NL-12-2270, SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0, Vogtle Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 4 of 20

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML13003A243)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0, Vogtle Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 4 of 20
ML13003A243
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Volodarsky D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2270 SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0
Download: ML13003A243 (47)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheets, 1 of`2 Status:~ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipifient ID No. P"- 0t 4f Equip. U, Equipment Description YIS' ] iQ .o-t C 0 / .Location:

Bldg. 4A4- Floor El., /.P.L. Room, Area .3 ..M anufacturer, M odel, Etc. (optional but recommended)

.. .. .. .. ........ ...........

.. ..Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistmay be ised to document the reisults of the Seismic Walkdownof an. item of equipmefit on the SWEL. Thespace below each of the following questions may be usedto record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additionia.l space :is provided at the end oftthisl checklist for documenting other comments " Ancliorage

1. Is the: anchorage configiuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y NEI, of the 50% of 8WEL items requiring such, verification)?

12 Is:the: anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?S3.Isithe ahchorage free~ofcortosi6n that is more than mild surface.oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near.tlie anchors?4tJ v.I z*z.YE9.NEI.UQ N/AE1 Yg NE-J UEJ N/AC:/Y/NE U N/AC YIvI~n U0IN/L 5. Is thedanchorage configuration consisteht with piaht docurnmritatibii?(Note-, This~question only applies if'the item is.one of the 50% for which an anchbragec.onfiguration verijfication iS're~quired,)

Jx~o61e 7 6.. Based on the above, anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditionis?

J1 Efiter the, quipinent class namie fr:n,Appendix B: Classes of.Equipmnenht

<C-3 PAGE 114 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equiprn1ntIlD,N6.

I sr 1 7~/rEup ls'/0 Equipment.Descriptionl~I'PiIs~

CcAlr i4..........

...interaction Effects 7. Are softtargets free from impact by nearby equipment or strutures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systemns, ceiling tiles and lighting, and-masor-y block Walls notlikelytocollap~se onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lInes have adequate flexibility toavoid damage?Y0. Based onAhe above seismic interaction cvalUationls, is equipmenit free of potentially adverse seismic interactJioh effects?YVINCI UE] IN/A[]YM/(NC] UEI N/Al]Y0, 4 BE] UF1 N/Al]YY)NE] U111 Other Advere eConditions ifI, Have yo94looked for ahd,tound ijb other seismic conditions that could Y MN] tUEi 0dyersely affect the safdiy'flinctii-s.

of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be addedas necessary) f,..j 9A e.-Evalbuatcd, by.. £ý;mi#n, S *~~f , r~J4-0.41L t f' 'Date: Pc?)/?<0C4>PAGE 115 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO PAGE 116 of 668 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOIRO PAGE 117 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet,1 of 2 Status:QN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IS -Equip. CWass12ý10, Equipment Description VOO)LS ." ....Location:

Bldg.. AU. FloorEl. Room, Area .R210 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

....... ....Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist be-used to document the resultsofthe Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the.SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional spaceis1 provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments, Anchorane.IJs the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e. isthe item one Y NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is'the anchorage free of bent, broken, m issing or loose hardwarep?
3. Is theý nchorage free of corrosion (hat is more than mild surface oxidation?

513vg .vd..a. ftp sig" CR* 4. Isthe afichorage free of visible.cracks"in the coiecrete nearutie anchors?5. Is the.anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note.:This question only applies if the:item is one oftfhe 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is"required.)

4YAA,)iC~'-

cOo*4.Z V,6 W"0 6, Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse. seismic conditions?

~ C~OZ ¶~S~U4 Clce Y)'NF1 UDl N/A[]XANDE VEI N/A[D t N: UD N/AD Y..; ND _UD N/AD Y; ND UD"Enter the equipmeni class name from Appendix B: Clas

<C-3 >PAGE 118 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic .Walkdown Che£klist (SWC).Equipment ID No. --tlb7,oj OýpO Equip. ClassY: Equipment Descriptioin Pir PCN TrATI OJ, ij ARC-Aý C-,ZLC@ZE-Interacti6o Effects 7. Are soft targets ffee fromimpact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are qverhead equipment, distributio6n systems, cediing iles: and lighting, and.masoni~y block walls nort likely toc6llapse otnd theeqUiOninlt?
9. Do attaiched lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?106. Based on the above seismincinteraction evaluations-is equipment free of-gptentially adv rse-.seismic interactioneffects?

