ML13144A056
| ML13144A056 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 05/16/2013 |
| From: | Davis P - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch |
| References | |
| NRC-2013-0070, 78FR22576 00319 | |
| Download: ML13144A056 (2) | |
Text
%
I Page 1 of 2 RULES AND DIRECTIVES BRANCH As of: May 17, 2013 Received: May 16, 2013 PUBLIC SUBM ISSIO NO MAY 17 AM 11: 26 Status: PendingPost
~Tracking No. ljx-85df-5puq Comments Due: May 16, 2013 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0070 RECEIVED Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination Comment On: NRC-2013-0070-0001 Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, U it 2 Document: NRC-2013-0070-DRAFT-0230 Z_.I (o o'5 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-08888 Submitter Information Name: Patti Davis Address:
San Clemente, CA, 92672 General Comment Do not allow SC Edison to lower safety standards at the San Onofre Nuclear plant.
I am appalled that SC Edison is even asking for this "No Significant Hazard Consideration Determination" This is a nuclear power plant in the center of an overdue seismic zone and population of over 8 Million with in fifty miles.
I ask that all five NRC Commissioners support the recommendation of the ASLB and require that Edison undergo a full adjudicated license amendment hearing before any re-start of unit 2.
The ASLB called the Unit 2 re start plan an experiment and that is exactly what it is. The SG's in Unit 2 and 3 have a globally unique design flaw and Edison has already tested it, Unit 3 failed the test. Unit 2 is the same design and the decades of damage in the tubes that accumulated in just 2 years should seriously trouble us all.
This should be the end of testing.
This was the Edison custom in house design team that came up with this design and I am shocked that this got past the NRC the first time.
If this is protecting the public and the environment, we have a very serious problem. What happened to the NRC being the gold standard in safety around the world? A system that lets something as important as RSG's go so wrong must be investigated and changed. This issue tells us that there needs to be major changes at the NRC.
SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= B. Benney (bjb)
+/
,.+
TA=+AoAnA AQ1 OA,<,QP,,,,
)1C/1 71"P)r httl
-11 a
Vllý,11 ý.V11M;;11L3L1Cra111%;;1 Ouji-C L...
Page 2 of 2 If Unit 2 is allowed to start up and anything, anything at all, goes wrong, it will do more damage to the nuclear industry then shutting down a plant. The public outcry will poor out all over the nation and the world to shut down all nuclear plants.
We have heard the warnings about San Onofre from the independent experts. The Japanese people now wished they had listened to the warnings. Listen to the warnings now.
- Also, I urge you to read the GAO report about "shadow evacuations" https ://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2013/04/10-2 Edison can find other ways to make profits.
https://www. fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=09000064812e9d68&for...
05/17/2013