ML13035A242

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2012 Point Beach Nuclear Plant Initial License Examination Administrative Files
ML13035A242
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  
Issue date: 12/03/2012
From:
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Florida Power & Light Energy Point Beach
Shared Package
ML11354A208 List:
References
Download: ML13035A242 (21)
v • d • e


Text

2012 POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION ADMINISTRATIVE FILES

ES*201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES*201*1 Point Beach 12/3/12 Developed by: Written - Facitity[l\\ NRC 0 1/ Operating - Facitity[l\\ NRCD Facility:

Date of Examination:

Target Date*

-180

-120

-120

-120

[-90J

{-75}

{-70}

{-45}

-30

-14

-14

-14

-7

-7

-7

-7 Task Description (Reference)

1.

Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b)

2.

NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)

3.

Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)

4.

Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

[5.

Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)]

6.

Integrated examination'outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ER-301-5. ES-D-1's, ES-401-1'2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)

{7.

Examination outline(s) raviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}

8.

Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

9.

Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202)

10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.1; C.2.i; ES-202)
11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.f)
12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)
13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.!; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)
15. Proctoring/written exarr administration guidelines re'jewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)
16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3,i)

Chief Examiner's Initials

.~

~

c,()VJ I

~

,vIA CP-J

~

~

W;

~

C(}J Ofrt cry CfiJ(

-~

otYJ

  • Target dates are generally based on faCility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination d~te identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies onlyJ {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201, Page 25 of 28

Point Beach Nuclear Plant Master Security Agreement The Master Security Agreement is used for those personnel having both knowledge ofExam Sensitive Material and unrestricted access to Primary and Secondary Containment.

1. Pre-Examination (Review FP-T-SAT-71, Attachment 1 for pre-job briefing requirements)

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the ILT 2012 NRC examination(s) scheduled for the date(s) of December 3-14, 2012 as of the date ofmy signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by an Operations Training Supervisor. I understand that I am not to instruct or provide performance feedback to those individuals scheduled to be administered these examinations from this date until completion of examination administration. I also understand that I am not to evaluate individuals scheduled to be administered these examinations from this date until the date ofadministration. Acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if! do not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback to an examinee. Furthermore, I am aware ofthe physical security measures and requirements (as documented in procedures) and understand that violation ofthe conditions ofthis agreement may result in cancellation ofthe examinations and/or an enforcement action against my facility or me. I will immediately report to the Exam Project Manager any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best ofmy knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the examinations administered during the date(s)

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those individuals who were administered these examinations.

JOB TITLE!

RESPONSIBILITY PRINTED NAME

1. f\\ A~~ ZauM el"J ~r <>9J TI1I1':
2.

.Jof2.{ TtZ..JotAJ 5e.&"cY" ¢e> L'5t-\\

3. 9-..~l.J\\ &""".J.**~ P'iH. ~- t *.,,..I.*.....Jv ~Z ~ Z2
4. ~ b. Uilrop G..wPi1llJeif/)~JvPNNIJIA ~ ::

Retention: Life of Plant Retain in: Exam File DATE NOTE

~~ JIJ/tO/'t~21ff/hL p..' \\~ lL. __ _

!%j:L _

QF-!071-01 Page 1 Of~\\ ~ \\\\\\lo\\\\t..

Revision 1 05/12108

Reference:

FP-T-SA T -71

Point Beach Nuclear Plant Master Security Agreement The Master Security Agreement is used for those personnel having both knowledge ofExam Sensitive Material and umestricted access to Primary and Secondary Containment.

JOB TITLE/

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE PRINTED NAME RESPONSIBILITY

5. /,\\J\\<<.~ f\\ ~g-.

\\<ps Uro,w:, ~ ~r-okj7J./tl'..

_._ ~

6. ;11~--A~

~,V1<:V 6}-u.;z;: rA-,k

? /2/2-.

Moj-z.

7..1~'r.-CJ.y) S1~ Sk. 1R:.r£A') it 7-2-0/t.

R[,? ~_

H

8.

