ML13008A032
| ML13008A032 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 10/23/2012 |
| From: | Guerra E M, Helffrich A L Paul C. Rizzo Associates, ABS Consulting, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| L-12-283, ICC-E-1A | |
| Download: ML13008A032 (91) | |
Text
APPENDIX B SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS (SWCs)B-1 C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.I \(,INFERS
& CONSI IIANM, Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet I of 439 N U Status: (Y)Equipment ID No. ICC-E-IA Equipment Description Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Primary Plant Component Cooling Water Heat exchanger Location:
Bldg.AXLB Floor El. 735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Long heat exchanger on two saddles hung from the ceiling. Fixed support at ceiling is anchored with 28-1 1/2" diam anchor bolts. Sliding end is anchored with 24-11/2" diam amchors.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage configuration confirmed per Drawings RV-0076A and RV-0076B 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N XI I I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E.C.INEERM
& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 439 Status: (2)N U Equipment ID No. 1CC-E-IA Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Primary Plant Component Cooling Water Heat exchanger Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Eddie M. Guerra Date: Evaluated by: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/20 12 Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEEMS
& CONflLTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ICC-E-IA Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Primary Plant Component Cooling Water Heat exchanger Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Sheet 3 of 439 Status: W N U tuie Name: 2-0!-1-1-44.Jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID tile Name: 2-OL-1i--4+.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component I Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEE1&S
.COSULTAN"IS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ICC-E-I A Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Primary Plant Component Cooling Water Heat exchanger Sheet 4 of 439 Status: (Y N U File Name: 2-63-1-1-44.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of anchorage for fixed support File Name: 2-04-1-1-44.Jpeg
==
Description:==
View of anchorage for sliding support LKQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEE'RS
& CONSULTANS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 5 of 439 N U Status: (-)Equipment ID No. IEE-EG-I Equipment Description Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Diesel Generator Location:
Bldg.DGBX Floor El. 735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchored with 14-1 1/4" diam anchor bolts. 6 of 14 anchors are below the engine block and there is a gap of -1/2" between floor and base of DG skid Other anchors have grout pads. It is judged that the skid has adequate capacity for the demand loads.Also it is judged that bolt bending is not a concern due to gap of -1 112". (see also calculation 52233-C-018).
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Calculation 52233-C-018, page 4/17 confirms the anchorage configuration.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
The support beams for the EDG skids were identified not to be grouted.for their entire length. SQUG and design basis documentation provides justification for this finding.Y N X II I~Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I 41r-- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.S & COWLTAN-S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 6 of 439 Status: (W N U Equipment ID No. 1EE-EG-I Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.[NGINIEWS (CNSULTASTrs Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IEE-EG-l Equ Equipment Description Diesel Gene Other supportil Sheet 7 of 439 Status: W N U.ip. Class 17. Engine Generators erator ng or relevant documents and photos (if any): rite iName: L-oi-a-i-zu.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID riie Njame: z-o-5-i-zu.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component X Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN(IGNEE-S
& COW I LTANTIS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment 1DNo. IEE-EG-I Equ Equipment Description Diesel Gene Sheet 8 of 439 Status: (Y)N U ip. Class 17. Engine Generators erator File Name: 2-63-8-1-20.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of marks surrounding DG exhaust pipe.File Name: 2-64-l8-i-20.jpeg
==
Description:==
Partial view of anchorage configuration Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINESR s. CONWS1oC LTANI(S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 9 of 439 N U Status: (Y Equipment ID No. IEE-EG-l Equipment Description Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Diesel Generator File Name: 2-73-8-1-20.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of base detail showing no grout below DG's middle section.File Name: 2-94-8-1-20.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of base anchors and grouted section for DG base.
I ' Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.UNGINEMRS
&
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 10 of 439 N U Status: W Equipment IDNo. IEE-EG-2 Equipment Description Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Diesel Generator Location:
Bldg.DGBX Floor El. 735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchored with 14-1 1/4" diam anchor bolts. 6 of 14 anchors are below the engine block and there is a gap of -1/2" between floor and base of DG skid Other anchors have grout pads. It is judged that the skid has adequate capacity for the demand loads.Also it isjudged that bolt bending is not a concern due to gap of -I 1/2". (see also calculation 52233-C-018).
