Text

Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report, Appendix B Seismic Walkdown Checklists (Swcs), 4160V/480V Transformer TRANS-1-8N to Emergency Bus. Pages 361 - 439
	ML13008A037
Person / Time
Site:	Beaver Valley
Issue date:	10/23/2012
From:	Guerra E, Helffrich A; Paul C. Rizzo Associates, ABS Consulting, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	TRANS-1-8N, L-12-283
	Download: ML13008A037 (79)
	v • d • e

11-0-%

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTAM.1S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 361 of 439 N

U Status:

(Y)

Equipment ID No.

TRANS-l-8N Equip. Class

4. Transformers Equipment Description 4160V/480V Transformer TRANS-i -8N to Emergency Bus Location: Bldg.

SRVB Floor El.

713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Front and back of base welded to embed with 2" @ 8" of 3/16" welds. Component identified to be bolted to adjacent L VSGR. Coils are anchored to heavy base with 4-1" diam machine bolts. Adequate clearance identified between buses and housing.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U N/A Y

N U

xI

i-4-Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONMLTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 362 of 439 Status:

()

N U

Equipment ID No.

TRANS-1-8N Equip. Class

4. Transformers Equipment Description 4160V/480V Transformer TRANS-i -8N to Emergency Bus Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Flex lines attached.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

7 Y

N U

x I I

I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N

U x

I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date:

10/1/2012

LŽ1Ž Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULI AN-rS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TRANS-1-8N Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description 4160V/480V Transformer TRANS-i -8N to Emergency Bus Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Sheet 363 of 439 Status:

W N

U File Name: 2-6 1-12-1-25.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2 -6 2 1-2 5.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component

L*Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEFRS & CONSULTAN1S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

S Equipment ID No.

TRANS-I-8N Equip. Class

4. Transformers Equipment Description 4160V/480V Transformer TRANS-i -8N to Emergency Bus Sheet 364 of 439 tatus:

(2)

N U

File Name: 2-63-12-1-25.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of base mounting frame configuration li-le Name: 2-b4-i2-i-23.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of flexible attached line

I

Ž Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONU LTANIS Sheet 365 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TRANS-1-8NI Equip. Class

4. Transformers Status:

W N

U Equipment Description 4160V/480V Transformer TRANS-I -8N 1 to Emergency Bus Location: Bldg.

SRVB Floor El.

713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Housing anchored with 4-1/2" diam anchor bolts through angles at base which are welded to base of the TRFMR. Component bolted to adjacent 480V substation. 2" gap identified for door entry cage judged acceptable.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Calculation 52233-C-006 Anchorage Calc confirms anchorage configuration

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

W N Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

I I

I

L Y

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTA*nT Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 366 of 439 N

U Status:

(Y)

Equipment ID No.

TRANS-1-8NI Equip. Class

4. Transformers Equipment Description 4160V/480V Transformer TRANS-1-8N 1 to Emergency Bus Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

I I

I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N

U x

I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date:

10/1/2012

L

Ž Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGNINEERS

& CONSULTANMT Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

St Equipment ID No.

TRANS-1-8N1 Equip. Class

4. Transformers Equipment Description 4160V/480V Transformer TRANS-1-8N I to Emergency Bus Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Sheet 367 of 439 atus:

(W)

N U

lPile Name: 2-6I-1-l-34.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-1-1-34.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component

L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGTNEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

St Equipment ID No.

TRANS-1-8N1 Equip. Class

4. Transformers Equipment Description 4160V/480V Transformer TRANS-1 -8N I to Emergency Bus Sheet 368 of 439 atus:

W N

U File Name: 2-63-1-1-34.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of base mounting frame

L[YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONLULTA&NT Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 369 of 439 N

U Status:

W)

Equipment ID No.

TRANS-I-9P Equip. Class

4. Transformers Equipment Description

.41 60V Bus I DF to Emergency Bus 1 P Transformer Location: Bldg.

SRVB Floor El.

713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

4160V Bus 1DF to Emergency Bus 1P Transformer Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Connected to steel base frame with 18-3/8" diam machine bolts. Base frame is welded to embed with 2" @ 8" of 3/16" weld. Component was identified to be connected to adjacent SWGR. Coils are anchored to heavy base with 4-1" diam machine bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Verified to be connected to adjacent.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Spalled concrete identified on concrete pad. Judged not to be a seismic concern.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U N/A Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U x

-F I

[*'Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTAN-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 370 of 439 Status:

W N

U Equipment ID No.

