ML13140A262

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (114) of Grace Sloan Opposing the Re-Licensing of the San Onofre Unit 2 Plant
ML13140A262
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre 
Issue date: 05/07/2013
From: Sloan G
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR22576 00114, NRC-2013-0070
Download: ML13140A262 (1)


Text

Page 1 of 1 fRULES AND DIRECTIVES BRANCH As of: May 14, 2013 Received: May 07, 201 PUBLIC SUBM ISSION 201 MAY 14 PM : 16 Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljx-8578 Comments Due: May Submission Type: Wel Docket: NRC-2013-0070 RECFIVED Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination Comment On: NRC-2013-0070-0001 Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 Document: NRC-2013-0070-DRAFT-0030 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-08888 3

-c7ut 16, 2013 b

Submitter Information

,y/n Aq0 -

Name: Grace Sloan Address:

1621 Madrone Glen Escondido, CA, 92027 Organization: Citizen h

General Comment As a person who lives in the Northern portion of San Diego County, I do not think San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station is safe enough to be running. If you read all of the different reports on this institution it was a mistake from the beginning. I wish it had never been built. There are other ways to generate power which are safer.

SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add=9ý. /6b0 https ://www.fdms.gov/fdlms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?obj ectld=090000648 12bff8b&for...

05/14/2013