ML13003A247

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0, Vogtle Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 7 of 20
ML13003A247
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Volodarsky D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2270 SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0
Download: ML13003A247 (35)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

shet 1 orj
  • St-tus:& N' -U Seismic: Wa kdown Chelklist;(SWC)

Equ~ipment i

o.

E.uip. Class. 1 I

1

1.

~

'.~.

/

E~juiplineo-t' I

cit~~4g

/ Af CC:

I A Lo~~o:'

ld. ~,4

~

Floor El. lltý!

Room, Area INanufactu-irr N[oioet, Etc, (optionail buit '~dn~idd listructions for CompletingChecklist This checklist-ay."be'uscd to doc'i!inet the:"results of the Seismic! Walkdown.ofanif em of.equipment on the, SWEL TPih space bWow each oftheifollowiiigtqlesionsd n

t i

be used to rkecondethe'ere i~ts ofudgmenrts and (i ndings. Additional spacc is providgd a-i the, eiid-6.f-t~hlisglielcLklist frdcmnigole omns A ne diorav~

I. Is the anchorage: configuration ý,&ifti~itiontrequired.(i.

ist-IS thiem on' of, the 5.% o f S WEL te..ms reqiiig Stich, viication)?

Yo Nml/

2. Is the anchoric*age free of beiit, brokeji, missing or loose hardware?

3: is the anchorage free ofcop'o'sionfiliat*is more thaniidsui' e oxidation?

4.slis a

r c of visibllre cra i's ic th;.c'i5h t,,e rarthe a chots?

5. Is tbc-nhe auc irk ofiuato consi'stent with pl: nt oiutain (Note.T7 1is, quetstion-onlv' applits if tilic itcmý n

ý!

i oi-eo th&ýl5W for w hicha!ý -,ill....z!Le c n fg. t nvi C

'en i

s, r-eqtuircd.)

6:

t

,potentiall

ýy:dvcr, se sVimms. ccmi

  • {!d..oitiqs9ý YENIUE, N/AFC Y2',NEI, 11 W/AD]

YD,'NE]N U -1 N/ACF1 C3 NO11

/

YII/JEJ Q-no Eiltdr<C t>

ý i rý"

PAGE 233 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown ChecklIst (SWC)

Equipment DeNp.

E"B uip-M Css" MC(

Equiipme~nt Description 440~ V M CIPr3 tnteraction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by;nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution.systems, ceilifg tiles and lighting; and masonry block wals not l4key: to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility tp aybid damage?
10. Based~on theabo4ve seismic interaction evaluationsiJs equipment! free of potentially adverse seismicinteration, effects?

Y NO U-NIAQ YdJNKf UC N/AC YJ$4E UEI Other Adverse Conditions

/

11. H-ave you looked for and found no o t.her seismic conditions that could Y

N-U0-adversely.affect thisi&q' ty functions of the equipment?

e rilinmhts (Additiorhial 'pages.maybe added as necessary)

Eývaluated by 4r4--Y Date:

< C.' >

PAGE 234 of 668

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIO

.0 PAGE 235 of 668

3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO PAGE 236 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet1 oft2 Status:;,N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)ý Equipmentýs IDN.V lO A5¶L Equi p., Ciasu

,Equipment!Description

%io V40T

,Gr

... iAr-,

Location:, Bldg. A Floor El. :0Z2 :

Room, Area

%k Manufacturer,-Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results oftheSeismic Walkdown of an item of equipment, on the SWEL. The space below each of the6 fo16owing questionsi-ay be used to record the.resultsvofjudgments and

ýfindings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorageý ('6/2-1/z~-ws

1. Is'the anchorage configurationverification required (i.e., is the item :one Y] NEI ofthe 50% of SWEL items requiring suchverification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken3 missing or loose hardwaire?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more, than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the. archorage firee of visible cracks in theconcrete near, the anichois?

,5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with 0plant docurnentation?

(Note.: This questiononly applies if the item is oneof the 50% for whiclvan anchorageconfiguration verification"is required:)'

6. Based on the above anhora-ge evaluations, is the anchorage freeof potentially adverse seismicconditions?

YE] NE] U], NIAE]

YE]-'N] UE] N/A'O YE] NE] UE] NWAE]

YE] NEI] U] N/AE]

YE] NE] UE]

Enterile e#uipment class name from Appendixt: Classes of:Equipment; PAGE 237 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2of 2' Sei'smic Walkdown Clhec kllist (SWC)

Equimen ID

o.

~

~

~ ~

Equjip. CJass12 I

Equipment Dscription h k.cr i

,r I Amr~.

