ML13141A120

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (162) of Perry Stahlsis Opposing Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2
ML13141A120
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 05/13/2013
From: Stahlsis P
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR22576 00162, NRC-2013-0070
Download: ML13141A120 (1)


Text

Page 1 of 1

ýRULES AND DIRECTIVES BRANCH SNI-,

jA s of: M ay 14, 2013 Received: May 13, 201 PUBLIC SUBMISSION 21 MY 14 tatus: Pending Post PUBLC S BMISION 70r lAY n

Tracking No. ljx-85bc Comments Due: May Submission Type: We Docket: NRC-2013-0070 Rt!ECE!\\!ED Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination Comment On: NRC-2013-0070-0001 Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 Document: NRC-2013-0070-DRAFT-0077 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-08888

.3

_-7ivp 16,2013 b

Submitter Information Name: Perry Stahisis 7e37 Address:

1072 Casitas Pass Road Carpinteria, CA, 93013 9

General Comment I write to ask that the NRC reject Southern California Edison's narrow license amendment request and no significant hazard consideration. These requests from Edison would pave the way to restart before a full adjudicated license amendment hearing with testimony from independent experts was held. This license amendment seeks to remove the critical licensing issues from the context in which it is requested - to pave the way for restarting a severely damaged reactor without understanding the cause and without fixing the problems.

It further fails to address significant safety and licensing issues, such as impacts on vital safety systems. Given the extensive damage at both reactors and tremendous public concern, Southern California Edison should not be attempting fast-track a restart decision. The health and safety of Southern Californians must come first.

SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= B. Benney (bjb) https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=09000064812e l a 12&for... 05/14/2013