NL-12-2271, Vogtle, Unit 2, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 7 of 14

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML12355A040)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Vogtle, Unit 2, SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 7 of 14
ML12355A040
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Volodarsky D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2271 SNCV061-RPT-02, Ver 1.0
Download: ML12355A040 (40)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. K .-%. 0U3 0i4- Equip. Class 1 2 .20 5) C Equipment Description.

1,i1tailf Location:

Bldg. Cof%+i'da FloorEl. "-100 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) CtLA C0oqff'¢-oI Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE] N¢2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YKNE UFJ N/AiJ 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YX NEI U5 N/A0 oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yo No U0 N/AK 4. 4 4 Isr 4 thel ALoa 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y NEI-- UE] N/AE-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

agw (c k;o. ri-. 2 --.7. 2 &v -utr4[ 0 o7O samf[e.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YXNE- U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 PAGE 211 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment.ID No. 2-1 -U3! 0 1o4- Equip. Class'2 ! C Pq 1 Ws.EquipmentDescription I'm l y Gy PaoV'(Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YY'NO UO N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y ND Ur N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YIN(NC UC N/AC:]UC Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y4 NE UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 5E2-31 K-0S-O01 FR.IPA-4 WA-Lt0('CU'ffCLe4S-r(AM).

Evaluated by: mo Date: 3/1"7_ _ 101_1" 8I7, g 7 0 PAGE 212 of 433

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0;PAGE 213 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 214 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status'6 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z-I,9- UY, -00/ Equip. Class 1 2 20 Equipment Description .YF.6 C', '/? Io4R& 'Rt / 4 Location:

Bldg. 4-w7' o L¢. Floor El. Room, Area 1,6/6 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

_ satc1 41tP r dVT--ýv 01,5 co Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and finditngs.

Additional space is provided at tie. end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorai 1, Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YX NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bentý broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anc rage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

AY.X3AaEo 3 o 0002-) , 12A0 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YX ND UU N/AD YO NEI Ur N/A9f YN] U-- N/AD Ytý NO UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of -Quipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 215 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-/62/1 C'- PO/ Equip. Class'2 2o Equipment Description fP9 S 5 -ENC&-- o9?P 7,41,V/A Interaction Effects 7. Arc soft targetp free from impact by nearby equipment ol structures?

Yk'N1 U0 N/ADl 8. Are overliead:equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, meNEI UE] N/ADI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

f 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YKN-- UCD N/AD YK NO UCD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI ND U[ D adversely affect the safety functions .of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

I,'Evaluated by;_ gJ! 'n Date:~' _____£ 27 ~<C-4 >PAGE 216 of 433 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 217 of 433 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONR PAGE 218 of 433 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 219 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 t N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z2'o',3-7?'9'oof Equip. Class' z'F"/471V -1A7s"/7 Equipment Description 4451 4 &Ff,4 rOk A Location:

Bldg. ta Floor El. ZZQ " Room, Area R1011 --Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

,0,6F1-.4V.4Z r4le$IAJýF 1AIC.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] N;K of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration.

consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

1oT7 //Y 50;1. 5,,A,'P 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y;K NE] UE] N/A[]Y; NE] UE] N/Ar YK NE] UE] N/AD 4W Yp NE] U0 N/As YX NE UC S2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >PAGE 220 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2 24'03 -?1e- 00/ Equip. Class 1" A(7/AAE M'R, 7- -/7 Equipment Description --(T- R A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YP ND U' N/AD YX NEI UD N/AD Yj ND UD N/AD YX ND uD Other Adverse Conditions
11. I-have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NDI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

I-oAXE Evaluated by: 44 9 A.C4P,,1R4St/Date:

`Zýj!L*$VM .CHA/0/ 2-i< C-4>PAGE 221 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONOO PAGE 222 of 433

.ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIONOO PAGE 223 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Statuso N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2"-403"-4i'OF01"f Equip. Class'2 17 (F nA ta. 1 Equipment Description P)'wd ar"Nk A'" 1t'rk/Location:

Bldg. Die(C I Floor El. 2."" Room, Area 9o4M A-Off t Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

NtftrIC1 A- 'rf"..Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YKNO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)-QLV -I1 V.r,s-,o 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YlA NEI UC N/AC Y[X NC U-- N/AC Yg NC- UC N/A-YW NCI UC N/AC YP NCU UC"2 Enter the eqtuipment class name from Appendix B: Clasmes of Equipment.

A C-33>PAGE 224 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Z°A- '.3 Equip. Class'2 \" u "q.Equipment Description -ltdcf "

  • A fHfr Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yo ND UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y1 ND UEO N/AD Yg NO UO N/AD 11 NO UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YW NEI U" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

(.Io e-Evaluated by. IF" #4-~iY~/~/~ / Pt4~' O~'94?K Date:-<C-4 >-PAGE 225 of 433 9 TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 226 of 433 9 rACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS ie NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 227 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: C) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. .-, 3 "ii +V'quip. Class" Eouinment Descriotion

£DG Ll-tr a ('.~ ~ Lkrt~Location:

Bldg. D. Floor El. -.& Room, Area &( 1)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%. for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)NC UI-C N/ACl YK NC UC N/ACNEI! O-1 N/All YX NCI UC- N/AC-YX NC UC3 N/AC Zx,>c4 /(s'I- 13g..e.+6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y5Q NE UC Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 1: Classes of Equipment.

ý< C-3 >, PAGE 228 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.