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Calculation 52233-C-018, page 4/17 confirms the anchorage configuration.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
The support beams for the EDG skids were identified not to be grouted for their entire length. SQUG and design basis documentation provides justification for this finding.Y N I X I I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I L-- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FNCINFERS 4, CONSLIAN3"n Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet I1 of 439 N U Status: (2)Equipment ID No. IEE-EG-2 Equipment Description Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators)iesel Generator Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U x T ----Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U X II I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 L 11C Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& COULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1 EE-EG-2 Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Sheet 12 of 439 Status: W N U File Name: 2-61-3-1-21 .jpeg
Description:
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-3-1-21.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E)NGINEERS
& L'I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. I EE-EG-2 Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Sheet 13 of 439 Status: (N U File Name: 2-6 3-3-1-21.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of DG exhaust pipe File Name: 2-6 4-3-1-21.jpeg
==
Description:==
Partial view of anchorage configuration L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.NEERM & COM. ULTANM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. I EE-EG-2 Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Sheet 14 of 439 Status: (Y)N U File Name: 2-73-3-1-2 l.jpeg
Description:
View of base detail showing no grout below DG's middle section.
I M Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSILTANTM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 15 of 439 N U Status: )Equipment IDNo. IFC-E-IA Equipment Description Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Fuel Pool Heat Exchanger I A Location:
Bldg.FULB Floor El. 735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Mounted on two saddles. Fixed saddle with 8-5/8" diam anchor bolls and sliding saddle with 4-5/8" diam anchors. Mounted on -3"-6" tall concrete pedestal.
No edge distance issue found 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N LIZZIY Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U x T- --T LKQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 16 of 439 Status: 0 N U Equipment IDNo. IFC-E-IA Equip.Class
- 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Fuel Pool Heat Exchanger I A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Nozzle piping found to be well supported 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 L-vQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CON*LULT&N"S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IFC-E-IA Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Fuel Pool Heat Exchanger I A Sheet 17 of 439 Status: W N U Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-6 1-2-1-60.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-6 2-2-1-60.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component Sheet 18 of 439 01 <Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS C CONALLTAXI3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IFC-E-IA Equ Equipment Description Fuel Pool H Status: (2)N U ip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers eat Exchanger IA File Name: 2-63-2-1-ou.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of saddle outter anchorage configuration File Name: 2-04-Z-i-Ou.Jpeg
==
Description:==
View of saddle inside anchorage configuration I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINFLRLS
&
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 19 of 439 N U Status: Equipment IDNo. IFC-P-IA Equipment Description Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Fuel Pool Recirculation Pump Location:
Bldg.FULB Floor El. 735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Small pump on -6" tall concrete pad. Anchored with 4-1/2" diam anchors. No edge distance issue found.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N LIZIX Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A Y N U N/A x7 E Y N U xI L 12Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Seismic Wa rko .COhcUlTAN(S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 20 of 439 Status: W N U Equipment IDNo. 1FC-P-IA Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Fuel Pool Recirculation Pump Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Nozzle piping found to be well supported 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENMINEERS
& COý.ULTMI ITS'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IFC-P-IA Equ Equipment Description Fuel Pool R Other supportir Sheet 21 of 439 Status: W N U ip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps ecirculation Pump ng or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-6 1-3-1-60.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-3-1-60.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTANTn Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. IFC-P-IA Equ Equipment Description Fuel Pool Sheet 22 of 439 Status: (2)N U ip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps ecirculation Pump File Name: 2-63-3-1-60.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of anchorage base configuration File Name: 2-64-3-1-60.jpeg
==
Description:==
Flexible attached lines IXY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EWOINERS & CONS4LTANT$
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 23 of 439 N U Status: (D Equipment ID No. IFW-PNL-IOOB Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description HYV-IFW-IOOB Local Panel Location:
Bldg.SFGB Floor El. 735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Small panel (-30"x30"x 1O") mounted on HSS4x4 rack with 4-1/2" diam. channel nuts.Rack has three posts and carries two other similar panels. Each post is anchored with 4-5/8" diameter anchors.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N LZILZX Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A Y N U x I 'q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
& CONSULTANIT Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 24 of 439 Status: (Y) N U Equipment ID No. IFW-PNL-IOOB Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description HYV-IFW-IOOB Local Panel Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached top entry cables have adequate flexibility.
