ML13116A290

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (3) of Susan Brown Opposing the Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2
ML13116A290
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 04/22/2013
From: Brown S
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR22576 00003, NRC-2013-0070
Download: ML13116A290 (2)


Text

Page 1 of 2 jAs of: April 24, 2013 Received: April 22, 2013 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: PendingPost PUBLC S

BMISIONTracking No. ljx-84xf-3ahb Comments Due: May 16, 201 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2013-0070 Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination Comment On: NRC-2013-0070-0001 Application and Amendment to Facility Operating License Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination; San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 Document: NRC-2013-0070-DRAFT-0004 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-08888 3

Submitter Information Name: Susan Brown ifi Address:

La Mesa La Mesa, CA, 91942 Submitter's Representative: n/a Organization: none fli General Comment I hereby request that you REJECT the request by Southern California Edison for a "License Amendment" to restart the failed San Onofre nuclear generator(s) until your proper oversight is completed as specified below.

This request for fast-track approval of a San Onofre restart without any public hearings or full and transparent procedure that we deserve, is just a ploy to keep San Onofre back in the ratepayers pockets. (and by the way, when can we expect a refund of the money ratepayers have been paying for zero power since the shutdown?)

I request a Fully Adjudicated Public License Amendment Hearing process before any restart, including through Independent safety assessments.

Your first priority should be public safety. Elmo Collins, Nuclear Regulatory Commission said "Our job is to make sure it's safe."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liRgBFDuxBI I have seen no reports showing conclusively what the problems were that caused the shut down, nor have I seen any proposals to actually REPAIR the faulty tubes and whatever else is broken!

SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM - 013 E-RIDS= ADM -03 https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000064812a24a4&for...

04/24/2013

Page 2 of 2 I also have many questions, but I will hold these for the meetings except for this one:

"NRC is also contemplating requiring filters to capture vented radioactive material." was quoted in an article here http://cen.acs.org/articles/91/il 3/Nuclear-Retirement-Anxiety.html Do you plan to install such safety filters at San Onofre?

It is somewhat concerning that one of the reactors has been closed permanently.. Perhaps they all should be closed permanently.

There is a new question. Edison plans to layoff hundreds of employees and I believe this is on top of other recent layoffs. Does that leave enough people to run the plant safely? Very important to determine what effect this will have..

Our families deserve better.

Sincerely, a concerned grandmother https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=09000064812a24a4&for...

04/24/2013