ML13121A061
| ML13121A061 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee, Mcguire, Catawba, McGuire  |
| Issue date: | 04/26/2013 |
| From: | Waldrep B Duke Energy Corp |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML13121A061 (3) | |
Text
Benjamin C. Waldrep 526 South Church Street ENERGYe Charlotte, NC 28202 Mailing Address:
Mail Code ECO7H / P.O. Box 1006 Charlotte, NC 28201-1006 704-382-8162 704-382-6056 fax April 26, 2013 10 CFR 50.54(f) 10 CFR 50.4 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Rockville. MD 20852
SUBJECT:
Duke Energy, LLC (Duke Energy)
Catawba Nuclear Station (CNS), Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 Renewed License Nos. NPF-35 and NPF-52 McGuire Nuclear Station (MNS), Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370 Renewed License Nos. NPF-9 and NPF-17 Oconee Nuclear Station (ONS), Units 1, 2, and 3 Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270, and 50-287 Renewed License Nos. DPR-38, DPR-47, and DPR-55 Duke Energy Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident
REFERENCE:
- 1. NRC Letter, Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident, dated March 12, 2012
- 2. Federal Register, Vol. 78, No. 38, Tuesday, February 26, 2013, pp. 13097-13099
- 3. NEI letter to NRC, Proposed Path Forward to NTTF Recommendation 2.1:
Seismic Reevaluations, dated April 9, 2013 On March 12, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued Reference 1 to all power reactor licensees and holders of construction permits in active or deferred status. Enclosure 1 of Reference 1 contains specific Requested Actions, Requested Information, and Required Responses associated with Recommendation 2.1, Seismic Evaluations. Reference 1 requires a "60-day response" in which each addressee must submit: (1) its intent to follow the developed guidance, or (2) an alternative approach including acceptance criteria. In accordance with References 1 and 2, the 60-day responses are due to the NRC by April 29, 2013.
Duke Energy intends to respond to Enclosure 1 of Reference 1 by following the approach described in Reference 3, and on the schedule provided in Reference 3.
This letter contains no new regulatory commitments.
AcoT
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission April 26, 2013 Page 2 Should you have any questions concerning the content of this letter, please contact Jeff Thomas at (704) 382-3438.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on April 26, 2013.
Sincerely, Benjamin C. a drep, V ice Preside orporate Governance &
Operations Support
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission April 26, 2013 Page 3 V.M. McCree, Region II Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Avenue NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1257 John Boska, Project Manager (ONS)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North, Mailstop O-8G9A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 J.S. Kim, Project Manager (MNS and CNS)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North, Mailstop O-8C2A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 E. L. Crowe NRC Senior Resident Inspector Oconee Nuclear Station J. Zeiler NRC Senior Resident Inspector McGuire Nuclear Station G. A. Hutto, III NRC Senior Resident Inspector Catawba Nuclear Station Justin Folkwein American Nuclear Insurers 95 Glastonbury Blvd., Suite 300 Glastonbury, CT 06033-4453