ML13148A159
| ML13148A159 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 05/14/2013 |
| From: | Cherwink R, Charles Murray, Young N - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Cindy Bladey Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch |
| References | |
| 04/16/2013; 78 FR 22576, 78FR22576 00342, NRC-2013-0070 | |
| Download: ML13148A159 (20) | |
Text
Joosten, Sandy From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Rob [rcherwink@comcast.net]
Tuesday, May 14, 2013 7:53 PM CHAIRMAN Resource; CMRSVINICKI Resource; CMRAPOSTOLAKIS Resource; CMRMAGWOOD Resource; CMROSTENDORFF Resource ASL's San Onofre Rulin
Dear Commissioners,
Yesterday's decision California have been decision, and at the forward.
by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is exactly what the people of calling for these many months.
We want to express our gratitude for this same time, let you know what we expect to happen as this process moves
- 1. No reversal of this decision by the five NRC Commissioners. That would be seen as a breach of your oath of office and your motto "protecting people and the environment"
- 2.
For this adjudicated public hearing under oath to happen here in Southern California.
- 3. Clarity and transparency in this process.
Hoping to work especially our through this process with the NRC for a safer future for all Californians, children.
Sincerely, Robert Cherwink
- Sonoma, CA
I Joosten, Sandy From:
Nancy Young [hopesnana2@gmail.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 4:43 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource; CMRSVINICKI Resource; CMRAPOSTOLAKIS Resource; CMRMAGWOOD Resource; CMROSTENDORFF Resource
Subject:
Shut down San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant Dear Commissioners.
Yesterday's decision by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is exactly what the people of'California have been calling for these many months. We want to express our gratitude for this decision, and at the same time, let you know what we expect to happen as this process moves forward.
1, No reversal of this decision by the five NRC Commissioners. That would be seen as a breach of your oath of office and your motto "protecting people and the environment"
- 2. For this adjudicated public hearing under oath to happen here in Southern California.
- 3. Clarity and transparency in this process.
Hoping to work through this process with the NRC for a safer future for all Californians, especially our children.
Nancy Young 827-0 Via Alhambra Laguna Woods, CA 92637 I
/
Joosten, Sandy From:
Charles Michael Murray [charles@endangeredplanet.net]
Sent:
Tuesday, May 14, 2013 11:57 AM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
SAN ONFORE - Decommission Now.
Dear Commissioners,
Yesterday's decision by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is exactly what the people of California have been calling for these many months. We want to express our gratitude for this decision, and at the same time, let you know what we expect to happen as this process moves forward.
- 1. No reversal of this decision by the five NRC Commissioners. That would be seen as a breach of your oath of office and your motto "protecting people and the environment"
- 2. For this adjudicated public hearing under oath to happen here in Southern California.
- 3. Clarity and transparency in this process.
Hoping to work through this process with the NRC for a safer future for all Californians, especially our children.
Sincerely, Charles Michael Murray CMM Studio
.design.internet.photography cmmstudio.com Endangered Planet "connecting the arts with the environment" EndangeredPlanet.net Laguna Beach CA 92651 949.306.9640 1
Joosten, Sandy From:
Libbe HaLevy [breezersmom@gmail.com]
Sent:
Tuesday, May 14, 2013 12:30 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource; CMRSVINICKI Resource; CMRAPOSTOLAKIS Resource; CMRMAGWOOD Resource; CMROSTENDORFF Resource
Subject:
Support the ASLB ruling on San Onofre
Dear Commissioners,
Yesterday's decision by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is exactly what the people of California have been calling for these many months. We want to express our gratitude for this decision, and at the same time, let you know what we expect to happen as this process moves forward.
- 1. No reversal of this decision by the five NRC Commissioners. That would be seen as a breach of your oath of office and your motto "protecting people and the environment"
- 2. For this adjudicated public hearing under oath to happen here in Southern California.
- 3. Clarity and transparency in this process.
Hoping to work through this process with the NRC for a safer future for all Californians, especially our children.
Sincerely, Libbe HaLevy ProducerlHost Nuclear Hotseat Podcast www.NuclearHotseat.com/blog 1
V/
Joosten, Sandy From:
Diane Smith [celebratepaso@gmail.com]
Sent:
Tuesday, May 14, 2013 2:09 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Decision
Dear Commissioners,
Yesterday's decision by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is exactly what the people of California have been calling for these many months. We want to express our gratitude for this decision, and at the same time, let you know what we expect to happen as this process moves forward.
