ML13003A249

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0, Vogtle Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 8 of 20
ML13003A249
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Volodarsky D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2270 SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0
Download: ML13003A249 (33)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2, Status/ N 0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (sWC)Equipment:ID No.. I-8OS-! t .Equip. Class!'EquipmentDescription ?A4VI. vS.& LV iz-'-'Location', Bldg. '- Floor El. b r Room,..Aea z- ig: Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optIinal but re.omlmilended) ........... _____ ._*_.__....._.__, Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Waikdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. Thie space below each of the following questiiis may beausedt:o record the results ofjudgmentsand findings. Additionaispace is provided at, the end of this checklist for documenting other cormnents. Anchorage F-- A-Er-1.'i. Isthe anchorage:confieurtioniveri'fication required (i.'h., isthe iem one YE- NEI of the,50%/ of SWEL itemis requiring such, verification)?

2. Is the.anichorage free of bent' broken, missing or!lose haredware?
3. Is the anchotage free of corrosion that is morethan mild surface oxi4atoion?

4.AIs the anchorage,free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with,.plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one'ofthe,50% for Which. an anchoragedponfiguration verificatfon.is required.) 6., Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage freezof potentially adverse seismic conditions,?-YE1 NE ur N/AE1 Y[E] NE] UE] N/AE[[YE NE UE N/AE YEr NEI UE N/A YEI N[E UEJ"'Enter the equipment class name ftcrm Append ilk B' cIassesbt.!iýipmenrt PAGE 268 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown.Checklist (SWC)Equipment!l0 I.\o61 P-: l t o -- Equip. ClassO Equipment Description 1-4`z Is,, 4V1 I linteaction Effects Ctze ' ~~~ /, *)7. Are s6ft taragts free from, impact by nearby equipment or structures?, 8. Are overhead equipment, diStribution systems, ceiliýg tiles and lighting, and masonry block Walls not likely to collapseonto the equipment?

9. Do ,attached lines haye adequate flIexibility to avoid damage?,",l0. 0Based on.the above, seismic interaction evaluatiois, is equipment free o6f potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO ND, U-I N/A-YD NO UD N/AD1 YO ND UE-, N/AD YEI NEI UDE Ot4er Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found noother seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety &nctions ofthie equipment?

Ya NEI UD1 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y/ F$A~ -(TrT ~~~ ~C'~ b e5.U-V4 %-1W~STO mc_ý v AN vw OIZNC~.% ov: %t4TVht*4 e 0 4wNk=A1T Pj~ VV*'1Z0a.7U: -t~t~.E Sa1~tC~ O~?T'~ J-4 oA r~i-C TGA~FJ Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) PAGE 269 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 270 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0%.PAGE 271 of 668

  • TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIO .0 PAGE 272 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Stanus:o N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID Nol. IL_ -c"3 Equip.,:1 Ass'Equipment Description A q. e -t'K 4 , Location:

Bldg. .. Floor El. 4 Room, Area L_3 /3 -.--Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional butrecommended)_ Instructions for Compnleting Checklist This checklist may be used to documentj he resu!slt of the Seismic WalkdoW0. of an item.e of equiphient of the SWEL. The space below each of the, following questionsmiay be used to record the results ofjudgmentsand findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklisttior documrenting other comnents.Anchoraze 1. Is theanchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item 0on of the 50% of SWEL items requirihg such verification)?

2. is the ancihorage free of bent; broken, missing ot ,obse hafdware?,3. Is the anchorage free of-corrosion that. is more than mild surface oxidation?

4;. Is the anchorage: free of visible cracks:inihe concrete near the anchors?,5. Is the anchtrage configuration consistentwith plantdocumentation?(Note: This'uestion only applies if.the item is:Qbe of the SOofor Whi-diin ianich0rage. cpoifiguination verificadon is required.)

6. Based on the-aboVe.

andiorage .evaluations, is thteacidhorage free of.potentially adverse seismit conditions? YOýNOEIJE N/AE YENE UE_ N/AE YV'NE UEJ NIAE3 YE -NEI UEI N/AM*'YM NEI] UO Enterthe equipaient Class T'name from Appeiidi Bý Classes df Eauipmeint. PAGE 273 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Shee't 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdownr Checklist(SWC).Equipmefit ID No. i/ i ,Equip. Class"://: Enuintihent' Dscsriptio ia Hlrtz C 4 Vr C~r I/iD /CL~Inferaction Effects 7. Are'soft fargets free from impact by nearby e~quipmentI or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution, systems; ceiling tiles and lighting, a block" ,alls not likely to collapse 6ntoIthIeq~uipme