M; e.\\,..;J ~ / "S1 "'" 'fA3'1nr:et:

7A2-(2.

OJW,z. __

9. vY\\l~ JV~e-

~vLL;f cts \\n<;.+tvldCll lMu~1 j a--

!J-. 9*/~

~

10. ~F..Ib:t:-1V?vJ c?>P~jfl1'b">>

Z:,.:J~c..~ ~

7j7/f'Z-

-fL

11. John> f-fon-e-Sirn [;;";;

~~ 7/?/lJ-(),vL ~ J2j/V}z._

12. ~O"u2;tJU L:,~~(Ci~

S-l~ r(A.v-)e,..-ve E~5 d!:.p!;:.EL 7/;D/;2-;1tLj 9'lJ(ZL 1-4102-__

13. ":i\\~~1[1.s. 1\\ MeA.Y\\yt<>~~.,I "P6:;-OL j)~~7 7-11.,.,.. ~~

(Z-II-/l- __

14. ~L~.V;o{JE td~EI;c,;;rC;; U/tJtJJIJh 4~- ;t~

~.-

15. JlMlJ Hl~Cl1L" OAT[

(f)

~~

Z. \\~~(M~pV-'D/t9j;z v

NOTES:

\\0" 1.... '"

f 1,1\\ £))d\\f eJ IJ.1--'(e t-I/h.J f\\IUc..

o Iolar I SSI.,.}ac) A-M"tJ~ /

\\

r.,\\

0

\\ )\\U4J' (.1-r:., Ai '1('

i I

r I Ii" l,C..I N

'\\

I.r

~

5l.t t.J 1"..(,~ Iv) <<.; 1'~*v

H) /'!t:J..1u-.

ffl (I*

.1 A)'Itv'-f() l/4 Of..e)cJ-.ff' I V/ L.~.. {tfl' ~.

Retention: Life ofPlant Retain in: Exam File QF*I071-01 5 Q(

Revision 1 05/12108 Page 2 of).

\\1\\~It...

Reference:

FP-T-SAT-71

~/t -r-1-rrr=nT-:.7-P1q..~L 1/.:30-/1 rr h dI

. I I I

~,I:,", L£'

(

~

C>

~~

~

Point Beach Nuclear Plant Master Security Agreement The Master Security Agreement is used for those personnel having both knowledge ofExam Sensitive Material and unrestricted access to Primary and Secondary Containment.

JOB TI1LE I PRlNTED NAME SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

RESPONSIBILITY

/,A" r DATE NOTE

.,s.

~=-----------

/t/Jtja

.- --.A 7 J

itIliel'?

~=-=---:=-=-=-=-=-=--

16.

..J 0& i4fiiI-SGJJ1I1L ()/'5 1/vS(

/7.

p.,(o.t.- (~-

~

s.t.ik/\\.is~"

{ 8.

~

V'-

/1J:JJ2-It-'L'~

(9.

~ ~~e' bf'S

\\NST Off !,,JjJ op~ 5)20

~::1/a;f~n

12. ;3z;/f1' A(5!k?t

~~:-7};~"J 57<h

13. 6iu, LA / (

l4. ~&;!;;:e Cz21

,1;;.

1 NOTES:

Retention: Life of Plant Retain in: Exam File QF-I07I-01 lot]

Revision 1 05/12108 Page ~ ~ \\\\\\~(,\\It..

Reference:

FP-T-SAT-71

."/

&~ "

Point Beach Nuclear Plant Master Security Agreement The Master Security Agreement is used for those personnel having both knowledge ofExam Sensitive Material and unrestricted access to Primary and Secondary Contaimnent.

