ML13141A122
| ML13141A122 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 05/13/2013 |
| From: | Mathews R - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch |
| References | |
| 78FR22576 00164, NRC-2013-0070 | |
| Download: ML13141A122 (2) | |
Text
Paoe 1 nf2 RULES AND DIRECTIVES BRANCH (U.NRC As of: May 14, 2013 Received: May 13, 2013 2013 AY 1 pM tatus: Pending Post PUBLIC SUBMISSION T
,rackingNo ljx-85bc-9d6o Comments Due: May 16, 2013 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0070 RF...F.ED Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination Comment On: NRC-2013-0070-0001 Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 Document: NRC-2013-0070-DRAFT-0079 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-08888 Submitter Information Name: Richard Mathews
§_
-7 Address:
18810 San Fernando Mission Blvd Porter Ranch, CA, 91326 General Comment Please do not restart a San Onofre reactor at 70% (or any) power level. We cannot afford to "see what happens."
Edison appears to have tried to make a design change while pretending it was not a change. The new pipes have proven inadequate. Edison must start over and get this design change approved. They bear the burden of demonstrating that the change is safe. Their executives and stockholders bear the responsibility for apparently trying to cheat. Ratepayers and those living close to the plant should not take on any cost or risk as a result of any cheating that took place.
I also note that the California Democratic Party and the Democratic Party of the San Fernando Valley have passed resolutions calling for these reactors to remain idle until there has been a thorough, independent investigation. I quote below from these resolutions.
California Democratic Party:
THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the California Democratic Party calls for an independent design review prior to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's decision to permit a restart of either Unit 2 or 3, culminating in an adjudicatory hearing including discovery, testimony and cross-examination by independent experts on whether it is safe to restart the San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant before it makes a decision on whether to permit a restart of either Unit 2 or 3.
SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?
Add= B. Benney (bjb) 4/2 )13
Page 2 of 2 Democratic Party of the San Fernando Valley:
THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Democratic Party of the San Fernando Valley will submit this resolution to the NRC to oppose the proposed license amendment to allow a restart at 70% power and calls for an independent design review prior to the NRC's decision to permit a restart of either Unit 2 or 3, culminating in an adjudicatory hearing including discovery, testimony and cross-examination by independent experts on whether it is safe to restart SONGS before it makes a decision on whether to permit a restart of either Unit 2 or 3.
https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=09000064812e 1 b6f&for...
05/14/2013