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x I Y N U N/A x Y N U x Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 44C Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINFERS
& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IFW-PNL-100B Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description HYV-1FW-100B Local Panel Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): wMP IrM Sheet 25 of 439 Status: W N U File Name: 2-61-1-1-60.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID M~ U, 1 M 3M File Name: 2-62-1-1-60.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEES & CIONSULTAN-rh Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IFW-PNL-IOOB Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description HYV- IFW- 100B Local Panel Sheet 26 of 439 Status: ()N U File Name: 2-63-1-1-60.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of panel anchorage IN 1W7*. ýi File Name: 2-64-1-1-60.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of channel struts attached to posts 4 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 27 of 439 FNGINEERS
& CONStTLTANT Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N U Equipment ID No, I FW-PNL-1OOB Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description HYV- IFW- 10013 Local Panel File Name: 2-7 3-1-1-60.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of top entry conduits L Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.MNGINEESR
& COMULTTAKTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 28 of 439 Status: W)N U Equipment ID No. 1PC-145 Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Equipment Description Fuel Pool Cig Sys to RWST Recirc Sys Isol.Location:
Bldg.FULB Floor El. 735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Small manual valve on -2 1/2" diam line. Piping found to be adequately supported 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N~Y N U N/A Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A Y N U N/A I I I I x I Y N U x I
[ --- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTANMS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 29 of 439 N U Status: W Equipment IDNo. IPC-145 Equipment Description Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Fuel Pool Cig Sys to RWST Recirc Sys Isol.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/20 12 Sheet 30 of 439 IX IPaul C. Rizzo Ass ENGINEERS
& CONMtLTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No. IPC-145 Equipment Description Ot ociates, Inc.(SWC) Status: ) N Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Fuel Pool Cig Sys to RWST Recirc Sys lsol.U her supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-5-1-60.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2---1-odpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINFLRES
& CONWSLTA\"S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 31 of 439 N U Status: (S)Equipment IDNo. IPC-IFC-102A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description (PS-FC-102A)
ISOL Location:
Bldg.FULB Floor El. 735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Rack consists of a 2 1/2" diam post (-5' tall) anchored with 4-3/8" diam anchor bolts.Instrument attached to face of the rack with 2-3/8" diam machine bolts. Intrument is very light (-/ Ib).2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
~I X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x 4<' Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEURS
& COMSULTANI3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 32 of 439 Status: (2) N U Equipment IDNo. IPC-IFC-102A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description (PS-FC-102A)
ISOL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines found with adequate flexibility.
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012/4 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 DCNQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERSl lm C014SE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IPC-IFC-102A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description (PS-FC-102A)
ISOL Sheet 33 of 439 Status: W N U Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-4-1-60.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID rie iame: L-oz-,'+-i-ou.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component
'b~b Sheet 34 of 439<Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEMS & COMSULTAN-T Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: ) N U Equipment ID No. IPC-IFC-102A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description (PS-FC- I 02A) ISOL File Name: 2-63-4-1-60.jpeg
==
Description:==
Anchorage detail for post base plate File Name: 2-64-4-1-60.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of intrument to steel plate connection X Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 35 of 439 N U Status: W Equipment IDNo. IRW-189 Equipment Description Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Primary CCW HX Outlet Valve Location:
Bldg.AXLB Floor El. 735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Small manual valve on -18" diam pipe line. No degraded condition identified
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
I XI Y N U N/A_ _ Ix I Y N U N/A Y N U N/A Y N U N/A x Y N U x L C Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCGINEERS
& CONSULTANI1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 36 of 439 N U Status: Equipment IDNo. 1RW-189 Equipment Description Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Primary CCW HX Outlet Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 L Q Paul C. Rizzo Ass GNGINEERS