1. Pre-Examination (Review FP-T-SAT-71, Attachment 1 for pre-job briefing requirements)

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the ILT 2012 NRC examination(s) scheduled for the date(s) of December 3-14, 2012 as ofthe date ofmy signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by an Operations Training Supervisor. I understand that I am not to instruct or provide performance feedback to those individuals scheduled to be administered these examinations from this date until completion of examination administration. I also understand that I am not to evaluate individuals scheduled to be administered these examinations from this date until the date of administration. Acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable ifI do not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback to an examinee. Furthermore, I am aware ofthe physical security measures and requirements (as documented in procedures) and understand that violation ofthe conditions ofthis agreement may result in cancellation ofthe examinations and/or an enforcement action against my facility or me. I will immediately report to the Exam Project Manager any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best ofmy knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the examinations administered during the date( s)

From,the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those individuals who were administered these examinations.

JOB TITLE!

PRINTED NAME DATE NOTE RESPONSIBILITY

1. rt,J,tec..v' UlA.(,M e,.J ~r 095 rtvr

~I~_"

2.

.JC>f2( TlAJoe;AJ

$£"",'"Dr ~e" :r:;,.5~

WI ~/1'z-_

3. ~l..~~ &""Y.J..-.~ P\\H. ~ toorJ......hv~Z :- i2,...... ->_0; ~t'J..\\\\oll'L__
4.

1!/tJrnAf b<< L.ttuo# ~ fl1/JJ&<<()f£IM11QI.IJ'vNlMIIIf ~

'V~/{~~%h __

Retention: Life ofPlant Retain in:. Exam File QF-I071-01 Page 1 oi\\ ~ \\\\~\\\\ 't..

Revision 1 05/12108

Reference:

FP-T-SAT-71

Point Beach Nuclear Plant Master Security Agreement The Mas~er Security Agreement is used for those personnel having both knowledge of Exam Sensitive Material and umestricted access to Primary and Secondary Containment.

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE

(?b/71,k

~

""'"'"I 7/z/;Z 7~/~~----------

7-2-('2 14._

II. (.

\\ /'

<1.

~ lILt'; f ~

\\ n'i.f(t.,tdo.f VV\\~ u......... '.J 0---

T

  • 9*/:J.

EJP~.Jt.T"Ib~J Z:~~c.~(~..

7"fi/l'z..... -;2--~~,-~--~-.~---~-- 1~/z.,1'~

11.

SifY' ~f\\O

~~ 7/?/n-

12.
),..., t{A<rJw-.ve ~~5 ~z
.L 7/1./Z-______
13.

~i~:O:.J1 b:.5. 1\\ Me.<i--.r'\\~

14. 4!/tId.C6.L~12£ Nt:/?. BEETCJ£ 114ft-me{;
15. Jlf\\fu;:f! LHMClVl'1 OAT[

.(f)

NOTES:

r fA r}dlf -J.41-,?e t-.lfhJ ~

o JJ~ I SSt..}ad A- ~~~ /

(i) N uT \\ S \\'V'V~

~q-

'-7 N ~('

Retention: Life of Plant Retain in: Exam File QF-I071-01

$ ~

Revision I 05112108 Page 2 of).

\\1\\~/It....

Reference:

FP-T-SAT-71

The Master Security Agreement is used for those personnel having both knowledge of Exam Sensitive Material and unr~,

and Secondary Containment.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY DATE

5.

/J$e~ f\\~~

.\\{pS. Uu1lM ~J ~,-

e&ju./'e: ~n1~,

/J I

I DATE NOTE

~~

6.

j21iRe '~k 7/z/2

7.

~~iIJc~,.) 3t~ Sho.,. ~r £"') {} !. -

"N~btt..-~--T-//-!/-'~=-"""""-'i-- l~=

Point Beach Nuclear Plant Master Security Agreement

8.

M, e.lc.c \\ ~ vi '".Si "" k~,"Cer

'-2-(2- ~..~ c1fW,z..-

9. vY11~ Y

(),)...e-

~vLl; f qs ~ n'i.+rvtdo r ltut.L! ~\\~

!f. "./~ LJA., c..e.A-<...,:-I J c--

1.;./ III..201 a.... t

10. ~aar F.. fi7t;-~

-t!)P~kr{b':>J Z",..,~c..~

f1/rZ-..
11. John, f1-on-e..

