ML13106A377
| ML13106A377 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 04/13/2013 |
| From: | Watland G - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Macfarlane A NRC/Chairman |
| References | |
| LTR-13-0326 | |
| Download: ML13106A377 (32) | |
Text
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Tue, Apr 16, 2013 16:49 Page No: 1 CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET PAPER NUMBER: LTR-13-0326 LOGGING DATE: 04/13/2013 ACTION OFFICE: EDO AUTHOR: Watland G , et al.
AFFILIATION:
ADDRESSEE: Macfarlane A M
SUBJECT:
LTR-13-0326 - E-mail from multiple citizens, requests the NRC to take no action that could lead to the restart of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station before the Commission completes its invest. and provides a full opportunity for public participation ACTION: Appropriate DISTRIBUTION: RF, SECY to Ack.
LETTER DATE: 04/13/2013 ACKNOWLEDGED: Yes SPECIAL HANDLING: Lead Office to Publicly Release 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after Secy's assignment.
NOTES:
FILE LOCATION: ADAMS DUE DATE: DATE SIGNED:
Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of George Watland
[george.watland@sierraclub.org]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 1:33 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 13, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its cpmprehensive investigation and provides a full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "li~ense amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License*
Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let' alone the level of public concern. .
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club to dismiss any requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut the license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators that the public deserves.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mr. George Watland 18346 Collins St Apt 10 Tarzana, CA 91356-2471 1
J Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub,org] on behalf of Cody Riechers
[codyriechers@yahoo,com]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 2:03 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 13} 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville} MD 20852 Dear Chairperson Macfarlane}
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides a full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play} Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses} evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant} let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch} desperate attempt to avoid a full} public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club to dismiss any requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut the license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators. Please help protect us and our environment.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mr. Cody Riechers 280 Hospital Cir Westminster} CA 92683-3992 1
j Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub,orgj on behalf of Lauren Steiner [laurensteiner57
@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 20132:33 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource .
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 13~ 21313 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville~ MD 213852 Dear Chairperson Macfarlane~
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no ~ction that could lead to any restart of the San onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 713% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre 'generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play~ Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses~ evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant~ let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch~ desperate attempt to avoid a full~ public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club to dismiss any requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut the license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators that the public deserves.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms. Lauren Steiner 1725 Clear View Dr Beverly Hills~ CA 9132113-21312 1
J Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of James Pomeroy
[aufheben.astra@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 20132:33 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 13 J 2913 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville J MD 29852 Dear Chairperson Macfarlane J We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any, restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 79% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word plaYJ Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses J evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plantJ let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch J desperate attempt to avoid a full J public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club to dismiss any requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut the license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators that the public deserves.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mr. James Pomeroy 3250 Avenida Del Presidente Apt 19 San Clemente J CA 92672-4521 1
j Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub,org] on behalf of Susan Brown [soulmagicl2@gmaiLcom]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 3:03 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 13, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent, review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate'"given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of 'public concern.
SCE'S request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Ediso'n's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club to dismiss any requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut the license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators that the public deserves.
Please respond to Rep. Markey & Sen. Boxer's letter to you.
"We are writing to request that you immediately confirm that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Will take no action that could lead to any restart of San Onofre nuclear power plant Before the commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides a full opportunity for public participation." ...
Is San Onofre prepared for a possible EMP? Do you have any studies that show the consequences?
Please do not sidestep federal regulation and deny the public meaningful hearings with appropriate safety reports that address all .of our concerns. Hopefully all meetings will be held in southern California ...
1
At your April 3rd meeting (in Maryland) John Geesman (sp), who is a former board member ISO, a past member of the ca energy commission during davis/schwarzenegger's terms asked this question:
"Based on information edison has turned over for investigation being conducted by cpuc) even if both units 2, unit 3 were working perfectly, there were only 96 hours0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br /> in 2812 when they would have been competitive with the market price for power in so. california. That's only 1%
of the time. Why are we putting ourselves through so much regulatory pain and suffering for a plant that is not cost effective 99% of the time?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GswNgQ82bW4&feature=youtu.be There are far too many problems. Huge safety issues and questions, failure to address problems with citizen evacuation, failure to adequately address potential earthquake, .
tsunami, EMP, aircraft or other hazards that could result in a disaster and other problems. I would like to see your full nuclear disaster preparedness plan, Please do the right thing. We do not need San Onofre! Please move on to clean, safe, sustainable energy.