YVqNEI UE N.AEI Y4NQ UEj N/AQ YY EIN U- NEAE1-¥b6E] oH]Other Adverse Conditions 1t, lHave you, looked for and foiund no..ther seisriic cý6iditions thitt cotild 'YA N U0 adversely affect the safety functionsofthe euipment?Commen t ..(Additiorap ages.may' be 'added as.necessary)

EvaIluated by:- -..../! /~~i~s Datte: -.<@ C4>PAGE 119 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 6 r 1-D-1 77, Tr 7 NIROLS"!NC, L-01)PAGE 120 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet, 1 of 2 Srarus:Q N U'Seismic WaIkdown Checklist (SWC)Equlpment 10No.. :OOZ: Equipm Class 1 ICl~iLLrE(ZS

-CLASS.~ V Equipment Description CS Q AtALAJfP.. .. ... ..... ... ... ~. .. ..--..........-._Location-.:Bldg.

gO~W-FloorEl.

2410_' Room_, _Aea _ _ _ _NManuiftactuter, Model, Etc. (optiona but recommended) "v7it A _ v Instructions for Completing Checklist, This checklist may be'used'to documenti the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an:.item theq SWEL. The space below each of-the following questions may be used to record thexresults ofjudgments and findings.

Addi't'inal space is prpvided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.AnchOrage 1. Is theanctiorage configurationr verification required (i.e., ishlje item one, Y' NCI of the,50% of SWEL items requiring suct verification)?

2. Is the anchorage fiee of bent, broken,, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the 'amichorage fi-ee of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free ofvisible cracks in the concrete near the inchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant docuimentat.ion?

'(N,6te: This quest'o I on4yapplies if the item is one 6ftlie 50% for Which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based onthe'abj6ýV uchLorLge, evaluations, is. the: anchorage ffee of potentially adverse seisnic:.condiiions?

IYd NC0 UC N/AC Y>ý NCT IJC N/AC YXNC UC N/AC: 'YNEI UC1 N/AC YXXNCl LjC titer he' qpipirnent class name from, A pendix3: C1asscofEquip~n*an.

<-0-3 >PAGE 121 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet .2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist(SWC)

Equipment IDENo., 1- 15Z:- C7-6oZ Equip. Class 1 2 C"t Lt..' E- -C L.,$ 1,.,Equipirient Description C.C3 !~ JI4~L Iiiteraction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from, impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems,.

ceiling tiles and'lighting;, and masonry block walls. not lik6ly to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility, to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is'equipment:.free of potentially adverse seismic hinteractioneffects?:

YXN EJ UEj N/AEI X(NIURI: N/AP XN';NEI U0I N/AEJ VýgNR ýUli Other Adverse Conditions

.11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could X i NE UOJ adversely'affect the safety functions.of the eqbipment?

Cdtoments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)( F, rc1(Z?2Ptx.6 V+z L PA&j Ao--O too A,&. .Wi ~ ~t'e- .CA"-wz Son j ýd Evaluated by:.. .." .... ...Date: __6_ (7.___-A >r PAGE 122 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIO .0 PAGE 123 of 668 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO PAGE 124 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:Q N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SfC)EquipmientlID No. 1 qiiCas 2__ " S~* p, Class .. .oEquipment Description Floor l. -Are_______

Location-lg Floor El. Z Room, Area __________________

Manufacturer, Model, .Etc. (optional:

but recommended) instructions for'Completing CheCkliSt This checklist'may be used to document the results of the SeismicWalkdown of an item of equipment-on the SWEL..The space below each of the followingquestions may be uscd to record the results ofiudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other Anehora.te

1. Is the anchorage.

configuration verinfi cati6n required (ixej..is thejitem-6ne YX ND3 of the:50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free ýof bent, broken, missing or loose hrdware?3. Is the achliorage free of corrosion'that is rnore'thtan mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage fiee of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5'. IsIte anchorage configuraiion.consistent with plant documeenta.ionn (Note: Thi's question only applies. if the item is one. ofthe 50% 5for ihichtanf tchorage configuration verification.

is iequired.)

