our own industry.
We cannot risk public safety to give SCE a break.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Carol Lynn Prager 10047 Genesta Ave Northridge, CA 91325-1622
Apr 28, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
0 We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action qt ft could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befor-C-'
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides'-
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert 7T1 C)1 -§0 testimony.
o Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licerl's41 rnf review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart C/)
decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
%AJ Senator Boxer and U.S.
Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
We live in Orange County never did i imagine i would in my lifetime be so closely surrounded by not one but 2 nuclear plants.
When i was about 3 living in Pennsylvania 3 mile Island had its meltdown I was so young i could not fathom the stress my mother endured as we lived across the river from the plant and it was within view at all times.
Now as an adult getting ready to get married this year i think will my children have to be raised around a melt down>? will i get to experience what my mother had in the past..
I can only imagine what horror and devastation the Japanese people when through after the tsunami hit.
I have recieved pics from friends in Oregeon of debris that has washed ashore and im amazed this is a
conversation about reopening a plant.
Please do not reopen. create earth safer energy and jobs another way please Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Geneva Jackson 9512 Pacific Ave
- Anaheim, CA 92804-5942
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
i-m The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action tha-t could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before,*
r-n the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesC-)
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
kUA CO C:)
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Dear Cindy Bladey,
Re: Docket ID NRC20130070 We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take NO action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a COMPREHENSIVE investigation, and provides FULL opportunity for public participation and INDEPENDENT expert testimony !
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC NOT to follow such a course.
We were DEEPLY disturbed when on April 10, the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern, and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a WIDE range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a FULL and TRANSPARENT review of the failed San Onofre generators is ESSENTIAL, before the NRC considers ANY potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that short cuts procedures is TOTALLY INAPPROPRIATE
I I. SCE's request to weaken its license REQUIRMENTS was made despite evidence showing that there could be a SIGNIFICANT hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a FULL review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre BEFORE it considers ANY restart of either failed generator.
I SUPPORT the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to BLOCK ANY restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a CONPREHENSIVE and OPEN review process I Angeles Chapter angeles.sanonofre @gmail.com Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Gail Noon CA
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provideso full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licern-review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not follow such a course.
I
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
It is time to continue green energy in CA.
San Onofre is old and a dangerous plant-it is time to learn from what happened in Japan.
An earthquake in that area would be devastasting to the MILLIONS of people living near and around a decrepit plant that has the potential to kill and injure so many people.
WAKE UP AND DO WHAT IS BEST FOR US ALL!!!
Close the plant down!
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Joel Polinsky 3319 Barham Blvd Los Angeles, CA 90068-1452 0-
~
- Im C-)
NOm
'A C/
00
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
ID The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
FT1 We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action Q could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforf-l the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides -
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
M Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the liceo review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
As to, also agreeing to the 2 paragraphs preceding mine, would Some One edit 1st paragraph; "We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission ( NRC) to, not allow the restart of the San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant, before the Commission Completes a COMPREHENSIVE investigation, AND provides full opportunity for the Public's participation, including independent expert testimony's."
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Cynthia Lebuda 833 W Foothill Blvd Apt 15
- Monrovia, CA 91016-1953 0-.
C/o 0-.
Apr 27, 2013 C/)
Ms Cindy Bladey C
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission fl Washington, DC 20555-0001
- Er
Dear Ms Bladey,
r The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
CJ-OD We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Since Japan I'm scared because I live 20 miles from San Onofre and would be affected if an earthquake damaged the plant!!!
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Kelly Olsen 21932 Drexel Way Lake Forest, CA 92630-5995
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 10 7rn CC-)
crn
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
VT1 We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thaý could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
It is absolutely necessary that we consider the current, apparently unsolvable troubles at Fukushima Daachi.
The radiation is now moving toward California.
A congressional hearing as to how to deal with the crises is being called.
We cannot afford to ignore the dangers.
In Japan, it has become clear that the company cannot deal with the problem. Neither can the government.
We are not confident that anyone can.
Let us not have a Fukushima here.
The way San Onofre is set it up, it is a Fukushima waiting to happen.
It is absolutely necessary that there be a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre, that exactly meet everyone's concerns before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a full, comprehensive and open review process.
