ML13095A463
| ML13095A463 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 04/05/2013 |
| From: | Roth D NRC/OGC |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| RAS 24353, 50-361-CAL, 50-362-CAL, ASLBP 13-924-01-CAL-BD01 | |
| Download: ML13095A463 (7) | |
Text
April 5, 2013 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY ) Docket Nos. 50-361-CAL/50-362-CAL
)
(San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station )
Units 2 and 3) )
)
JOINT MOTION FOR CORRECTION OF TRANSCRIPT OF MARCH 22, 2013 ORAL ARGUMENT In accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(a) the NRC Staff, Friends of the Earth and Southern California Edison Company (collectively, "Joint Participants") hereby request that the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board correct the transcript of the oral argument in this matter, held on March 22, 2013. The Joint Participants respectfully request that the transcript be revised to incorporate the corrections identified in Appendix A, attached hereto.
In accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(b), the Joint Participants developed Appendix A cooperatively, and have reached agreement on this motion.
Respectfully submitted,
/Signed (electronically) by/
David E. Roth Counsel for the NRC Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15 D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Telephone: (301) 415-2749 E-mail: David.Roth@nrc.gov Dated at Rockville, MD this 5th day of April, 2013.
Appendix A to Joint Motion for Correction of Transcript of March 22, 2013 Oral Argument PAGE/LINE DELETE INSERT 6/20 [Judge Hawkens] concludes and concludes that it 6/25 [Judge Hawkens] In order In our order 7/7 [Judge Hawkens] if wishes if it wishes 7/19 [Judge Hawkens] is not is not to 9/11 issues issues regarding 9/20 also the NRC also with the NRC 9/20 My left To my left 10/8 a Request for Request for 10/15 recert restart 12/5 [Judge Hawkens] o0ne? one?
12/7 an the 13/7 [Judge Hawkens] us SCE's announcement 13/14 believe the believe that the 13/16 that we have voluntary that it would be a voluntary 14/8 [Judge Hawkens] precedence precedent 15/7 If these 17/21 conceived conceded 18/9 "
18/12 quotation mark at end of sentence 18/18 "
18/19 Unite Unit 18/20 quotation mark at end of sentence comma after "CAL" and change 20/16 . uppercase T to lowercase in "this" 20/24 Mr. Ayres Judge Hawkens 22/3 stuck shut 23/5 I think I see insert dash between "I'm sorry" and "if 24/4 period after "I'm sorry" you need to make a change" 26/13 figured triggered insert "and that is" after "others" and 27/13 in that instance before "the Commission" 28/2 commas on either side of "as it read it" 28/4 comma after "next step" 28/5 comma after "proceeding" 28/13 comma after "Judge" 30/25 [Judge Baratta] they're you're 31/2 decision position 33/19 comma after "conclusions" 36/8 [Judge Arnold] Results are Results in 36/13 [Judge Arnold] how do how far do 41/18 ASOP ASLB 43/12 [Judge Arnold] called culled 44/5 [Judge Arnold] deducting deducing 44/14 dashes before and after "triggering" 46/18 comma after "that" 46/19 comma after "us" 48/19 insert dash after "that" Appendix A Appendix A to Joint Motion for Correction of Transcript of March 22, 2013 Oral Argument PAGE/LINE DELETE INSERT insert dash after the second "tubes" on 48/21 line 19 51/13 whether restart whether Edision's restart 53/6 rights. rights 53/7 And until 53/25 has already is already 54/19 if they know it if it knows it 59/10 Can't make a It can't make a 59/12 eminent imminent 59/18 3 or 3, or 60/9 precedent the precedent that 60/13 [Judge Hawkens] of referred issue of the referred issue 62/5 is clearly was clearly 62/22 was well before was submitted well before 64/3 [Judge Baratta] at restart at the restart 64/18 [Judge Baratta] de factor de facto 65/10 [Judge Hawkens] is if by is that if by 66/24 you've indicated you've just indicated submit amendment. And 68/13 it's a formal submit an amendment, then it's a formal 68/25 [Judge Hawkens] barr bar 69/7 are submitting application aren't submitting an application 70/14 [Judge Baratta] statement statements 70/20 tubing tube 71/11 [Judge Baratta] contact for AVBs contact force between the AVBs 72/6 [Judge Arnold] mixed next 72/16 assessment assessments 74/11 or are every time the 74/21 inspections every time we do the routine inspections 75/24 , it . It 75/25 generator or tube generator tube 76/3 fueling refueling 76/5 conservative. conservative here.
have five month period 76/5 where have a five month period 76/8 paragraph paragraph of 76/25 [Judge Arnold] eight criterion C2 eighth criterion in (c)(2) 77/6 or where 77/19 an any 78/3 this the 78/19 we have you have 78/25 under the 50.59 under 50.59 79/3 is a is it a 79/4 method. method?
