ML13121A231

Comment (8) of Irl Stalcup on Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2

ML13121A231
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	04/24/2013
From:	Stalcup I - No Known Affiliation
To:	Office of Administration
References
NRC-2013-0070, 78FR22576 00008
Download: ML13121A231 (1)

Text

Page 1 of I PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: April 26, 2013 Received:

April 24, 2013 Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljx-84yj-sdot Comments Due: May 16, 2013 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0070 Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination Comment On: NRC-2013-0070-0001 Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 Document:

NRC-2013-0070-DRAFT-0007 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-08888 Submitter Information CA-Name: Irl Stalcup Stalcup Address: ":.?5066 Chalet Dr ::C)Oceanside, CA, 92057 FT'General Comment I live in Oceanside, just 10 miles away from the dangerous San Onofre nuclear reactors.them, even partially.

Please do not re-open* The San Onofre facitlities

-except for turbines -- are old, run down and unpredictable

• A very large earthquake is overdue -- Now that we've seen what earthquakes can do, in Fukushima, we are very afraid they pose an imminent hazard.* A radiation leak would probably cause gridlock on our highways and public panic.Yesterday the Los Angeles City Council joined other SoCal cities by voting unanimously to ask the NRC not to allow the restart of the crippled San Onofre nuclear reactors before the formal public hearings.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 Add= https ://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?obj ectld=09000064812a6462&for...

04/26/2013