TRANS-I-9P Equip. Class

4. Transformers Equipment Description 41 60V Bus 1 DF to Emergency Bus 1 P Transformer Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x I I

I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N

U x

I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date:

10/1/2012

L*----Ž Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS &

ONSULTAN1$

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TRANS-1-9P Equip. Class

4. Transformers Equipment Description 4160V Bus I DF to Emergency Bus I P Transformer Sheet 371 of 439 Status:

W N

U Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-7-1-26.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-7-1-26.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component

L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTAPtS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TRANS-I-9P Equip. Class

4. Transformers Equipment Description 4160V Bus 1 DF to Emergency Bus 1P Transformer Sheet 372 of 439 Status:

Y N

U File Name: 2-63-7-1-26.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of base mounting frame File Name: 2-64-7-1-26.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of base mounting frame

L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONMULTAX1T Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TRANS-1-9P Equip. Class

4. Transformers Equipment Description 4160V Bus I DF to Emergency Bus 1 P Transformer Sheet 373 of 439 Status:

w*)

N U

Pile Name: 2-/3-/-I -2h.jpeg

==

Description:==

Pile Name: 2-94-/-1-26.jpeg

==

Description:==

IŽ----

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 374 of 439 N

U Status:

(2)

Equipment ID No.

TRF-1015 Equipment Description Equip. Class

4. Transformers Vital Bus # 1 &#3 Aux PWR Supply Static Line 480V/i 20V AC Voltage Regulator Location: Bldg.

SRVB Floor El.

713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

4-3/4" diam anchor bolts identified through inverted base channel Separation with adjacent panelsjudged to be adequate (-1JO'.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N

Z I X~I Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

I I

I

1" Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 375 of 439 N

U Status:

(

Equipment ID No.

TRF-1015 Equipment Description Equip. Class

4. Transformers V.1ital Bus #1&#3 Aux PWR Supply Static Line 480V/120V AC Voltage Regulator Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Block wall SB-I-ll has been qualifiedper IE 80-11 review.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Flexible attached lines judged to be adequate.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U xI Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N

U X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date:

10/1/2012

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Sheet376of 439 ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status:

W N

U Equipment ID No.

TRF-1015 Equip. Class

4. Transformers Equipment Description Vital Bus #1 &#3 Aux PWR Supply Static Line 480V/120V AC Voltage Regulator Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

lile Name: 2-bI-/-l-2-.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-7-1-25.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component

LPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS I CXMU LTANnS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TRF-1015 Equi Equipment Description Vital Bus #1 Sheet 377 of 439 Status:

()

N U

p. Class

4. Transformers

&#3 Aux PWR Supply Static Line 480V/120V AC Voltage Regulator File Name: 2 -6 3 1-25.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of channel mounting basc File Name: 2-64-7-1-25.jpeg

==

Description:==

Close up view of channel base with anchor bolts M

Sheet 378 of 439

[*2Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEM$ & COMSULTAN*S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TRF-1015 Equi Equipment Description Vital Bus #1 Status:

(Y)

N U

p. Class

4. Transformers

&#3 Aux PWR Supply Static Line 480V/120V AC Voltage Regulator File Name: 2-73-7-1-25jpeg

==

Description:==

Block wall identified in the vicinity of the component

.[ŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSU1.T.nTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 379 of 439 N

U Status:

W)

Equipment IDNo.

TRS-BIP-PNLI Equip. Class

20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Backup Indicating Panel Transfer Switch Location: Bldg.

SFGB Floor El.

735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Wall mountedpanel (-36"x36"xlO") welded on sides to 3/8"plates with -18" of 1/8" weldv (on each side). Each 3/8"plate is anchored to wall with 4-3/8" anchor bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A Y

N U

XI

ulKŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Seimi INEc & CheckLTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 380 of 439 N

U Status:

W Equipment ID No.