- 1. No reversal of this decision by the five NRC Commissioners. That would be seen as a breach of your oath of office and your motto "protecting people and the environment"
- 2. For this adjudicated public hearing under oath to happen here in Southern California.
- 3. Clarity and transparency in this process.
Hoping to work through this process with the NRC for a safer future for all Californians, especially our children.
Sincerely, Diane Smith 402 Montebello Oaks Drive Paso Robles, CA 93446 I
V/
Joosten, Sandy From:
Kate Sirkin [katesirkin@gmail.com]
Sent:
Thursday, May 16, 2013 9:04 AM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
Nuclear Safety
Dear Commissioners,
Yesterday's decision by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is exactly what the people of California have been calling for these many months. We want to express our gratitude for this decision, and at the same time, let you know what we expect to happen as this process moves forward.
- 1. No reversal of this decision by the five NRC Commissioners. That would be seen as a breach of your oath of office and your motto "protecting people and the environment"
- 2. For this adjudicated public hearing under oath to happen here in Southern California.
- 3. Clarity and transparency in this process.
Hoping to work through this process with the NRC for a safer future for all Californians, especially our children.
Sincerely, Kate Sirkin 1
Joosten, Sandy From:
suwish [suwish37@yahoo.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 2:47 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource; CMRSVINICKI Resource; CMRAPOSTOLAKIS Resource; CMRMAGWOOD Resource; CMROSTENDORFF Resource
Subject:
San Onofre
Dear Commissioners,
Yesterday's decision by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is exactly what the people of California have been calling for these many months. We want to express our gratitude for this decision, and at the same time, let you know what we expect to happen as this process moves forward.
- 1. No reversal of this decision by the five NRC Commissioners. That would be seen as a breach of your oath of office and your motto "protecting people and the environment"
- 2. For this adjudicated public hearing under oath to happen here in Southern California.
- 3. Clarity and transparency in this process.
Hoping to work through this process with the NRC for a safer future for all Californians, especially our children.
Sincerely, Claudia Ziermann I
Joosten, Sandy From:
Valerie Sanfilippo [vsanfi@gmail.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 3:13 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource; CMRSVINICKI Resource; CMRAPOSTOLAKIS Resource; CMRMAGWOOD Resource; CMROSTENDORFF Resource
Subject:
Support Decision to Close San Onofre
Dear Commissioners,
Yesterday's decision by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is exactly what the people of California have been calling for these many months.
We want to express our gratitude for this decision, and at the same time, let you know what we expect to happen as this process moves forward.
- 1. No reversal of this decision by the five NRC Commissioners. That would be seen as a breach of your oath of office and your motto "protecting people and the environment"
- 2.
For this adjudicated public hearing under oath to happen here in Southern California.
- 3. Clarity and transparency in this process.
Hoping to work through this process with the NRC for a safer future for all Californians, especially our children.
Sincerely, Regards, Val Sanfilippo, San Diego, CA Service Employees, Sierra Club I
Joosten, Sandy From:
Laurie Gooch [lauriegooch@hotmail.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 3:12 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
San Onofre
Dear Chairman,
Yesterday's decision by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is exactly what the people of California have been calling for these many months. We want to express our gratitude for this decision, and at the same time, let you know what we expect to happen as this process moves forward.
- 1. No reversal of this decision by the five NRC Commissioners. That would be seen as a breach of your oath of office and your motto "protecting people and the environment"
- 2. For this adjudicated public hearing under oath to happen here in Southern California.
- 3. Clarity and transparency in this process.
Hoping to work through this process with the NRC for a safer future for all Californians, especially our children.
Sincerely, Laurie Gooch 1
Joosten, Sandy From:
Dawn E Papaila [dawn.papaila@gmail.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 3:10 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
Yesterday's Decision by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
Dear Chairman,
Yesterday's decision by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is exactly what the people of California have been calling for these many months. I want to express my gratitude for this decision, and at the same time, let you know what I expect to happen as this process moves forward:
- 1. No reversal of this decision by the five NRC Commissioners. That would be seen as a breach of your oath of office and your motto "protecting people and the environment"
- 2. The adjudicated public hearing under oath will be located here in Southern California.
- 3. Clarity and transparency in this process.
Hoping to work through this process with the NRC for a safer future for all Californians.
Sincerely, Dawn Papaila, CPT 858-414-5566 (mobile) 1
Joosten, Sandy From:
cathy iwane [cathyiwane@yahoo.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 3:01 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource; CMRSVINICKI Resource; CMRAPOSTOLAKIS Resource; CMRMAGWOOD Resource; CMROSTENDORFF Resource
Subject:
No to restart without a public, adjudicatory hearing!!!!!!!