O~~'C~A, 6S_4Ab' -600 27 V ritzr C. -6. B1ased on' the above anchorage evalbations, is§ the anchorage free of potentially adv.erse sismi.c dýonditions?

Y'g ND UD 'N/A M Y'NO UD N/AD YVND U0 N'/ADI X~NO UD N/AO Y;<NO UDI-neteeqtuiprnienrcl35 nan~e from Appendix 13 Cimcss of FEqdpm nen.PAGE 125 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No., 15 I4t OoZ Equip. ClaSS'2__ ZOP'p lJI>1- -5 5 Xquipment Description-

" Interaction Effects 7T Are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are, ovethead equipment,.distributionsystems, ceiling tiles alnd. ightingi andmasonry blbck walls not-ikely to collapse.

onto the eqitiipment?

9, Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to.avoid dimage?10, Based on the above seismic interaciion is equipment free of potentially adverseseescismi inte titm effects?YX NEI UR N/ALJ YX NO UQ1 N/A.0 SNO UL1 N/AD3 NEI U[J Othe'r'Adverse Condiioiis

1.1, Haveyou looked for and, found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect.the safety functions oif the equipment?

YX'N 1-1 'GE]Commenits (Addiiotinalpages.maybe added as necessary) u .-'2* .ý 1-1\ 3 JAmt-3t r:'ovc3'-

Date: 9 c z.7, (L4~ /e~J4tf~O'6~/tti(Z~s~i~Z

-<C4 >-PAGE 126 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 127 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0'Sheet I of 2 Status:Q N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID N. F W-70-OZEui.Cas'

%--C~~~Eqdipmendrt Description tL .'3 TiJ Location:

Bldg. COAdet2 Floor El. 2cO -O6 Room, Area 'S 0.5 ManufaCturer; Model., Etc. (optional but-recormmended) f'Cb4 --Instructions for Completing Checklist This'checklist may be usedto document the results ofthe Seismic Walkdown of an-item of equipmenit'on the SWEL. The spacebelow each of the following questibns may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space isprovided at the end of this checklist for documenting other conmments.

Anchorage 1. Is the:anchorage configuration verication required (iie., is the item one 1N14 of the 506 of SWELitemns reqimiring~such verification)?

2. Is theanchorage free of beni,, brbken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is-the anchorage; free of£corrosion that is.mrore than mild surface oxidation?!
4. Is the anchorage free, of visible cracksin,'the concrete near, the ,anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration cornsistent With: pluntrdocumentation?(Note: This question only applies if the.item is one of the 50%,for which an anchorage configuration verification'is required.)
6. Based, ontthe above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of ,potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YXND3 UD- N/ADNDU YD.[ ND1 UDIF N/AN'ýYNDUD N/AD]YV NDj UD 12 Enter the equipment ciss name ifrth AppendixiB:I Cas;es of Equipment.

<. C13 PAGE 128 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 ,Sh~eetS2 of2 ,Seismic.Walkdown Checklist (SWC-)lquipmeqtlD'No.

14t%9lz-r 00?7:. Equip. Class,' _7-1 ýj, i Lp r4.4 o cr Equipment Description E5ýF'AtiýrZ6d C~r!ti6O WU'-c Al it~~V7ki Interaction Effects T7. Are soft targets free;efrorn impact. by nearby equipment or sfiructures?

8 Are overhead:equipment; distribution systems, ceiling tiles andjlightingi and masonry m bck wa]lls not likely to collapse ontothe eqipment?9. DO attached.lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on theiabove seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially ad4erse seismic interactIoneffects?

'ýX ND UD N/AD Yý NE UG NWAD YjýkND U N/AD Y~DUD Other AdverSe Conditiohs I.IL Have you looked for and found no dthers~eishmic oonditionis that could Yý& ND- UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

tCoinments (Additiona.

pages may he added~aS necssary)*

Evaluated by: .,. I .. ... *Date: $ -/ -2C?&<04~>PAGE 129 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIO10 A Jv 4 PAGE 130 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Sta.us: Y U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Eqiuipment IDNo. /,J-lý-8, -quip. Class'y.9 Equipment Description Loction: Bldg AW LP j'~Floor El.' ?&-e' Room, Area Z ,Manufaturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recomniended)

.. _.,,..Instructions for Completing Checklistl This checkli'st may be'used t6o documefit the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment:on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

AdditioI ja space is pi-ovided at thie end of this checklist for documenting other'comments.

Afichorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verificationrequired (i:.e. is the item one YE N[Et of the 50% 6/.ofSWEL itemS requi.ring suh verification)?
2. :Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YE[] NE[V [ 3.. Is the inclorage free of corrosion thatis more than mild surface, Yflj/N 4 -UE: N/AE)oxidation?, 4. Is the:anchorage free of visible cracks inthe concretenear:

the anchors? Y[ NE-] TE-1 N/AE1 5T. the aihorage c'6hfigurationconsisteit Withplantdocumentation?

YEJ NE UE] NIAEIK (Note: This qaes~ion only applies if the item is one of the 50% for Which varification i ireqiired.t) 6z Biased~on.;the aboveanchorage evaIiuatiiis,:

is theanichorage free o f YB'NE] UE poetiiiat],'

adverse seismic conditions?

SEnter the equipmeni class name from Appendix..::

Classes of Equip'iment.

..... .. , , .. .3 .)PAGE 131 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet.2 of2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist.(SWC).

Ei~uipmenit ID No. " /--3-37 , Equip.,Classr' EquipnmenitDecription 13-' , u~y4 , -tlte~ractfon Effects 7. .Are sogi targets free fromrimpactby nearby equipmen't.or structures?

8, Are overhead equipment, distribution systems,.ceiling tiles and lightinig, arid masonry block walls not likely to colapse onto the equipment?

9) Do attached lines have adequateflexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipuient free of potientially adverse seismic interaction effects?YYE~NEJ UE NWAD YI3/NrJ U[EJ N/AE-YdENE11 U0 N IN/AQ YE/ND UEl Other Conditions
1. Hve ypou looked fotrand found no other seisiic condi.ons that could No U-j adversely affect the:safotyfiunictoio of the eqtipu sent?Corn mnents (Additional pages may be added as: necessary)

Evalate by --Date: 1< C-A>PAGE 132 of 668 TTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOR FA"ý;Nl PAGE 133 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 134 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 135 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0!I PAGE 136 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 lof2 Status: 9 N U Seismic Walkddwn Checklist (SWC)E quipment-IDNo.

Equip. Classll 2 -OLC E qCUipment Descripfion U C a_ _Location:

Bldg. Floor El. 122-0' Room, .Area P.U t(3.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but, recomnimended)

__.instructions for Completing Checklist Thfs checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown.

f an item of equipment onthe SWEL The;spaCe below each ofthe following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments..Anchorage 1I. isthe an chorage configurationwerification required (i.e., is the itemone Y 1 NE)of the 50% 6of SWEL itemsreqhiriig.

such verification)?

2, Is thieanchorage free of bent broken, missing or loose hardware?3. is the anchorage flee of corrosion.that is-more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is theanchorage free of visible-cracks in the concretenear the anchors?5. Is the anchorage confignrationi 66tisistent with plant documeitation?

Note: This question on ly applies if the item is one ofthe Do% for which an anchorage confi.gufation Verificati6n iS required.)

6. Based on the .abbve anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YgNEI UE N/AEU YMNE] U0. N/AU YANEI UEI N/AU YXNEI UE] N/AU YbýNEI UF_a 2 Entqr the equipment class-niafire from A ppendix.B-

'Classes of Equpipmet.

-0, C. >.PAGE 137 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic WalkdownChecklist (SWC)'Equipment IDNo. KU.5,NR Equip. Class" 2 2 L C ýJ5)Interaction Effects 7. Arc soft targets free frome impact by nearby equipme.ntor strutif-res?

8i. Are overlhead.

equipment, distributiinosystems, ceiilng tiles arid.lighting, and masonhry block wa!ls nqt'likely to collapse onto the-equi-mit?

9. Do attac~hedj!.inies?:have adequate flexibiljity toavoid damage?10. ,Based on the above seismic interaction eval uations, is equipment free of potentiially adverse seismicinte-action effects?YAý,NF U0, N/AU Y0. N7 UEJ N/AU1 YP' NE Un N/AO Y.0 JU 0 ther Adverse Conditions
11. Have yo 16ooked for and.found inio 6ther seismic conditions thatcould NE UlE:adversely affect the safetyfunctions of the. equipment?

