ML13141A080

Comment (202) of Lana Morano Opposing the Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2

ML13141A080
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	05/13/2013
From:	Morano L - No Known Affiliation
To:	Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR22576 00202, NRC-2013-0070
Download: ML13141A080 (1)

Text

Page 1 of 1 RULES 14,10 DIRECTIVES BRANCH As of: May 14, 2013 Received:

May 13, 201 Status: PendingPost PUBLIC SUBMISSION 2013 MAY 14 PH 4: 19 TVracking No. ljx-85bf Comments Due: May Submission Type: We Docket: NRC-2013-0070 RECFIVFD Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Pr6posed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination Comment On: NRC-2013-0070-0001 Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 Document:

NRC-2013-0070-DRAFT-0117 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-08888 3-ovih 16, 2013 b Submitter Information Name: Lana Morano Ilk ov -Address: 834 Valley View Ave Monrovia, California, 91016 General Comment I am writing to ask that the NRC reject Southern California Edison's narrow license amendment request and no significant hazard consideration.

These requests from Edison would pave the way to restart before a full adjudicated license amendment hearing with testimony from independent experts was held.Given the extensive damage at both reactors and public concern, Southern California Edison should not be attempting to fast-track a restart decision.

The health and safety of Southern Californians must come first.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= B. Benney (bjb)https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?obj ectld=09000064812e26db&for...

05/14/2013