ML13141A132

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (169) of Ramin Boustani Opposing Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2
ML13141A132
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 05/13/2013
From: Boustani R
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR22576 00169, NRC-2013-0070
Download: ML13141A132 (1)


Text

Page 1 of 1 RULES ANID DIRECTIVES BRANCH As of: May 14, 2013 Received:

May 13, 201 2013 MAY 14Lf PM 4: 01Status:

Pending Post PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. ljx-85bc Comments Due: May Submission Type: Wel Docket: NRC-2013-0070 RECFIVFD Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination Comment On: NRC-2013-0070-0001 Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 Document:

NRC-2013-0070-DRAFT-0084 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-08888 3-hqpe 16, 2013 b Submitter Information

/17?Name: Ramin Boustani ¢ /- --Address: 2456 Roscomare Rd Los Angeles, CA, 90077 General Comment Even Edison's own consultants have stated that if Unit 2 is restarted, another leak could be expected within months.According to a 1982 NRC study, a meltdown at one of San Onofre reactors could cause 130,000 prompt fatalities; 300,000 latent cancers, and 600,000 cases of genetic defects within 35 miles of the site.In light of such facts, won't that be psychopathic to call such a thing "No Significant Hazards"?

Instead, please consider switching over to the solar power from Mojave Desert.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= B. Benney (bjb)https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=09000064812e lc7d&for...

05/14/2013