Commentis, (Addtiohal Page; may be adddadnaceesai'y)-5-?6 ,/-g9, Evaluated by: VI A. H4+Date: -

PAGE 138 of 668 t ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS100NO PAGE 139 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 140 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O SN .U Seismic WalkdoWn Checklist (SWC)Equipment D No. i-! ' .1-16Z-451.41i, Equip. Class'" z!o Equipment:

Descripti6o t'd A ,iN r______ _Location:, Bldg. Cak.1,ot Floor EL zzo' Room, AeaT Manufa'cturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for'Completing C(iecklistl This checklist-may be used to docurment the results of theSeismic Walkdown ofAan item ofeq0ipment on the'SWEL. Thd space bel6w each of the following question .may be Used ito-recoid the results ofjudgmentsandý findings.

Additional.space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comment.&Anchorage VDA/C --1. Is the:anchlorage,,configuration verificationrcquired (i.e., is the item rone of the 50%of SWEEL items requiting such:verification)?

YE NEI 2. Is,-the anchbrage free oftbent, brokene missing or loose hardw'are?

3'. Is the anchordgefree of'corrosionthat is morethan mild surface oxidafion?

4'. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5.' I's the anchorage configuration consisteht wit 1plant documentatIin?T (Note: This question, only: applies if the itemis one of the,50% for whlich an anchorage configuration verifilcation is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage freeof potentially adverse seismic conditions,?

YE NE UE N/AE1 YE NE UEl NIAE1 YE NE UE :N/AE1 YF NEI UE N/AEI¥YE NEI UVE 1 2 itnter.the eupmn class hiamefrom Appendix B: CIAsses:ofEipii'iien't.

~<C4 >~PAGE 141 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0: Sheet,2 of 2 Seismic WalkdOpwn Checklist (SWC): Equipment ID No. Vl" 1 -ýiO -Equip. Class 1 Equipment:Dseisription NUC t't1T 1ACkZ Interactioi Effecfts( EJ % 8/ / z 7.. Are softdtrgets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distrib ution systems ,ceilIing tiles and Iightihg, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attacfied lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on th eabove seismic interaction eyaluations, istequipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE 7NO UQ. N/AE, YE NEI UE N/AE YE] NEq U N/AED YFE NEI UE -Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX, NE- UFt Affect the safety functions of tie equipment?-

.. .. .. -..... ,.. " .... & o c " 4 -i ,Comiments (Additional ppages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: ~ S. &h~.o 1.4-*1.- ~To 5.........Date- /q ezei q A 6:5'<'C-4 >ýPAGE 142 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 143 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 144 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I, oU2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment iD No. ' Equip. Class, 2 2`0 8niirniment Descrinptijon SO? &dl"f'( .t, i Location:

Bldg. _Coko ( Floor EJ. -22QO RoomArea RAS_____________

Manufacturer,..Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) instructions for Completing Checklist-this c.hecklist may be use4 to docupmi-ent thelkesulmtof the Seismic W'alkd6wn of an item of equipinent on, the SWEL. The:space below ýeah of tlie following questions-may be used to record the:results ofjudgments and findings Addifional space is provided at the end of this checkiist for other cormnents.

Anchorage J.. Is theianch.o)rage.:co)nfiguiration verification required-(iL-., is theitem one, of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification!)?

]Nb 2. Is"the anchorage free of bent, broken, imissing oif loose hardware?3. is-the anchorage.free of corrsion that isimore surface:xidation?

4. Is the anchor-age ftee of viible cracks. in the ~6iniete near tiie.achdri?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant docn.e tatdoti7?(Note: This questioh, only applies if the iten.iS one of the 50%.for which anianchorage configuration verification is required;):

f l4 5 ,GOb Vert',JoA:*Anpf,,e.

6. Based on.the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage-free of potentially adverse scisin-c cotiditi ns?YX IND UDE N/AE]YV' Nn] lE] N/AE]Y4NE]~ U1E], N/AE]YE] NIE UE] N/AV Y'NE] rE .2Enter tile eqipmirent-class..naime fro'hi Appvný#x.