TRS-BIP-PNLI Equip. Class

20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Backup Indicating Panel Transfer Switch Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

I I

I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N

U x

I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date:

10/1/2012

I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENWINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TRS-BIP-PNLI Equip. Class

20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Backup Indicating Panel Transfer Switch Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Sheet 381 of 439 Status:

(2)

N U

lile Name: 2-b1-1-I-23.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-1-1-23.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component

LŽ2'Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENG INERS & CONSULTANXh Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TRS-BIP-PNL1 Equip. Class

20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Backup Indicating Panel Transfer Switch Sheet 382 of 439 Status:

W N

U File Name: 2-63-1-1-23.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of wall mounting configuration File Name: 2-64-1-1-23.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of top entry conduits

I N Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERSk r CONSULT&N-rS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TRS-BIP-PNLI Equip. Class

20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Backup Indicating Panel Transfer Switch Sheet 383 of 439 Status:

W)

N U

File Name: 2-73-1-1-23.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of flexible attached line from bottom of panel

I

Ž Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & ON*NULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 384 of 439 Status:

W N

U Equipment ID No.

TV-iBD-1OOA Equip. Class

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description STM GEN IA Blowdown Trip Valve Location: Bldg.

SFGB Floor El.

722 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Valve monted on -6" diam pipe line. Pipe is well supported within (+/-) -3ft of valve.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Slight surface rust visible at bottom of the yoke and judged acceptable.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YIzN Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U N/A Y

N U

N/A Y

N U

N/A I I I

I x I

Y N

U x

I I

I

[

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEMRS

& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 385 of 439 N

U Status:

(W Equipment ID No.

TV-lBD-100A Equip. Class

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description STM GEN IA Blowdown Trip Valve Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N

U x

I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/1/2012 Aa

/

/L.

I, /,

Adam L. Helffrich Date:

10/1/2012

IX Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TV-1iBD-100A Equip. Class

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description STM GEN I A Blowdown Trip Valve Sheet 386 of 439 Status:

(2)

N U

Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Vile Name: 2-bl-i-i-ii.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-1-1-38.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component

LX--

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

IEN(INE[RS & CONSUMTNTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TV-iBD-1OOA Equip. Class

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description STM GEN I A B lowdown Trip Valve Sheet 387 of 439 Status:

(Y)

N U

m File Name: 2-63-1-1-38.jpeg

==

Description:==

Slight corrosion identified on vlave

IXŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONMULTANS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 388 of 439 N

U Status:

W Equipment IDNo.

TV-ICV-102 Equipment Description CN Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid Valve MT Active Monitor DISCH CNMT ISOL Location: Bldg.

SFGB Floor El.

722 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small valve mounted on -1.5" line. Pipe supported off offloor on both sides of the valve (@ - 0").

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N

I X

Y N

U N/A I X Y

N U

N/A 7777x1 Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U N/A I I I

I x I

Y N

U x

I

4VQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENTGINEERS

& CONSULTAN"n Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 389 of 439 N

U Status:

Wl Equipment ID No.

TV-ICV-102 Equipment Description CN Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid Valve MIT Active Monitor DISCH CNMT ISOL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines identified with adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U x

T - - -

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N

U x

II I

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich Date:

10/1/2012 Date:

10/1/2012

L ----

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEMS & CONULTAMTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TV-ICV-102 Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid Valve Equipment Description CNMT Active Monitor DISCH CNMT ISOL Sheet 390 of 439 Status:

(2)

N U

Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-2-1-38.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID lile Name: 2-=2-2-1=i-ijpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component

IŽCQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANiS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TV-ICV-102 Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid Valve Equipment Description CNMT Active Monitor DISCH CNMT ISOL Sheet 391 of 439 Status:

(W N

U vile Name: 2-63-2-1-38.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of line supports location relative to valve

L Y

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 392 of 439 N

U Status:

W*

Equipment ID No.

TV-ICV-150B Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid Valve Equipment Description CNMT VAC PP IlB CNMT ISOL, TV-CV-150B Location: Bldg.

SFGB Floor El.

722 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

CNMT VAC PP 1B CNMT ISOL, TV-CV-150B Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small solenoid valve on -2" diam pipe. Pipe is well suported near the valve.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N

I X

Y N

U N/A SN I

N x/A Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U N/A I I I

I x I Y

N U

x

'7 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSU.TAN'h Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 393 of 439 N

U Status:

(W Equipment ID No.

