ML13122A373

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (29) of Christopher Oloughlin Opposing Southern California Edison for the Relicensing of San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant
ML13122A373
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 04/28/2013
From: O'Loughlin C
- No Known Affiliation
To: Cindy Bladey
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR22576 00029, NRC-2013-0070
Download: ML13122A373 (1)


Text

Apr 28, 2013 T-2 Ms Cindy Bladey U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Ms Bladey,

The comments that follow are regarding Docket ID NRC20130070.

We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to a restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes a comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation and independent expert testimony.

Southern California Edison (SCE) is attempting to shortcut the license review process by calling on the NRC to make a fast-track restart decision. We and other environmental groups have joined with U.S.

Senator Boxer and U.S. Representative Markey in urging the NRC not to follow such a course.

We were deeply disturbed when on April 10 the NRC staff disregarded numerous statements of concern and announced a "preliminary finding" that a San Onofre restart at 70% power posed no significant safety risk.

We join a wide range of concerned citizens and public officials in believing that a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators is essential before the NRC considers any potential restart at either partial or full power of the failed generator.

We support Senator Boxer, Chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who stated on April 10, 2013: "The NRC staff

proposal, which could pave the way for the restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the investigations of the crippled plant are completed, is dangerous and premature."

Given the recent failure of tubes that carry radioactive water, speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate.

SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.

Given the troubled history and current condition of the plant and the raised level of public concern, the public deserves a full review by the NRC of conditions at San Onofre before it considers a restart of either failed generator.

I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to block any restart of the failed San Onofre generators at this time, and to conduct a comprehensive and open review process.

I'm an RN PHN in Los Angeles County and I take care of lots of citizens. Health and Safety are very dear to my heart. Please look at the facts. This 60 year old industry still has no long term solution to waste disposal/storage. This 60 year old industry just asked you our nations nuclear regulatory agency for permission to restart an known damaged steam tube. Please protect the health and safety of our citizens and just say no to this request to restart San 0.

Thank you, Christopher O'Loughlin RN PHN 7I) 0-m 4_110w__3 Thank you for your attention to these concerns.

Christopher O'Loughlin 7215 Hillside Ave Apt 17 Los Angeles, CA 90046-2326 SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= //(