.....nt?9. D0o attached' lines:haye adequate fexibility to0avoid damage?10.. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentiafly rinteraction effects?UNO N/AO Y0 N] UiC N/AC]Yrg/NC! ur1n Other Adv&se Conditioris', 11. Hve, you looked for and found no otherseiýsmiccoriditidos that could Y NE-. Uti A'ffect the safety.fiuhctibns'o'Fthe equipment? Comments:(Additional pages may be added as necessary) Evaluated by,.-Date: ý1 /27 ?,,V t 2 .J"1+/-< C-4:ýPAGE 274 of 668 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0P PAGE 275 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOVO PAGE 276 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Shteet". N2U:Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist.(SWC)

Equipment ID No.- 1-r -, ..Equip. Class'EquipmentI)e1s.cription. m Loation: Bldg.. Floor El.. Room, Area M:% 5' .7L-.Maiiufactureri Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions forCompleting Checklist This checklistmay be used to documenit the resultsý of the'Seismic:Walkdown of an item of e4iuipmentaon the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to recorod.fthe results ofjudgments'and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.:An ch orage ý 5 .* 5,W ¢, aC- / /l a -1 }1. Is the anchorage configuratio rverification required(ic .e., i's theitem one Y1 NE of the 506% of SWEL items requiring such; verification)?

2. Is the anchorage.free of benit, broken, missing or loose hardware?.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that islýmiorc than mild surface oxidation?, I Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the-concrete near the anichors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of tihe:50:%

for which an anchorageý configuration verification is r.equired.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage' free of potentially'adýVese seisimic.6onditions?

YE'] NE] UEI NIAE YEI NEI U0, N/Ar YEL NO UE1, N/AEr YE NEI UE1 N/AE YE NE UE'2 iEnter thle equipinent elafss naeiifrorn Appendix B: Classes of Eqwiprnenr.,C-3 )PAGE 277 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0'Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. i- t9O i -C AGJ Equip.. Class 1 2__Equipment.Description .. ,. -.i C. 1,....... .. .." t l Int'eraetiIon'E Iffects ('See- 8MA.-C,J Sl];;an 7. Ae free from impact by nearby equipmenOtr structures?

8. Are overhead]

equipmentj distribution, systems, ceiling tiles and iihting, apnd block walls not likely todcollapse onto the equipmefit?, 9, Do attachedflines have adequateflexibility to avoid: damage?10. Based.oh-the above seismic i.nteraction evaluations, is eqtipmient free ofpotentially adverse seismic interaction effecfs?: YEI NO UTJE N/AD1 YEJ NI U, N/ADT YE NE UD N/AD YE] ND UE Other Adverse Conditions 11,. Rave you looked for, and found q6other seismic conditions that could :M ND-1 UD1 adversely affect thie Safet3fiuntions of the equipmentTA v% -,,, 0.%..'c 1 -, ,.k Comments (Additional~pages may beadded as necessary) Date: ..-1 Gt /IZ-< C4a >PAGE 278 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 279 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 280 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of:2 Status& N U Seismic Walkddwn Checklist,(SWC) EquipirenIID No. -ieP"L '- A 4 EqUip. Class'.EcIpipment'Description V4L)e- AiA^ 'A Locatibn: Bldg. C& Floorti. EL I ?, Room, Area .-Manufaicturer, Model, Ete. (optional but reconuncnded)_ Instructions for Coinpleting CheklWist This checklist may be used to document the results of ihe.Seismic Walkdown of ai. item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of thde following qifestionsfmay be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings Additionial space is provided at the end of this for documenitig other cbrmnnents. Anchorage 1., Isthe anchorage configuration verification resuired (i.e., is the item one.ofthte: 50%,ofS .L items requiring such verification)? Y~NC 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loso hardware?3. Isthe anchor0age freeof-corrosion that is more than mild surface ,oxidation?

4. Is the, anchorage free of Yisible: cracks in the:concrete near the, anciors?.5, Is the c consistent With plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item .is one of the 50% for, which a ichorage configtitn verificationisrequired.)
6. Basedlon the abov.e anchorage evaluattions, is the anichbrage ftceeof potentially adverse ieismic: conditions)

YVjNE UC" N/A-7'Y N' UC NAC YIWINC UC] N/ACI Yt'I]UC' NI/A0 1V2 NC: U[2Enter the cqUiprnetrwCiass~name fim .Aopeniidi B-. Classe of p~ilrnt<( C-3 >PAGE 281 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC)EuipmentIDNo.3 2Eqp Clas___ /4 Equipment Description /I Kr vba khot' ae Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by near-by equipment or structures?

8.

equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry'block walls:not likely to collapse:ono the eqUipment?