I also ask you to extend the review process to international experts and advisors as a failed plant is no longer only a local issue.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Deena Metzger 20666 Callon Dr
- Topanga, CA 90290-3712
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- J Washington, DC 20555-0001 F
Dear Ms Bladey,
C)
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t
could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befoiV' the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesU full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Californians deserve full assurance of safety, in light of our being in an earthquake area and age of the plant.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Raceal Mcwhorter 8609 De Soto Ave Apt 209 Canoga Park, CA 91304-2839 10 0-
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission fTf Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
I--
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before-the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
I very well understand that the NRC licensing process is considered onerous by Nuclear power operators and owners; from the point of view of residents and customers there is another term which describes the process far better: SAFE.
The regular licensing process should proceed without shortcuts; no to any contemplated license 'amendment" permitting an early restarting of this compromised facility.
I urge the NRC Commissioners to mandate the full licensing process be followed before San Onofre is permitted to restart at any level.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
John Connolly 2117 Woodland Way Los Angeles, CA 90068-3138 M
m C:-)
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Im
Dear Ms Bladey,
C5)
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
F-We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
We saw what happened after Chernobyl and the Japanese reactor problems.
Gambling on our safety by restarting the generator is too dangerous a bet to make. Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Suzi Orozco-Neu 3458 Lee St Los Angeles, CA 90023-2312 rI-
%-n CDm
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regardina Docket ID NRC20130070.
0 1~~
ýCi C.
0-C:/)
.3T' We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t3 could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before, the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such.a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
The public deserves a full review of conditions at San Onofre before even considering starting it up again.
Anything less would be irresponsible.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Angeles Chapter
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 CiJ
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.)
(.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action tQhQ could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before<
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides
.9 Cl full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
0 Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
I live only a short distance from the plant and until all the problems were revealed a few years ago, I was not aware that they had operating issues. I don't want them to operate again until they have a high level of confidence that the equipment will function safely.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Stephen Anderson 9585 Toucan Ave Fountain Valley, CA 92708-5833
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
--n
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
E--
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t
could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befog d the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provide*-
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
r-I3 C=
C/7 C__
I support the of the failed comprehensive call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a and open review process.
Please consider the devastating results if anything goes wrong at this facility. You have an obligation first to the people of this area and to the people of California, not to the San Onofre nuclear power plant.
Please exercise that position.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Judith Phillips 1504 Carmelita St Laguna Beach, CA 92651-3359
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before_
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides <
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
C=I rT-tj 0--
m~
N) a)
I support the of the failed comprehensive call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a and open review process.
Also, after the Fukishima disaster in Japan, it needs to be noted that San Onofre is on the coast in a relatively active earthquake zone.
In addition, the area around it is being built up so any incident at that plant is more likely to affect both of the two major metropolitan areas of Los Angeles and San Diego than when it was first built.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
B Adjemian 23673 Sandalwood St West Hills, CA 91307-1332
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action ;t could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforlW1 the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides(-
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert -
testimony.
T-Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licen<
review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
r-Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not t09-follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Believe it or not, my husband and I both worked at SONGS back in the 1980's.
We enjoyed our jobs and our coworkers.
We were treated well and were paid very well.
But even as we went there each day to work, I was always aware of the fact that we were exposing ourselves to the very real possibility of danger.
"What if there was an earthquake or tidal wave right now?"
"What if the Russians launch an attack on the West Coast?"
I worried about ourselves there at the plant, and for the nearby community of San Clemente - and farther.
Who knew how far-ranging the consequences could be?
But it didn't take any of these catastrophic events to set the station on a course for closure.
A leak within the plant was serious enough to shut it down.
This only serves to illustrate how problematic nuclear energy can be.
SCE understandably wants to get SONGS up and running again.
But there is too much at risk to fast track the approval.
We've got to be absolutely sure that the process has been thoroughly reviewed.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Laurel Tucker 676 W 9th St Claremont, CA 91711-3741 C/)
0?
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 C="-
Dear Ms Bladey,
M C/')
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
-7)
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no actiorjat could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befg the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providep 0r full opportunity for public participation and independent expert 1 1' q
testimony.
M Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please DO NOT reopen the San Onofre nuclear power plant. I live within the danger zone; its radioactive waste will remain deadly for centuries. What arrogance to think we can do what we want to future generations. Enough. Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Bella Silverstein 15620 Carrousel Dr Canyon Country, CA 91387-4435
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
C=
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action tj t
-M m
could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befor.
