NL-12-2271, Vogtle, Unit 2, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 8 of 14

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML12355A041)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Vogtle, Unit 2, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 8 of 14
ML12355A041
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Volodarsky D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2271 SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 1.0
Download: ML12355A041 (40)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z -o 61v Equip. Class" 2'(/e-9 Equipment Description k1 PVAIP!A / a-00'a Tb kY>Z/1 EQjJ V,-41b Location:

Bldg. Floor El. jiI Room, Area iD 113 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

-jJ4,d,7-.OA/

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YO 9 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

mq-I' -,7' 5-i e.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YK.NO UO N/AC Y0'NO U- N/A[J Y)'NC] UC N/AC YO NO UO N/AW Y/N -UC Enier the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classe; of Equipment.

'<C-3 >PAGE 251 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- Fr -0 ,60 Equip. Class'2 (c0 Equipment Description 00I A', e 4 A2 -AelmlF. .VAL /1C Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are:overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do.attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YkND UD N/AD Y&/ND UD N/ADl YWND UD N/AD YWND UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y 'NEI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages maybe added as necessary) blufft -FT~t- O FOIf NC0-og r WKYC/I I fi LIST(4W .Evaluated by.: l ~4L, 4lc~t Date:-C-4 >PAGE 252 of 433 9 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 253 of 433

/ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 254 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

.2- P5L Jao-.S Equip. Class" 2 III- , _,,/Equipment Description C L-t.; --,u.. Jipt. , eý4.f Location:

Bldg. XcbL .. Floor EL 19C.-C)" Room, Area 9gSQ Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification, required (i.e., is the item one YO] of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

/-2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for Which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YXNE] UE]N/AE]UE] N/AE]UtE N/AE]YE] NEi UO N!As SNE]3 UE]12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

4 C-3>PAGE 255 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

f-SL-a.q5 Equip.Class1 2 Ir- .Equipment Description 0 d o, c', ...... .; IL lde Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Xý NEI UD N/ADNO Ul] N/AD YV NO. UD N/AD YVNED UiD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NDi Ui adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) b A>. !'¢..;7 -Nbe S -5 6 -- '3 " ýt-Date: --****k a-' .-< C-4 >PAGE 256 of 433 qTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 257 of 433 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERS1000 PAGE 258 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-- -Fr- oPh , Equip. Class 1 2/Z'4( /<j Equipment Description CCj9 , F/ePkj Location:

Bldg. /¢Ix Floor El. 143-4'" Room, Area 0 c Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

.........____-___-__, Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y0 NO/'2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y6 N UC" N/ACU-No uN/ACD YY N'C UC N/AC YCI NC UC Y'NE1 UEC 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classs of Equipment.

PAGE 259 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 #V- II Equip. Class'ýI P f---,,, t. ,,ef k -r E minirment Fescerintion CC-P A r-I&I-)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZZND UF N/AC1 Y NECUE N/ACI Y9 EU0 N/AC YDN NCU Other Adverse Conditions I 1.1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YinN[o UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) sý -Hd'¶l((h rox AW'c Evaluated by: iI. .Date: ,/PAGE 260 of 433 4TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 261 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 9 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 262 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No, 2 6 41 Equip. Class" Equipment Description

,4 FLoi~.J Location:

Bldg. 44A ... Floor El. I / -3 Room, Area 9'P 11.3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items rcquiring such verification)?

YýfNCl 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)P M02 7 J ý , T yDPMO27 jj 3.0 C)c 59) 9(O29J V~--6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y'N] U0 N/AC Y4 NO UC N/AC YV 7 N] UO N/AC Y N-- U-1 N/AC YXfNO U-12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

-<C-3 >PAGE 263 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2- PT Al Equip. Class"-Equipment Description I-A & k a'214J Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YVNEI UE1 N/Afl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y] NE] UF1 N/A[: and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YýNEI UEJ N/A.[]Yfý'NI U0]Other Adverse Conditions N.1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could y NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N~o Uofal E~valuated hv: W )Au Wt'kIL 5 0 I ,AO Dat 1>,f R-S't--ZI2--<C-4 >" PAGE 264 of 433

, ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 265 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 266 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of'2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No. Z- ,/ ClassQ Equipment Description P'I P .4 _Location:

Bldg.. / Floor El. _.o F Roo: Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) m, Area //&00 ii jJAfl'&Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgrments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO]- Nf[of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

NE] UE] N/AE 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y% NE] UE] N/A-'oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YA NE] UE] N/AE]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE] NE] UE] N/Ad'1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.).