Dear Commissioners,
Yesterday's decision by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is exactly what the people of California have been calling for these many months. We want to express our gratitude for this decision, and at the same time, let you know what we expect to happen as this process moves forward. I write you because after evacuating Japan, I now live 35 miles downwind of SONGS. You are endowed with the responsibility of protecting the people and yet you side with the nuclear industry time and time again!
- 1. No reversal of this decision by the five NRC Commissioners. That would be seen as a breach of your oath of office and your motto "protecting people and the environment"
- 2. For this adjudicated public hearing under oath to happen here in Southern California.
- 3. Clarity and transparency in this process.
Hoping to work through this process with the NRC for a safer future for all Californians, especially our children.
Sincerely, Cathy Iwane (US citizen and evacuee with my 2 daughters from Japan in April, 2012 after working and living there for 25 years.)
1
I Joosten, Sandy From:
Diane Hennessy [diane@cslcv.org]
Sent:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:28 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource; CMRSVINICKI Resource; CMRAPOSTOLAKIS Resource; CMRMAGWOOD Resource; CMROSTENDORFF Resource
Subject:
San Onofre
Dear Commissioners,
Yesterday's decision by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is exactly what the people of California have been calling for these many months. We want to express our gratitude for this decision, and at the same time, let you know what we expect to happen as this process moves forward:
- 1. No reversal of this decision by the five NRC Commissioners. That would be seen as a breach of your oath of office and your motto "protecting people and the environment"
- 2. For this adjudicated public hearing under oath to happen here in Southern California.
- 3. Clarity and transparency in this process.
Hoping to work through this process with the NRC for a safer future for all Californians, especially our children.
Sincerely, Diane Hennessy San Clemente, CA 1
-,/
Joosten, Sandy From:
Gene Stone [egstone700@gmail.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 11:37 AM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
San Onofre
Dear Chairman,
Yesterday's decision by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is exactly what the people of California have been calling for these many months. We want to express our gratitude for this decision, and at the same time, let you know what we expect to happen as this process moves forward.
- 1. No reversal of this decision by the five NRC Commissioners. That would be seen as a breach of your oath of office and your motto "protecting people and the environment"
- 2. For this adjudicated public hearing under oath to happen here in Southern California.
- 3. Clarity and transparency in this process.
Hoping to work through this process with the NRC for a safer future for all Californians, especially our children.
Sincerely, Gene Stone Residents Organized For a Safe Environment (ROSE) 949-233-7724, On twitter @gene_stone http://residentsoreanizedforasafeenvironment.wordpress.com/
www.sanonofre.com "The earth and myself are of one mind." -Chief Seattle, Nez Peree "It does not require many words to speak the truth." Sitting Bull 1
Joosten, Sandy From:
Capt.D [captddd@gmail.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 3:38 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource; CMRSVINICKI Resource; CMRAPOSTOLAKIS Resource; CMRMAGWOOD Resource; CMROSTENDORFF Resource
Subject:
NO Restarts at San Onofre before Open Hearings (in CA.) about their flawed RSG Dear Commissioners.
Yesterday's decision by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is exactly what the people of California have been calling for over a year. We support this decision. and at the same time, urge you to fasttrack this process.
PLEASE:
- 1. No reversal of this decision by the five NRC Commissioners. That would be seen as a breach of your oath of office and your motto "protecting people and the environment".
- 2. Conduct this adjudicated public hearing Under oath, here in Southern Califomia.
- 3. Insure clarity and transparency in this process along with webcasting I'm sure you will agree, the USA cannot afford a Trillion Dollar Eco-Disaster like Fukushima!
Sincerely.
Don ILeichlling
- The DAB Safety Team 1
Joosten, Sandy From:
Jennifer Steward [heartorg@cox.net]
Sent:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 5:51 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant
Dear Commissioners,
Yesterday's decision by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is exactly what the people of California have been calling for these many months. We want to express our gratitude for this decision, and at the same time, let you know what we expect to happen as this process moves forward.
- 1. No reversal of this decision by the five NRC Commissioners. That would be seen as a breach of your oath of office and your motto "protecting people and the environment"
- 2. For this adjudicated public hearing under oath to happen here in Southern California.
- 3. Clarity and transparency in this process.
Hoping to work through this process with the NRC for a safer future for all Californians, especially our children.
