ML13003A258

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0, Vogtle Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 15 of 20
ML13003A258
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Volodarsky D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2270 SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0
Download: ML13003A258 (43)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0.Sheet 1 of2 Stattus:6 N U Seismric WakdoWn Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. /JFT.Li. :Equip. Classs R 461e,5M le.4eKS)Equipment Description.

OZ 3 -o, L AW .. ..,.Location:

Bldg. 6& FloorfEl.

10-4 Room, Area 6zModel, Etc. .(ptional but-recoommended)

_Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to: documentthe results of the Seismic. Walkdown of an: itemof equipment.

on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions ,iy be used to ecord the.results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other commen0ts.

...in d .A d it o n l .,P .... ...... .: ..... ....Anchdiage.

I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (iIe, is the item one ofthe' 50%,of SWEL items requiring-such-i verificafioh)?

YEI NMI ,2. Is the anchhrage free of bent, broken, missingeor

[oose hardware?3I Is.the anchoragre fte ofl&e6 sionl that'is imiore tlihanild surface oxidation?

4. Is the ancfhrag&,,f of ý.isibIectacks init!}c6nrfete near the anchors?5 t Is the anchorage configftratiori cOnisisentAWtt pjAn'tn:dodineitatioa

?(Note- This qciestion:

ibly applieif theitem is one of the-50% for which an anchorage contfiqguration verifiatii is ceuiivd.)6. Based on theý aboveanchorage cva ltations, iS thoahchoragc fr.ceo(potentnially adVyrse.

ýonditiqfi$?:

YfgiN jCjO N/AOUEI N/A Ya' NOl U.] N/AU]YO NO UU]4ý NEIlU Env~rithe~qtiipincn chiss nmle froin Appendix [B: Cla~,sinisf .qire PAGE 545 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checkllst (SWC)Equipment D No. F T I: o Elquip. Class','1A/~ rgUAf(6~A/r ,e4~k~)Equipment Description AA V v.. .. ..... 10ýLt " " fn'teractibn Effects 7.. Are softrtargets free from impact by nearby equipment or s'trutures?

8. Are overheadequipment, distribution Systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,*and masonry block walls -not likely to collapse ofito the e-qUipment?

'9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibilityto avoid damage?10. Based ondtheaboVeseismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interacijon effecis?NE U[3 N/AC Y NIC UNA IN i OtherAdverse Conditions

11. nfave you looked for and found no othetseismiicconditions that could. YdNC U0i adversefly aAfect the safety 'fubtionsl of the, equipment?

Comrinnts (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

  • ., .... ... ., .Evaluated by: .-YJAZ.Date: f (7:1<.C4.>PAGE 546 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .00 PAGE 547 of 668 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOONO PAGE 548 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Statu \7~ N Uj seismic WalkdOwn Checklist (SWC)Equipment'lD No, Equip. Class" 2 0 .0 ... .. .Equipment Description A-M($ f/4Arc Z v- t.o .d ,Z Location:, BldE. A -4 ON Floor EL z7--64 Room, Ar.a / /4 Manufacturer,Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for 'Completing Checklist' This checklist may be usedto document the results of the "Seismic W -alkdown of an item of equipment on theTtespac~ b~elow each ofthe follo~ing qudstions fay.be uised to results ofjudgments-mad findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comrments.

Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification requited, (i.e., is the item one of the 5.0% of SWEL items reqquirinig' such verificatioh)?

yE N 2I is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing 6r loose hardwdre?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion thatzis more than mild surface olxidatlon0?

4. Asthe-anihorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near thme anchors?5. Isthe anchorage:configuration consistent with plant, documentation'?(Note: This question only applies if the~item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage con figuration verification, is, required:)
6. Based oh the above anchorage evaluati6hr is fthe anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions'?

YE NEI UEJ N/AfJ YE NO UE1 N/AR YO NO UO N/A0'YE NE UE 11 Enter tec equipmenit class~name frohimAppendix B: Cla5sse fEqutipaicni PAGE 549 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheer2 of 2 Seismic:Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment.ID No. , .................