http://www.ucsusa.org/clean energy/smart-energy-solutions/increase-renewables/infographic ramping-up-renewable-energy.html?utm source=fb&utm medium=fb&utm campaign=fb Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms. Susan Brown La Mesa La Mesa, CA 91942 2
/
Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Darrell Clarke [darrclarke@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday! April13! 2013 3:03 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 13, 2~n3 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 2e852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
.We ask that. the. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 7e% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudi'cated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the piant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club to dismiss any requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut the license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators that the public deserves.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mr. Darrell Clarke 2756e Ruby Ln Castaic, CA 91384-3175 1
j Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Chris Roth [cjoroth@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 20138:34 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Falled San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 13, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that tbe Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public-concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club to dismiss any requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut the license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators that the public deserves.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mr. Chris Roth 34564 Camino Capistrano Unit B Capistrano Beach, CA 92624-1232 1
J Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Susan Haroutunian
[susan.casita@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 11 :35 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 13, 21313 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 213852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 713% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the pub.lic deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks'a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient stea~ generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I live 14 miles from the failed reactor. When we moved here we trusted that Edison, the NRC, and the Public Utilities Commission would do the right thing - Please do the right thing!
Don't restart this reactor.
It needs more investigation.
We can't take chances like this and we can't rush things. I support the call by the Sierra Club to dismiss any requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut the license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators that the public deserves.
Thank you, Susan Haroutunian Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mrs. Susan Haroutunian 3eeSl Poseidon laguna Niguel~ CA 92677-8839 2
j Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Morey Wolfson
[moreywolfson@aol.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 201312:35 PM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 13, 2a13 Chairperson Allison M.. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 2a852 Dear Chairperson Macfarlane)
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 7a% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a wtird play) Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses) evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcu:ts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant) let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch) desperate attempt to avoid a full) public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club to dismiss any requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut the license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators that the public deserves.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mr. Morey Wolfson 53 N EI Molino Ave Apt 143 Pasadena, CA 911al-5658 1
j Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Nanci Oechsle [dishesbite@cox.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 1:07 PM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 13, 2813 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 28852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We" ask that the" Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 78% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of "the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alohe the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club to dismiss any requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut the license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators that the public deserves.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms. Nanci Oechsle 2438 Alta Vista Dr Vista, CA 92884-7856 1
j Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Diane Etchison [detchison22@cox.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 3:48 PM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Calion the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 13, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word plaYJ Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally. inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the lev~~ of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club to dismiss any requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut the license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators that the public deserves.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Dr. Diane Etchison 422 Plaza Estival San Clemente, CA 92672-3539 1
j Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of sabina'virgo [sabina1@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 8:43 PM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 13, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MO 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory 'Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club to dismiss any requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut the license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators that the public deserves.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms. sabina virgo 1701 Morton Ave Los Angeles, CA 90026-2613 1
j Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Felicia Bander
[feliciabander@gmail.com}
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 201311:37 PM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 13 J 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves, a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts
. procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history-and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there
. could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club to dismiss any requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut the license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators that the public deserves.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms. Felicia Bander 3400 S Barrington Ave Los Angeles, CA 90066-2018 1
Joosten, Sandy J
From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.orgj on behalf of Karen Berger
[kareneliseberger@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 12:09 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 13, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "licens~ amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club to dismiss any requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut the license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators that the public deserves.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms. Karen Berger 4412 Ocean View Blvd Apt 207 Montrose CA 91020-1286 J
1
j Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Keith Solberg
[blackneko. wind@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 11 :38 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 14, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it 'seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a s~gnificant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators. The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mr. Keith Solberg 244 Boyce Road Sydney, None 02035
J Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of pam nelson [pamela05n@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 2:37 PM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 14 J 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville J MD 20852 Dear Chairperson Macfarlane J We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before ~he Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment.that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word plaYJ Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses J evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plantJ let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch J desperate attempt to avoid a full J public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators. The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mrs. pam nelson 38723 Highway 79 Warner SpringsJ CA 92086-9275
J Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Marna Cornell [marnatcornell@me.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 5:38 PM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 14, 2813 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 28852.
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that-could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 78% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed- San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators. The public deserves better.
The news from Japan currently is NOT good ... re their nuclear meltdown ... Problems which are dangerous to human beings are still present ... and there is a strong movement against nuclear facilities ..*
We need to do the research and pay attention to the results ...
