ML13030A331
| ML13030A331 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 01/28/2013 |
| From: | Jennings S, Gregory Stone - No Known Affiliation, Residents Organized for a Safe Environment (ROSE) |
| To: | NRC/SECY |
| References | |
| G20130082, LTR-13-0078 | |
| Download: ML13030A331 (5) | |
Text
ETS P S, NRC,t.tNr Proerig~epe the D iownen Ticket No: G20130082 1915
.l Inorato Assigned Office: NRR Other Assignees:
OEDO Due Date:
SECY Due Date:
Date Response Requested by Originator:
Other Parties:
Subject:
Coordination Between the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Public Utilities Commission Regarding San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS)
==
Description:==
CC Routing: RegionlV ADAMS Accession Numbers - Incoming:
Response / Package:
Cross Reference No: LTR-13-0078 SRM\\Other: No Action Type: Appropriate Action OEDO Concurrence: No Signature Level: No Signature Required OCM Concurrence: No Special Instructions:
OCA Concurrence: No For Appropriate Action.
If response is determined, please be sure to create an ADAMS Package to include the incoming (version we forward to you from DPC), with response and process accordingly.
Copies should be provided to RidsEdoMailCenter and RidsSecyMailCenter.
0 ynatio Originator Name: Gene Stone, et al.,
Originator Org: Citizens Addressee: The Commissioners Incoming Task: E-mail Date of Incoming: 01/28/2013 Document Received by OEDO Date: 01/29/2013 OEDO POC: Dan Merzke
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET Date Printed: Jan 29, 2013 10:14 PAPER NUMBER:
ACTION OFFICE:
LTR-13-0078 LOGGING DATE: 01/28/2013 AUTHOR:
AFFILIATION:
ADDRESSEE:
SUBJECT:
ACTION:
DISTRIBUTION:
LETTER DATE:
ACKNOWLEDGED SPECIAL HANDLING:
NOTES:
-FILE LOCATION:
Gene Stone, F7-er
,6Kr j_.0-_; C.q dý :;*
The Commission/SECY/NRCExecSec Concerns regarding the restart of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Appropriate RF, SECY has Ack.
0 1/28/20 13 Xrjc O7ý/_l~
Yes Lead office to publicly release 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after SECY's assignment, via SECY/EDO/DPC.
SECY is beginning to receive multiple emails on this topic (3 are included with this ticket).
ADAMS DATE DUE:
DATE SIGNED:
EDO -- G20130082
Mike, Linda From:
Gene Stone [genston@sbcglobal.net]
Sent:
Monday, January 28, 2013 12:27 PM To:
NRCExecSec Resource
Subject:
NRC & PUC timetables To NRC commissioners, Please support the people of CA in our effort to coordinate the actions of these two government agencies. We demand that the NRC make no decision to restart San Onofre (SONGS) until the PUC has done it's work and made their decision as to whether it is cost effective for Californians to have to pay any more rate increases for a dangerously defective nuclear power plant. It is now time the PUC and NRC work together on the same timeline for the good of Californians and our economy. It makes no sense for these two agencies not to work together and to be on different time tables.
Gene Stone Residents Organized For a Safe Environment (ROSE) 949-233-7724, On twitter @gene stone http://residentsor-gan izedforasafeenvi ron ment.wordpress. corn/
http://coalitionagainstnukes.org/
"The earth and myself are of one mind." -Chief Seattle, Nez Perce "It does not require many words to speak the truth." Sitting Bull 1
Mike, Linda From:
Frederica [rik3@mindspring.com]
Sent:
Sunday, January 27, 2013 11:09 PM To:
public.advisor@cpuc.ca.gov; NRCExecSec Resource
Subject:
San Onofre We the people demand that the NRC make no decision to restart San Onofre (SONGS) until the PUC has done it's work and made their decision as to whether it is cost effective for Californians to have to pay any more rate increases for a dangerously defective nuclear power plant. It is now time the PUC and NRC work together on the same timeline for the good of Californians and our economy.
1
Mike, Linda From:
Stephanie Jennings [stjennings@ucsd.edu]
Sent:
Sunday, January 27, 2013 1:04 PM To:
NRCExecSec Resource
Subject:
PUC hearing pleaseH!!
Dear Madam Secretary,
Please support the people of CA in our effort to coordinate the actions of these two government agencies. We demand that the NRC make no decision to restart San Onofre (SONGS) until the PUC has done it's work and made their decision as to whether it is cost effective for Californians to have to pay any more rate increases for a dangerously defective nuclear power plant. It is now time the PUC and NRC work together on the same timeline for the good of Californians and our economy.
Stephanie Jennings San Diego, CA 1