CD the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert 0-%
testimony.
CD Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licP C) review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart 0
decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S. 0 i
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
I get depressed every time I drive by San Onofre.
WHY isn't it being converted to wave and wind and sun power?
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mary Marshall 5256 Pizzo Ranch Rd La Canada Flintridge, CA 91011-1850
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 31 Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
0 The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
T-We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that-could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforeF-the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides f-full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Having spent 35 years working aboard US Navy nuclear ships, I can appreciate the extensive and unrelenting adherance to safety measures applicable to all nuclear infrastructure.
No procedrural shortcut can justify ignoring the risk of not doing the required due deligence to insure public safety from nuclear failures.
John W. Thomas Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Charlene A and John Thomas 27523 Paseo Verano San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675-5314 c_
rn Y.)
C=C)
%.ni
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pavethe way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
FOR THE LOVE OF OUR CHILDREN someone please have the foresight to NOT RESTART this or any other nuclear power plant.
Amy de Macena Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Amy Demacena 1158 26th St Santa Monica, CA 90403-4698
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
- J We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t al 0
could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before --
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides<
mCD full opportunity for public participation and independent expert l
C-testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
For now we support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
We support CLOSING the San Onofre facility.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
K Higgins 14281 Prospect Ave Tustin, CA 92780-2316
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washinctnr_ iv' 2nY55-noo1
-n C~)
-n Cý c)
C_2
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
I0 We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Don't sacrifice the safety of those living in Southern California and surrounding areas to the financial demands of Southern California Edison.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Albert Nault Irvine, CA
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey
-J U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action tA could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
More open spaces are needed in So California.
Lets shut down San Onofre and enjoy less traffic and more open spaces to enhance our lives....
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
G. A. Johnson 542 Mayland Ave La Puente, CA 91746-2033 1~-3
-~
rn cr~
SZ~.~
rn c~)
rn 0
'-'I
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
.70 C-)
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action th could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before
'jl the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
We now know that nuclear power is not yet safe to use because we do not have ways to "clean up" accidents.
It is foolish and criminal to restart the San Onofre plant to "test" the replacement parts.
Do not restart up the San Onofre Power Plant.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Judy Stege 44500 Sandhurst Ln Lancaster, CA 93536-6438
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 rn C)
C_)
mý 0_
-. 2 Ts
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforeK..I the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Eight million people live within 50 miles of the San Onofre nuclear power plant and I live 20 miles away.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club, Senator Boxer, and Congressman Markey for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Nancy Kingston 25861 Marguerite Pkwy Apt 201 Mission Viejo, CA 92692-3112
Apr 27, 2013 C__
Ms Cindy Bladey r-l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 0
CD
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
_l r1 0:)
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action to could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
STOP !!!
Given the troubled history. and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to BLOCK ANY RESTART of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a COMPREHENSIVE AND OPEN review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
!! Emery CA 90016-5205
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action ta could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
I am not willing to sacrifice my current and future air, water, habitat and general contentment for the danger and convenience of nuclear power.
Thank you, Jasmine Patton Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Jasmine Patton PO Box 8448 Los Angeles, CA 90008-0448 m
C)d 0-
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
mý CDC 0ý The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action tha*-
could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
The situation at San Onofre is quite troubling. The public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Carolyn Olney 4924 Argus Dr Los Angeles, CA 90041-2121
Apr 27, 2013
-T" Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 0-C_5-*
Washington, DC 20555-0001 I
Fri
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
C We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please do not re-start San Onofre without a complete and comprehensive investigation given the various problems that this nuclear facility has had in the past and continues to have at present.
Uphold NRC standards by rejecting a dangerous and premature re-start!
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Hope C'Dealva-Lenik 7462 Sale Ave West Hills, CA 91307-1640
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 C
.)
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
Cl)
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thd) 0-could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
I am a long time resident of San Clemente. If you allow this to happen you will force me to move.
My former husband, now deceased worked at San Onofre and saw many many problems with welds in the plant. You are risking everyone within a hundred miles radius lives.
No restart, its long past time to shut down San Onofre Thank you, Joanne R. Pennington Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Joanne Rose Pennington 315 Avenida Monterey Apt B San Clemente, CA 92672-6622
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
m
-0 ID I-C__
C-rj C:C) 0-I The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thT could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before ýj the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
The generators failed. There needs to be a full and open investigation.