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Marna Cornell 1211 Sinaloa Ave Pasadena, CA 91184-3152
Joosten, Sandy J
From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Marshall Stackman
[marshall.saul@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 8:39 PM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 14, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investig~tion and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated license Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a.so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators. The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mr. Marshall Stackman
.PO Box 237047 178 Columbus Ave New York, NY 10023-0028 1
J Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Virginia Sendor
[vfsendor@optonline.net]
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 201311:40 PM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 14, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a wordplay, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of Sail Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators. The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mrs. Virginia Sendor 66 Glenbrook Rd Apt 2122 stamford, (T 06902-8404 1
j Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Mark Evje [pinthief@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 20134:08 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 15~ 2a13 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville~ MD 2a852 Dear Chairperson Macfarlane~
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and 'provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 7a% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play~ Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses~ evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a 50-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators. The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mr. Mark Evje la81 Alveda Ave El Cajon, CA 92a19.-3456 1
j Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Carl McCall
[divinorumdevotee@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 7:39 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 15, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment""
a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a .so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators. The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mr. Carl McCall PO Box 882206 San Diego, CA 92168-2206 1
J Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of susan brown [soulmagicI2@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 20132:39 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 15 J 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville J MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC consiaers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "l~cense amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of thee plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismfss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full and open license & SAFETY review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
A lot of questions remain unanswered. Please respond to Senator Boxer's request on this.
Public meetings in southern California are essential.
I also request an updated emergency evacuation plan. 10 miles is not enough it needs to be 50 miles and the current plan is completely out of date and unworkable.
Is San Onofre going to withstand a large EMP? Do you have any studies that show the consequences?
Please do not go down in history as Fukushima USA!
1
Please don't put my family in such terrible jeopardy. Do you have family in southern California?
"All 104 nuclear reactors currently operational in the US have irreparable safety issues and should be taken out of commission and replaced, former chairman of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Gregory B. Jaczko said."
http://rt.com/usa/us-nuclear-reactors-should-replaced-592/
350 layoffs pending at San Onofre nuke plant - HUH????
For the first time, solar energy accounted for all new utility electricity generation capacity added to the U.S. grid last month, according to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC's) March 2013 "Energy Infrastructure Update." More than 44 megawatts (MW) of solar electric capacity was brought online from seven projects in California, Nevada, New Jersey, Hawaii, Arizona, and North Carolina.
All other energy sources combined added no new generation.
http://www.seia.org/news/new-federal-report-shows-solar-achieved-history-march Solar is 5 times cheaper than Nuclear http://www.nbcnews.com/id/21134540/vp/43222728#43222728 Shutdown - The case against San Onofre video - 'Kill Nuclear Power Before It Kills Us' SHUTDOWN '
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=W1R4jc2wIGs# .
GAO finds NRC needs better understanding of emergency preparedness beyond 10-mile zone https://www.facebook.com/groups/162282963826465/permalink/4860S3194782772/
"San Onofre's Steam Generators: Significantly Worse than All Others Nationwide" -Arnie Gundersen, senior vice president of Fairewinds, Master Degree in nuclear engineering with 40-years of nuclear power engineering.
During his nuclear power industry career, Arnie also managed and coordinated projects. at 70 nuclear power plants in the US. http://fairewinds.org San Onofre sits on active earthquake faults and is also right on the ocean. A quake will happen, a tsunami is inevitable.
Just like Fukushima.
Songs is designed to resist a 7.0 earthquake - It is entirely possible that we will have one greater than 7.0.
The Fukishima earthquake was 9.0 ..
The tsunami wall at San Onofre is 14 feet at high tide - The fuku tsunami was 45-65 feet high ..