Equip. ClassV .EquipmentDeseripti6n Interactioh Effect& t' ~ (2 7: Are soft target freerom im!pacpt by nea.rby equipment or structtres?

YgNEI U NIAO'8. Are overhead equipment; distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Nn] U] ,N/AI]and imasonry'block walls n6t likely to collapse onto the equipment 9. Doattached lines have adequate flexibiity to avoi.d damage?10. Based ont he above sdismicrintteration.evaluations, is equipmntfree of potentially adverse seisinic interaction effects?N!] U!] N/A!]ylýNo] U!]1.Other Adverse Conditions I I-. Have you looked, for and found no other seismic conditions thatecould adverssely affect the safety fupctions of the equipment?

Yb,6NEIU0 Cofmments (Additional pages maybe added as necessary)

~c- 4, EvPluated by: D ate:`<C4 >PAGE 550 of 668 4 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 V 3 j PAGE 551 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of,2 Status <N U.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment-I D No. k 4 /'7 Equip. Class- 2 -. 7 5 -Equipment Description

£W4O/v r1tjzFF- rng.;w7:w eastq ý vz~o vZu -rv- j-ej09 Location:

Bldg. : Floor El. ;Z6 ..Room, Area ........Model, Etc., (optiona.

but recommended)

Instructions:

forCompleting Checklist This chedkiistmay be.Useddt6 documeiit the"resuitts of the.Seismic, Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below- each of the, following questions.

may be used -o record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is providdd at the end of thikschecklist for documenting other comfiments.

Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage (onfiguratjon .Vtificatioin required (i,e., is the item one YE N5(of the 50% o0f SWEL items requiring:such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken,: missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of, corrosi6n that is more than mild suiface oxidation?
4. Is.the- anchorage free: ofvisible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?51 Is the, anchorage configuration consistent:

withplant documentati6n?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an a nch.or'age config uation verificationig reqiu.ired.)

6. Based on the above anchorage e4l10a6ions; is the anhoragje free of.potentially adNtse seisrnic c6oditions?

y NE UE0 N/AE Yý NE UE N/AE YýNEO UE N/A'E YE NEUEN/§YNE UEn.NA YI-I:[ tIqN'l rltei' thP equipm.0nt class napmlei-ram Append~ixB1:

Classes ofEqudprncnt.

PAGE 552 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. I; /c:' .Equip. Class' / ..-...Equipment Description ,O "-/. Tl7"P Oz76F- t-0 ACaW ,e- o'AvozcvL i/V i- rv -//17w/Interaktion.Effects 7, Ar soft targets free fr6inimpact bynearby equipment orsatiictuttes'?

8. Are overhead einquipment,.distributioi .sygtems, tiles-and.lightifig,.and masonry block- iwalls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do-.attached lines have. adeqiuateflexibility to:avoiddamage?
10. Based on the ab6ve seismic interactidn'evaluatibts, is equipmenttftee of potentially adv'erse seismic interaction effects?YNEI Ut2 N/AUJ Y-1ANO U1J NIA5O KNEI UEJ N/AFE-YM(NEI Urn O.lther Adverse Conditions 14, HaYevyoutlooked for and found no other seismic conditions tifat could adVersely affect the.Safety functions of he equipmnhn Nflo U0i"Cormnents,(Additional.pages.may be added'as necessary)

Evaluated, by, U~ 44-T-)7 '71 Date: Afffff~. r~:.<"C-4 >PAGE 553 of 668 Q ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS O0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 554 of 668 9 '7ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0O NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 4 F Nk 27 2012 PAGE 555 of 668 Q ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSA PAGE 556 of 668 QTTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 557 of 668 tACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 i 3 27201 2 PAGE 558 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0.Sheet 1 of 2 Status: ( N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC).Equipment-lD-No..