7/9/1:2-

-!:M-(l-=-.

I-'h-.-~--:'-~- 1210}2..

12. R.obe;lI<< L~...~c4;p 51~ H.-.vJ(w-<-ve 6~

7/JD/tZ-dLi ~ /-l-J0l-__

13. ])O;Jtft.s. /\\ M~V1'i'_y to-.:>..-:lZo (

~ PC~o£..

14. ~,!,-~J?£ /V16R. fi,cETM 71IHtl!;Jt.
15. Jlf\\fu.; 'HtHVV\\cm~Y)

DATe (f)

NOTES-A-t---'(e t-JfN f'\\£.L o IJCrr ISSuod A-- \\,AJ-~~ /

l:~~)d~eJ (Z) ~jI..)'l \\ ) \\i:..J'<'o~,q c, N 'jf AcTc.J'/+-\\

~Is A t4--ru.re II f

~~

f..\\t~ ze.,4,"""

fA,\\Le UA"<>--'

/0--/1;>\\('>

O-~

Retention: Life ofPlant Retain in: Exam File QF-I071-01

)

~

Revision 1 05112/08 Page 2 of).

\\1\\&4IIt...

Reference:

FP-T*SAT-71

Point Beach~ear Plant Limited Security Agreement The Limited Security Agreement is used for those personnel having limited knowledge of Exam Sensitive Material but do not have unrestricted access to Primary and Secondary Containment.

1. Pre-Examination (Review FP-T-SAT-71, Attachment A for pre-job briefing requirements)

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the ILT 2012 NRC examination scheduled for the date(s) of December 3-14. 2012 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about this examination to any persons who have not been authorized by an Operations Training Supervisor. I understand that I am not to instruct or provide performance feedback to those individuals scheduled to be administered these examinations from this date until completion ofexamination administration. I also understand that I am not to evaluate individuals scheduled to be administered these examinations from this date until the date of administration. Acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if I do not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback to an examinee. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in procedures) and understand that violation ofthe conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation ofthe examination and/or an enforcement action against my facility or me. I will immediately report to the Exam Project Manager any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the examination administered during the date( s) of

_________. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of this examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those individuals who were administered this examination.

Furthermore, I agree to NOT discuss any aspects associated with the contents of this examination with ANY examinee until the completion oftheir examination administration. I further understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination and/or enforcement action against the facility licensee or me.

DATE NOTE PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY DATE

~.~

1.

M:c..l...~.. ( HG!..~-'

../tf..O

/

/./J PC"Yt "JJ f2 ft

~l.

2.

J:Jti'fN RIIASa+

S}l.a/OP5 SUPV,

~/zl2 1?l6 3.J~~ Slot o(lS StAll/..

&-1./~ ~~~~ t.J-II-/~

4. -1/111 klCll 7}.0 Leo

~.'H.Z.

I~

I

5. 1)__.~,:,-e \\ c. ?o... ~

~o 1(0

~ /e; I, z

).2/1,/1'1 I~-II>-i)...

6.

Sit'! frttN1r SIlo /~ 50(*

8-9'fJ..

I Retain in: Exam file tion: Life ofplant Form retained in accordance with record retention schedule identified in NP 1.3.1.

QF-I071-02 Revision 2 05112108 Page lof2

Reference:

FP-T-SAT-71

Point Beach~ear Plant Limited Security Agreement The Limited Security Agreement is used for those personnel having limited knowledge ofExam Sensitive Material but do not have unrestricted access to Primary and Secondary Containment.

PRINTED NAME

7.

md4? fve$/<<

8.

~v..5S. l<fV~~'1"~

7.)

~

9.

laMe ("

10. PAUL SkfrrJ.I 11.~(A.e;~
12. WYJ1rr C;,-o~.J

'f l3.

S'1fV6 ~1l*.MaJt

14.

