ML13141A105

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (147) of Sandra Joos Opposing the Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2
ML13141A105
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 05/13/2013
From: Joos S
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR22576 00147, NRC-2013-0070
Download: ML13141A105 (1)


Text

Page 1 of 1 RULES AND DIRECTIVES BRANCH SJ,\R "As of: May 14, 2013 Received:

May 13, 201 PUBLIC SUBM ISSION2013 MAY 14 PH13: 4 Status: Pending-Post Tracking No. ljx-85b6 Comments Due: May Submission Type: Wel Docket: NRC-2013-0070 RECEIVED Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination Comment On: NRC-2013-0070-0001 Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 Document:

NRC-2013-0070-DRAFT-0062 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-08888 3-d3tl 16, 2013 Submitter Information Name: Sandra Joos j '/-6 -Address: 4259 SW Patrick P1 Portland, OR, Submitter's Representative:

blumenauer Organization:

Individual General Comment I'm writing to ask that the NRC reject Southern California Edison's narrow license amendment request and no significant hazard consideration.

These requests from Edison would pave the way to restart before a full adjudicated license amendment hearing with testimony from independent experts was held. This license amendment seeks to remove the critical licensing issues from the context in which it is requested

-to pave the way for restarting a severely damaged reactor without understanding the cause and without fixing the problems.It further fails to address significant safety and licensing issues, such as impacts on vital safety systems. Given the extensive damage at both reactors and tremendous public concern, Southern California Edison should not attempt to fast-track a restart decision.

The health and safety of Southern Californians must come first.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= B. Benney (bjb)https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648 1 2e~dda&for...

05/14/2013