"California nuclear plant (San Onofre) a 'time bomb' if restarted
-- Chance of nuke disaster in U.S. very, very, very high ... not if, but when" -Dr. Helen Caldicott, Nobel Laureate http://enenews.com/caldicott-san-onofre-a-time-bomb-if-restarted chance-of-nuclear-disaster-in-u-s-very-high-its-not-if-but-when-video SAN ONOFRE: Secret report confirms Edison knew of major problems http://myemail.constantcontact.com/Edison-guilty-of-putting-PROFIT-before-SAFETY-and-another tmportant-documentary-being-released-Saturday-.html?soid=1109660143359&aid=Oq4r94i4lTM 2
Expert: Report shows California nuclear plant "will progressively destroy itself" -- AP:
Could breakdown at full power (VIDEO) http://enenews.com/expert-report-shows-california nuclear-plant-will-progressively-destroy-itself-ap-could-breakdown-at-full-power-video Nuclear Experts Agree, San Onofre's Replacement Steam Generators Are Unsafe http://decommission.sanonofre.com/2813/81/sce-violated-federal-regs-and-public.html http://sanonofresafety.files.wordpress.com/2811/1/steamgeneratortubesplugged1.pdf Ratepayers get the shaft in San Onofre fiasco http://articles.latimes.com/2813/mar/12/business/la-fi-hiltzik-28138312 At your April 3rd meeting (in Maryland) John Geesman (sp)J who is a former board member ISO J a past member of the ca energy commission during davis/schwarzenegger's terms asked this question: "Based on information edison has turned over for investigation being conducted by cpuc, even if both units 2, unit 3 were working perfectly, there were only 96 hours0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br /> in 2812 when they would have been competitive with the market price for power in so. california.
That's only 1% of the time.
Why are we putting ourselves through so much regulatory pain and suffering for a plant that is not cost effective 99% of the time?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GswNqQ82bW4&feature=youtu.be Please do the right thing.
SincerelYJ a concerned grandmother Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms. susan brown La Mesa La Mesa J CA 91942 3
Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Garen Yegparian
[yeghpairiank@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 20131:33 PM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 15, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators. The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mr. Garen Yegparian 310 E Providencia Ave Apt 212 Burbank, CA 91502-2759 1
Joosten, Sandy
/
From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.orgj on behalf of Barbara Hunt [hapeez@sbcglobal.netj Sent: Monday, April 15, 20132:34 PM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 15 J 2813 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville J MD 28852 Dear Chairperson Macfarlane J We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 78% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word plaYJ Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses J evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant} let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch} desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators. The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms. Barbara Hunt 16689 Mount Hoffman Cir Fountain Valley, CA 92788-2435 1
j Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.orgj on behalf of Reynaldo Reed [reyreed@aol.comj Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 1:51 AM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 16 J 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville J MD 20852 Dear Chairperson Macfarlane J We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word plaYJ Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated license Amendment with sworn witnesses J evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plantJ let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch J desperate attempt to avoid a full J public review by the NRC.
Dear Commissioners J I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators.
The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Reynaldo Reed 14733 Chadron Ave Apt 104 Gardena, CA 90249-3522 1
I Joosten, Sandy From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.orgj on behalf of Mary Ann Shelton [maryanns3490
@gmaiLcomj Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 7:51 PM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Calion the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 15, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike.
Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word play, Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment with sworn witnesses, evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plant, let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch, desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators. The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Ms. Mary Ann Shelton 44 Nicholl Ave Point Richmond, CA 94801-3919 1
Joosten, Sandy
/
From: Sierra Club [information@sierraclub.org] on behalf of Cheryl Kline [cherylkline@verizon.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 12:56 PM To: CHAIRMAN Resource
Subject:
We Call on the NRC to Dismiss Licensing Shortcuts for the Failed San Onofre Nuclear Units Apr 16, 2013 Chairperson Allison M. Macfarlane 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852
Dear Chairperson Macfarlane,
We ask that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take no action that could lead to any restart of the San Onofre nuclear power plant before the Commission completes its comprehensive investigation and provides full opportunity for public participation.
Southern California Edison (SCE) is seeking to shortcut the license review process by urging the NRC to declare that a license amendment that would enable the restart of the San Onofre facility at 70% power involves no significant hazards. We believe that the public deserves a full and transparent review of the failed San Onofre generators before the NRC considers any potential restart.
In a word plaYJ Edison claims it seeks a "license amendment" a phrase that properly refers only to the process provided by an Adjudicated License Amendment'with sworn witnesses J evidentiary hearings and a judicial decision.
Speeding restart of San Onofre through a so-called "license amendment" that shortcuts procedures is totally inappropriate given the troubled history and current condition of the plantJ let alone the level of public concern.
SCE's request to weaken its license requirements was made despite evidence showing that there could be a significant hazard from the operation of the deficient steam generators.
Please completely dismiss Edison's request. This latest maneuver by Edison appears to be merely a last-ditch J desperate attempt to avoid a full, public review by the NRC.
I support the call by the Sierra Club for the NRC to dismiss requests by Southern California Edison to shortcut a full license review process for the failed San Onofre nuclear generators. The public deserves better.
Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
Mrs. Cheryl Kline 6168 Saddleback Way Camarillo, CA 93012-4421 1