79/9 we are okay you're okay 80/2 value volume 80/9 fitting thinning Appendix A Appendix A to Joint Motion for Correction of Transcript of March 22, 2013 Oral Argument PAGE/LINE DELETE INSERT 80/22 [Judge Arnold] going to go going to go the 80/23 [Judge Arnold] would do would then be able to do 80/25 procedural proceduralized 81/4 we knew we we automatically knew we 81/7 were already screened were screened 81/10 directed coolant the reactor coolant 81/16 And I mentioned And as I mentioned 81/19 their the 83/1 [Judge Arnold] state before state, and I believe this was before 83/17 Your Honor In general 83/24 for power at full power 83/25 do 100 do a 100 84/12 in our without a 84/13 had raised a agrees to 85/15 [Judge Arnold] that then 86/13 every utility has other utilities have 86/14 to take taken 86/19 slight, quick clarification slight clarification 86/22 in 86/23 our tech of that standard tech 87/3 [Judge Baratta] analogous what analogous to what 87/14 in at 87/16 [Judge Baratta] Okay. Also had a no But they also had a no 88/8 [Judge Baratta] CAL CALs 88/19 could did power. We're choosing not to. We're 88/23 power. We're using to choosing to 88/24 it we 89/7 agree don't believe 89/24 We are not I don't believe we are 90/5 seven 70 90/9 that at that both at 91/6 taking doing 91/10 [Judge Baratta] I like in I liken 91/11 [Judge Baratta] the first line that we to the first time that we 91/16 power, we're not power, and we're not 91/17 yet. We yet, we 92/5 [Judge Baratta] at that 92/16 organizations the regulations 95/5 [Judge Arnold] Criteria for Criteria 14 for 95/17 ADB AVB 96/2 Yes. I don't Again, I don't 96/3 in describing in describing the 96/5 wearing wear 96/8 assessments which assessments, which 96/9 program. We program, we 97/6 indeed instead different analysis. We're 97/16 talking different analyses. You're talking Appendix A Appendix A to Joint Motion for Correction of Transcript of March 22, 2013 Oral Argument PAGE/LINE DELETE INSERT 97/19 really different really two different 98/17 [Judge Arnold] or for 98/18 [Judge Arnold] if U tube steam If there are U tube steam 98/24 possibility for in plane possibility in a laboratory for in plane Those were cases of out I believe those were cases of out of 99/2 plane FEI plane FEI 99/9 [Judge Arnold] if is 99/24 credit product 100/1 ADB content AVB contact 100/2 ADB content AVB contact, 100/3 fraction we fraction, we 100/14 had high void had relatively high void 100/15 you get we have 100/18 have seen assume 100/19 presuming presumably 101/6 [Judge Hawkens] Although that sequence Although does that sequence 101/7 [Judge Hawkens] makes sense make sense 102/2 out right out one right 102/3 against on the against us on the presumably we'll be 102/4 enlisting a license presumably there'll be a notice of license 105/14 in and 106/12 Unit [no insert]
108/11 period hearing 109/23 that the 110/19 whether with their 111/21 that the 112/7 [Judge Hawkens] barr bar 113/12 there they 113/14 Do you mean now right you may now run 113/15 has is 114/3 a [no insert]
Honor. And that's your 114/8 word. Honor, as you're aware.
115/13 and behalf and on behalf 116/21 end to ended 117/20 [Judge Hawkens] analysis and analysis aside and 119/10 give correct that said give corrective 119/22 in a 122/12 And No and 124/18 the same is saying 126/22 says as has 126/25 They The 131/11 but that 131/16 or and 132/3 licensee licensing 132/4 or are 133/13 would not are not going to 134/5 trying declining Appendix A Appendix A to Joint Motion for Correction of Transcript of March 22, 2013 Oral Argument PAGE/LINE DELETE INSERT 134/20 would have 134/21 issue issued 134/24 would have 136/24 any of these 50.59 the 50.59 ones which 137/24 59(f) 59 F 3rd 284 138/9 an act of in fact a 140/2-3 an option adoption 141/1 of [no insert]
142/14 to and Appendix A UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICNSING BOARD In the Matter of )
)
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ) Docket Nos. 50-361-CAL/ 50-362-CAL
)
(San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station )
Units 2 and 3) )
)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to 10 C.F.R § 2.305, I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing "JOINT MOTION FOR CORRECTION OF TRANSCRIPT OF MARCH 22, 2013 ORAL ARGUMENT" dated April 5, 2013 have been served upon the Electronic Information Exchange, the NRCs E-Filing System, in the above captioned proceeding, this 5th day of April, 2013.
/Signed (electronically) by/
David E. Roth Counsel for the NRC Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-15 D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Telephone: (301) 415-2749 E-mail: David.Roth@nrc.gov Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 5th day of April, 2013