-.Equip. Class". .. ._ _ _ _ _Equipment Description AU 54 _c.-. P,-"p,4 $'-, , LocatiOn, Bldg. I :Floor El, 4o- Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

.. 5 ..Qe-c .........Instructions for Completing Checklist'This checklist, may be:used to document the results. ofthe, SeismicN of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space, below each: of thefollowing questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space isprovided at the end of this checklistfor documenting other comments.Anchorage SIs, the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.,.is the item one ,of the50% of SWEL items requiring such verification),?

YO Nj 2. Is the anchorage' free of bent, brokeh,.nissirg or loose hardware?3. is the anchorage free of corrosion that is'mrie tthan mild surface oxidation?

4. Js tlfe anchofagefree of visible cracks i neiar the anchors?5. Is the,anchorage;configuration planit documenitation?(Note- This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50%, for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the-above anchorage evaluations, is. the anchorage freePof potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yi.S' NEI: Ui NWA YNEI UTE N/A[NEn UO N/AQ 0 UO N/AX)ýg NOEUO-nter~~~~

th qimntcasn efrmApnixýCassofqire PAGE 559 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 seismic WA I kdowln Chelcklist (SWC-)Equiproent ID No. lT 5 itO Equip Class"______________

Equipmnent Description Auy rW 1tY- pkump )Pi r~e r'A q....

  • 2,*Interaction Effects 7. Are soft, targets free from impact~by nearby equipment or structures?

8..Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto.theýequipment?

9, :Do attached fines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse. seismic interaction effects?'Yý(T\,E unN/AEJ YC4 NO, Un, N/AEI NINn U'E NIAfl-IN]UE3 Other Adyerse Conditions-Have-yoI 0ooked for and found no other.s§eismiccwnditions that could adversely Affect the safety functions:of'the equipment?

YATN~E UE1/ Commenis (Additionalpages may be added as necessaiy)

-!C>.c. ~ 4tZ Date: _____________________

-< 04>PAGE 560 of 668 T7ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 561 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 status:YN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist: (SWC)Equipment ID No; A T/$f_ /ZZOV Equip. Class'-7~M ,,4rz'~&5

~-~(/5~~q

-es. 5 4 i'f' ,T.

, Location: FloorEl. Room, Area 7 Manufacturer, Model. Etc. (optional but recommended)

  1. v'7 >I, !A'.Instriuctions for Completing Checklist Thifs checklist may be used to document theresults of the Seismic WAlkdown of, item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questiois~

may be used to reorid the results of judgments and findings.

Additional is provided 'at the endiAof this checklist for documenting other comments.Ancliorace 1- Is tei anchorage configuration verification required (i-e.,jis the itemr one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YJX NO.2- Is the, anchorage;free of bent, broken, missing p'r loosehardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that, is more than,mild surface.oxidation?

4: Is the anchorage free of visible cracksin the concrete near the anchors?(eL'x "9.'YX NEI UE N/AE3 YXýNE- UE NIAE)N E U E N/AE]x NEn Un N/AE Y1 NE UEJ ,Xý5P 6-p,./OZ%ý, w-ý,e. 3 -.",t 5. Istlhe anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This qgestiononly applies if. the itemisjone of the 50% for which an anchoragc conhfiguration verification isrequired:,)

6. Based on the above anchorage evdluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions,?

12 Enter tbe equipirnent cYa~ss nalme ftrom j~jpendix B: Classer, of Eqwpn~ent.

<.C-3.>PAGE 562 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seisric walkdown Checklist(SWC)

Equipment IDýNo. Tr/S /Je/ZZ-0.Equip, CIass;re-~"6A?4 TZ'6~~ C Equipment Descriptioin 64ýtr .5 aGAR 4 AzeeC /0A" A 7oo/e cc Interaction Effectsi 7. Are soft targets f!ee fromn imipactby nearby equipment or structures?

1% NO UC1 N/AC 8. Are overhead equipmient, distribuftionsystems,,ceiling tiles and Iighting, NCI UC-1 N/AC and iasonry block Walls not likely to'collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached..lies have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?-10., Based onthe aboveseisnic interaction evaluatjionsq5,s equipment firee of potentially adverse seismic inferaction.effe.ts?