Interaction Effects

&wK. ~-~'c~

8 /z~A)

7. Are softtargets free from imipactby nearby equipmet or structures?
8. A. e.oyerhead equipment, distrib-ution systems;ceiling'tiles and!lighting, and masonry block wallsnotlikely to-coIlapse onto theequhipment?
9. Do attaced linfes hiave adequate flexibilityto amoiid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adyerse seismicint.eraction effects?:

YE3 NE:

UE N/ArE:

Y-E NEI UEr N/AE YEI NEI UE NIAE YEJ NEI UE)

Ofher Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and.fou-nd no other seisimic conditions that,ould V

NEI UE A

adversely-affect'the safety-functions of the equipment?

VtSdA¶".

vM¶(c.VPt4 I

,A..X.&*

ow- -Vv:

C

,.t-

?cY',

~ ~

ei-

~

~

C'R~~i-~4~~A wo&

'A Zý AO Vk~m-- C.Pm- 0 P

-t%

Comments (Additional pages may beaddedg necýessary)

J.

.n7 Date:

1 7*

4 I C-4 >

PAGE 238 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION PAGE 239 of 668

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS1000 I

PAGE 240 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 241 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS1000 I

I 0

PAGE 242 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:&,4N Uv Selsmic Walkdolwn Checklist (SWC)

Equipment{ lD:N,0".

5(

f"=Sr93 -oL*.O Equip:. Class'l

/

E quipmenllt.DescriPti bn.-tL y H4tFC~~r/(7k

/4 Location: Bldg, Floor El.

)-&

RoomArea iManufacturer, Model, Etc, (optional but recbtfmeuied)

Instrudtions for Colnpietiiig Checklist Thischecklist may be used to document the, tesults of the Seismic Walkdown of an item ofequipindnt on the.

SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used td record the results:ofjudgments and

,findings. Additional space is provided at the end of thi s cfiecklist for documenting qthercomments..

Anchorage I:1. Is the anmhorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one

'of the 50% of SWEL iteims, requiring such verification)?,

2. Is the anchorage fr~ee of bent, broken, misging or loose hardware?
3. Is thcanchorage free of corrosion that is more th-an mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage;frce ofvisible cracks in theconcrete Inear the anchors?

.5, lsthe anchortage con figurafion. consistent with plant dbcumcn tatiIon?

(Note,-This qtesftion only app'lisif theiltezemis:,one of the 50% for

'which an arichora*e configuration verification is required.).

YF/NUJ U0 N/A*l

,Y[*>NE-UEI N/AEJ Y[9'NE] U.0 N/AFll YIETNO uo Pq/Ari

6. Baseld On thlýe.abovd ahchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potcnihilly adverse scismic~conditions?

4 ffNE3 Unl Ewier tk~c~quipmrwnllkssmn fromiAppeiidbi BXICisscs Of Ej1 1 q)[imtn PAGE 243 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of2 8e'ismic Walkdown CheckIlIst (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. /4 a

t Equip. Class--

/

Equipment.Description

-4 LaSi4 C.si I3L Interacition Effects

7. Areesoft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are:o\\erhead equipment, distribution systems; ceilipgtilesand lighting, and masonrti*bk:y walls n6t likeoy to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached line. have adequajte flexibility to avoid 4amage?
16. Based on the above seismic interaction evauaitions, is equipmqnt free dfp6tentially adVerse ceismic jnteraction'effects?

YiNKO UEJ NT/AfEl Y~DUL N/AEJ YW1 NE UO N./AEJ YAN'NEJ UE

,Other Adverse Conditions/

14. 1Have you looked for and found~no other seisniccoriditiohs.th.at could NO UE adversely affect the safety functions of the'equiipmInit?

Comments_

(Adifional'pages miay be added as necessary)

.Evaluated by:,

  • /

" :",v.1" FART~~4~i f44),

Date: 2y

ý-a

/i_

/1

'(< CA4 PAGE 244 of 668

SACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOON.

PAGE 245 of 668

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION.0

  • 40
  • 1 A

pp

  • w
  • ~

-u 40 PAGE 246 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION.0 PAGE 247 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheaetu1i of 2 Status: (D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist. (SWC),

Eqipmpnent ID No. V-I.o5 - -J*","i, Equip.t ClasnsiL______

'Equipment Desoription '-lbo' M

CL4A.

i1rr Location: Bldg. A Eloor El.,.ZAo"., Rboim-, Area t yz.%.!

Manuiifacturer, Model, Etc. (optionalibut recornmended)

InStrUctions for Completing Chieeklist This,checklist may be used to document thexesults of the,, Seismic:Walkdown of anitem of equprment on the SWEL, The space below each ofthe foltloig qustions may be used to recor*d*

the* results.of j~udgments and, findings. Additional space is provided at the:end of this checklist for documenting other c6mments.

Ancloralce (5 ee. $C leAc Jtl

1. Is the anchorageý configuration verification required (i.e., is,the item pne YLI NED of the 50% oof SWEL items rqiigsc vrfcto) 2,, Is the anchorage free ofbent, broke,,missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosionthlat is more than mild surface ox-idation?

