ML13141A077

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (199) of Dinda Evans Opposing the Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2
ML13141A077
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre 
Issue date: 05/13/2013
From: Evans D
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR22576 00199, NRC-2013-0070
Download: ML13141A077 (1)


Text

Page 1 of 1

!RULES AND DIRECTIVES BRANCH

!St',.PIC As of: May 14, 2013 Received: May 13, 2013 Status: PendingPost PUBLIC SUBM ISSION 2

NAY 14 PM 4: 19 Tracking No. ljx-85bb-nx Comments Due: May 16, Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0070 D[

G'ol\\.no-[

Application and Amendment to Facility Operating Licensd IoIQnfP~oVci-seJo Significant Hazards Consideration Determination Comment On: NRC-2013-0070-0001 Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 Document: NRC-2013-0070-DRAFT-01 14 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-08888 m4 2013 Submitter Information Name: dinda evans Address:

/S i

6 c: CA, Submitter's Representative: self Organization: individual Government Agency Type: Federal Government Agency: NRC General Comment Last month, Southern California Edison requested a license amendent with a "No Significant Hazards" consideration that would allow it to re-start Unit 2 at the San Onofre Nuclear Power Station at 70% power. Take action to keep San Onofre shut down now.

Both reactors have been shut down since January 2012 when a radioactive leak led to discovery of extensive damage.

Though Edison has tried to minimize the damage of Unit 2, a September report revealed that its damage is nearly as bad as Unit 3 and more than 400 times what is normal for new steam generators in the entire country. Even Edison's own consultants have stated that if Unit 2 is restarted, another leak could be expected within months.

No significant hazard? According to a 1982 NRC study, a meltdown at one of San Onofre reactors could cause 130,000 prompt fatalities; 300,000 latent cancers, and 600,000 cases of genetic defects within 35 miles of the site. Since then, the population in the area has increased substantially with over 8 million people living within 50 miles of the reactors.

San Onofre must not be allowed to restart, and must have a public adjudicated license amendment hearing with testimony from independent experts before any decision is made.

SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= B. Benney (bjb) https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=090000648 1 2e25c l &for...

05/14/2013