& CONSLLTANT" Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No. IRW-189 Equipment Description sociates, Inc.Sheet 37 of 439 (SWC) Status: ) N Equip. Class OD. Other-Check Valve or Manual Valve Primary CCW HX Outlet Valve U*Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-2-1-47.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-2-1-47.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& COMSULTAMSTh Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 38 of 439 N U Status: (Y)Equipment IDNo. 480VUS-1-8-N Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 480V Bus Location:
Bldg.SRVB Floor El. 713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2-1/2" diam plug welds at front of sections verified Welds at back of SWGR not inspected since SWGR was energized and inaccessible.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N II x I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x : Y N U x I -I I QPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.SeismiR W o & CheWTTisSWC Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 39 of 439 N U Status: W Equipment IDNo. 480VUS-l-8-N Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 480V Bus Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.LMMIEMR & CONSMLAN-M Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 480VUS-l-8-N Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 480V Bus Sheet 40 of 439 Status: (R)N U Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-10-1-25.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-10-1-25.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component L11 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E"Gu1NIERS
& CXONSLTANI"S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 41 of 439 N U Status: (Y)Equipment ID No. 480VUS-1-9-P Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 480V Emergency Bus Location:
Bldg.SRVB Floor El. 713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2-1/2" diam plug welds affront of sections verified Welds at back of SWGR not inspected since SWGR was energized and inaccessible.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
EmmN Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x L'-Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEER & IOCNSULTTANr-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 42 of 439 Status: (2) N U Equipment ID No. 480VUS-1-9-P Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 480V Emergency Bus Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012/Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 L-- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
CONIULTAXn Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 480VUS-l-9-P Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 480V Emergency Bus Sheet 43 of 439 Status: (Y)N U Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): I File Name: 2-61-4-i-26.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID Hile Name: 2-02-4-l-2.b.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component I
[DC)Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTAN'I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 480VUS-1-9-P Equip. Class 2. Low Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 480V Emergency Bus Sheet 44 of 439 Status: (2)N U File Name: 2-63-4-1-26.jpeg
==
Description:==
Base detail from inside of component I X Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.,NGINEEILS, CONS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 45 of 439 N U Status: (Y)Equipment ID No. 4KVS-IAE Equipment Description 4 Equip. Class 3. Medium Voltage Switchgear 160V Emergency Bus Location:
Bldg.SRVB Floor El. 713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
8 plug welds (1-1/4" diam) verified at the front of the SWGR sections.
Welds at the back not verified as the panel was energized 3 rows of embed channels under the SWGR were verified Two at front of the SWGR and one at the back.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N I X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U X --F I
[ ICY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CON. ULTA."M'.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 46 of 439 N U Status: W Equipment IDNo. 4KVS-IA Equipment Description E Equip. Class 3. Medium Voltage Switchgear 4160V Emergency Bus Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions 1 1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffirich Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/20 12 LKY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Si ENGINFERS
& CON4 LTTAý-[S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: W N Equipment ID No. 4KVS-IAE Equip. Class 3. Medium Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 4160V Emergency Bus Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): I/ ý1ýIAN heet 47 of 439 U File Name: 2-6 1-9-1-25.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view inside of component File Name: 2-6 2-9-1-25.jpeg
==
Description:==
Inside view of component showing base detail i Sheet 48 of 439 IX7Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
& CONSUILT,'T Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Status: W N U Equipment ID No. 4KVS-1A Equipment Description E10 mrec u Equip. Class 3. Medium Voltage Switchgear 4160V Emergency Bus File Name: 2-63-9-1-25.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-64-9-1-25.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINUi-RS
& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 4KVS-IAE Equip. Class 3. Medium Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 4160V Emergency Bus Sheet 49 of 439 Status: W N U File Name: 2-73-9-1-25.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of steel floor embeddment I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E0NGINEERS
& CONSLTANIS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 50 of 439 N U Status: W Equipment ID No. 4KVS-IDF Equipment Description 4 Equip. Class 3. Medium Voltage Switchgear 160V Bus Location:
Bldg.SRVB Floor El. 713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
8 plug welds (1-1/4" diam) verified at the front of the SWGR sections.