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y;Q NE] UE]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

/,$A 36 O A 7-e 11. T $- 7~p 4,v6 -Enter theequipment class nane from Appendix B: Classes of Euiiipment.

< C.3 >, PAGE 267 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2Z- 0-1/4 Equip. Class'=/2-Equipment Description SIP 4 'zrto-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YXND UD N/AD YJ ND U- N/AD YX ND UD NiAD YX ND uD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YR] ND UD" adversely .affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 5SG 2 -/zo÷ PO o} , oR -gz"j Evaluated by: /7~,y~ +s.Date: .:!<K C-4 >" PAGE 268 of 433

'TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 269 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N. U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. .2 I- T- 1 _ 7 _ Equip. Class" 1 ( a-,v t Equipment Description (JN FA-w -r !4 Location:

Bldg. /AJKd Floor El. I--T Room, Area _ _t__Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic. Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWELý The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YND 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YWNEI UCD N/AD Yý/N- UD N/AD YWN- UD] N/AD YV NO UD N/A[D (.P PMO27, V\r. 9.0 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is potentially adverse. seismic conditions?

the anchorage free uf Y NDI UDJ" Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment-

-< C-3 >PAGE 270 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seism ic W alkdow n..C hecklist (SW C ) ..................................................................

Equipment ID No. I F 7 1 B 7 ( Equip. Class 1 2 J1 ( I*N 1 4 o4.s J EquipmentDescription C(U/I Flou

-T ,rlA A Interacfion Effects I~nteraction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipmentor structures?

Y o i t10 *-Jv~f6 W NO UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yg NO um] N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YtND UD N/AD YNEI u[D Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

-KCeA" 6,Y Q(. 9l5r, 506" X-14ý-OjqoA.

  • 7 C*olPWCJ-0 A5 W-Jt t, svik er 1(-ptii.Evaluated by: / //1(44) [iJ~IU(*of Xl 1rZ4Vi4 PIO /?(2 R A-Y Date: "< C.4 >PAGE 271 of 433 TTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 272 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Il PAGE 273 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: ON UY Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 24-__T-5151_

_ Equip. Class" 2 5 (___________

__Equipment Description -Ax FVJ 4-5 h5k0 Go 1- R aw r aiu/n(r Location:

Bldg. A-__k Floor El. 115" Room, Area PO .Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

_ _,_t_ _ __-Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE[ No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y4'NLi UE YI NE U-E N/AE YI4Nn UE N/AE YE NE UE N/Ar(Y-NE] UEID 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >PAGE 274 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. E________~quip.

ClaSS 1 2 IS Ius~r Equipment Description

/hJ), FW f~uao ý- Sktn Gm. I. -~ Fhcv 7sn~YIr-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, isequipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YK NEI UI N/AO Y/NO UC- N/AC Y'o NO UC N/AC Y4 NEI UL-C Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions thatGould adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment'?