YX NE UC N/AC xYg'NEI U[-1 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no. other seismic, conditions that coulda adversely'affect the-safety functions of the'equipment?

YNC UC Comminents (Additionalpages may be added as necessary):

Y~6~ 3 -$5 f~' ~q7 t4AILK- 6Y c6ftszcg asr Evaluated by: 4 41-Date: ?)2/2012..-SC! >PAGE 563 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOONO PAGE 564 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 V PAGE 565 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONPO PAGE 566 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 St'atusO N U Seismic'WaIkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. /2S:h' Equip. Class"-I Equipment Description WL .z 6a .~/p~~~~Location:

Bldg.; &t. FlorEl. iS'.Lk.. Room, Area, AE C e Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (6ptional but recommended)

_ _ _ _ __........

Instructions for Completing Checklist:

This checklist may be used~to documenttliteresults ofthe Seismic Wakdfdwn ofan itefi of oqui pment on.the S.WEL, The space below each offhie following questions may beused to record theresults ofjudgments.and flhdings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documnenting other comments.Anchoraze 1. Isthe anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., isthe item one of the: 50%,of SWEL itis rfýqirinig such- verification)?

YEJ NV'2. Is theanchorage free;ofbent, brok.n, missing orl.oose hardwate?3. Is~the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the, anchorage freecof visible cracks in the concrete near the, anchors?5. Is themanchorage configuration consistent with plant, documentation?(Nqte:: This question only applies if tde is o0neof the 50%/ for ,which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6, Based0on.thie aboVe .anchotage\ivalhs.tions, isithe anchorage free of potentially~adverseseismic conditions?

Yii N[3 UEiJ N/AEI Nn Un N/Afl YS/N~L UE1 N/AE N/Al YEI Ncl UE]~NEI UFl*2 Enter the equipment class naiefromi Appendik 8: Classe~s of Equipment.

PAGE 567 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Ch-eckifst (SWC)Equipment ID No, I -TIS4-2 LaV Equip. Class'2 .: Equipment-Description 7h 48 8 a, a. .Interaction Effects 7. Are, softtargets free from impact bynearby equipment orstoructures?.

8: Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles arnd lighting, andImasonry block walls not'likely to collaps1Conto d the uipmient?9. Do attached.

lines have adequate flexibifity toaVoid-damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction~evaluations, is equipmenit
,free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yt'OUE] NIA[]YýVNN ULI.N/An'Y/~NE] UE3 N/AEJ YýMNEJ U0I Other Adverse Conditions ii. Have yot looked for aiid found no dther6eismic conditions-that could Y NE Advefsely:affect theisafety functions of the:equipment?

COmments (Additional pages'nay be added 'a nieces.s ry)Evaluated by: Y~~1.4 -L K--PAP'% ____Date: /* (' C-4 >PAGE 568 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 569 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equiipment ID No ' 74 .Equip.

_ _ _ _ _ __f__.Equipment Description c(Jo Location:

Bldg. c Floor El. Room, Area pz.3 ?-e Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional bute' recmendcd)

Instructions for 'Completing;Ch ecklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the.Seismic Walkdowxn of an item of equipmunt on the SWEL. The space below each:of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additioial sphace is provided at the end of this checklist for'doctiif&nting other coiments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required'(iLe, is the item one YE[ NA-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is thezanchoragelffee of bent; broken, missing or loose h ardware?: 3. Is thednchorage free of corrosio"nthat is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free .of visible cracks in the concrete near the. anchors?5,. IS theanlchofage configuration ,cnhsistit with plant~doctiirehtatibn?(Note: This, question only appliesif theitem is one of the 50% for whichan anichorage

'onfiguaratiofrVerification is:reqUirIed.).Based,o the obvye anchorage evaluations.

is: e anchorage free of potentiril"adveie seismic conIditions?