Dou) LLA1r7

15. J7"Y'1 dIYL6l

, t.J Do/hue Ht:J PS 'AI

~l[S

~

l8.~t; I't,-----

JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY Co I< P S i.l..fI) ec

$1<-.0 SICO

"/""~-z- ~

7',.,..r f.,~{/.rSc./

Co Co

('n 5'~()

'S/?J!:;

~o

~

~

~

DATE 1-15'~/2

/!f-' ~( ).

'fZZ-IZ

'1/Z7/rz,. ;......;:'-=--~!.H-r.'~;14..9-#""',fL

t. f{f/ ~ r

/6-/-/3- ~

/'/P/IJ.

ftl" L

-v~ r-~ I

/1/120 fit..

11~/3-'/~

[~/

11/;;;1/1..

lVrX"Z" IIA*/t2

.'.c

~

DATE NOTE

/0/;0;2 1)*11 tL 1f£1i Il/dtt- __

/:?-IO -£-."

I:)J~/Ir J1ddt'l!

t2bJ,z

(;I - J)-I...____

J...

I~

trqtJZtpz

., 'z6,,/vz...,.__

Retention: Life ofplant Retain in: Exam file Form retained in accordance with record retention schedule identified in NP 1.3.1.

QF-1071-02 Revision 2 05112108 Page 2 of2

Reference:

FP-T-SAT-71

ES-401 Record of Rejected KlAs Form ES-401-4 Tier I Group Randomly Selected KIA Reason for Rejection

-gO-Tier lIGroupl APEOS4.AK2 No importance ratings> 2.5, shifted to AK3.

RO-Tier lIGroupl APE062.AK2 No AK2 to select shifted to AK3.

RO-Tier lIGroup 1 EPE 007.EK3 Not enough K2 categories selected on this tier. Went from K3 to K2 to even out category totals.

RO-Tier 2/Groupl OS9.K6 No imJ>ortance rating >2.5, shifted to Al RO-Tier 2/Group 1 061.A2 Selected A2.02 and does not apply to plant, reselected A2.07 RO-Tier 2/Group 1 OS9.K2 No K2 >2.S, selected K3 RO-Tier 2/Group1 r----- ----

062.KS No KS or K6 >2.S, selected Al RO-Tier 2/Groupl 064.K6 Selected to raise total ofK6 to even distribution RO-Tier 2/Group2 OSS.K6 Due to limited number ofKIA >2.S, randomly choose available KIA RO-Tier 2/Group2 068.A1 No Al >2.S, selected A2.

RO-Tier 2/Group2 08612.4.49 No immediate operation from memory for fire system, rese1ected 2.4.2. No EOP entry c~l1ditions based on fire system, rese1ected 2.2.38.

RO-Tier 2/Group2 016.K2 Nothing> 2.S, randomly selected KIA between K4 and A2.

SRO-Tier 2/Group 1 lO3/02.04.08 Duplicate generic RO KIA, no containment AOP, reselected 2.4.6 (JST S/30/12)

SRO-Tier l/Group 1 038.EA2.0S Shrink and Swell subject similar to RO 60. Randomly selected.07 (JST 617/12)

SRO-Tier lIGroup 2 068.AA2.02 AOP-1011 OA doesn't have operators use local boric acid flow. Randomly selected.03 (JST 617112)

SRO-Tier lIGroup 1 054/02.04.04 Entry level conditions for EOP and AOP is RO level. Randomly selected 02.02.40. (JST 617112)

RO-TierllGroup 1 062.AK3.04 PBNP has no automatic interlocks between service water and CCW. Tried to write a question with a partial loss of S1 sequencer (SW pump starts/SW valves failing to open/close) and there are too many variables to get a concrete answer. This KJA doesn't match our plant, randomly re-selected.02 in AK3. (AKZ 6/12/12)

SRO-Tier 2/Group 2 028/02.02.38 Hydrogen Recombiner and purge controls are no longer covered in license basis.