9. Do attached liries have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic initeraction evaluations, is equipment free-of potentially' adverse seismic interaction effects?Y9'N0 UQ N/AJ Y&O-NO UOI N/AOl Y~VNO tFIl Other Adverse Conditions I I.. :Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[2/NOt UE]adversely affect the safety functions of theequipment.

.Coinmeiits (Additional pages:nlay be addedas necessary) 133 Evaitfated by:. / ..r~f~ ___Date:<' C-4,>PAGE 282 of 668 ATCHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 283 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet l pf 2 Status: Y U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)-l',quip~ment IDNo't~SO~. Equip. Classl29jL Equipment Description 11T5 _ $ kV4 o,,;b.hDii Location: Bldg. r ,.,\. Floor El 0'. Roomn, Area, ,L L 5 2 Maniufacturer, Model EtC. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to, document the results of the Seismic Walkld0wn f an. item of equipment on the SW EL. The space.below each of the: following questions may be used to record the resultsofjudgments and indings. Additional space is provided at the end of this.checklist for documenting oilier comments, Anchorage (sc -.da..3.l, S/ýX1 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (ie ,c is ýthe item one: of the _50%s of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YO NO 2, Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missingobrloose hardWare?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is,the anchora ge free of visible cracks in the~concrete nearthe anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistentwith plant documentation?

"(Note: This question only applies if the item is one:bf the 50% for which an anchorage Configuration verification is required.) "6. Based on the above anchorage evaluatioiis ii the anchorage free of potentially adverse cismic conditions? YFO NO. UO] N!AEJ YI.. NEI, UO] N/AE]Y-I NO U .NI/AE]Y[] NO- U[ N/AU]YO Nt] Ut]Enter the e~uiwiient dtass nanfie, from Appendixt It3Cla 's (if Eqiuipment; PAGE 284 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2.Seismic.Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. I1-. 1O6 -.01- 7A 2-. Equip.2Class~ 2 Equipmient

== Description:==

0635 'I~c~.ý t*-,ý,,.AVjjm 2An& .1tl InteraCtion Effects 7. Are's6ft targets. from impact by nearby equipmnent or structures?

8. Are oVerhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and block walls hibt likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached .lines have adequate flexibiliity to avoid damage?10. BMsed on the above seismiciinteraction evaluations, is equipment:

free seismric intcraction effects?YD NO-t Ut-N/Ar YO NE urD N/AD YYD NEI UID N/ADE YLJ ND Dun.Otrher Adverse Conditions 1 .,> Fla~e you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yf-1 NN UO adverSely affect-the safety .functions.of the equipment?g 4 ;u-ak iMi ,? t 0,4 4.N .,-CPmmrnt (A dinap es v a :6 Aaee Cormments (Additional pags may be added as ftec~ssary) Evaluated by: 4.' 4- " _...., ..Date: q o<C C4 1>PAGE 285 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 286 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 I I II PAGE 287 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 288 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 289 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheetrof 2 Status2 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipreift DNo. fep -d o _4C- Equip. Class'2/EquipmentDcscription /f-r ,/bliC A/CC 1AC.,4_Location: Bldg. C Floor El. / Room, Area 9 .' .Manufacturerý,Model, 8Etc., (optional but recommended) .-._._ _ _Instructionsfor.,Comrpleting CheckliSt This checklist may-be usedto-document the results of the Seismic Walkdo~ n ofan item,6fequipneiton the SWEL. The space b6low each of the following: questions maybe used to record: the results of judgments and findings. Additional space: is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other commrent.Anichorage I. Is the.anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring suchverification)? Y0I NEý2. Is the aifbhotage free Of bent, broken, missinig or loome hard ,are?3. is the anchorage free ofcorrosionathat is more than nild oxidation?

4. Is the-anchorage free of visible cracks in the:;c'ncretenea t tIe arschoifs?
5. Is the anchorage.configuration consistentwith.

pintf docUmentatioii?(Note; This questio.n opny~applies if the item is one ofthe 50% for which an anchorage configuration verificajionis required.)

6. Based on1the abdve.anchdrage;eValuitions, is the anchorage free of poiesstia1Iy adverse seismic conditions'?

Y[ NI. CEJ .N/A--YgN E "N N/A!E Y9P NO UE! N/AE3 Y NEl Nn. N/AfV YEf NE UL!'E-iiter tle-ýqui'pnehr class niifof oAppendi, B: Cla~sesof-Eqii~pmi PAGE 290 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sbeet.2,of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNO. / i -A Equip. Class 1 2___Equipment

== Description:==

.2- V C /.... l A /7 Interaction Effects 7. Aresoft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment; distiibution systems,.

ceiling tiles andlighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines haveadequate flexibility to avoid damage?101 Basedlon the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects?