Given the fact that scores of lives are lost when inspections and regulations done improperly, or are fast-tracked.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Jeanne Dunn 7413 W Manchester Ave Apt 2 Los Angeles, CA 90045-2389
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey
- )J U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
-o Washington, DC 20555-0001 I
1-)
Dear Ms Bladey,
0-C-)
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action ttatl could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before 0(
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
We must do everything that we can to protect human health, the environment and animals.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Victoria Maturo 4241 Baldwin Ave Culver City, CA 90232-3201
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
T--n We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action th could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before M the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
I ABSOLUTELY OPPOSE restarting the nuclear power plant at San Onofre!!!
I SUPPORT the SIERRA CLUB's call for the NRC NOW to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
This full review HAS NOT occurred to date. It must be done.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Isaac Lieberman 29250 Hatari Way Valencia, CA 91354-0712
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
(--)
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action tht could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
The area around San Onofre was once relatively unpopulated. This is quite obviously no longer the case. Most of the people I know live within 20 miles of that plant. I drive by it on a regular basis. There are other options for energy that do not carry this unacceptable amount of risk.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Jason Varvas 24 Muirfield Dove Canyon, CA 92679-3420 C-2)
C:C) 0_
Apr 27,
- 2013, Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission J
Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t <_
could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beform]
Ci the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provide" full opportunity for public participation and independent expert o
testimony.
I%
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
This Plant Needs To Be Retired!!
This facility is over 25 years old and has outlived it's lifespan of safety.
What kind of madness is it to operate it at only 70% of capacity.
This should be a RED FLAG automatically as to it's safety.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Melvin Kong 2240 Pacific Ave # A Costa Mesa, CA 92627-3914
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
m The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
C_) c2 We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befor
-)--)
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides<-
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert fli testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S.
Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
I do not want San Onofre started up even for a moment!
Anyone who allows this will not ever have my vote in the future or hundreds of thousands of other votes!
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Josephine Viscito 171 S Bayberry Ct
- Anaheim, CA 92807-4019
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action tM could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before-the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert M
testimony.
u Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
I believe it was President Nixon that actually overroad the California citizens in authorizing this plant in the first part.
It sits between Los Angeles and San Diego, not to mention it is right on the Pacific Ocean!
Our citizens deserve to have a full impartial inspection of the entire facility, the United Sates can NOT afford a Chernobyl or Fukushima.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Linda Reavely 4924 Auckland Ave North Hollywood, CA 91601-4805
%-3
=
m 2f-
_=
CI)
Ca)] >
00 C)
Cn
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
DD The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
M We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action Oha could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforffl the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licero review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Sitara Mamdani 3901 Westerly P1 Ste 115 Newport Beach, CA 92660-2306 cr, C-)
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission I-
_n Washington, DC 20555-0001 C /1
Dear Ms Bladey,
K3l The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action C-could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befor.
C) the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides C
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S.
Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
For love of the Planet and all it's inhabitants!!!!!!!
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Summer Dale 577 Ramona Ave Laguna Beach, CA 92651-2461
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
m 0m
-c-C)==)
CD' o
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action tl could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before f the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert K..
testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
I understand that alternatives are more expensive, but I would rather pay high taxes than risk an unforeseen Fukushima situation.
Please, just turn the plant off and change gears. The future of our planet can be safe and clean, and over time it will get cheaper.
My respect and thanks, Caleb Mayo Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Caleb Mayo 4512 Whitsett Ave Studio City, CA 91604-1371
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
0 The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforo_.
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides I) full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S.
Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous.statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear
- power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Any activity that has the significant potential of serious damage to public health and saftey should be subject to prior approval of the public affected.
As it stands, this project does not have the approval and consent of me, my family, or any of my friends and neighbors.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Bruce Purdum 2146 E Avenue Q5
- Palmdale, CA 93550-4031 I.
l
.1 V.3 C=)-
rrn C/)
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
0 The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before--
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesl.ý full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures. is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
These rules & regulations were put in place to protect humanity and the environment. Please don't circumvent the full license review process by allowing this "license amendment" which is NOT part of the true process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Gloria Bram 12091 Sapphire St Garden Grove, CA 92845-1825
-Tri=
LA, rn)
CD C/3 Na
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
m E
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
C-M We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action M.
could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befor *m----
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides F C) full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
o Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S.
Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Using nuclear facilities is potentially much to perilous to all of us living in Southern California, especially considering the high risk of earthquake damage.
Find a safer, more natural way to provide power!
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Barbara Lamb 1517 Marjorie Ave Claremont, CA 91711-3545
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action jh--
could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforeT_-
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides <
M full opportunity for public participation and independent expert C-)
testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S.
Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process. PLEASE for this generation, and those that, God-willing will follow close-down San Onofre.
NO!
Fukishima in Orange County!
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Peter Mcdonald N Catalina St Los Angeles, CA 90027
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.--)
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action It-Tý la [C-could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beford the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides-CM full opportunity for public participation and independent expert 17-testimony.
99 Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license
- f review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% powe'r posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
This is way too important for the residents in Southern California to even consider letting San Onofre have whatever they want with out a full reveiw. Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Cloudia Wintermute 2377 W Avenue 33 Los Angeles, CA 90065-2715
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 C=C
Dear Ms Bladey,
rl_
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
)
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action -D could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befor**
=J)TJ M
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesn C) full opportunity for public participation and independent expert
.,j testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Why wait until disaster strikes?
Take preventive action now rather than have to regret not having done so later.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Bill Tuohy 3420 Calle Azul Unit le Laguna Woods, CA 92637-2851
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
C')
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action <' t could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befof-..
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provide--_,
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
I live in Orange County, and I don't want to be blown to hell in the middle of the night because some big corporation wants to get even richer. Just say NO.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Marjorie Benet 38 Filare Irvine, CA 92620-2527 L~a C='
M GO
- 0,
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 ER
Dear Ms Bladey,
ri-i The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action<at could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befo-C-)
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provide*
9--
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
THE OVERALL RISKS OUTWEIGH THE REWARDS I Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Robin Deans 10875 Portal Dr Los Alamitos, CA 90720-2508
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
J tcz We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no actiro t
could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befoce)
"n the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides-full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
- rri Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the 1 e
C.)
review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restar decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
The San Onofre Nuclear power plant must not be re-started until and when it can be absolutely proven that the plant is safe and the equipment is properly installed and correctly manufactured without any defects which can affect human health.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Richard Saretsky 20720 E Walnut Canyon Rd
- Walnut, CA 91789-4420
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
DO The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
C-)
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t¶ could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before--
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides <
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process. Full, open review first; possible re-opening down the road, if deemed safe and cost-effective.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
David Schonberger 6711 Woodlake Ave West Hills, CA 91307-3423
-.3 C/)
C-)
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
-J C=
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
Ir-We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t~a could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beform-J K.."-
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
t fei testimony.
C)
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the lice review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
There has never been a better time to admit that we cannot control nuclear power plants. From previous disasters in the U.S. to Russia, to Japan, it is clear that this source of energy is an illusion.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
William Messenger 5204 Tierra Encanta Dr Whittier, CA 90601-2247
Apr 27, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
-AJC
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
Wfl We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action a
C could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befom the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provide 5
co
)
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
O/
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
We do NOT need a second Fukushima right here in California!
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Sylvia Halasz 268 W Dryden St Apt 114
- Glendale, CA 91202-3722
Z75)
Apr 28, 2013 X.)
Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
-2
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
0-We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Enough of your DISREGARD for humanity and all life.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Terri Kana PO Box 291398 Los Angeles, CA 90029-9398
Apr 28, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
i-The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
a We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that-could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before <
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides m full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
San Onofre Nuclear Plant is another Fukushima waiting to happen, and we all know how THAT turned out.
Are you intelligent, or not?
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Holly McDuffie 11565 Erwin St Apt 1 North Hollywood, CA 91606-4823 t-.)
cj,
-n C)
Apr 28, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no actiont--t C)-
could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befor -
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides*
C-)
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert f l testimony.
M Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Please listen to the publics safety concerns about starting failed generators aT San Onofre.
Penni and Tim Dauwalder Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Penni and Timothy Dauwalder 1568 Seneca Pl Claremont, CA 91711-3338
Apr 28, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
-n
Dear Ms Bladey,
- 0 The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action rt could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant beforiel the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provideD full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
As I live close to the San Onofre plant I have been anxious and worried about any restart.