Randomly selected 02.02.44. (JST 6/18112)

RO-Tier 2/Groupl 005.Al.06 Reviewed OP-7A, OP-3C, IT-03, IT-03A, TS-30 and all items related to time-to-boil which is the same item tested in RO question 16. Randomly selected Al.02. (6/19/12 AKZ)

SRO-Tier I/Group 2 005.AA2.02 Attempted several iterations of questions associated with the KJA, could not meet the requirements to be written to SRO-Ievel (system knowledge only for rod speeds).

Randomly selected AA2.04. (JST 6119112)

SRO-Tier l/Group 2 068.AA2.04 AOP-I01l0A actions under AA2 are all RO actions, SRO attachment and steps are pertaining to power, EDG's, batteries and SW. Tried writing questions but they are all RO system level or would get too complicated with plant conditions In order to maintain the 2 AA2 and 2 G questions in this tier we randomly selected a new procedure for AA2, which was 067.AA2.13 (AKZ 6/28/12)

RO-Tier 2/Group 1 012.Kl.04 PBNP has no direct cause or relationship from RPS to RPI. Questions would be related to a trip and some RP1 malfunction or a LOD I question ifwe have a trip what to the RPI's do. Randomlyreselected 08 MFW within Kl. (AKZ 6/28112)

SRO-Tier 2/Group 1 063.A2.02 Tried writing several SRO-level questions, could not tie loss of ventilation that relates to SRO-level ofknowledge. Everything kept going back to having to know only system knowledge to answer the question. Randomly selected 007.A2.03. (JST 7/27112)

SRO-Tier 2/Group 2 056/04.04.50 Tried writing 3 different SRO level questions. Due to the limited condensate system alarms we couldn't come up with an SRO only level question. Randomly re-selected a new Generic KJA 2.01.07

SRO-Tier 1/Group 2 005.AA2.04 APE is for stuck or inoperable rod and AA2.04 is KIA for dropped rod. Tried writing several questions tied to CET maps, they were RO knowledge (reading a map). It is impossible to determine if a rod is completely dropped or partially stuck just by CET maps. The additional information needed to make a TS call makes the CET map not needed. Reselected.03 under AA2. (AKZ 8/21/12)

SRO-Tier 1/Group 2 060.02.02.40 After discussion with the Chief NRC Examiner, reselected the KIA due to over sampling of generic KIA 02.02.40. Randomly res elected 02.04.18. (JST 9/24/12)

RO-Tier 1/Group 1 WE011.02.04.47 After discussion with the Chief NRC Examiner, reselected the KIA due to over sampling of generic KIA 02.02.47. Randomly reselected 02.02.37. (JST 9/24/12)

SRO-Tier 2/Group 2 028.02.02.44 After discussion with the Chief NRC Examiner, reselected the KIA due to over sampling of generic KIA 02.02.44. Per FSAR section 5.3.2.4 Post Accident Containment Venting, the NRC dropped hydrogen release associated with a LOCA from 10CFR50.44. These systems are no longer required for design basis, but are still referenced for situations beyond design basis.

Randomly reselected new system (containment iodine removal) and generic k/a 027.02.02.25. (JST 9/24/12)

RO-Tier 2/Group 2 086.02.02.38 After discussion with the ChiefNRC Examiner, reselected the KIA due to over sampling of generic KIA 02.02.38. Randomly reselected 02.04.35. (JST 9/24/12)

RO-Tier 3 02.04.09 After discussion with the Chief NRC Examiner, reselected the KIA due to over sampling of generic KIA 02.04.09. Randomly reselected 02.04.34. (JST 9/24/12)

RO-Tier 2/Group 1 003.KS.04 After 45-day submittal this question was deemed LOD 1 and GFE knowledge. Unable to get a question using S/G level due to the plant transient stabilization time. In trying to maintain the sample plan with K5, there is 4 other KIA's to choose from. 3 of the 4 are GFE type knowledge like the one we are rejecting. After discussion with the Chief Examiner we are selecting 003.K5.03. (AKZ 1112/12)

SRO-Tier 2/Group 1 076.02.04.46 Tried writing several questions and after discussion with the Chief Examiner we are re drawing another generic KIA with the same system. The current generic KIA lends itself to RO knowledge. Randomly reselected generic KIA 02.01.20.

i ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist int Beach Nuclear Plant Date of Exam: 12/8/12 Exam Level: RO X SRO X Item Descri tion

1.