Sincerely, Jennifer Steward 1
Joosten, Sandy From:
Ron Steward Iresteward@cox. net]
Sent:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 6:11 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant
Dear Commissioners,
Yesterday's decision by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is exactly what the people of California have been calling for these many months. We want to express our gratitude for this decision, and at the same time, let you know what we expect to happen as this process moves forward.
- 1. No reversal of this decision by the five NRC Commissioners. That would be seen as a breach of your oath of office and your motto "protecting people and the environment"
- 2. For this adjudicated public hearing under oath to happen here in Southern California.
- 3. Clarity and transparency in this process.
Hoping to work through this process with the NRC for a safer future for all Californians, especially our children.
Sincerely, Ron Steward 1
I Joosten, Sandy From:
Gene & Dee Barilotti [barilotti@cox.net]
Sent:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 6:27 PM To:
William Ostendorff; CMRMAGWOOD Resource; CMRSVINICKI Resource; CMRAPOSTOLAKIS Resource; CHAIRMAN Resource Cc:
Cammie Ingram; Bob Hamilton; Craig Barilotti; David Barilotti; Dee Barilotti; Dianne Barilotti; Emilia Williamson; Jessica Elwise; Jim Foster; Rick Barilotti; Tiffini Scurry; Tyler Hamilton; Vicki Hamiltton; Wendy Randal; wjfosterj; Gene Barilotti
Subject:
San Onofre Immediate Action Alert
Dear Commissioners,
Yesterday's decision by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is exactly what the people of California have been calling for these many months. We want to express our gratitude for this decision, and at the same time, let you know what we expect to happen as this process moves forward.
- 1. No reversal of this decision by the five NRC Commissioners. That would be seen as a breach of your oath of office and your motto "protecting people and the environment"
- 2. For this adjudicated public hearing under oath to happen here in Southern California.
- 3. Clarity and transparency in this process.
Hoping to work through this process with the NRC for a safer future for all Californians, especially our children.
Sincerely, Dee and Gene Barilotti Oceanside, Ca 92057 1-760-967-2157 1
Joosten, Sandy From:
Dhanaleen Lee [dhanaleen@yahoo.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 6:33 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
Public hearing Follow Up Flag:
Follow up Flag Status:
Flagged
Dear Commissioners,
Yesterday's decision by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is exactly what the people of California have been calling for these many months. We want to express our gratitude for this decision, and at the same time, let you know what we expect to happen as this process moves forward.
- 1. No reversal of this decision by the five NRC Commissioners. That would be seen as a breach of your oath of office and your motto "protecting people and the environment"
- 2.
For this adjudicated public hearing under oath to happen here in Southern California.
- 3. Clarity and transparency in this process.
Hoping to work through this process with the NRC for a safer future for all Californians, especially our children.
Sincerely, Sent from my iPad 1
Joosten, Sandy From:
Paul Carlton [pfcsage@cox.net]
Sent:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 7:48 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource; CMRSVICKI@NRC.gov; CMRMAGWOOD Resource; CMROSTENDORFF Resource
Subject:
SONGS Follow Up Flag:
Follow up Flag Status:
Flagged
Dear Commissioners,
Yesterday's decision by the ASLB is what I and most citizens in San Clemente wanted.
I want to express my gratitude for this decision and here is what I expect you to do as the process moves forward: No reversal on this decision by you Commissioners as I want you to protect we citizens of San Clemente and the surrounding areas.
I want an adjudicated public hearing to happen in San Clemente or nearby.
And please be clear and open to the public and the media as you go forward in this process.
Let us not have another Fukishima here!
Paul Carlton San Clemente 1
Joosten, Sandy From:
Maureen Masters [momasters@cox.net]
Sent:
Wednesday, May 15, 2013 10:52 PM To:
CHAIRMAN Resource Cc:
CMRAPOSTOLAKIS Resource; CMRSVINICKI Resource; CMRMAGWOOD Resource; CMROSTENDORFF Resource
Subject:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's decision is right on!
Dear Commissioners,
Yesterday's decision by Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is exactly what the people of California have been calling for these many months. We want to express our gratitude for this decision, and at the same time, let you know what we expect to happen as this process moves forward.
- 1. No reversal of this decision by the five NRC Commissioners. That would be seen as a breach of your oath of office and your motto "protecting people and the environment"
- 2. For this adjudicated public hearing under oath to happen here in Southern California.
- 3. Clarity and transparency in this process.
Hoping to work through this process with the NRC for a safer future for all Californians, especially our children.
Sincerely, Maureen Masters Ron Plomell 1