It should be closed permanently. Please consider my request for a permanent shutdown.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Elizabeth Rudrigues 1211 Avenida Buena Suerte San Clemente, CA 92672-2349 cn Cn 9
Z m
CIn CO
Apr 28, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
r-1 We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t1 could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before--_
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and providesi FT full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
When San Onofre was built, the area around it was sparsely inhabited.
Now, with the massive amount of people living within it's radius, I just don't think you can be too careful.
Once there is a problem, you affect SOO000 many innocent people.
Let us find a safer alternative, and/or scale back our use of power, but to pose any risk whatsoever to such a dense population seems way to risky.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you so much!!
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Nancy Bauer 18 Ensueno W Irvine, CA 92620-1845 DO r'n
Apr 28, 2013
- ,o Ms Cindy Bladey FTI U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ii ci; Washington, DC 20555-0001 717-D23T
Dear Ms Bladey,
!141 vi The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
)
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no actionC t
h'.,
could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befor'-
10 the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
This plant needs to be shut down and we need to focus on clean energy.
Nuclear energy is way to dangerous and produce terrible toxic waste.
How can that be good??????
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Jennie Jensen 6106 Matilija Ave Van Nuys, CA 91401-2920
Apr 28, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
-r We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no actionf--it*ht C/-)
could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant befor the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides-I, full opportunity for public participation and independent expert i
testimony.
F-n Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the lic~n-f o
review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart r-m decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
0 Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Dear NRC,
SAFETY FIRST!
Recent history has proven sce's assurances cannot be relied upon.
Profit is their primary motive.
Please tell them NO.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Allan Cate 5307 Cortolane Dr La Crescenta, CA 91214-1309
Apr 28, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
Cit We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action t could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before*)
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides Fri full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the licene_
O review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
The standard for operating any potentially life threatening equipment is that it is in good working condition.
The problem with nuclear plant failures is the lifespan of the damage far exceeds our own.
Holding a "company" liable after the fact is a moot point.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Donna Williams 6234 Afton P1 Los Angeles, CA 90028-8205
Apr 28, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
F-The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
CI)
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action thlaLi could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before,<
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
This license review process was created for a reason!!! It just doesn't make sense to ignore these safeguards!!
The responsibility and liability will fall on you if something goes wrong.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Debbie Velarde 260 Avenida Vista Montana San Clemente, CA 92672-9402 Co C-)
-0 CY)
Apr 28, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission DJ Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
I')
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action tt could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff
- proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
I know you are probably under pressure from special interest groups who stand to benefit substantially from restarting this catastrophe waiting to happen, and probably even being offered personal remuneration for helping it along. But we the people do not want this highly suspect, extremely dangerous, and endless problem of what to do with the waste around anymore.
Do the right thing for us. Quash this bad idea now.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Richard McGonagle 201 N Myers St
- Burbank, CA 91506-2316
-0 M
C,,
C:
Apr 28, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action Ch--
could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before-)
the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides '
full opportunity for public participation and independent expert 7F1 testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the lice;1 review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart
(-
decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
Potential radioactive contamination is an extremely serious matter.
There is no room for error, so every effort to ensure our safety must be made without fast track short cuts.
Anyone who thinks otherwise should have a conversation with the people of Fukushima, Japan.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Scott Burnell 1761 S Marvin Ave Los Angeles, CA 90019-5122 Flri Fr C-)
-M
Apr 28, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey
-)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-00010
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.
I remember when that place was built.
And I am almost 74.
Altho less than 74 I know it is past retirement age.
Let it retire.
Remember what happened in Japan.
This place is surrounded by people.
It would be a much bigger population that would be nuked than at Fukushima!
I live in Pomona and millions live between me and San Onofre.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Karen Chapman Lenz, Phd 693 Parkwood Ln
- Pomona, CA 91767-1208
oil Apr 28, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey Z'
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Ms Bladey,
The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.
Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.
We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.
We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.
We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."
Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.WHY WOULD YOU EVEN TAKE A RISK????????
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive.....
and it must be COMPREHENSIVE...
and OPEN review process.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Betty Murphy 35 Linden Ave Apt 310 Long Beach, CA 90802-5059