, 2.

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors reviewers s ot check> 25% of examinations)

Initials Pjp.

RlA OPJ

. 4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, N/A N/A tJ!fJ as a licable, +/-4% on the SRO-onl reviewed in detail

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades N/A N/A rJ/J}

are 'ustified

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity

\\~ e1:j of uestions missed b half or more of the a licants Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader fr,J~~ (ON NlRl'f-l--:"""""-"-~,.J'=-I..l-_--"

IJlJiL

~b.411.\\\\ ~1M.",""&~r:>"1

..::C:..:.h::::..~~'\\-.:;.L~-=-....:l:o=-=--I£l.~*_-I-..l........~=::..:::...---}~~

IJ-.} Il/l')....

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

1!LI1-L/'1 1(3/1 7/12.

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
d. NRC Supervisor (*)

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two inde endent NRC reviews are re uired.

NEXTera' ENERG~~

POINT BEACH December 12, 2012 NRC 2012-0120 10 CFR 55.40 Mr. Hironori Peterson, Chief Operator Licensing Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532-4352 Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Dockets 50-266 and 50-301 Renewed License Nos. DPR-24 and DPR-27 Initial Operator and Senior Operator License Examinations Written Examination Results Operator and Senior Operator License written examinations were conducted at Point Beach Nuclear Plant on December 8,2012 Enclosed please find the following examination-related materials:

One (1) form ES-403-1 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Student seating chart Three (3) forms ES-401-7 site-specific Reactor Operator (RO) written examination cover sheets Seven (7) RO exam original answer forms, clean photocopies and machine graded student profiles Four (4) forms ES-401-8 site-specific Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) written examination cover sheets Four (4) SRO exam original answer forms, clean photocopies and machine graded student profiles Candidate questions during written exam administration and proctor responses Exam score statistics Question analysis for questions with :5,50% pass rate Examination Security Agreement EXAM MATERIAL - ENCLOSURE TO BE WITHHELD FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE FOR TWO YEARS NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, 6610 Nuclear Road, Two Rivers, WI 54241 DEC 1 4 2012

Operator licensing Branch Page 2 The licensee is not submitting significant post-exam comments and agrees with the exam as given.

Please withhold the written examination and associated documents from public disclosure for two years.

Very truly yours, NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC Mike Millen licensing Manager Enclosures EXAM MATERIAL - ENCLOSURE TO BE WITHHELD FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE FOR TWO YEARS

-I

-,,~' -,'

~

- t sniAtE CABiiits

,.-I It I8m I~

I fJ f""

1 21 r

I

....w

~~

IiiiiI 1::1.

~I[I

'(SRQ)'.'",,,:,j':ii,i,',il.

i~~c;l,) i; i

..,J't I

I Iw..

  • ll""f,

,~

~~ -

g T'"

"'T'"

IiiiiI liSRQ}

J I

01

,too n 0'-'-

.... p' j

I.

01 (SRO)

I IiiiIr r I

j=j I I

J lr"'11 I

I (RO)

Q

.I _

~_ I

'"II'!!

JPRP)::.i'!'i:;',11

,...., I 01

1\\TRC License Exam Questions During Ad.1'11inistration

[Test Iteml"Individual with Question Resolution

! comment

+----" -------------_

-f--------

~~.Lsked "vhatthe

  • C: and ~D*

~one ~ecded R027 the question, and before we ans\\vered, he said I see llmy".

~-".----- -----.---------f-.,---.. -c-c--.,-,----

we were iIl the EOP network working R025 m the CSP.

"prior to perionning We told him that,ve mean TeclL.-ucal Specification test". He noted that IT 01,'ems the equipment for the purposes of the R069 pump casing as a pan of the IT.