B: Classes of Eqbipmenit,<C-03 >'PAGE 145 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 ,Seismici Walkdown Checklist (SWC)E quipment I DNo.6 E'quip. ClassI2.2 Eqipmen Descriptioni 20Y1 (0.4nfo I Paovi I Interaction Effects.7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby~equipment Or structures?

8. Are oyerhead equipmený,, distri'ution,systeims, ceilig tiles and lighting, anrd masonry block walls notflikely to collapse onto the:equipmeit?

9 Do a~ttached lines'haye adequate flexibility to, avoid dahi-e?qJo 'erl1(gq( Cvkli4Ab o :cJI 4 CoptW 'U 10. Based on the above;seismic interaction evaluations, is eqqipment free of.iotbntially adverse seismic interction effctsTU[] N/A-I Y&(,N.n UCI N/AD Y-I NEI UC N/AX YO(NO UC]'Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked'for and found no other seismic conditions that, could Yk/N UC El adversely affectthe safetyffinctions ofthe equipment?

Comments (Additional piges may beadded a necessary)

  • NoA. .OAý RdAýj W"N"ýSoý'Evaluated by: Date:- ~< c-4 >PAGE 146 of 668 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .00 PAGE 147 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2*Sftus:D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No. -1004.- Q6-,*T'C-Equip. Class 1 2 zo EquipmentDescription ? ..Locatioi:

Bldg. '.o i.. FlobfiEl.

'ZZ Room, Arfea _ _ _,_,.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but rcomrmncndcd)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of andfirm of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each ofthe:following questions may be used to record the results:ofjiudgments

ýad: findings.

Additional spjce is provided at the end of this.checklist for documenting other comnients.

Anc ....W' ... ho. .e 1. Is the:anchorage configuration verification required (i.eis theitem one of the 56% of SWEL items requiring such:verification)?

YE NEI 2. Is the anchoragelflee of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free ofcorrosion that. isnmore than mild surface oxidation?

4., Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the, concrete near the anchors?5.Is the anchorage configuradion.consistent withplant documentation?(NoteýThis question only applies if the. item is one ofthe 50% for which: an anchorage coriiguaition verification is required.)

&. Based.n! th~e anclor~ge evaluations, is the anchorAgefreeof, potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NE1 U-T N/AE-YE NEI UO, N/AE YO NEI UiE N/AE YEO NE lE N/AE YE NEO G: P2 Enter the e uilrmeht class n'ame from Appendix B- Classes.0f Eqiprint." * ...... a ..C-3,>... ..... .PAGE 148 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdowh Checklist (SWC)EquipmeintiD No. .: ? Equip. Class 1 2 , EquipmentDescription -O? , -.IniteractionE ,ffects, 6vPr- /t Y, wr 7. Are soft targets free from .impactfby nearby'equipmen orstructt'ures?

8. Are ovdrliead equipment, distribUtion systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,'and masonry bloek,wafis not likely onto. the equipiment?
9. Do attached lines have addquate flexibility to avoid damage?: 10; Based on the above seismni interaction.evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interactiloneffects?

YE! NEI Uo N/At1 YQ' Nr- UO N/AE-YE .NE] UE! N/AO YO NO! UM, Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have yoti looked for'and. found no:other seismic conditions thatcouild YA.NF1 UO: adversely affectthe safety functions of the equipment?

i CAA..- ,M ..L C,- ..V e .M ,t 'A T; .V ..V 9 Comments (Additional pages rnay be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: ,y.: -t" S.-7z Date: ? z;It~ ~< C-A)PAGE 149 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOP PAGE 150 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 151 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS1000 PAGE 152 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheetl 00f Status: N 'U Seismic Walkdcown Checklist (SWC)EquipmefitiD No. I-l{*Oa -.-PSI Equip. Class'2-("" ?Qiw(5 Equipment-Description rr'ce5s. , C Pr0]hd-Loqcation:

Bldg 64f+of -loor El )-,Z01 RomAra I 63 Mahufacturetr Model, Et.C (optional but recommended)

__.__(___

e Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to :docummitlthe results of the SeismicWalkdown ofman item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the, fllowing questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provi ded at the end of tfhi checklist, fordocumenting other commnts.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item:one Y4'NE of the 50%/ SWEL items requiring such verifi cation)?2. IS the anchorage, free ofbent, broken,.missing orloose hardware?:

3. Is the anchorageiffee ofcoriosion that is more than mild suarface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage ftee Of /iisible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5.. Is the afchbrage:

confitent with pint docuinentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an kanchorage cqotifguration veifiction is required) 40 6. Based on the aboyeaichorage is tle anchorage free of p~tertitially,.adiV,ejse.:seiimi conditions?