Welds at the back not verified as the panel was energized 3 rows of embed channels under the SWGR were verified Two at front of the SWGR and one at the back.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N II x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A I I I I x Y N U x I -I L[LQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINfERS
& Own I CeLiAst(SXJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 51 of 439 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. 4KVS-IDF Equip. Class 3. Medium Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 4160V Bus Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U X --T Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U X II I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 I ---- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTAWS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. 4KVS-IDF Equ Equipment Description 4160V Bus Sheet 52 of 439 Status: (Y)N U ip. Class 3. Medium Voltage Switchgear Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-3-1-26.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-3-1-26.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Sheet 53 of 439 ENINEERS & CON! ULTA,.IS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: N U Equipment IDNo. 4KVS-IDF Equip. Class 3. Medium Voltage Switchgear Equipment Description 4160V Bus rite iame: z-o.)-.)-i-zo.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view inside of component rite iName: L-04-i-zo.jpeg
==
Description:==
Inside view of component showing base detail I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.NGWIEERS & COMNSLTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 54 of 439 N U Status: (2)Equipment IDNo. BAT-I-I Equipment Description Equip. Class 15. Battery Racks 1 25V DC Battery/Instrument Control Power Location:
Bldg.SRVB Floor El. 713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Braced rack-double wide rack composed of 6 bays. Each bay anchoraed with 6-1/2" diam anchors. End restraints and spacers found in adequate condition.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage configuration confirmed per drawing 8700-1.24-IE and calcualtion 52233-C-016 Anchorage Calc.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N XIx II I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I
-< Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Sheet 55 of 439 ENGINEERS
& CONSULTANIVS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. BAT-I-I Status: N U Equip. Class 15. Battery Racks Equipment Description 125V DC Battery/Instrument Control Power Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Block walls SB-I-I , SB- 1-12, SB-I-13, SB-I-14 and SB-1-15 have been qualified per IE 80-11 review.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U xI Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U X II I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEEMS
& ""JUM"AXI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. BAT-I-1 Equi Equipment Description 125V DC Sheet 56 of 439 Status: W N U ip. Class 15. Battery Racks attery/Instrument Control Power Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): 1ile Name: .-Ii-1-1-I 1.jpeg
Description:
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-61-1-1-1 I.jpeg
Description:
General view of component L Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONIULTAN'hT Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. BAT-I-i Equi Equipment Description 125V DC Ba Sheet 57 of 439 Status: (2)N U p. Class 15. Battery Racks ittery/Instrument Control Power File Name: 2-62-1-1-1 1.jpeg
Description:
View of flexible attached lines File Name: 2-63-1
-1.jpeg
Description:
Typical frame anchorage configuration I qC Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EVGINEERS
&
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 58 of 439 N U Status: (2)Equipment ID No. BAT-1-2 Equipment Description Equip. Class 15. Battery Racks 1 25V DC Battery 2/Instrument Control Power Location:
Bldg.SRVB Floor El. 713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Braced rack-double wide rack composed of 6 bays. Each bay anchoraed with 6-1/2" diam anchors. End restraints and spacers found in adequate condition.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage configuration confirmed per drawing 8700-1.24-1E and calcualtion 52233-C-016 Anchorage Calc.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N I X I I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I
[ 1r- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONISULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 59 of 439 Status: N U Equipment ID No. BAT-1-2 Equip. Class 15. Battery Racks Equipment Description 1 25V DC Battery 2/instrument Control Power Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Block walls SB-I-I /, SB-I-12, SB-1-13, SB-I-14 and SB-l-15 have been qualified per IE 80-11 review.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x : I Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.UNGI NEEjIS & CONSULTANTM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. BAT-1-2 Equi Equipment Description 1 25V DC Other supportin Sheet 60 of 439 Status: (Y)N U p. Class 15. Battery Racks attery 2/Instrument Control Power g or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-73-1-1-01.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-61-1-1-01.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component
[---- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.INGINFERS
& CONSUL TANMS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. BAT-I-2 Equ Equipment Description 125V DC B Sheet 61 of 439 Status: (2)N U ip. Class 15. Battery Racks attery 2/Instrument Control Power tile Name: 2-62-1-1-01.jpeg
==
Description:==
Flexible attached lines File Name: 2-63-1-1-01 .jpeg
Description:
Typical frame anchorage configuration X Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEESe i W CONStUE (SW)Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 62 of 439 N U Status: ()Equipment ID No. BAT-CHG-1-1 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Station Battery Charger NO. I Location:
Bldg.SRVB Floor El. 713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Charger anchored with 4-5/8" diam anchors. -4" gap found to next panel judged not a concern.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage configuration confirmed per Calculation DSC-6698 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N i I I I~Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I_ I L---- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSILTANN'TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 63 of 439 N U Status: W Equipment ID No. BAT-CHG-1-1 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Station Battery Charger NO. I Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Top entry conduits found with adequate flexibility.