L-----__._4-______._______~---------- _________________

-L\\Ve "'Tote this on the board fOT all $rudents,

~

~Pt'p,."tr\\,. has a

"\\Ve told rum there i~ enou>rh infonnation in the stem to small amount of leakage'?"

ans\\ver thc question and h~ should/onlY make RO!'3 assumptions,hal ::Ire based on inf'Omlation p;:ovided in

-~--.--.~---.

aSSllme operator actions \\yere taken in EOF-O hirr; *yes SR085 in 1?

WRITTEN EXAMINATION ITEM REVIEW Directions: (Refer to TR-AA-230-1 004 SAT Implementation)

Complete this analysis for each question missed by 50% or more of the students.

Evaluation Title/Number:

ILT 2012 NRC Written Exam Date the examination was administered:

12/8/12 Number of questions on the examination:

75 RO 25SRO i Number of questions that were missed by 50% or more of the students:

4 Number of students evaluated:

7 for RO Exam 4 for SRO Exam Number of students who failed the exam:

0 Percent of students who failed the examination:

0 Complete page 2 of this form.

Indicate AR number(s) generated as a result of this analysis (or indicate "NONE"):

TWR01831590 ILT TRC to review ILT 2012 high miss questions from NRC RO and SRO written exam.

<iLc.

Review performed by:

Approved by:

~

Date:

r~ III {1'1 Training Supervisor TR-AA-230-1004-F02 Revision 0 Page 1 of 3

LIST EACH QUESTION THAT WAS MISSED BY 50% OR MORE OF THE STUDENTS

%of

  1. of students Review Conclusions Comment Section Question students who missed the Include a comment for each Number who missed question AND A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

F.

G.

H.

"NO" answer. If a corrective action is the question failed the exam generated. list the corrective action number on the front page.

Some students were unfamiliar with RO 10 57%

0 rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY the power supplies of the CR HVAC ON N ON ON ON ON ON ON Chill Water Pumps and their auto start on low pressure.

rgjY Y

rgjY

~Y rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY Some students were unfamiliar with R021 57%

0 N

N ON ON ON ON ON ON the P-6 bistable and what occurs to de-energize the SR instruments.

Some students were unfamiliar with R045 57%

0 rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY the normal loading parameters of an ON ON ON ON ON N

N ON EDG during testing. This testing occurs weekly and was a perform OJT ITPE by the students.

Some students unfamiliar with SR019 50%

0 rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY whose final authorization is required.

ON ON ON ON ON N ON ON Both missed answers were a position in the decision process.

Some students unfamiliar with the Y

rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY rgjY Mode table definitions in the TS SR021 75%

0 N ON ON ON ON N ON ON book. Students did not apply the notes and items listed in the table properly.

TR-AA-230-1004-F02 Revision 0 Page 2 of3

QF-1040-14 Rev. 1 Review

Conclusions:

Review the question for each of the areas identified in A through H and check a "Y" for "Yes" or UN" for "No" to determine if there is a discrepancy with the question. For any 'NO' response(s) to A-H, initiate a corrective action if needed to define the issues and document the corrective action number on the front page. Attach this form electronically to the corrective action (if written) and file the paper copy with the exam key. One corrective action may be used to document multiple issues.

I H. Is this an acceptable test question per response of A-G (I.e. all 'YES' responses)?

Verify response to column H is 'YES' if no corrective action is indicated.

A. Does the test question tie directly to the learning objective(s)?

B. Is the test question at the same cognitive level as the tested objective(s)?

C. Does the lesson plan! instructor guide provide information to support the objective(s)?

D. Is the training material content correct regarding the exam answer (that is, does the material support the answer or does it lead to an incorrect answer)?

E. Is there ONLY one correct answer provided on the exam?

F. Does the exam answer key indicate the correct answer?

G. Does the test question meet the guidance in TR-AA-230-1 002 SAT Design Phase?

CAUTION: Hard copy reproductions of this document should be verified against the on-line system for current revisions.

Retention: NONE Disposition: Instructor, Reviewer, and Approver Retain in: With lesson plan Page 3 of 3

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13035A242&oldid=5242963"