4.:-Is the andhoragee fe of visible cracks inthe concretenear the anchors?

5.. Is the anchorage configuration consistentwith plant documentation?

'(Note: This question only applies if tho item is one of the '501%,for which an anchorage configuration verification s required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the aichorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YCE NEI VE -N/AE YEI NEI UEI N/AE]

YE NW. UIET N/AD YE1 NW UE] N/AW YEI NO UEW

)1,-Efit&r the equipment classffiiarme frorm Appendix B: Classes 6fEquipment;

<C.3 >

PAGE 248 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet2 6f 2 Seismic Walkdowni Checklist (SWC)

Equip'ment ID No. i;-i 6io 5-5 1 - 1& l Equip. Class" Equipment Description1.& !:gl.y

\\~4,-,Can4p [

gt4,.

1531 Interaction Effects, (See- ~5Lkyc..

4o..4-J

%/iojm2ý

7. Are soft targets free from imp.act bby'neabyequipment or structtfes?
8. Are overhead'equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and, lighting, andnma'slonry block walls not likely to c.ollapse-onto th eequipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations,, is, equipmentffree, of potentially adverse,seismic; interaction effects?

YO] NFI: UED N/AE1 YO ND UD1 N/ADq

'YO NDI UN Other AdverseConditions

.11. Haveyou looked for'and. found no other.seismic cpnditions that could Y-(K NEI Un adv.. ersel affect the safet functions of the equipi

,en. "

ua

.p.c4r%

4

i.

W~w~4v.~~V

~ec.I4 4C).

Commentsf(Additional pages~may be added as necessary).

lc~u ~)O~~

~

~

C~C

~

~

~

tirr~4nl 1~ctcIS' bate:

IO.I 2

ý<:

PAGE 249 of 668

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIANO PAGE 250 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 251 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 252 of 668

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION.0 PAGE 253 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 254 of 668

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS1000

¶6 ~ ~

/

PAGE 255 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status;@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.I/g 3

iA,1-Equip. Class'u

/~ (,~,q rr~

y c~5(,AWERY~)

Equipment bescripfion 574/?T 97lef lX

,O'/

8oZ, Locatibb:,- Bldg. *,,l-RW Floor El.

Ro o

oRoom, kfea 1__

Manufacturer, Model, Etc- (optional bit recoi5mnended) instrucctions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of therSeismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The spaceObelow e~ach of the following questions 'may be used to record, the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end 6of this, checklist for dcticmenting other comments.

Anchorage I-Isthe anchorage configuration verification required (i e.,- is the item one of the.50% of SWEL items requiring such verificaion)?

YENI

2. Is the anchorage'free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

-3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion:that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4., Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the~concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorageconfigurati6n.dOnsistent withplant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for Which awnanchoragi corifigirati6on verif!catiori iS.r.eqtiired,)

6. Basedon the above anchlrage evaitluions, is the aniorage free of potentially,adverse eismic conditions?;

YJD NE] UE1 N/AE.

YX"NEO Un1 N/AE Y<NE UET N/AE YE NO U 0:

I~tnter.-iheý, equ~iprncn~t las~so.aiarnc firom Appendik B.: Classes of Equi~rment:

1< Cr3;>

PAGE 256 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist'(SWC)

Equipment I D. No.A/'/_/_o5-$3-, R/fiR2.A Equip. ClaSm22 k6'~~&R rm),/

Equipnent Description S7,4,? ýRe-

/Rjr, V9 -A'0 Interaction Effects

7. A

,esofttargets free from impact by nearby equioprent 0r sructures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and maSonry block walls not. likely to collapse onto'the cquipnent?
9. Do attached1inies have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismicminteraction evaluations,,is equipmentnree of potentially adverse seismic intera:ction effects?

YX/NE] UOI N/ADl INCT UC'- N/AC YE NEI U] NCApý YX(NCJ UC*

Other Adverse Cbnditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditioins that could Y

0 UC adversely affect the safety finctioms of the equipment?

'\\

Comments (Additional pagesmaybe added as necessaiy)

~ 4-o 18'6S"-'0 -!'pt for 4oogn P"O Aqa. 4aiown 'CkA(0ý5's-(WC i~~kYj E-vi*dUUatU N;

Date:

K 2:,'1Z.-

C

>4 PAGE 257 of 668

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS1000 r

UNIT 1

PAGE 258 of 668

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS100NO UNIT PAGE 259 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1of O2

.Status

,N, U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment iD No.

I6" 7

1, L"V zA Equip-Classlz

\\

Equipment Description

.izfv 9xv&1 0ZŽ A Location: Bldg. ",*

iTz-. Floor El.