YE- 'NE U.0 -N/A'S(YE] NEJ. UEJ N/Ag YE NIE UIE]' N/A.YEI NE l1,EI 'N/AS Yý6NEPE V Enter the equipment class name-from Appendix!B::

Classes. of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 570 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipnnID No. Equip. Class'_ _-nequjprcnt Description T In-teractiott Effects 7-. Are soft targets free from.impact'by nearby equipment or structures?

8 Axereoverhead equipmentj distribution systemsi ceiling-tiles and lighting, andamaasq"N block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipmient?

9. Do .attachedlines have adequate flexibility to avoid'damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations; is equipment free of potentially adverse seisriicipteraction UEf NIAE]YW. Nr7 UEr N/A.I NED UM N/A[Y1 NE UF1 Other Adverse"Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found-no 6ther seismic conditions that i0hld Y4,d ND) UD1, adversely affect the safety finctions of the equipment?

Coinfenits (Add4itional pages mnay beaddqe as necessary)

VSL- -,' 7 -c 2 -. D~~s C, i-Vzý 11-I Evaluated by:. ~ .7 ~ )~tA.J /)hv~tC~5

~I I.Date: " , kZ.4< >4:>PAGE 571 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSICNIO.

PAGE 572 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIO .0 PAGE 573 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0P PAGE 574 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0ýfliet I 6t,2, ,Sitaus: 67N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipient ID No, -TV I Equip. Class 2_j Equipment-Description

_0L6 ....f. O 7 `7, Locatidnj:.

Bldg. -0& Floor El. " Room, Area'([9: ___________________

Manufacturer, Model,.Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistfmay be used to document the resiIts of the Seismic WalkdoWn.of an item of equipment onthe SWELý. Thebspace below each of the followinigquestions may be used to record the results ofjudgmcnts and findings.!

Additional space is provided at the end of th is checklist

ýor-documenting other comments.Anchorage 1, is the-anchorage configuration verification r'qtiired (Le:, iSthe itefn.one, n NE of the 50% of SWEL itemns requiring such verification).:

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?:3. Is the anchoragc free of corroson that is more than mild surface.odid[4tion?ý 4.- Isthe anchboage free of visible cracks in the concfete near the anchors?.5. is the anchorage configurafion.

consistent with~p ant~docutuentatiori?(Note: This question only applies if the. item-is one.ofthe.50%

for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the~above anchorage evaliuaiions; is the anchorage free.6:f Poten iallay adverse stdismicconditions?

V~NEI UENIVAE YýýNEI U.0 N/AE1 Y~EUE N/AE YE NE1 UE N/As3 Y, NE].UE j.:I.rter the equipment clhss name ftrom Appendix B: Classes ofEdn uipm nt.PAGE 575 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0:Sheet 2 o(f2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment iD No. ul /- Equip. Classn 2 £d Equipment Description OU:1 _ -/], Interaction Effects 7- Are soft targets free from impact bnfiearby equipmcttor Struc ures?8. Are.:ovehead equipm&nt, distribution systems ceiling tilesand.'lighting, ,and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto:the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10.

the above seisrii&iditeraction..e,;aluations, is equipment free of potentially.

adverse seismic interaction effects?.YNVE UC N/AC YýN] Y)ýNU UQ Other Adverse Conditions II. H'aveyou looked for and found no otlier seismic conditions that could EN U[17:adyersely affect the' fety, n.uiio.ns f the 6equipment?

Comments (Additionai'pages maybe added as necessary)

Evaluated by: "kxs 'Y. .-Date' ? -2z~< CA4 >PAGE 576 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIO 9 O1 PAGE 577 of 668
  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONPO4 PAGE 578 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 I'PAGE 579 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status& N U.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWVC)Eqtuipment.D NO. 7v- 1 Equip. Class" Equipment Description C- P(4r7" cOAir/O.. s.te (4/p)Location:

Bldg. "'C.r -Floor El. 15 6o Room, Area , (/2-Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

--tf O' J , Instructi0ns for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used. to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an i-em of equipment onr the.SWEL.,The space below each of the f6llowing quest ions may be used to record the results o'fjudgments:

and findirigs.