Equip. Class 1 2 I1 -EquipmentDescription b(2 04ir S 4 d&-r --Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?P/P/SA/4 4r74 eYl/E, i -Al 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yo NO- UO] N/AO YE NO U1 N/AC YX NO u0 N/AD Y\ NO] U" Other Adverse Conditions 11, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N-' U1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

S --, , 5e z24,c3-4-o y R&Evaluated by; 14Y /'A 4 Av'5VO 114P49AS/-

/ Dale: ~£ Z/..L~rc~ ~ ChACObJ 9 £ z~iz< CA>PAGE 229 of 433

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERS1000 PAGE 230 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 231 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 S' 1 of 2 Status Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID) No. Z~ '14'3 -~/Equip. Class" 2 Equipment Description

$,(- .f Location:

Bldg. ,OU T Floor El. 2rI--C '4 Room, Area L.- o/Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comnments.

Anchorage!. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE Nýof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

I 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NEI UE YE NEI UE N/AW YE) NEI UE- N/ArX YE[ NED LIE] N/A[YANE UVE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >-PAGE 232 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) P7 ?//)Equipment ID No. ra Equip. Class" 2 .. .Equipment Description I ,-I-lew-,Q4 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NO UO N/AC YA NOl UO N/AO Y@R NEI UO N/A-Y}p NE UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YXNQ UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Eva lUated by: t 4 Date: ,,~2 6~ZA."~ ~q vp £'o< C.4. -PAGE 233 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 234 of 433

'ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERS1000 PAGE 235 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Status:Q N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentlDNo.

2 O p Og Equip. Class' e 4 c t -4 C~~4~Equipment Description P4 I 4 G'e., C-. ?ane Location:

Bldg. D Floor El. 'L-c Room, Area .Co 1 I /Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO] N[O of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Isthe anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item. is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

iY,,r ,a Sq mA p4 e 6, Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YI NE] UE N/AE]YNq NE UE] X/AO YV NEI UE] N/AE]YE] NE I /E]A Y,.NO UO 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classev of Equipment,-' C-3 >PAGE 236 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown ChecklIst (SWC)Equipment ID No. 22403P.7-&

fil Equip. Class'a ?, Equipment Description ) 4 A .G11CrL PA)&.Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse.

onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YF12 U N/AFJ Y~q NO tJFJ N/AQJ YJK NO liD N/AQ Y;QNO UTO Other Adverse Conditions 11, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Ya NQ U[]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Ak'e 2 -zC -,, ,,I eq

'.Evaluated by: /,4 tl k,," .~Dit,. .cC Date: 1//2 A &j~n~ -0. C&C-Om-< C-4.>PAGE 237 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 238 of 433

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 239 of 433 9 TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERS100NO PAGE 240 of 433 I ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ORO, " JI I PAGE 241 of 433 9 ACHMI ENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSIO 9!LA PAGE 242 of 433 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -242o 003- Equip. Class 2 1 /itA'X -,4$.5 2/Equipment Description

/ E ). , , .L 0 It 0,411 7.q 4Id<Location:

Bldg. DOt.. -Floor El. ZZ / Room, Area _ ./*--,f02.

Mndel Etc (ontional hut recnmmended) t ?/SiL.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdowu of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.A&Lh~ora e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y9 ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3.. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yo ND UD N/AD YX ND UiD N/AD 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO No UOi N/As C o, ,,/ r1 6&9eoA1 r4 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y;Q ND UD N/AD (Note- This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

___,__, 0 7A 00/ 5 FR,. 2.0 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y,9 ND DE]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 1: Classes of Equipmcnt.

<( C-3>PAGE 243 of 433 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2-Z40Y-14-OOAquip.

Class" 7",411//K

-C., 4 5!Equipment Description t9/4%5g F/'ýl- o454 .-b r-,4,,Wt Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yf NEI UED N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y;R NEI U- N/A-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NEI U- N/AD YR NO UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. flave you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YA ND U1" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/WM A/E Eva'inted bv: o4'/ OD/f 4 5 Date: -.............

  1. Nz- /( C-4 >PAGE 244 of 433 OTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 245 of 433 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION .0 PAGE 246 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2.Status: 0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Jie Equip. Class'2 ,

\Jibe Equipment Description

!\ C T "i L c6,j , 1 5 0 O\/Location:

Bldg. N) I C.T Floor El. qO6' Room, Area ý 40R Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

.l. s __C Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment.on the SWEL. The space below each of the. following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments..

Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] N[V3 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free. of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuaration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yd NE] UE N/AE Yg NE. UE] N/AE]Y@j/ NE] UE] N/AE]YE NE UE] N/A[IV YD1 NE] UO/u Enter the equipment class.name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >PAGE 247 of 433 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0.Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

--Equip. Class" 2 7- &-.-hL '#. \. Equipment Description N) C T 1 I c A 0-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment Or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YW/NE- UC N/AC Y9/N-- UC- N/ACl YWN0- UC N/AE3 YM/NE- UC-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y1NE3 UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) j~Iiit~dhw h14,4 ( t>)..........

Jv.f -'(+L. (fW~~\~ } *~1j' (41 1.,~ LA.Date:< C-4 '>PAGE 248 of 433 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 249 of 433 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-02, VERSICIONO J PAGE 250 of 433

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-12-2271,_Vogtle,_Unit_2,_SNCV061-RPT-02,_Ver._1.0,_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic,_Part_7_of_14&oldid=908760"