I 6 Room, Area V-.4 a Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instruetions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to0document the results of the Seismic. Walkdown of an item -of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each bf the foll6wing questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional spice is provided at the end of this checklist for documentinig other comments.

Ancharaee AL Q gr V.i 1, Is the anchorage configuration verificatiofi required (i,.e, is the item one of the 50% of SWELitems requiring suchla7'verificauion)?

YLJ NEI

2. -Isfheanchorage free of bent, broken, missing or4bose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corsion thiat is':more than mild surface oxidation?
4. 'Is th iachorage ffee of visible cracks in the concrete near tleianchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuratio6n consistent with plant docurnentation?"

(Note: This question onlyyapplies if the item is one of theP.5 0% for.

which an anchrage configuration verification is required.)

6. BaSedon'th.e above anchorage evaluations9, is:tli anchoragfree of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'YO NOI HO N/AE; YD NO LI U3N/AEl YE] NO1 HE N/AO YO1 NE HE, NIAO YEJ NOI HE]

12 Eianer the equipmentclaiss name from Appendix B: Clasessof Equipment.

< C-23 >~

PAGE 260 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) f quipmetI o

5 tqi.ls' Equipmentbpescription

-re-izA Interaction Effects

~

~-~W'~

~

Gji G/4-)

7., Aesoft argets free from impact bynearby, equipment or structures?

8. Aer overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lightihg,
ard.masonry block walls not likely tor collapse onto"the equipment?
9.

oD attached lines have adequate flexibility to 'avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations,. is'equipment~freec otfpotentially adverse seismic inteiaction effects?

YEP NO] UL N`/AE YE ýNE] UE. N/AOl YE NE] UL1 N/AL]

YIE NEI UEI Other Adverse Conditions i11 Have you looked foi'and found nib other seismic conditions that could Y

NEI U-1

  • ,d/,iadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Addilional pages inay be added as nece~ssarýi)

Evaluated by:. -!

A.

<C4>

PAGE 261 of 668

,ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONPO PAGE 262 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 263 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:* N U Seismic: Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipmeit 1D No, /"/15-1-1)t'44 Equip.,Class'2 "'

Equipment Description,

/Sot / T

,*. V4 v-1G0 V

.A9.

'6 Locatibn: Bldg. -ao'koz Floor ELI.

Room, Area

13ge, Manufacturer,.Mode IEtc, (optional but recommended)

,qA*e*j,*

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checkliist may be, used to documeht the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. Thespace below each of the following questions may'be'used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is. proxvided at:the end of this checklist fo* documenting othert:bjirnefintss.

Anichora~e

1. Is theanchorage configuration verification required (i'e., isthe item one. YN. NE
  • of ]te 50% of SWEL.items requiring such veific, atin)?

2, Is :ihe anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anichoage'f&eý of corrosion thit is:mfiorethan mildsurface oxidation?

Y4 NEI UEUi N/AEl Y0 NEI UE NAE

4. Is the anchorage free of-visible cracks in'the concrete.near the anchors?:

YE] NE] UE1 N/Ax jVEz p.e-0 c c-2ft'V,,c 7? Of,/

7-0 t4,E1W,8L S-Ce YW NE7 UE N/A4 4

4i

5. *Is tle:anchorag~e bcofiguration consistent with plant. docuimentation?

(Note: This question only applies ifthe itemis one:of the 50% for which an anchorage-configu.ration! erification is requfted')

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the ancihorage freeof Y

NE UEf potcntially adverse seismi6 codditioqi,?

"X

., A/ý4A VC A' E 6

A e-A 15 j57 12 nter. die ecpii~frient class~natile from.A pendixB: Classes of Equipment.

PAGE 264 of 668

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2:of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Eqnip ment ID No.

E iT'. Classqi

,*S/VMA)7EA'S".)

EquipmentDescription, /'$-.

4t

/S 10,(

r 1Ifc6( -/,

0 V. 3* A'ME/6VR,-rCr, Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from imact by nearby equipment'or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling-tiles and lightififg and masoty-block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to0avid damage?

io0 Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is qijtipiIent free

...of p~etl*g~i seismic, iinteraction' effects'?......

YKNO UEJ N/A.E y)gNE] UE] NIAF]

Y-ý NEI UEr N/A[J YX NE]I U0 Other Adverse Conditions

14. Have you looked for and~found noother seismic condiiionstfhat could

-adversely affect the safety funcdions of the equipment?

NE]UE]l 1.

Comm'ents,(Additiornal pages mayhbeadded asnecessary)

/,,D. A4E Evaluated by' dag:*t

ý2 4 4--

~'97PS 4 iSDate:

1eZ02 iM1a/4i

-W-Sh

-< C-A >

PAGE 265 of 668

ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIO

.0 PAGE 266 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION.0 PAGE 267 of 668
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13003A247&oldid=5244580"