ML13140A332

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (136) of Laurie Steele Opposing the Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2
ML13140A332
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre 
Issue date: 05/12/2013
From: Steele L
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR22576 00136, NRC-2013-0070
Download: ML13140A332 (1)


Text

RULES AND DIRECTIVES BRANCH As of: May 14, 2013 Received: May 12, 201 PUBLIC SUBMISSION AY 4 PM 3 37 Status: PendingPost PUBLC S

BMISIONTracking No. ljx-85af Comments Due: May Submission Type: Wel Docket: NRC-2013-0070 RECEIVD Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination Comment On: NRC-2013-0070-0001 Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 Document: NRC-2013-0070-DRAFT-0053 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-08888 Page 1 of 1 3

"sgtk 16, 2013 b

Submitter Information 12, Name: laurie steele Address:

525 so freeman st apt a oceanside, CA, 92054 7 kl; r- ý Aýý ý4 ý 2 General Comment I feel it is a huge mistake to restart San Onofre. We do not need a Fukushima here in Southern California. The plant is at the end of its intended life span and to continue to use it at any rate will be to put the citizens and moreso their children in grave danger. I oppose the restart.

SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 A d d ='5 ý / '

y cb-ýo https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000064812dfO 1 8&for...

05/14/2013