Y4/NEI UO Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) hvaduated by: # {AMlQMS/\lrIS Date: 0202.< C >PAGE 275 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERS1090 PAGE 276 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 277 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.2- F Vo' I Q Equip. Class 1 2_Equipment Description

.-16IC'1-'i w A-froil ...'Location:

Bldg. hXI Floor El. /i'-"- Room, Area eC-6,4S7 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) s -, Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage/1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NB/of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild. surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NEI UO YE] NE] UE] N/Ao/" YE] NE] UE] N/A[O'YE NE] UEI N/Aa"" Y2NO UE-12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment,<t C-3 >PAGE 278 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 4 F-V 6/ 1 'D- Equip. Class 1'v Equipment Description

?Wkt, P014P A 1-lti, hf &-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Y NO UE1 N/AO Yg NO UO N/AU YMIel Urq N/AO-r 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[r-] U. O adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 4&/.Or, <-C 2."~ f Evaluated by: i);.-1 ,L,, " " / / " -"[7' " Date: t~-L7-~~.L /-~ /1< C-4 >PAGE 279 of 433

, ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONOO PAGE 280 of 433 qrTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERS1000 PAGE 281 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of2 Status: ýr) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. E-4V-OIqOP Equip. Class, 1 2__EquipmentDescription C.CP A Sc.dfý( Gr&.(.ho S(haq &oq 0 Va V., Location:

Bldg. PrQ Y- Floor El. Iq. j Room, Area _, _ _ _ __1_Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but reconnnended) 1y. I (oa'c Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%. of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NE UlE N/AE YE NE UE YD NE UE N/AEcy" Y NEUE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of'Equipment.

< C-3 )-PAGE 282 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

-+V --I-0190A Equip. Class'Equipment Description CCP A-r Graj. S-dQno;j Opi VOIVq Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YdN-I UO N/AEC Y&f/NE UE- N/AQ YZN'- U- N/AQ Y11 4 11 UEJ Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEYNN'] UC-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

.cep"%'sL-AO 5 [own plw e( wefe~v mV4 iOPU6+ k-dX5 Cc If Ad-~elýZcCoriCUPf.

Evaluated Date: _0 r117 /___ _-..2c2/-< C-4 )PAGE 283 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONVO.L PAGE 284 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:D N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No. 2--VV 1/2 00S Equip. Class2 Equipment Description ARI) Pu,,o, .,- o%'i 4 Aer",-Location:

Bldg., I&-re, Floor El. .. Room, Area P,_/O 2.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

L i I,, tIi-Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (ie., is the item one YOI- of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

-1 , fine- C 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in Ihe concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 500/, for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YD NEr UE N/A[2" YEI NEI UO N/A[D YE NE UE NIA[a YE NE UE N/AE'YN[NEI UVE Enter the cquipmcnt class name from Appendix B: Classes o(Equipment.

<C-3 >PAGE 285 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -"" / Z o Equip. ClassZ 2 0 A~ZI~~l Equipment Description AF/1 /0? J1i",/e .4 9ý7 a e" Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YfNI-- UO N/AD Y"/NDJ UD N/AD Y[2/ND UI" N/AD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found.no other seismic conditions that could Y 7/No ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

--V! "I " C- 0 J4 A'd2ý~s')

/Z-/30 Evaluated.

by-. Ct>vLy- Date: cl'/Z. _/PAGE 286 of 433 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 287 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Status: V N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

2 -( Equip. Class,_ _______Equipment Description Cr .% '( ol t ;. So Location:

Bldg. E6Q .3 Floor El. 2-W' Room, Area Z i'a 5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE1 N]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

K 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware'?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfhce oxidation?

X OUO N/Ap/XNE UD N/AtL 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE UE-1 N/AX 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NE UE N/As%y NE UDE 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B:.Cluses of Eqipmeam., C-3 >PAGE 288 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. --2 Equip. Class'2 0(0{f¢).Equipment Description C..x- , , , -' 0t.C- h '3 Interaction Effects 7. Ate soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

\X NEI UO N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yj NEI UO N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

X 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y NE U-I N/AEUE Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NE UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YýCorments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

-<CA4 >" PAGE 289 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONO.I 2-HV-262-7 CAPCS CT8 NORMAL PURGE SUPPLY ORC MII ISo L AOV FC B PAGE 290 of 433

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-12-2271,_Vogtle,_Unit_2,_SNCV061-RPT-02,_Ver._1.0,_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic,_Part_8_of_14&oldid=908758"