Additional space is provided.at the end of this checklist fAr documentingother comnments, Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e, is the-itemfi one YO NX ofthie 50% ofSWEL items requiring such Verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. is,the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Isthe anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchdrs?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistcnt'with plaiit documentation?

.(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% fot which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based 6n the above anch6raigc evauations; i§ the anchorage free of po'tentially adverse seismic-conditions?

NO 00ý N/AO YNO nE N/AO YMýNn U-0 N/AQ YO' NO 00 NIAp, YXNECVEO 1' tinter fiie~equtipiuiicnh:class natme rroin AppendiX,1:

1Cliscses of Equipftfntl:

<0.ý3>PAGE 580 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walikdown Checklist (SWC).Equipment IDNo. T-\ R Equip. Class 1CLASS, 8, Equipmen~t Description

%lTH ¶ O.QL. (P)Interaction Effects 7. Aresoft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or s~tructufes?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tilesahd ligfiting, and masonry block wallswnot likely to collapse onto the equiprnenit?

'9. Do attachedliihes have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the naboyveseismieSc interacjtion valuations, is equipment free of~potentially adyerse seismic-inte'raction effects?YX NEI C UC1 N/AC: Y)('NMC UC N/AC I NM UC- N/ACNC]ý 'UC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couId UC adqyerse.y affect the:safety functions of the equipment?

Y Comments (Additional pages may be-added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date': _!A 414 ý, 4 C-4 >PAGE 581 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO i PAGE 582 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONI PAGE 583 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 584 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:Q N JU Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment-ID No. t-TrT tt7Teo Equip, Class'2 __, T Equipment Description c-4vC'&J v tZ t-ot' ., ,7.Location<:

BIdg. & Floor El. Z Room, Area R .5 .0.fanufacturer, 4o del, Etc. (optional but recommended)

.C0"I-OL5.

.Instructions for Completing Checklist.

This checklist may be used to document the results of.the Seismic Walkdown ofah, item of equipmenton the SWEL. The space below each of the following-questions may be, used to record thcresults ofjudgments and findings.

Additional sp-ace'is-provided at thýe end of this checklist for documenting other comnments.

Anchorage.2Is the anchorage verification required (i.e., is the iteni one NX of the 50% of SNVEL items requirifigsuch verification)?

2. Is .theanchorage free of bent, broken, nissinggor.loose, ardwaae?.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more.thani mild surface oxidation?
4. is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?'5. Is the anchorage configurati~on consistent with plant documentation?ý(Note: This questibnonly appIie* if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configurationv.yerification is retquired.), 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YXND U[ N/AD YX ND UD N/AD YXNND UD N/AD: YD ND UD lA YXND LTDI;I'Enthr-tcr cquijmend class namne from Appemdix B: Cla sses of Equipment,< .C-3 >PAGE 585 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2, Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentfIDNo.

1 Y -1740' Equip. Class 2 Sri .Equipment-Description I=c;,R -TV-! X%74-0 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets freefrom impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiliirgtiles and.lighting, and masonry block:walls not likely to ollapse onto the equipment?

9, Do attached linesbhave adequate flex.ibility to avoid damage?10. Based, on the above seismic:interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interadti6n effects?YND UE 'N/AC YX NEI UC N/AC Y?(NC Ut] N/AC Y;<NC UC-Other Adverse Con ditioizs 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y O NC UC-adversely affect talie safety Ifunctions of theequipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as ne6es~sary)

N 0 see- V t-1 SI x- 537 OOZ--Ooq r-lorLt 4 4C, J~~~~~ ~~~ ca~§Iks~~

~Kir-Sv15 r::Evaluated by:i I Date: ~Z~OZ<( C-4.>PAGE 586 of 668 ATACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 587 of 668

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13003A258&oldid=1544972"