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A X Y N U x II Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 L Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.LENGlNEEUIS
& COW ILTA%'r1S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. BAT-CHG-I-1 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Station Battery Charger NO. I Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Sheet 64 of 439 Status: (2)N U File Name: 2-61-1-1-03.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-1-1-03.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component I Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. BAT-CHG-1-1 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Station Battery Charger NO. I Sheet 65 of 439 Status: (Y)N U File Name: 2-63-1-1-03.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of top entry conduits File Name: 2-64-1-1-03.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of component anchroage configuration I Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGPMMUS & CONSULTAprS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 66 of 439 Status: Y 8 U Equipment ID No. BAT-CHG1-2-A Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Battery Charger Location:
Bldg.SRVB Floor El. 713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Component identified as a compartment in BA T-CHG1-2.
Battery charger is anchored with 4-5/8" diam anchors.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y NI Y N U N/A x I I Y N U N/A x 77T7771 Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x T I I Z Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTANM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 67 of 439 S U Status: Y Equipment IDNo. BAT-CHGI-2-A Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Battery Charger Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Battery charger BV-BA T-CHGI-2 is adjacent to switchboard DC-SWBDI-2 and there is 0" gap between the two panels. These panels are not connected to each other and hence Condition Report CR-2012-14321 was issued to resolve this concern.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U I I x I I Other Adverse Conditions
!1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTANnS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. BAT-CHGI-2-A Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Battery Charger Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Sheet 68 of 439 Status: Y 8 U rue iName: z-oj-:-i-Lo.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-5-1-26.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component L QY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.E"GI;NEiR.
& CONSUiTAN-T Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. BAT-CHGI-2-A Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Battery Charger Sheet 69 of 439 Status: Y a U File Name: 2-63-5-1-26.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of component anchroage configuration File Name: 2-64-5-1-26.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of top entry conduits I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
&
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 70 of 439 N U Status: ()Equipment IDNo. BAT-CHG-1-3 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Station Battery Charger NO. 3 Location:
Bldg.SRVB Floor El. 713 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Charger anchored with 4-5/8" diam anchors. -4" gap found to next panel judged not a concern.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
~I X Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I "4' Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.Ssc lINEoERS & CONhcLt (ASWC Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 71 of 439 N U Status: W Equipment ID No. BAT-CHG-1-3 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Station Battery Charger NO. 3 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Block wall SB-I-15 has been qualified per IE 80-11 review.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Top entry conduits found with adequate flexibility.
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012
[ Z Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
& CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. BAT-CHG-I-3 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Station Battery Charger NO. 3 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): Sheet 72 of 439 Status: (2)N U File Name: 2-61-1-1-02.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID tile Name: z-oz-i-i-U.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS 6 CONSULTA&iS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 73 of 439 N U Status: (2)Equipment IDNo. BAT-CHG-I-3 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Station Battery Charger NO. 3 lPle Name: 2-0.3-I-!-u2.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of top entry conduits 1, le Name: 2 !- I-u2jpeg
Description:
View of component anchorage configuration IVQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEEIM
& CONWULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. BAT-CHG-1-3 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Station Battery Charger NO. 3 Sheet 74 of 439 Status: (2)N U rite Iname: L-ij-i-i-uL.jpeg
==
Description:==
Close up view of component anchorage L[Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINFESI&.