YNE UEU N/AU?Yxf"NE UU N/A[]4'QUU N/AUj YK'NO tin N/AU YýNU nUUE'2 Tfitvr the quiprnent classiiiirne fromi Appendix B: Chisues of Eqllipmenr.

4, C-3 >PAGE 153 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet.2of2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWO)Equiprnent ID No./- /oO f- P-5/-$ Equip. Class: 2 (C 46 Equipment Description Psc~ C$.. 7 C PrecT ,_ __Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free fromrimpact by nearby equipment or structures?

1~ N1 UE1 N/A[J 8. Are-overhead:equipmentidistribuition systems, ceiling tles and lightipg, YK:NE UE] N/AE and masomy blocik walls lnot likely' to collapse onto the equipmet?9. Do attached lines-have adequate flexibijity to avoid damage? Y," NE UE NIAE 10. Basedlon the aboveseismicinteraction evaluations, is equipment free of potential ly ad.erSe seismic:interaction effects?Y NO. UEj Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YK NEI UEi adversely affect the Salfety functions'of thevequipment*

COn.ments (Additional pa'ges may'be added as necessary)

I: .. .... .Evaluiated by: Mq{ILAt lq~Date: 81242012o-z

&~ ___< C-4i>PAGE 154 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS is NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 155 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 156 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of`2 Status'OQN U'Seismjc Walkdown Checklis~t (SWC)Equipmentl lNo. \- V1O4-Q5-?sz Equip. class'2 Equipment. ,escription X Location; Bldg. -Floor El. zzo Room, Area \ 4-n Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

._._.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the. results: of the Seismic Walkdown of-an item ,ofA uipment on the SWL. T~he space below each ofthe following questiorns may be used to reord the results ofjlidgments ard findings.

Additional spaceis provided at-the end of this checklist for documenting other comments., 1. Is .the anchorage configurationi verificationrequired the item one YE] NE]of the '50% of SWEL items r'equiring.

such verification)?, 2. Is the anchorage free'of bent; broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is-more than mild surface:oxidation?

4.. Is the anchorage free of Visiblecracks inthe, cncrete near thealich6rs?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if thejitem iý one of the,50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.")J
6. Based onthe above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE- NEI UE1 N/Al]YlE] NEI UEi N/A-YE- NE 14E NIAE-YE]NE UE N/AE1 YE NEi UE 12 Enter the equipmnent class name: fromAppendix B: Classes of E~tiipment;

< 8C-a PAGE 157 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 -f42 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentiD No. 1- %410o -Vl z J'qZ Equip I. Class"'Equipmen't Description Interacti on Effects --s /z /v )7. Are.sqft targets free from impact by nearby .equipmentworstructdres?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, nd mad:#sonry Lblock walls not lieyto collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do dttached lineslhave adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of pgotentially adyerse seismic interaction effects?YEI ýNE U0 N/AD YEI NE7 U0E N/AE]YEt NEI UE N/AEr YE NEI UE1 Other Adverse Conditions
11. Haveyou looked for and found no other seismic conditions that 6ould YjX'NE uJ]*V adversely affectthe safety functions of the equipment?

ýeV-t~qP CW -rv: tI. V'r ig %LA.b ~ V~~~~~~~~~~~~~~At S: 0 C.WG.AY V AC.C ¶%& N*S E &Y.,: 'Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated' by:: t. .s-r-Date:L , S q ~g.g<C- 4, *PAGE 158 of 668

,ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS104NPO PAGE 159 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 I I K'II01 PAGE 160 of 668

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-12-2270,_SNCV061-RPT-01,_Ver_1.0,_Vogtle_Unit_1_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic._Part_4_of_20&oldid=908273"