Yfr NO] Ut] N/At]: Yr(NF1 UOt N/At]Yif NEI UtN Other Adverse Conditions 1.1, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could' NEI Ut]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) .. .. ..hjy ....7 .... .c., Date: /_____F 6~~(Y~s{) 2 (/ý< C.4:>PAGE 291 of 668 TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS100NO/PAGE 292 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (9 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 1- I's 0(-,- $3 -U( C A Equip. Class12-1 Equipment Description I 1 S V T*- L 4!C .1 ,IM Location: Bldg. C L... Floor El. -Room, Area V% 5 a.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae (Scee- 5WC.. 140-44 al/4'I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YI- NO UCI N/AO YCI NO UC N/AO 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YCI NO UC N/AC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YC NO UC N/AC YC NO UI" Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. <C-3 >PAGE 293 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheer 2 of 2 Seismic WalkdOwn Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. i,-l.Sý.c; Equip. Cass3'.Equipm~ent Description ",.; tAc.C; lA Th2..Interaction Effects -¢I 'e.-. :- 1 7)7. Are soft targets free fr4om impact by nearby equipment orsttructures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems ceiingtiles and ilighfing, and masonry block walls not likely to collapýse onto the equipmient?
9. Do lines -have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. BasMd on the above s6ismic ifnteraction evaluations,is equipment free of potentialIly adverseseismic ffectsT Y10 NEI U[] N/AEJ YE NO UD N/AuI YE [ NO UEI NIAEI Yn.N.E UE1 Other Adverse Conditions 11, Have YOu looked for and found no other seismic conditionsthAteould YM'N- Up adversely affecftthe safety functions .isu&!t c{ oA k, ifO [.r..at o Nh G.A, ,', ... ..,t e ao uk.c.. ...Comments (Additionialpagesh may beladded asnecessary), Evaluated by: -:Da~te: 9.2, z<04 PAGE 294 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 295 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 296 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Status: N U Seismc Waikdown iChecklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -/`6Oý553:-5

ý,/ Equip. Class" 2 2 -'1T4Y C'5if EquipmentDeseriptibn .,9;$V .w#rSh'E ' /4 7/5 Location:, Bldg. od&X Floor El. 1 ý3 R 3' oom, Area ,,4 O.Manufacturer, Model, -Etc. (optional but recommended) -.Instructions for Complefing Checklist This checkIist may be used to document the results of the Seisimic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the.results ofjudgments anfd findings. Additional space is provided at the end of tlis checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorap=e

1. Is the anchorage onifiguratioi verification r&cquied.(i.e., is-the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification).?

YX ND 2. Is the anchorage-free of bent, broken, migsing or loose hardware?3, Is.the anchorageq free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Isthe anchorage free of visible cracks in the ioincrete near the anchors?5. Is.the eanchorage:

configuration Plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if thei femis one of the 50 % for whiich an anchorage cn.figu.ationverification is teqiiired.)

6. Based on theabove anchorage evaluations, is' th.e anchorage free of potentially advd~rssenismnic cofiditions?

YPNDI UD] N/AD ND UDJ N/AD-Y NDI uD N/ADl YýND UD N/AD-NDI UID* Enter:the equipmcnt class name from Appendix B:.Clascs of Equipment. C-'8 C->PAGE 297 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)Equipmenft ID No0 /-/; o"53 -/5EquipqC ss-.~ ~~ ~ .I .." ..a...- ........e t ~ , ,#Equipment Description 1P8WOV' YeA}1 tCk"E6q, _ _ _ _ _ _Interactioni Effects 7. Are soft targets free frbm impact by nearby- equipment.or structures? YXNOUO NAC 8. Are overhead equipment, disiribution systems, ceiling tilesand lighting, YJ NM UC N/AQ3 and masoniy block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipmen"t?

9. Do.attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoiddamage?
10. Based on theabove seismicinteraction evaluations, is equipment free pofpo~entially adyerse seismic ihteraction effects?Y NE3 UE3NA AJN5V Other Adver'se Conditions T,1..Haye yiou .lookqed for and found no other seisinic:

cohditions that could Y NEI UE],adversely affect the safety, functions of the equipment? !A, Comments (Addttuhofal pages mjay bVe added As necessary).Evaluated, by: ./< A41/1A eo~.p<Y Date: YZ-<,C-4 >PAGE 298 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCVQ61-RPT-O1, VERSIOON-a PAGE 299 of 668
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONPO PAGE 300 of 668}}
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13003A249&oldid=1544986"