ML13144A074

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (300 of Chihoko Solomon Opposing Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2
ML13144A074
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 05/16/2013
From: Solomon C
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR22576 00300, NRC-2013-0070
Download: ML13144A074 (1)


Text

Page 1 of 1 RULES Af-JFD DIRECTIVES BPANCH PUBLIC SUBMISSIONZOI rlAY 17 AM !o: 2 As of: May 17, 2013 Received: May 16, 2013 Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljx-85d5-jx6s Comments Due: May 16, 2013 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-20 13-0070 R EC,ý IV Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License n&voivngproposed Consideration Determination Comment On: NRC-2013-0070-0001 Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 Document: NRC-2013-0070-DRAFT-0208 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-08888 No Significant Hazards No Significant Hazards 7 5F

=.

Submitter Information Name: Dr. Richard and Chihoko Solomon General Comment We write to ask that the NRC reject Southern California Edison's narrow license amendment request and no significant hazard consideration.

These requests from Edison would pave the way to restart before a full adjudicated license amendment hearing with testimony from independent experts was held. This license amendment seeks to remove the critical licensing issues from the context in which it is requested - to pave the way for restarting a severely damaged reactor without understanding the cause and without fixing the problems. It further fails to address significant safety and licensing issues, such as impacts on vital safety systems. Reports have found that Edison has grossly underestimated the extensive damage that has taken place at both reactors. Thus, it is not suprising that there is tremendous public concern.

We ask that Southern California Edison should not be attempting fast-track a restart decision. As a retired clinical psychologist Richard can attest to the damage to the public's mental health that leaks or even more serious problems with the reactors would cause.

The health and safety of Southern Californians must come first.

SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= B. Benney (bjb) https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=09000064812e8259&for...

05/17/2013