TV-1CV-150B Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid Valve Equipment Description CNMT VAC PP I B CNMT ISOL, TV-CV-l50B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines identified with adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U x

ý Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N

U X II I

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date:

10/1/2012

L----

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TV-1CV-150B Equip. Class 8B. Solenoid Valve Equipment Description CNMT VAC PP lB CNMT ISOL, TV-CV-1 50B Sheet 394 of 439 Status:

(2)

N U

Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-2-1-37.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID Pile Name: 2-o2-2-i-ji.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component

I*I--1 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUtTA.IN1S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 395 of 439 N

U Status:

W)

Equipment ID No.

TV-I MS-101C Equip. Class

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description Loop I C Main Steam Trip Vavle Location: Bldg.

SFGB Floor El.

768 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Side mounted on large pipe found in good condition. (This valve is a power assisted check valve)

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Slight surface corrosion identified.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N

U N/A Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U X

L2C* Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 396 of 439 Status:

S)

N U

Equipment IDNo.

TV-1MS-101C Equip. Class

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description Loop 1 C Main Steam Trip Vavle Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines identified with adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x I I T Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N

U x

I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date:

10/1/2012

ICQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEftS & CO"ULTA,-S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status:

Equipment ID No.

TV-IMS-101C Equip. Class

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description Loop IC Main Steam Trip Vavle Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Sheet 397 of 439 W

N U

File Name: 2-61-5-1-32.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-5-1-32.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component

I D Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSOUITA**S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 398 of 439 N

U Status:

(Y)

Equipment IDNo.

TV-IMS-105A Equip. Class

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description AFW Turb Steam SUP A TRN Trip Valve Location: Bldg.

SFGB Floor El.

747 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Valve./bund in good condition.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N

II x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A Y

N U

N/A I I I

I x I

Y N

U x

I I

I

[

Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEiRS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 399 of 439 Status:

()

N U

Equipment ID No.

TV-1MS-105A Equip. Class

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description AFW Turb Steam SUP A TRN Trip Valve Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines identified with adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x T -- T Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N

U x

I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date:

10/1/2012

L QPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEEM & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TV-IMS-105A Equip. Class

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description AFW Turb Steam SUP A TRN Trip Valve Sheet 400 of 439 Status:

(W)

N U

Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

rue iName: L-ot-o-i-jL.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-6-1-32.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component

L,

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULThANT' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TV-IMS-105A Equip. Class

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description AFW Turb Steam SUP A TRN Trip Valve Sheet 401 of 439 Status:

()

N U

tile Name: 2-63-6-1-32.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of flexible attached lines

C Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

"e44 W

NaNEkd S & CONSULTAN(S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 402 of 439 N

U Status:

W Equipment ID No.

VB-A Equipment Description Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Control Room Location: Bldg.

SRVB Floor El.

735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Panel welded at base to embed with 2" @ 6" spacing (1/4 "fillet). Middle post support identified which provides reinforcement to the.front mounting panel. These posts are anchored with 2-3/8" diam anchor bolts. Posts are spaced at -4"-6".

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N

II x

Y N

U N/A x

77I 777I Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

I I

I

L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANh" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 403 of 439 Status:

(Y)

N U

Equipment ID No.

VB-A Equip. Class

20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Control Room Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Control room ceiling's main runners are supported by wires at -4' spacing. Each ceiling tile (i.e., ege grating) is tied to the main runners at each of itsfour corners with tie wraps. Judged no interaction concern.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U x T-

-F Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N

U X II I

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/1/2012 Ada L

Adam L. Helffrich Date:

10/1/2012

Sheet 404 of 439 L Ž Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEE*, & COMNULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

VB-A Equ Equipment Description Control Roo Status:

(2)

N U

ip. Class

20. Instrument and Control Panels Im Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-6-1-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component Plle Name: 2-62-6-1-1&.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of instrumentation inside control panel

LXQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTA&TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 405 of 439 Status:

(2)

N U

Equipment ID No.

VB-A Equip. Class

20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Control Room File Name: 2-63-6-1-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

Welded detail between panel housing and embeddment File Name: 2-64-6-1-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of mid posts inside panel providing support to front mounting panel

IŽCQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEE*R & CONSULTANTS Sheet 406 of 439 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. VS-AC-i A-BLOWER Equip. Class

10. Air Handlers Status:

(W N

U Equipment Description Control Room Air Handling Unit Supply Location: Bldg.

SRVB Floor El.

