ML13134A416

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (76) of April and Gary Wayland Opposing the Relicensing of the San Onofre Nuclear Plant
ML13134A416
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre 
Issue date: 04/30/2013
From: Wayland A, Wayland G
- No Known Affiliation
To: Cindy Bladey
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR22576 00076, NRC-2013-0070
Download: ML13134A416 (1)


Text

Angeles Chapter Angels Chpterhttps://secure.sierraclub.org/site/Advocacy/Ms+Cindy+Bladey.html?c...

Apr 30, 2013 Ms Cindy Bladey 642 Voorhees Avent U.S. Nuclear ReguIaMF98frflAlbiA 90266-704 Washington, DC 20555-0001

~I//~/2~ /3

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.

0ýý I Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S. Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013:

"The NRC staff proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate. SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.

Don't jeopardize your children or mine.

Do not restart San Onofre prematurely.

Or ever.

S oufr attention to these concerns.

Gary And ApriXWayland 1642 Voorhees Ave Manhattan Beach, CA 90266-7044 M

co M

1-7)

N)

SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Ad d=

6.

C

"*65*-'

T*

tel 310.376.8760 fax 310.379-4523 e-mail: rabbitt01l@aol.com I oflI 4/30/2013 8:37 PM