CONSUITAIN'T Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 75 of 439 N U Status: W Equipment IDNo. BB-Al Equipment Description Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Control Room Location:
Bldg.SRVB Floor El. 735 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Control room bench board Anchorage is covered with mastic and cannot be inspected 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y Nz Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.SNiGINEak S & COhcUlTA(SN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 76 of 439 N U Status: Equipment ID No. BB-A I Equipment Description Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Control Room Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Control room ceiling's main runners are supported by wires at -4' spacing. Each ceiling tile (i.e., ege grating) is tied to the main runners at each of its four corners with tie wraps. Judged no interaction concern.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EN(;INEEMI, &
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. BB-Al Equi Equipment Description Control Roor Sheet 77 of 439 Status: N U p. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels n Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): P-ile Name: 2-61-5-1-18.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component File Name: 2-62-5-1-18.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of insulating material covering component anchorage LCQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENF.EERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. BB-AI Equi Equipment Description Control Roo Sheet 78 of 439 Status: (2)N U ip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels m File Name: 2-63-5-1-18.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of electrical instrumentation connected to panel L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.PN(.INEUNS
& CON LTA"TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 79 of 439 N U Status: (Y)Equipment ID No. CC-TK-1 Equipment Description Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Component Cooling Water Surge Tank Location:
Bldg.AXLB Floor El. 768 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Tank supported on 4 legs (L6 x 6 x 1/2). Each leg anchored with 1-1" diam anchor.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y Nz Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A T x--Y N U xI L -- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTAP.NS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 80 of 439 Status: W1 N U Equipment IDNo. CC-TK-I Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Component Cooling Water Surge Tank Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x Other Adverse Conditions
!1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. HelffTich Date: 10/l/2012 Adam L. Helifrich Date: 10/1/20 12 L --- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENG INEERS & C0NILtZLTAVS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. CC-TK-1 Equi Equipment Description Component Sheet 81 of 439 Status: W N U p. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Cooling Water Suree Tank Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-1-1-15.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-63-1-1-15.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTAN"S Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CC-TK-I Equ Equipment Description Component Sheet 82 of 439 Status: W N U ip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Coolin2 Water Surce Tank rite iName: L-oL-I-i-i.Jpeg
Description:
View of anchorage detail for a typical tank support N3 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINFERS
- 6.
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 83 of 439 N U Status: (9)Equipment ID No. CH-P-IC Equipment Description Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Charging High-Head Safety Injection Pump Location:
Bldg.AXLB Floor El. 722 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Pump anchored with 16-1" anchor bolts. Mounting base found in good condition.
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified per calculations CH-P-IC and 52233-C-007.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y N X I I Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U N/A X Y N U x --T I
'V' Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.
& LOMUtLTANT Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 84 of 439 Status: W N U Equipment 1DNo. CH-P-IC Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Charging High-Head Safety Injection Pump Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x I I I Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEMRS
& CONSULTAN-" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CH-P-IC Equ Equipment Description Charging Hi Other supportin Sheet 85 of 439 Status: W N U ip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps gh-Head Safety Injection Pump ig or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-1-1-17.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-1-1-17.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.EGN~ER' & CONSU1TA.1M Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. CH-P-1C Equ Equipment Description Charging Hi Sheet 86 of 439 Status: (Y)N U ip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps gh-Head Safety Injection Pump File Name: 2-63-1-1-17.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of component anchorage configuration File Name: 2-73-1-1-17.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of flexible attached lines
[2--C Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.FNSsNEc fkd .CheSis'T (NWC Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 87 of 439 N U Status: W Equipment ID No. CH-BL-2 Equipment Description Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Boric Acid Blender Location:
Bldg.AXLB Floor El. 768 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Small tank (-5' diam x -6' tall) supported off of a steel platform at its mid-height.
The stiffened ring support is attached to steel platform by 8-1" diam machine bolts. The agitator is directly attached to top of the tank with 8-5/8" diam machine bolts with flange connections.
The braced steel platform is attached to wall at top and anchored to floor through two posts.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y Nz Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x X Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
& CONSULTAI.1T Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 88 of 439 Status: W N U Equipment ID No. CH-BL-2 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Boric Acid Blender Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U N/A x Y N U x Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Y N U x I I I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Eddie M. Guerra Date: 10/1/2012 Adam L. Helffrich Date: 10/1/2012 L Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENGINEERS
&
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CH-BL-2 Equ Equipment Description Boric Acid Other supportir Sheet 89 of 439 Status: (S N U ip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Blender ng or relevant documents and photos (if any): File Name: 2-61-6-1-60.jpeg
==
Description:==
Component Plate ID File Name: 2-62-6-1-60.jpeg
==
Description:==
General view of component L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.ENCINEERS.
& CONSULTANIS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. CH-BL-2 Equi Equipment Description Boric Acid E Sheet 90 of 439 Status: (Y)N U p. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Ilender File Name: 2-63-6-1-60.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of agitator mounting on Boric Acid Batch Tank File Name: 2-64-6-1-60.jpeg
==
Description:==
View of platform surrounding Boric Acid Batch Tank