713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Blower located on top of steel platform mounted on vibration isolator with adequate lateral/vertical restraint. Platform is top braced to surounding 3 walls.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N

LIIKZ Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

I I

I

L C

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUtTANT-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 407 of 439 Status:

Y)

N U

Equipment ID No. VS-AC-IA-BLOWER Equip. Class

10. Air Handlers Equipment Description Control Room Air Handling Unit Supply Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

I I

I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N

U X I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date:

10/1/2012

LŽ-- jPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. VS-AC-i A-BLOWER Equip. Class

10. Air Handlers Equipment Description Control Room Air Handling Unit Supply Sheet 408 of 439 Status:

()

N U

Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-1-1-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-1-1-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component

I*7"Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. VS-AC-I A-BLOWER Equip. Class

10. Air Handlers Equipment Description Control Room Air Handling Unit Supply Sheet 409 of 439 Status:

(2)

N U

File Name: 2 -6 3 1-06.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of beam mounting detail

Il"Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CON0SULTAMIS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 410 of 439 N

U Status:

(Y Equipment ID No.

VS-D-22-2C Equipment Description Di Equip. Class

0. Other

-sel Generator BLDG. O.A. Intake Damper Location: Bldg.

DGBX Floor El.

735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y N~

Damper actuator rigidly supported off the wall and top of the door frame. Damper framing anchored to perimeter walls with 14-1/2" diam anchor bolts. Linkage between operator and damper is unobstructed and there is no potential interaction issues.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N

U N/A Y

N U

N/A Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U N/A I I I

I x Y

N U

x I

I I

[X 1r Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTAN-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 411 of 439 N

U Status:

W)

Equipment ID No.

VS-D-22-2C Equipment Description Di Equip. Class

0. Other esel Generator BLDG. O.A. Intake Damper Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U x

T - -T Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N

U X II I

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date:

10/1/2012

I2

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEEMS & CONSULTAn Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

VS-D-22-2C Equip. Class

0. Other Equipment Description Diesel Generator BLDG. O.A. Intake Damper Sheet 412 of 439 Status:

(9)

N U

Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-1-1-21.jpeg

==

Description:==

Component Plate ID Vile Name: 2-oz-i-1-2i.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component

L 1

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 413 of 439 N

U Status:

(W Equipment ID No.

VS-D-57i Equipment Description Equip. Class

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve A-Cubicle Supply Damper Location: Bldg.

INTS Floor El.

705 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Damper well supportedfrom ceiling and wall. Operator attached to strut channels with 4-1/4" diam machine bolts. Channels connected to concrete with 4-1/4" diam anchor bolts. Linkage has no obstruction and no interaction in the vicinity.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N~z Y

N U

N/A T X__x]

Y N

U N/A SN U

N x/A Y

N U

N/A X

Y N

U N/A I I I

I x Y

N U

x I

[ D Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 414 of 439 Status:

W N

U Equipment ID No.

VS-D-57AI Equip. Class

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description A-Cubicle Supply Damper Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x I I

I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N

U x

I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date:

10/1/2012

[

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEER5S

& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 415 of 439 N

U Status:

()

Equipment ID No.

VS-D-571 Equipment Description Equip. Class

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve B-Cubicle Supply Damper Location: Bldg.

INTS Floor El.

705 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Damper well supported from ceiling and wall. Operator attached to strut channels with 4-1/4" diam machine bolts. Channels connected to concrete with 4-1/4" diam anchor bolts. Linkage has no obstruction and no interaction in the vicinity.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N

II x

Y N

U N/A SN I

N x/A Y

N U

N/A Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U N/A I I I

I x I

Y N

U x x I I

I

L'Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & COMULTA2TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 416 of 439 Status:

W N

U Equipment IDNo.

VS-D-57BI Equip. Class

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description B-Cubicle Supply Damper Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x I I

I Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N

U x

I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date:

10/1/2012

L----

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

VS-D-57B1 Equip. Class

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve Equipment Description B-Cubicle Supply Damper Sheet 417 of 439 Status:

W N

U Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

rue iName: z-o i-.- i--L.Jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of component I

[Ž Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANT" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 418 of 439 N

U Status:

(2)

Equipment ID No.

VS-D-57(

Equipment Description Equip. Class

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valve C-Cubicle Supply Damper Location: Bldg.